Ask RC- What’s wrong with house churches?

Not a thing, if we mean by “house church” a church that meets in a house. One can make all manner of arguments about the best architectural forms for public worship, but no one, I suspect, would suggest that this kind of building or that is, in itself, sinful. The issue with house churches then isn’t with the house, but with the church, or lack thereof. There is a rather great gap between a group of people who are under authority gathering together to worship the living God while meeting in a house, and a home wherein the father, or the parents, decide for themselves that they are a church. The one has biblical precedent and standing. The other is rank rebellion, and a recipe for disaster.

I understand the temptation. It’s not often easy to find a church that does well what it’s called to do. It can get frustrating showing up Sunday after Sunday and being gawked at for keeping your children together during the service. It can be maddening when the pastor keeps preaching against judging others, all because he suspects you of judging him. Wouldn’t it be so much nicer, so much safer, so much more comfortable, not to mention, so much more convenient, if we did it ourselves? They told us we couldn’t do school at home, and we proved them wrong. Why not just do church at home as well?

Because we all need to be under authority. Because there is no one on the planet to whom God has said, “You just answer to Me. No need to bother with any human authority. They, after all, are all sinners.” No, we all need to be under visible, earthly authority, for our own protection, and for the protection of our families. That protection needs to be publicly affirmed, and measurably administered. That is, I need to be in a place where a specific group of men, called to this critical role, can confront me on my sin, and command me to repent. Hebrews 13:17 commands that we “Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give an account.” How often have well-intentioned Christians left the local church because it failed to honor the Bible, and came up with this program and that, or failed to encourage modesty, or had a praise band, and those whose consciences were too tender to stay, end up in churches where there are no elders and deacons as the Scripture clearly and expressly commands?

Friends, this problem is rampant in certain circles. And here is why. The world told us that we should only one or two children. We didn’t listen. Our parents told us we should not homeschool our children. We didn’t listen. The elders told us that our children should be in Sunday School and the youth service. We didn’t listen. Now remember that I not only believe children are a blessing, that we ought to homeschool them, and that the family ought to be together at church, but believe that actually doing these things is the right decision. But isn’t it just possible that it is also evidence that we have a hard time with authority? Isn’t it possible that we have reached the conclusion that wisdom dies with us? Isn’t it possible that we will have no one to rule over us, despite the plain teaching of the Bible that we must?

What we really need is more humility. We need a deeper understanding of our own sin, more than a deeper knowledge of the sins of the saints at the traditional church down the road. We need a consciousness of our own deceitful hearts, such that we recognize our need to be under authority.

This entry was posted in Apostles' Creed, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, kingdom, RC Sproul JR and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Ask RC- What’s wrong with house churches?

  1. “…When you hear the word “church,” what comes to mind? For most people, the word “church” means one of two things, depending upon the context:

    1) A building they frequent once, twice, or three times a week in which to pray, sing praises, and listen to preaching.

    2) The people who allegedly make up the church, aka the body of Christ, who frequent a building known as a church to do the things depicted in Option #1.

    “What doesn’t come to mind is a community of believers in the fullest sense of the word—a biblical community established, not only on the Word of God, but also on the moral laws of God.14 When obedient to our ecclesia commission, these biblical communities will be established not on the Ten Commandments alone, but upon the Ten Commandments and their respective statutes explaining the Ten Commandments and their respective civil judgments enforcing the Ten Commandments and their statutes, adjudicated by biblically qualified men of God who are a continual blessing to the righteous and a perpetual terror to the wicked, per Exodus 18:21, Deuteronomy 4:5-8, Psalm 19:7-11, Romans 13:1-7,15 etc.

    “There is not a living person today who hears the word “church” and thinks of what’s depicted in the paragraph above. And yet this description represents the true meaning of the Greek word ecclesia, which has been tragically translated “church.”

    “With that, it should be obvious how the word “church” has contributed to the defeat of Christendom—that is, Christians dominionizing society on behalf of their King. Just think what America would look like today if instead we were ecclesias (fully developed Christian communities) rather than merely street-corner churches….”

    For more, see “Ecclesia vs. Church: Why Understanding the Difference is Critical to Our Future” at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/onlineBooks/ecclesia.html

Comments are closed.