Is “color-blindness” the right response to racism?

No, and yes. Racism is, and will be, until Christ’s return a peculiarly ugly manifestation of the sin that remains within all of us. It is grounded in a pride that is as loathsome as it is ridiculous. Imagine taking pride in the history of cultures and genes that you neither built nor chose. Imagine looking down at those who were given a different culture, or a different genetic background. It’s just silly, embarrassing.

The “no” part, however, comes here. “Color-blindness” is wrong when it is used to wipe out any sense of cultural identity. I didn’t choose my family, but it is still my family. In my cultural context I identify not only with being a Sproul, but with being a native of Pittsburgh. In turn I identify with my ancestors who hailed from Scotland and Ireland. These cultural identities carry with them things to be proud of, like the glorious truth that no team has more Super Bowl trophies than my Steelers, and propensities that are not something to be proud of, like the habits of my Scottish ancestors to not do well getting along with each other. If “color-blindness” means I have to forget all that, ignore all that, I’m doing it wrong. Shared experiences unite us.

The “yes” part, however, may have been given its best expression in Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. Among the things King dreamt of was a future where a man would be judged not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. I am from Pittsburgh. My ancestors hailed from the British Isles. But I am also me. I know I didn’t do much to secure those Super Bowl trophies, though we Pittsburghers do believe in the power of a well-waved Terrible Towel. I like to think I haven’t succumbed to my cultural heritage of squabbling with my kin, even if my kin have such a cultural heritage. I should neither be praised for the virtues of my tribe, nor condemned for their vices.

In like manner, my calling is to look at others one at a time, to assess their character rather than their family tree. God, after all, rescued us from our first family, and adopted us into His own. Our identity is now in Him. And in Him we are called to love our neighbor, to recognize that our family is not black or white, but rather is all those covered by the blood of Christ. I not only have more in common with a believer who was born and raised in the Amazon than I do with an unbelieving Pittsburgher with Scots-Irish ancestors, but I am closer kin to that believer.

God has not only adopted me into His family, but has adopted in our family two boys whose ancestors came from Africa. They, and we with them, because we are family, ought to know and celebrate their historical background. But in terms of our family, their skin color is of no more significance than the color of their eyes. In the end we no longer have Adam as our father, but Abraham, the father of the faithful. All because we have the same elder brother, our kinsman redeemer, Jesus of Nazareth.

This entry was posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Is “color-blindness” the right response to racism?

  1. Doc DeRosa says:

    Actually, the Patriots have won 🏈🏈🏈🏈🏈🏈 more than the 49ers/Steelers four. Perhaps what you wrote was written years ago?

    Respectfully,
    Your fellow-native Pennsylvanian (Hermitage/Sharon) and attender of the weak sister of Grove City College; Slippery Rock University

  2. K.D. DeRosa says:

    Wow; it was NOT that which you had written years ago, but it WAS that my Ahlzheimer’s Disease had(surprisingly and evidently) commenced PRIOR to their TWO additional wins (“one for the thumb” plus one).
    Alas and alack, it is now the time of/for the dreaded Brownies and it may get predictably worse – when Big Ben is done. Personally, it matters not to me, in that l am sworn off of sports; l refuse to give them a platform for politically progressive regurgitation.

    Thanks for correcting me!

    Yours in humble senescence,

    A 1951 Model

    As a postscript, would u happen to have an EXTRA copy of Nichols R.C. Sproul: A Life book? Used is fine; l rather pay YOU, than buy it elsewhere. Please/thanks

    • RC says:

      Brother, a. not to worry. I have your back on Steeler stats. b. Not only do the Steelers and Pats have six, but the Niners and Cowboys have five. Green Bay and the Giants have four. Less than one fifth of the 32 NFL teams account for 30 out of 52 Super Bowls. c. I’m sorry but I don’t have a spare copy of Dr. Nichols bio of my father. Don’t know if you’ve read my remembrance, Growing Up (with) RC but I bet you’d like it. God bless you.

Comments are closed.