The Invisible Kingdom

It is a sure sign of our own sense of self-importance that we all tend to put ourselves in the center of the story. We’re the princess locked in the tower, never the scullery maid that brings her her food. When it comes to advent, we do much the same thing. We imagine ourselves in the place of Mary or Joseph. Or we see the story from the perspective of the wise men. If we have any humility at all, we’d see ourselves as the shepherds. What if, though, we were none of these but were among the millions across the globe who had no idea what was happening? What if, while the glory of the heavenly host shone round about the shepherds we were sound asleep in Ephesus or the Isle of Skye?

God’s Word blesses us with close-up shots of God at work. The gospel accounts zero in on the most earth shaking event in history, the incarnation of the Son of God. They give us a front row seat for His preaching and His power, His passion and His resurrection. Meanwhile, back at the oasis, or back at the steppe, or back in the Alps or back in the North American high desert, God was at work. Doing what? We don’t know. He doesn’t tell us.

What He does tell us, however, is that He doesn’t tell us everything. There is no Directory of Priestly Orders in our Bibles. You won’t learn much about the Order of Melchizadek. In fact, you won’t learn much about Melchizadek. He was, before Moses, before the written Word, and with no introduction along the way, priest of God most high, king of peace and king of righteousness. It’s like he was starring in another movie and somehow walked onto the wrong sound stage. Except that it was all part of God’s one story.

How many parts of the story, however, never visibly intersect with the parts we are familiar with? Was there a priest in the Order of Melchizadek in the new world? Are there other orders of priests we know not of? These things we don’t know. These things our Lord has not been pleased to reveal to us. What He revealed is that His Father is the Most High, I Am, that He is the God above all gods. The Word tells us that He has not only written the story, but that He has written each one of our stories before the curtain ever rose on the creation (Psalm 139:16). Not a word is wasted. Not a scene can be cut.

My earthly father used to write a monthly column he wisely titled “Right Now Counts Forever.” Forever true. It is also important that we remember, as we struggle to understand our place and our calling in the kingdom that right here counts everywhere. Pastoring a small church that doesn’t qualify as Big Eva, raising children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, in private, making better widgets to the glory of the Lord, all these are the kingdom at work. We don’t get a bigger part by wanting a bigger part. We get a bigger part by embracing how small we are.

Posted in Advent, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Invisible Kingdom

Forever Friends, Jims Whittle and Southard; The Sky Has Fallen

Todday”s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in abortion, apologetics, friends, friendship, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, politics, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Forever Friends, Jims Whittle and Southard; The Sky Has Fallen

Muddying the Mirror

The Westminster Confession, when dealing with how Christians ought to understand the place of the Old Covenant civil law (that is, the laws God gave Israel’s government at the founding of the nation), argues that we are bound by the “general equity” of these laws. That is, I believe, that we are called to apply that law faithfully, but in light of differing cultural situations. In Israel one was called upon to build a fence around one’s roof. Since few of us congregate on our roofs like they did then, a general equity application might be that we ought to have fences around our swimming pools. The point is to make our families and guests more safe. Make sense?

I suspect that we might should have a similar conception about what we ought to do with the moral law of God. I’m afraid that too often we think that because our circumstances have changed, that we no longer need to watch out for particular sins. Exhibit A is the internet, and gossip. We know the Bible is replete with warnings against the sins of gossip. We also have a mental picture of what gossip is- two ladies huddled over coffee, or the back yard fence, swapping stories about the single woman down the block. We come to conclude that if we’re not ladies and we’re not drinking coffee and we’re not talking about the single woman down the block, we must not be gossiping. Or, we think that if we don’t fashion idols out of stone or rock, that we’ve escaped the judgment of the second commandment, all while talking about how “my” god would never judge this one of that one because he’s a god of grace.

The law of God is a mirror. It reveals to us our sin. And sinners that we are, we seek to hide from the ugly truth by muddying up that mirror. What we ought instead to be doing is seeking the general equity. Is the defining quality about gossip the coffee, or even the person of whom we are speaking? Or is it instead the tearing down of the reputation of another? Is the defining quality of idolatry the materials used to construct the idol, or is it our insistence that we will give to our god the qualities we wish, rather than submitting to whom He has shown Himself to be?

Though this second principle is not as widely known as the first R.C. Sproul Jr. Principle of Hermeneutics, it is nevertheless like unto it. It goes like this, “Wherever we find the sinner in a given account in the Bible, that’s us.” If the story has more than one sinner, we are all of them. We are both the prodigal son, and the older son. That is, we squander what God has given us, and we resent that our Father forgives others. We are both the gnat strangler and the camel swallower. We have specks in our eyes, and logs in our eyes. If we were wise, we would tend our own gardens. We would realize that the greatest gift we could bring to the church is not to create Speck_In_His_Eye_Discernment_Ministry.com, but would be to get busy with the logs in our own. To get them out, we need to look in the mirror, honestly.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Muddying the Mirror

Appeal; Ask RC, When Should Christians Disobey the State?

