Grateful in the Kingdom

There is, in a rather small subsection of the Reformed world, a rather curious conviction. Some otherwise sound folks take the true and sound notion that because God knows those whom He has not chosen, because it is a great sin against Him to not give thanks to Him, that it is wrong to speak of Him being gracious to those who were not chosen. Every time He sends them the rain, and they fail to give thanks, all that happens for those not chosen is that the thermostat in hell goes up higher still. These folks are right-He does send the rain, knowing they will not give thanks. He will heat up hell all the hotter because of it. But, contra this peculiar view, the rain is in fact grace. In fact, if it’s not grace the very conclusion we have reached, that they will receive greater judgment for their lack of thanksgiving, makes no sense. If God is in fact not being gracious toward them, why should they give thanks? You can’t have it both ways. You can deny that God is giving the reprobate unmerited (or demerited) favor, or you can affirm the reprobate has a duty to give thanks. But you can’t do both.

There is, on the other hand, in the whole of the Reformed world, a curious lack of conviction. That is somehow we have come to forget that we too are the recipients of His grace, that we receive so much better than what we deserve, and that we have a solemn duty to joyfully give thanks. One of the ways this broader failure manifests itself is in what some might call the objection to “worm theology.” “Worm theology” is that pejorative term given to those of us who are eager to affirm the biblical reality of two things- first, we are by nature children of wrath. We are born the enemies of God. We are totally depraved. We would, in our natural state, if we could, commit deicide. Second, when we are given new hearts, and we embrace the work of Christ, as we grow in grace, moving toward our glorification, we have sin yet remaining in us.

It is true, gloriously true, that when we embrace the work of Christ on our behalf we have peace with God. The Spirit indwells us. We are made knew, and are deemed righteous by the Father who adopts us as His own children. We are promised eternal joy at His right hand, and that one day all the remnants of our sin will be washed away. We are promised that every sin, past, present, future, has already been covered by the blood of Christ. We become saints, beloved of Christ. None of which changes the truth that until our deaths, our glorifications, we still sin, often in the most grievous ways. We are still, in ourselves, worthy of His just wrath, of His displeasure.

The challenge is to keep all these truths in their proper places. Where we are in danger of doubting His tender love for us, we must needs remember that He moves us from grace to grace, that all His promises are yea and amen, that He allows us to be called His children. When, however, we are in danger of believing we deserve all the good that we receive, we need to remember our true nature, what we are apart from His grace. We should never despair of what we are because we are already His, and are being remade. We should never demand what we haven’t been given, because are still sinners, and are always already living in the very lap of His grace.

I have noticed in recent years a great upsurge in objections to the objective truth to what we are. Anytime I speak of the believer as a sinner, let alone a miserable sinner, I can always count on someone to come along behind and chasten me for forgetting how God sees us. They will, happily, often do so by reminding me of the great truths of the gospel. But one thing the gospel doesn’t do is make our sin disappear on this side of the veil. It doesn’t make us incapable of committing this sin or that (with the exception of blaspheming the Holy Spirit). If we define “sinner” simply as “one who sins” then it doesn’t cause us to cease being sinners. And it certainly doesn’t mean that we are removed from our calling to recognize and give thanks for His mercy.

When we get ahead of ourselves, when we start to think not that we are deemed fine fellows by our Maker due to the life and death of His Son for us, but think instead that are fine fellows in ourselves, we lose sight of the marvel of mercy. We forget not only to give thanks for the redemption of our souls, but for the preservation of our bodies. We forget not only to give thanks for the goodness in our lives in all the things that give us pleasure, but for the goodness in our lives in all the things that give us pain. In short, when we miss the sin, we miss the mercy. When we forget what we are due, we forget all that we have been given.

We forget we are sinners, we forget to give thanks for His mercy precisely because we are still sinners. We preach this truth not to beat us down, but that we would look up. Jesus told us that the man who beat his breast, crying, “Lord, be merciful to me, a sinner” went to his home justified (Luke 18:13). He went home then joyful, thankful. He did not, however, from that moment forward never again beat his breast. He did not, from that moment forward, never again cry out to God, “Lord, be merciful to me, a sinner.” But each time he returned to pray, he prayed the same prayer, and went home with the same joy. If we would remember the joy of our salvation, we must needs remember the sorrow of our damnation.

