Name It Blame It

Not long ago I published an Ask RC podcast titled, “What’s wrong with the enneagram?” One of my (many) concerns is that as with so many other so called assessment tests, we always face the temptation to excuse our sin on the basis of our personality type. The bossy person gives free reign (pun intended) to his bossiness by claiming to be gifted at administration. The more I’ve been thinking about this, however, the more I see it everywhere.

One of the reasons, for instance, that the Christian’s strategy of “Hate the sin, love the sinner” hasn’t been able to broker peace with the sexually confused is because the sexually confused wind their identities up in their confusion. Thus we have “Side B” Christians, celibate sexually confused people who are willing to give up gay sex, but not gay identity. When we hate the sin of the LGBTQ, they inevitably conclude we hate them because they think they are their sin. Even the “alcoholic,’ if he maintains a friendship with Bill W., even if he hasn’t had a drink in decades, holds on to his self-identity as an alcoholic.

We need not, however, find ourselves in these extreme circumstances to make the same mistake. I make it too. That is, even someone like me who rejects enneagram and other personality profiles, who rejects sexual confusion and who isn’t a friend of Bill W. still falls for this temptation. I needed no personality test to know this- I am introverted. I tend to find interaction with other humans less stimulating, more tiring. I’m far more likely to become a hermit than a salesman. Sometimes, witnessing my lack of enthusiasm, people reach the conclusion that I am rude. I am discovering that they are right.

The Bible calls me to love my brothers, to be actively involved in the lives of others. It does not call me to not be tired. That I am inclined toward the sin of rudeness, that I am selfish enough that I think being tired is sufficient reason to hide away isn’t a sign that I have a particular personality but that I struggle against a particular sin. My calling isn’t to grant a title to that temptation and then excuse my failure to overcome it by claiming, “That’s just the way I am.” “That’s just the way I am” doesn’t remove our guilt. It merely describes it.

When I name my weakness I make it my pet, something safe and manageable. When I give up that name, I can begin the good work of putting my weakness to death, nailing it to the cross. When I take the blame rather than shift it I can take my medicine and start to get better. Introvert can join the long list of things I used to be, that are no longer a part of my identity. I am not a slave to my habits, my temptations, my psychology, my past. I have been set free by Jesus. Whom He sets free is free indeed.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Name It Blame It

God Cares About Super Bowls? CYML- Fitzwilly

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, creation, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, prayer, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, sport | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on God Cares About Super Bowls? CYML- Fitzwilly

Ask RC- What is heresy?

Too Hard

There are at least three working definitions of what constitutes heresy. First is the view that all error is heresy. This view has as an advantage that it recognizes the unity of truth. Because God is one, and God is truth, truth is one. Any error that we hold, if carried to its logical conclusion will lead us to wicked, damnable errors. If we adjust all that we think to make it consistent with the error we hold, we will enter into heresy. The disadvantage to this view, like many broad definitions, is that it draws the circle too wide. If we are all guilty of heresy, and if all error is heresy we are certainly all guilty, then in a manner of speaking, no one is guilty. Definitions exist to differentiate, not to be all-inclusive.

Too Soft

A second view holds that heresy is holding to any doctrine specifically condemned as heresy at an ecumenical council. The Arian heresy, which denies the deity of Christ, was condemned as heresy in the first half of the first millennia of the church. The Pelagian heresy was likewise condemned. This view has as an advantage being tied to the labors of the church at its broadest. That is, it is the church as the church that names the heresy, rather than each of us as individuals. It has as a disadvantage the hard truth that there have been no ecumenical councils in quite some time. Such would be rather hard to pull off in our day. Heresy, however, is rather easy to pull off. This view ends up with too narrow of view of what heresy is.

Just Right

My own view is in the middle of these too positions. I agree with the second view that all those views which have been condemned as heresy by ecumenical councils are in fact heresy. I would add, however, that any denial of any element of any ecumenical creed, including the Apostles’ Creed, is heresy. That is, to avoid the charge of heresy, one must not only not embrace what the councils call heresy, but must affirm what the councils call orthodoxy. In light of the inability to put together an ecumenical council, indeed in light of the inability to reach agreement among all those claiming to be Christian churches, I would also add, though it is in the Apostles’ Creed only by implication, that one must affirm justification by faith alone in order to not be heretical. This doctrine Luther wisely called the article on which the church stands or falls.