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, appeal, Biblical Doctrines, church, covid-19, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Appeal; Ask RC, When Should Christians Disobey the State?

Should the elders anoint the sick with oil, and pray for them?

Yes. The Bible says so. James encourages the saints this way, “Is anyone among you suffering? Let him pray. Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing psalms. Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord” (James 5: 13-15). At Sovereign Grace Fellowship, the church where I am honored to serve, and every other church I’ve served, we do this with some regularity.

Why would we do this? Because the Bible tells us to. Why does the Bible tell us to? I do not know. There are some who see here an opportunity for miraculous healing. Jesus healed miraculously, as did the apostles. The Bible says nothing whatsoever about this necessarily ending. God certainly may bring miraculous healing. He, after all, is the one telling us to do this. He is the one who healed in the past. Or, He may send providential healing, astonishing providential healing, working through the natural means He governs always.

Some, facing the reality of the command but uncomfortable with the idea of miraculous healing, would suggest that we are given this instruction because of the healing powers in the anointing, that James is simply encouraging the saints to seek medical care in the best way they knew how. They will insert into the text all manner of medical hoo-haw to make James sound more respectable to our modern ears. Most, however, are simply embarrassed by texts like this.

We are embarrassed, I would suggest, because we are still modernists at heart. Even we who as Reformed folk affirm the sovereignty of God over all things, like to believe that the world is a great machine, that God before time established His laws, wrote down His plan, and tipped over the first domino. We are practical deists. Anything that can’t be explained in clear scientific detail gives us the heebee-jeebees. Like this text from James.

What we ought to do, of course, is joyfully, and trustingly submit to our Father in heaven. He is wisdom. He knows all things. He directs all things. And He directs us not to break down His universe into its constituent parts so that we can understand it. Instead He directs us to obey. Our greatest sickness is that we think we know better than God.

Here is a suggestion. Why don’t you, if this is not practiced in your church, respectfully, showing all due honor and submission to him, ask an elder in your church why you don’t practice this command? Don’t pick a fight. Instead plant a seed. Tell him you’re not angling to import the Toronto blessing. Tell him you’re not angry, just curious. And see what he says. While you’re at it, add this to the process as well. Both before and after you ask, pray for your elders. Pray that God would grant them wisdom and courage. Pray that their calling would be fulfilled by them in all joy and patience. Whatever answer you receive, keep praying for your elders.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, prayer, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Should the elders anoint the sick with oil, and pray for them?

American Idols

We are made in God’s image. The sheer fact that we could spend the rest of our lives contemplating what it means to be made in God’s image, without beginning to scratch the surface, reminds us that we are God’s image, not gods. We are, in some ways, to God, as our mirror image is to us. There is a resemblance, a connection, but the difference is one of ontology, dimension. Thus, God creates, and we create. But when we look at creation more closely we find that He speaks things into reality, while we merely rearrange what He has already created. I’m stringing words together; He spoke language into being. Adam named the animals, but God formed them.

God also, we remember, named Adam. Naming, whether from God or man, is the exercise of dominion. It is rule and authority. Naming has the capacity to shape not the thing in itself, but our perception of the thing. This is why we find the conjugation of adjectives so amusing — I am thrifty; you are cheap, and he is miserly. Each adjective lives in the same neighborhood, and could, in some sense, be used to describe the same behavior. But the choice of the name effects the perception of the reality.
This is the game that the Devil plays with us. He, because he is merely a creature, hasn’t the power to create. Instead, he has only the power of naming, without the authority. We are seduced by him when we think his thoughts after him, when our perceptions are his perceptions. His very first assault was undermining the very words of God: “Hath God indeed said …?” That’s his game.

We are told, for instance, that we live in a “secular” society. To be sure there are a few religious holdouts, most of them living in what is derisively named (there it is again) “fly-over” country. But the “real” world, the world that counts, exists on two coasts. On the east coast, in what we have named the “power corridor” of Washington D.C., Philadelphia, Boston, and New York, we have titans of industry and governance. On the west coast we have the professional namers, the visual mavens who form our culture through entertainment. Where it counts we are supposed to be secular, that is, beyond worship. This, supposedly, is where culture is formed, and thus we have a secular culture.
This too, however, is but the Devil’s sleight of hand. Renaming isn’t the same as remaking. And one thing man will never be is secular. When someone claims, “I’m not a very religious person” translate it to the more accurate, “I’m not a very truthful person.” We are all religious people. That we name our worship something else doesn’t change its true nature. We are still worshiping. The trouble is that the things we don’t call gods, but treat as gods, are merely his image bearers. We worship the creation rather than the Creator, and none more frequently than that two dimensional copy of God, man.