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, Doctrines of Grace, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Grateful in the Kingdom

Inerrant and Impotent

The devil, who is more crafty than any beast of the field, doesn’t particularly care whether we believe in the inerrancy of the Bible. Indeed it is conceivable that he might be more frightened of person A who denies the inerrancy of Scripture than person B who affirms it. The power of the Bible isn’t that it is a book that is true. The power is in the truth of what is in the Bible. The power is in the truths, not the truthfulness.

Imagine person A never heard of inerrancy, and so can’t affirm it. Suppose person A was badly taught, and came to believe that the Bible taught geocentrism. And suppose person A believes geocentrism is wrong. Now suppose person A reads the account of Adam and Eve, and comes to believe that his first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, that God promised to deliver them from death through the promised Seed of the woman. Suppose he believes that God’s deliverance, not just of Adam and Eve but of Noah, Abraham, Joseph, Moses, David all demonstrate God’s faithfulness to deliver His people, and point to the coming Deliverer. Suppose person A believes he can best love God and neighbor by submitting Himself to the law of God. Suppose he sees himself in the Psalms, even as he sees Jesus in the Psalms. Suppose he believes that Paul’s commands to husbands and wives are true and come from the very breath of God. Suppose he believes that Jesus will come again to judge the living and the dead. Suppose he believes that true religion is in visiting widows and orphans in their trouble, and so labors to do so.

Now imagine person B, a champion of inerrancy. Suppose, however, that person B was also badly taught, and came to believe that the Bible’s account of the creation is poetic- true in a mythic sense, but not actual history. Suppose he believes a devastating local flood took place in the days of Noah. Suppose he finds the accounts of the patriarchs true accounts of interesting people who lived in a distant land in a distant time, but which have little to do with us. Suppose he believes that the law of God given in the Old Testament was for a different era, for a different people. Suppose he believes the Old Testament tells the story about one people of God, who are different from the Gentile people of God. Suppose he believes that Paul’s commands are culturally conditioned, true in the sense that that is what he called them to do in their context, but would wish differently in our context. Suppose he believes that because Jesus is love that judgment is not something we need to fear. Suppose he believes that visiting widows and orphans in their trouble is just law designed to show our failure and drive us to Christ. Suppose he considers actually calling believers to visit widow and orphans in their trouble to be incipient legalism.

Please don’t misunderstand. Inerrancy is both true and vitally important. It is a grave thing indeed to doubt the Word of God. But is it not a graver thing still to affirm that it is God’s Word, and still dismiss it? Or parts of it? Isn’t it possible that we have been manning the barricades on inerrancy while the devil has been undermining the content of the Bible, finding ways to slip through our defenses?

The Bible is not God’s Word because it is true. It is true because it is God’s Word. Which means we need to know, indeed to believe what it says. It tells us who we are, who God is, how we relate, and what will happen. And that’s just in the first three chapters. The devil-horned, snarling theological liberals have relevantized themselves into irrelevancy. But beware the smiling, friendly, cunning theological liberals. They are the dangerous and seductive ones. And they may just be sitting in the pew next to you.

Posted in apologetics, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, Kingdom Notes, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Inerrant and Impotent

The Little Woman and I talk Little Women and A Letter to an Unbelieving Friend

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Books, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Little Woman and I talk Little Women and A Letter to an Unbelieving Friend

Ask RC: Does God really decide, and care who wins a football game?

I began asking this question myself long before Tim Tebow was even born. I was a little boy, deeply committed to the Pittsburgh Steelers. I remember praying that they would beat the Oakland Raiders in an upcoming playoff game. When my prayer ended fear set in- what if there were a little boy just like me, somewhere in Oakland, praying that the Raiders would beat the Steelers? My father comforted me by explaining that no real Christian would ever pray for the Raiders.

The truth is God does decide, and He does care. He not only decides who will win the Super Bowl, He decides who will win the game of Risk I play with our boys. He decides, or rather decided, everything. There are no places, let alone no playing fields, where God stays on the sidelines.