Most of those councils which included condemnations of heresy dealt with issues of the incarnation and the Trinity. These are, of course, critical issues to the church. They should not, however, be given a privileged position about all the other affirmations of the Apostles’ Creed. To deny the resurrection, for instance, is as much heresy as to deny the humanity of Christ. To deny the virgin birth is as much heresy as to deny the two natures of Christ. Which means of course, that we have no unity with those who deny any of these things, whether we find these heresies in mainline denominations, or as in the case of denying the resurrection, whether these are held by those who would otherwise describe themselves even as “Reformed.” That is, among the hyper-preterists.

If my perspective is accurate on justification by faith alone, that too sets us apart from both Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy. Rome, which while in substantial agreement with Eastern Orthodoxy, but which speaks to the matter with greater clarity, not only does not affirm that we are justified by faith alone, but formally and unchangeably affirms that all of us who affirm that a man is justified by faith alone, apart from the works of the law, should be damned. See the sixth session of the Council of Trent.

To name heresy what it is is not to be unkind or unloving. It isn’t bigoted or narrow- minded. It is instead to guard the wisdom that has been handed down to us, and to protect His sheep from wolves. Truth be told, everyone, no matter how broadminded, draws lines somewhere. The only question is, are we drawing lines where God would have us draw lines? The answer to that, in the end, is found in His Word.

Posted in apologetics, Apostles' Creed, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism, theology | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ask RC- What is heresy?

Attracted to Conspiracy? Catechism 60

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, politics, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Attracted to Conspiracy? Catechism 60

Evil Employees and Saintly Corporations

It is a common but dangerous business, our propensity to make ourselves the heroes of our own stories, and to see all who stand in our way as wearing the black hats. As a person with an interest in all things economic I see it in the realm of our buying and trading all the time. We all want to sell high and buy low. And we are all sellers and buyers. We all sell our labor in the marketplace. And we buy what we buy. The ones in the black hats, we think, are the ones keeping us from selling high, and from buying low.

First, when we sell our labor we all want to sell high. We might insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to hire anyone for less than what we think we ought to earn. We might simply grumble that we are being taken advantage of. We might cheat our employer on the ground that we are not being paid as we think we ought to be. In any of these cases the employer is wicked and must be punished.

Second, when buy goods and services we all want to buy low. We might insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to charge more than what we think we ought to be charged for the good or service. We might insist that the state give us money so that we can more easily buy what we want. We might simply grumble that we are being taken advantage of. We might steal from the business we are buying from on the ground that we believe they are charging more than they ought. In any of these cases the business is wicked and must be punished.

Trouble is, of course, that because we are all sellers and buyers we are all also buyers and sellers. Why should our employers not insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to work for more than they want to pay? Why should they not insist that the government give them money so they can more easily afford to pay us? Why should they not simply grumble that they are being taken advantage of? Why should they not steal from us, on the ground that we are charging them more for our labor than we ought? We may be, in selling our labor, a corporation of one, but we are a corporation.

Or, why should the business we buy from not insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to pay less than they are willing to sell for? Why should the businesses not insist that the government give them money so they can charge less? Why should they not grumble that they are being taken advantage of? Why should they not steal from us, on the ground that we are paying less for their goods and services than they believe we ought?

There is an economic lesson here, but as is so often the case with economic lessons, there is also a life lesson- we are adept at justifying ourselves and castigating others. Our moral compasses are out of whack because we think we’re the center of the galaxy, because we believe in our own innate goodness and the innate badness of all who oppose us, even if what it means to oppose us is charging more, or paying less, than we would like. The truth is that prices, for both labor and goods and services ought always to be determined solely by the free interaction of those making the deals, by agreement of both parties. When I stick my credit card into the gas pump that reads $4.00 a gallon I am reaching an agreement. When the Kansas City Chiefs write Patrick Mahomes a check for $40 million, they are reaching an agreement. When I pick up my spatula at the local Burgers Cooked By People Making $5 An Hour joint, I have reached an agreement. And when those deals don’t get made, we’ve just agreed to disagree. No one needs to be vilified or hung. No one needs to call the feds. But what we all need to do is own our own sins. We’re the hero of the story when we keep our agreement. And those who use the force of theft or the state to get their way, those are the ones in the black hats.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, kingdom, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Evil Employees and Saintly Corporations

Parable of the Sower; CYBL The Chosen

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Books, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Parable of the Sower; CYBL The Chosen

New Thesis, New Reformation

Thesis 60 We must love each other.

It should, though it doesn’t, go without saying. There’s no question that the Bible teaches this. There’s no question that the Bible emphasizes this. There’s no question that we’re not very good at it. Why, when the command is obvious, are we so bad at obeying it? Because we’re no good.