Here I am not referring to philosophical humanism, though such would fit. My point isn’t that those who will not have God in their thinking will instead worship man in the abstract. Rather, we worship men in the flesh. What is Beverly Hills but our own Mount Olympus? We watch television news magazines that tell us what the magazines are saying about what our gods on television are doing. We stand and gawk while they walk sundry red carpets. We build shrines to them on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
We even have established religion in this country. Local and state politicians live or die by whether or not they are willing to gather the funding to build temples to the gods of this age. Yankee Stadium is less a copy of the Roman Coliseum than it is the Athenium. It is where we gather together for worship, where we hoot and holler for the home team, as if our souls depended on it. These gods never fade away; instead, they simply retire to their respective halls of fame.

To note that we treat our celebrities like gods isn’t merely saying that we treat them better than we ought. Rather, it gets to the heart of the issue, the heart that Calvin rightly called a fabricum idolarum, an idol factory. Calling it cheering, calling it appreciation for the art of filmmaking, doesn’t change what it is — worship.

The bad news of the world out there is that these gods cannot save. They are deaf and mute. The bad news for us in the church is that we too are idolaters. We gleefully blend together our worship of these gods with the worship of the living God and praise ourselves for our cultural relevance. There is, however, only one thing relevant to nationwide idolatry, the call to put away these gods, to repent and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ. We worry that God might judge us because of our national failure to keep the second table of the law. With abortion we murder nearly a million babies a year. With tax-and-spend policies we live by stealing. With our eyes we commit adultery, even as we worship the gods of Hollywood. And we fuel it all with the envy of consumption. But we are fools if we think the first amendment trumps the first commandment. Our only hope is that we would worship the living and true God, and bring no other gods before Him.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on American Idols

Lead Us Not into Temptation

Posted in apologetics, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, Facebook Live, prayer, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lead Us Not into Temptation

Comtism; Conquering the World

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Comtism; Conquering the World

Should we follow the science?

Which science? Science, at its worst, is filled with hubris, insisting that it and it alone is the arbiter of truth. At its best science understands that it is seeking to think God’s thoughts after Him, and will ever be doomed to come short. In an earlier piece I made the argument that in this COVID era we have scientists galore who indignantly demand that we follow the science while they’ve left it far behind and have taken up philosophy. I noted then, “If we don’t all get the vaccine, 50% of us will die” is science. Not true mind you, but testable. “We must all get the vaccine because if we don’t, 50% of us will die” is no longer science even if it were so that 50% of us would die if we don’t all get vaccinated. “Must” is a moral demand, not a scientific conclusion. There are no ethical demands in a microscope.

Today, however, I’d like to remember that even when science stays within its own dominion it is clearly on shaky ground. Why? Because while right and wrong are grounded in the eternal and immutable God, our understanding of His creation is tossed about by the wind we’ll never grasp. Imagine Dr. Fauci as a pilgrim, complete with a buckle on his black hat. Imagine a grave illness running through Plymouth colony. Here comes the doctor who pulls out of his medicine kit a great jar full of leeches. Would he not, were we reluctant to attach said leeches to our bodies, insist that we are fools for failing to follow the science? “Leeching cures disease” is science. It is old, discredited science to be sure, but it was once brand spanking new and was still wrong.

Science is quick to, when faced with its own failures, speak through the egg on its face, conceding that science is always progressing. It’s their ready excuse when they get it wrong. The problem is that they forget the principle as soon as they’ve embraced the new science. We, however, unsophisticated rubes that we are, don’t conveniently forget not only that they’ve been wrong before, but that being wrong is seen by science as a feature, not a bug. Science is Hans and Franz pumping us up with gas, telling us, “Listen to us now and stop believing us later.” Because later the new science will slap a label of “quackery” on the old science.

When science says to us, “Yes, yes, yes, of course we’ve been wrong in the past. How stupid we were to believe so fervently in what we used to believe. It was all hornswoggle and hogwash. But now, now we have the truth. Now we really know. This,” they tell us, “is ESTABLISHED science. We know this is true because all the scientists agree.” When we ask about the scientists who don’t agree they tell us, “They’re not real scientists. We can tell, because they don’t agree with the ESTABLISHED science.”

Do not fall for the bluster. Believe what you wish about COVID, Omicron, vaccines. You’ll get no argument from me wherever you fall. Just don’t fall for the bluster that insists that only the wise can see the emperor’s new clothes. Science can best be served with a nation of children snickering at its nakedness.

Posted in abortion, apologetics, Ask RC, covid-19, creation, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Roe v. Wade Redux

Today’s Special Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, politics, prayer, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sexual confusion, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Roe v. Wade Redux