Can we solve the church’s theological divide?

Is there really any question that within the evangelical church there are churches where substantive study and teaching are foreign things and others where such are front and center to the mission of the church? Theological weightiness is likely a bigger divide than any particular theological issues. Those on the brainier side of this divide think the solution is for their brothers and sisters to repent of their disinterest in theological study. Those on the heart-ier side of the divide feel the solution is for their brothers and sisters to repent of their pride in their theological study. I would like to suggest that both sides are right.

The truth is that the study of theology is destructive when it is an end in itself and its absence is destructive whatever end we might have. The first bit of theology we all must learn is that to love Him is to know Him. If we are learning more and not loving more we are doing it wrong. It we aren’t learning more, we are not loving Him more, and are doing it wrong. What gets in our way, among both groups, is the same problem, pride. With the more scholastic folk that pride is pretty obvious. They are proud of all that they know, especially of how much more they know than others. When our study of the things of God leads us to greater pride, we can be sure the devil is in the mix somewhere.

With the less scholastic folk, however, there is also pride- pride in their purported capacity to love God purely, powerfully, passionately, all without going to the trouble of studying Him more fully. Imagine if a husband is so busy talking about how much he loves his wife that he doesn’t take the time to listen to her, to study her ways, to grow in his capacity to understand her. That’s almost as foolish as studying theology and coming out the other side with more pride than you went in with.

Pride, however, is not through with its destructive work yet. For the more scholastic, pride also leads us to refuse to acknowledge that we’re doing it wrong. When we suffer from theological constipation, filling our heads with more and more knowledge that gets clogged up before it reaches our heart, instead of reaching for the plunger, we simply fill our heads more. For the less scholastic, pride works in the same way, leading us to refuse to acknowledge that we’re doing it wrong. We just keep looking for something newer, louder, more emotional that won’t require us to make the effort to actually study the things of God. We show ourselves full of it when think ourselves better than those dry and dusty theology wonks whom we know must be full of themselves.

To know Him is life itself. He is the font of wisdom, love, knowledge, glory, power, beauty, wonder. He makes Himself known to us that we might better magnify His name. Let’s come together in worship.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, Education, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Can we solve the church’s theological divide?

Dr. Coates Imprisoned for Pastoring; Hosea

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, covid-19, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, politics, prayer, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dr. Coates Imprisoned for Pastoring; Hosea

Humble Lie

The devil, though His fall from grace was rooted in pride, knows how to use humility. Being craftier than the other beasts, he knows how to use nigh onto all things to bring about his nefarious purposes. He is resourceful, and overlooks nothing. His first attack upon man was to deny the very truth claims of God, to first cast doubt upon the word of God, “Has God indeed said…” until finally he claims that the very word of God is false, “You shall not die.”

As western culture began to lose its moorings in the revealed word of God, as enlightenment positivism posited itself as the arbiter of truth, that same strategy continued. God says we were made from the dust of the earth. The devil says we descend from single-celled chef’s surprise that popped out of the primordial soup. This strategy began to fall apart, as it became painfully obvious that the devil’s truth claims didn’t hold any water. His wisdom showed itself to be foolishness. But he did not give up.

Now instead of holding up his version of truth as a competitor for God’s version, the devil has determined to assault truth as an idea. Instead of offering an alternate vision of reality and pridefully proclaiming that his is true and God’s is false, he now humbly denies that his vision of truth is true, and pridefully says that neither is God’s vision of truth.

This is how our culture has moved from modernism to post-modernism, from the conviction that truth only comes through the application of our senses and our minds to external reality, while God is silent, to the conviction that truth is not real, that we each create our own truth, and all we can know is that which we create. On the surface it looks like a bad deal. What could a culture gain by giving up truth? It gains the façade of peace, and with it the façade of humility.