We need to remember that everything that happens must have a sufficient cause. And we must remember that every sufficient cause eventually traces its way back to God before time. This happens because that happened. That happened because this other thing happened. Eventually this takes us to “God said, ‘Let there be light, and there was light.’”

Of course God works in and through secondary means. He gives the gifts. He creates the weather. The one who numbers the hairs on our heads softens the ground where a defensive back slips, and a playoff game ends on an eighty yard touchdown pass. There is no thing, no cause, over which He is not sovereign.

Isn’t it, though, somehow beneath His dignity to be concerned with such things? Yes, of course it is. God has only one overarching concern- the manifestation of His glory. And that is how He determines what will happen in a football game, and what will happen in an election, and what will happen in an operating room. His goal isn’t ultimately to make little boys in San Francisco happy, or little boys in Kansas City happy. His goal, which cannot be thwarted, is to show forth who He is.

Does that mean He played favorites for the likes of outspoken Christians like Reggie White or Tim Tebow? Of course. Because God loves those who are His, even as He loves His own Son, God is certain to favor them. That favor, however, isn’t a path to winning a football game, but is instead the path to true victory, becoming more like Jesus. God wasn’t glorified in giving Tim Tebow unlikely victories that somehow redound to God’s glory. No, God is glorified in making His children, including Tim Tebow, more like His Son. Sometimes that means leading them to the thrill of victory. Sometimes it means leading them through the agony of defeat.

The more difficult and pertinent question for me isn’t does God care, but should I? I don’t pray for Steeler victories. I do pray that I, along with my wife and my sons, will make memories together. And I pray that we would have grace to accept His providence, even when the Steelers lose, or worse, don’t even play.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, creation, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, special edition, sport | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Ask RC: Does God really decide, and care who wins a football game?

Heraclitus, Resolutions and a Hero You Never Heard Of, Doug Jones

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything

Posted in Books, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Two Minutes Mourn

It is, perhaps, the strangest thing in that profoundly strange book, 1984. Orwell’s world is haunted by Big Brother, by spies on every corner and by memory holes through which the past disappears. It is, however, the “Two Minutes Hate” that captured my attention. The citizens of 1984, every day, join together for a two minute period where they are to direct their hatred toward the enemies of the state. They are shown images on a television screen of Emmanuel Goldstein, a mythical opposition leader and whatever supposed foreign enemy they are currently at war with. The state’s goal, however, is less to create a frenzy against these enemies, more to provide an outlet of the people’s sublimated hatred of their own leaders.

What may be stranger still is that this exercise in mass psychological warfare worked. The citizens didn’t go through the motions simply to avoid getting into trouble with the law. Winston Smith, the story’s protagonist described it this way:

The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but that it was impossible to avoid joining in. Within thirty seconds any pretence was always unnecessary. A hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge hammer, seemed to flow through the whole group of people like an electric current, turning one even against one’s will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic. And yet the rage that one felt was an abstract, undirected emotion which could be switched from one object to another like the flame of a blowlamp.

There is something profoundly contagious about group emotional experiences. It need not be centered around hatred. Today it is another experience of mourning. When a celebrity, if big enough, dies tragically and young we seem to have a national experience of catharsis. When John F. Kennedy Jr.’s plane went down the nation wept for days. This, despite the fact that his most remembered life moment was his salute to his fallen father. When Princess Diana’s car crashed not just the nation but most of the world put on figurative sackcloth. This, despite the fact that she was no longer part of the royal family. And now it is Kobe Bryant.

Please do not misunderstand me. In noting the cultural phenomena, and exploring it, I am not seeking to diminish the tragedy for those involved. His wife has lost a husband and a daughter. His surviving children have lost a sister and a father. It is heartbreaking. But it is not our heartbreak. Neither his fame, nor his talent, nor the championship banners he brought to Los Angeles make him ours. Oddly, pretending these things make him ours does not only doesn’t honor him, but dishonors him. Kobe Bryant was good at playing basketball. Beyond that I know nothing of the man. I have no closer a connection to him than I do to Michael Jordan or Lebron James or Zion Williamson.

But he was, just like everyone else on that helicopter, a real person, with real family and real friends. His tragedy shouldn’t be used for national catharsis. It belongs to them. We shouldn’t be trying to break into that inner circle. Crashing weddings is rude. Crashing funerals is disgraceful. Let us walk away from the Two Minutes Mourn, and leave the real mourners in peace.