Even a cursory reading of the gospels will reveal the connection between God’s love for and grace toward us and our call to love and be gracious toward one another. When we have been forgiven much we are to find it easier to forgive much. When we have received grace we’re to find it easier to give grace. We fail here, however, because we judge unjustly. We minimize our sins while maximizing the sins of others. We minimize the importance of others, while maximizing our own importance. Whether it is a marriage, a family, a friendship, or a church body, believing ourselves morally above others is a sure recipe for disaster.

When I find myself hated by others, including those who name the name of Christ, I try to find my comfort in the sure knowledge that my heavenly Father loves me. He knows how truly awful I am. Those who despise and accuse me are blind to my real flaws. My Father knows them all, and despite this loves me. When I find myself hating others, including those who name the name of Christ, it should be enough for me to remember that I am not due the love I receive. It’s not a bad first step. But I will do so much better if I remember not just that Jesus loves me, despite my sin, but that Jesus loves the one I’m despising, despite his sin. When we fail to love our brothers and sisters we put ourselves in direct opposition against the One who loves and redeemed us and who loves and redeemed our brothers and sisters. “Jesus loves me” doesn’t blow me away like it ought to. “Jesus loves them” barely registers with me. Because I am a fool.

Our love for each other makes manifest three things the world needs to know. First, that love is possible. How easy it is to grow jaded and cynical when living in a world untouched by God’s redeeming grace. Those fragments of the image of God that yet remain in the unbeliever long for love and acceptance. What a testimony when they see it among believers. Second, it shows that change in us is possible. My growing capacity to love the brethren is evidence that I am part of the family, that the Spirit is at work in me. When the unbeliever is discouraged in his own sin, it is light to blind eyes to see believers growing in grace, evidenced by increasing love one for another. Third, that acknowledging our sin is not a doorway to despair but the entrance into liberty. When the love others have for me is grounded not in me being good but in Christ being in me, when I have no need to pretend to be better than I am then I can know that the love I receive is for me, and not the image I project.

More important than all this, however, when we love one another we delight our heavenly Father.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, friendship, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Thesis, New Reformation

Clericalism; 2 Minutes Mourn; FF-Tim Caldwell

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in communion, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, Roman Catholicism | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Clericalism; 2 Minutes Mourn; FF-Tim Caldwell

What’s missing from the contemporary church?

Sinlessness. That is, the weaknesses that plague the contemporary church aren’t, in the end, all that different from the weaknesses that plagued the historical church. The more things change and all that, after all. It is said that one Lord’s Day a parishioner asked Martin Luther, “Brother Luther, why do you preach the same message every Lord’s day?” To which he responded, “Because every week we forget.” I’m not prepared to say that in the western world the church is at its lowest point. I am prepared to say that it’s not in good shape, just like normal. I would also suggest that what is missing is what is usually missing- a deep, heart, mind, soul and strength grasp of this message: I am in myself a vile sinner at war with a holy, omnipotent God. Jesus came and lived a perfect life in my place, then received the wrath of God in my place. Now, because the Spirit gave me faith, I am forgiven, beloved, adopted, secure.

That message is not new. It’s not especially insightful. Nor is it complicated. It’s not appealing to those outside the kingdom. It’s not especially appealing to those inside the kingdom. It is not the fullness of the message. It is, however, the center of the message, and the most needful thing to be proclaimed, believed and lived out in the church of Jesus Christ. It is the health of the church.

The irony is that everything in the contemporary church that shouldn’t be there would be quickly driven out by this simple message. A second irony is that the most potent weapon against our problem of sinfulness is a failure to believe this simple message. Programs, celebrity, entertainment, worldliness, compromise, these are the things we glom on to because we are not, as we should be, convinced of our own sinfulness, persuaded of Jesus’ payment for all our sins, comforted by the sure knowledge that our heavenly Father loves us infinitely, immutably, and by name. We have feel-good, white-washed, motivational messages because we feel bad, are ignorant of ourselves and are unmotivated to get back on the world’s hamster wheel.

As we come to a deeper grasp of our need and His perfect provision we are better able to stand on the Word, for we don’t need the world’s approval. We are better equipped to walk in the way, for we know where we are going. We are better driven, for we know our calling to run to the battle. We are at peace, for we know that we rest in the Son.

What the church needs in our day is what the church has always needed and will need until He returns. We need the gospel. We need to repent and believe. We need to teach our children that their need is the same, that our grandchildren will be fed the same truth. No branding, no marketing, telling not selling. It needs sheep that demand the message and under-shepherds who proclaim the message even when the sheep demand something else.

Posted in Apostles' Creed, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sacred Marriage Under Fire vii; Lamentations

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage Under Fire vii; Lamentations