Wars, both literal and figurative, are fought over competing truth claims. Whether it is two small children fussing back and forth, “Did too!” “Did not!” or nations bombing each other over a truth claim that a particular piece of real estate is theirs, we find ourselves disagreeing, and, with only ourselves to serve as the final arbiters, with no transcendent source of infallible truth, settle our arguments through battle. How much better if our son Reilly says to our son Donovan, “To me you shoved me”, and Donovan replies, “To me, I did not shove you” and they agree to disagree. How much better is Germany says to Poland, “To us, that region belongs to us”, and the Poles reply, “To us, it belongs to us.” And then children and nations pat themselves on their collective backs for their humility. No one is making an exclusive claim to the truth. No one has the arrogance to suggest that they have cornered the market on truth, that the other is wrong. And as both sides agree to disagree, swords are beat into plowshares.

It is the devil’s bargain. And when we trade with the devil we always lose what we offer, and never gain what he has promised. Is there peace and humility in relativism? Suppose Donovan did shove my Reilly. Suppose I explain to Reilly that to him Donovan may have, but to Donovan he didn’t. What is to stop Donovan from shoving him again? What is to stop Reilly from shoving back, when the glorious humility from relativism removes objective guilt (which by the way, is the real reason it is so popular)? Now my children are no longer arguing over whom is shoving whom. Instead they are shoving each other all over the yard. What happens when tax collectors from Poland and Germany enter the same region? We can’t agree to disagree when we finally have to act. If you think the right way is north, and I think it is south, all the humility in the world will not make the car move.

My concern, however, is not with the foolishness of the world, but with the worldliness of the church. The supposed humility of relativism resonates with us because we know we are called to walk humbly with our God (Mal. 6:8). We find ourselves caught between a rock and a soft place, as we are called to press the truth claims of King Jesus, yet seek to mimic His meekness. If the devil defines meekness for us, if he confuses relativism and humility in our minds, the battle is lost. The gospel of the Kingdom, if it is merely true for me, is the gospel of the devil’s kingdom. If it is only true for me that there is only one name under heaven by which a man might be saved, then it is not true that there is only one name.

We are indeed called to be humble. But true humility is that which bows before the truth of God, not that which would negotiate it. It is pride that leads us to humbly offer up the gospel as one alternative among many, when the one who paid for us says He is the way. It is humility to say with our Savior, “Repent, or perish.” It is pride to turn He who is the truth into a mere “true for me.”

The world tells us that we are arrogant, that we are love-less, that we are judgmental because we claim to have the truth. The accusations sting, in part because we are arrogant, loveless and judgmental. But it is pride that causes us to seek to wiggle out from under those accusations, by wiggling away from truth. Humility means being willing, like Jesus, to be persecuted for righteousness sake, to be willing to be thought proud because we feed upon the truth, and will not eat of the devil’s mock humble pie.

God knows our hearts. We speak, and we think coram Deo, before the face of God. He knows whether we are proclaiming truth for our glory or for His. And He knows, as we should, that every time we refuse to stand, we do so for our own sake. We are to be humble about ourselves. We are sinners still. We err in our thinking, and in our doing. We are a jumble of sins and lies. But we are to boast in Christ, who is the only way, the only truth, and the only life. If we will not proclaim Him before men as the only way, He will not proclaim us before the Father.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Humble Lie

Beggars All

For all the hardships connected to COVID- sheltering in place, riots in the streets, economic implosions, none of us, I suspect, have found ourselves giving thanks for having the head of a donkey or dove droppings to eat. That, however, was the situation in Samaria when the Syrians laid siege to their city. No one could come in and no one could come out and soon the city’s food supply dwindled. Elisha the prophet gave, however, a prophesy of blessing, promising that in only a day the cost of food would plummet. Everyone thought him out of his mind.

Outside the city gates several lepers did some hard reasoning over their situation. “If we go into the city,” they thought, “we’ll starve with the rest of them. If we stay here outside the gate, we’ll starve just like those inside the gate. If we go to the Syrian camp they might kill us. But they might not.” They made the obvious choice. The Syrians did not decide the spare the lepers. Neither did they kill them. Rather, they just weren’t there. They had already fled, leaving behind their tents, their horses, their weapons, and all their plenteous stores of food.