Posted in cyberspace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, special edition | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Two Minutes Mourn

God’s Decrees, Why We Read and That Hideous Strength

Today’s JCE Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Books, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, on writing well, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, Westminster Shorter Catechism, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on God’s Decrees, Why We Read and That Hideous Strength

New Theses, New Reformation

Thesis 10- We must rethink how “programs” drive our churches.

It has been said of the Calvinist, that having fallen down a flight of stairs, he could only respond, “I’m glad that’s over with.” I would suggest as well that in the wake of the Reformation, the Serpent wisely affirmed, “I’m glad that’s over with.” That is, while the Reformation did great things, and recovered vital biblical truths, the Serpent knew that it would succumb to the same foolishness that it responded to. Having had the Reformation, the Protestant church has moved forward, quite wrongly confident that it has mastered the sola’s that sparked it.

Our perennial temptation to believe that we must contribute something to our own justification, the denial of sola fide, we will cover in another chapter. Perhaps more glaring is our failure to live up the principle of sola Scriptura. The Reformation may have been sparked by a debate over indulgences, but it quickly became an issue of authority. Rome affirmed a two-pronged authority structure, suggesting that both Scripture and the tradition of the church were binding on the conscience. Luther affirmed that his conscience was held captive by the Word of God alone.

The Protestant church does not affirm a great deal of extraneous and dubious doctrines about the Virgin Mary. We do not add to the Scripture the doctrine of purgatory. Our traditions tend to fall more into the realm of practice than doctrine. This came to me as I was preparing to plant a church. I had never served as a pastor before, and was thinking through my future obligations. One woman wisely warned me that there was rather more to pastoring than giving a sermon. I asked her what other duties should I get prepared for. “Well,” she said, “you’re going to have to have a youth group.”

Youth group, Sunday School, nursery programs, choirs, ladies circles, kids clubs, these are to us similar to what the treasury of merits, holy orders and burying statues of dead saints are to Roman Catholics. They are not only not found in the Bible, they are not only wrongly treated as biblical necessities, but they also can do a fair amount of harm to the body of Christ. Just as the sundry accretions that have plagued Rome can usually be traced to syncretistic tendencies, so it is with our own accretions. We have age segregated “ministries” not because we found them in the Bible, but because we found them in the world. The same industrial mindset that plagues the schools now plagues our churches. Here people are products, and education is the process by which people are shaped into better products. We move people along an assembly line, and crank out, we pray, godly widgets. What we are finding, however, that what we do is work against the very design of God.

When the Bible speaks of demographic groups, it brings them together, rather than tearing them apart. Fathers are encouraged to train up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Ephesians 6: 1-4) Older women are called to disciple younger women, teaching them to love their husbands and their children (Titus 2:4). God’s design is a body, not a factory. When fathers train their children, then both grow in grace. When older women instruct younger, both are kept from the dangers that too often plague the fairer sex. When we substitute programs, first we encourage failure. Husbands fall down on the job, trusting Sunday School teachers and youth workers to do what must be done. Older women gather together with each other, and grow bitter for being set aside. And pastors, rather than laboring in Word and prayer, encouraging the flock in their respective callings, rather than tending the flock, look to the flock to man the programs and spend their time tending the machines.

Of course God has been pleased to do good things through programs. No doubt many people have been saved by well meaning youth pastors. No doubt many have learned wonderful things from godly Sunday School teachers. No one would dispute that. But who would argue that these innovations are wiser and more potent than God’s design? If we stop being program driven, perhaps we will get with the program, and start doing things as the Bible teaches.

Posted in church, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Roman Catholicism, Theses | Tagged , , | Comments Off on New Theses, New Reformation

Yesterday’s Study- Blessed Are Those Who Hunger and Thirst For Righteousness

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yesterday’s Study- Blessed Are Those Who Hunger and Thirst For Righteousness

Sexism, Celebrating the Feast and The Ontological Trinity

Today’s JCE Podcast

Posted in ABCs of Theology, communion, grace, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sexism, Celebrating the Feast and The Ontological Trinity