The lepers began to partake of these blessings, until their consciences accused them. They knew all too well that inside the city gates a whole city was in fear, and starving, when the cause of their fear had fled and the need for their want was ripe to be picked. They returned to the city and let the people know. Almost everyone came out to the feast. The one exception was the guard of the gate who, when Elisha had made his prophesy, insisted it could never happen. He didn’t go because he couldn’t go. He died, trampled by the people of the city on their way to the feast.

Who are we in the story? That depends. Though sin is central to what we were, and such would make us good candidates to be the Syrians, sin is not central to what we are. Though we are given to doubting, we are not the gatekeeper who was trampled to death. We may be the people of the city. Once starving, as good as dead, surrounded by the enemy, desperately hungry and then, invited to a feast we didn’t prepare, eating of that feast with joy and thanksgiving, now alive and secure, just as the prophet had foretold.

Yes, that is who we are. Rescued and redeemed. This, however, is not who we are called to be. It is one thing to be rescued, and we certainly needed that. Having been rescued, however, our Lord calls us to call others. He rescues us and calls us to be used by Him in the rescuing of others. We are supposed to be the lepers- no better than the people of Samaria. No better than the Syrians. But those who, by His grace, understood that their only chance was to throw themselves on the mercy of the ones who would likely kill them. Only to find the mercy of the One who gave them life. We are beggars all. We are feasters all. Let us show forth our gratitude by telling other beggars where the Bread finds them.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Beggars All

It’s About Forgiveness, Forgiveness

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on It’s About Forgiveness, Forgiveness

Made for worship. A Sovereign Grace Update

Posted in announcements, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Made for worship. A Sovereign Grace Update

What’ve we lost in losing letter writing?

A Letter from the Depths on Modern Communication, with a tip of the hat to Screwtape.

My Dearest Gaulips,

You asked about some of the newest features our media consultants are working on, and how you might put them to good use in your treatment of your patient. I will explain a few of them, but do not lose sight of the simple principle- the more we can take these cursed humans away from their bodies, the better off we can be. Entice them with ease, with reach, with speed, with convenience, but take away from them the things that matter the most- actual communication. When we move them from aural communication to written communication we automatically remove all the subtleties of communication, the non-verbal cues that give context, and perhaps more important, social lubricant.

Our enemy, however, managed quite well with the written word. I remember those heady days when we lit so many fires in those early churches. And that accursed traitor Paul would take pen to parchment and put out our fires. Hand copied, hand delivered letters, some plain and simple, others complicated and deep established and strengthened, and still strengthen His body. So we’re trying another tack.

Our internet division has still managed to hype all the familiar communication strengths while diverting attention from the weaknesses. Because the internet allows them to write and publish quickly, it encourages them to write and publish foolishly. One key stroke and every ill-formed, ill-informed and ill-intended thought is launched like a flaming arrow. I remember how humans used to labor over their words, how even the practical challenge of finding an envelope and a stamp would allow their ire to chill, and for cooler heads to prevail.

The same principle of speed works on the other end as well. Because it is so easy to send information there is a corresponding increase in the amount of information. But the eye gate cannot convert to broadband. That is, they can only read so much. Since there is so much to read, they read too swiftly, too carelessly. They scan just enough to form a broad opinion, then switch over to outgoing and send their take into the web. Soon enough such carelessness, in connection with the lack of context, leads to giving offense and taking offense, and we enjoy a feast of bitterness.

The humans, noting the glut of information, the bottleneck of the eye, have come up with an interesting solution. They call it twitter, and its key function is that it reduces all communication down to 280 characters. Paul would not have even made it out of his greeting. Imagine him trying to write to the Corinthians-

Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, b

and he’d be done. When Paul wrote, people mulled over the letters, studied them. They smelled of the very love and labor of the author for his audience.

Which brings us perhaps to the best feature of the internet- it is unreal. There is no actual world in the world wide web. Though there is a web. Just like buying with a credit card is easier because it doesn’t look or feel like money, so communicating via the web, where there is no ink, no paper, no hands touching, feels like not communicating at all. Which means none of the rules of communication apply. We aren’t lying if we aren’t actually saying something. We certainly can’t be held accountable if no one knows us, or knows our name.

My advice with your patient then is to push him away from patience. My advice for your human is to push him away from his humanity. Teach him to see himself as a mere collection of ever changing opinions about an ever changing world of issues. Teach him to see those with whom he disagrees as a collection of ever changing opinions about an ever changing world of issues. Encourage him to see letters as the media of a dead generation, and his own generation on the cutting edge of communication. As always, when we give them a shiny bauble, never let them see the beauty we make them give up.

Don’t forget that letters are personal, just as this one is. Be sure not to miss my tone. In case you’re unsure, it’s hungry.

In His Satanic Majesty’s Service,

Baron Tech

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, on writing well, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Being & Becoming; Friends, Peach & Beef & SGF

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, church, friends, friendship, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Being & Becoming; Friends, Peach & Beef & SGF

A Loving Response to Sexual Confusion

I suspect one of the reasons that the opposition to sodomy that was once the default position of all professing Christians is in such retreat says more than we suspect. We’re now being encouraged to be silent on the issue, for the sake of the gospel, to nuance the issue for the sake of our witness, to rethink Paul for the sake of our credibility. And all this is wrapped up on the one all consuming law of evangelicalism- you have to be nice. We have found that hating the sin and loving the sinner just doesn’t work anymore because sodomites define themselves by their sin.

Some have argued that we need to resurrect the ick factor. I not too long ago foolishly thought the ick factor would prove to be a stalwart ally to us, only to see it fleeing the battlefield before a shot was even fired. As Al Mohler once said, the trouble with the ick factor is that it can be changed. We have the capacity to change what makes us go “eww,” and so broadly speaking the culture has.

The ick factor wilted in large part because it was hidden. For years now we have seen a parade of homosexual characters, actors, pundits all putting their orientation on display but never their behavior. We have come to think that homosexuality is all about being clever, biting, witty and sophisticated. Instead homosexuality is all about sexual confusion. I would argue that we ought to force ourselves to consider the sexual acts of these broken not to up our ick, but to, ironically, up our compassion.

The problem with sodomy isn’t that it’s a delightful, pleasurable thing that is bad because God is uptight and is opposed to it. Nor is the problem that it still makes some of us go “ick.” While it is true that God opposes sexual perversion the immediate problem is that it is a repugnant, destructive thing for those engaged in it. If we love the sinner we cannot simply look past the sin. Indeed it is because we love the sinner that we call them to turn from their destructive behavior. It is compassion for those who destroy their bodies through misuse that calls us to call them to cease from doing so. The permissive “love” that the world offers is no more loving than if we “loved” those who cut themselves and others by looking the other way, or those who starve themselves and others. It is no more loving to “accept” this confusion than it would be to accept the confusion of those who think themselves an animal trapped in a human’s body.

Love calls those caught up in destructive sin (which is, of course, every last one of us) to repent, to turn from that sin and turn to Christ. But if the sexually confused will not turn to Christ, we still call them to turn from that sin, to cease from destroying themselves. Love means understanding that homo-sex isn’t just an odd adaptation of the normal, but a manifestation of the love of death. Love calls we who love Christ to be willing to be hated by both those caught up in the sin of homo-sex and those caught up in its apologetical propaganda. Loving the sinner means taking on the “sin” of what they call, in defense of their perversion, hate. Let us love the sexually confused, even as they hate us as haters.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Loving Response to Sexual Confusion

Parables- Mustard Seed; What’s in the Bible?

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, parables, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Parables- Mustard Seed; What’s in the Bible?