Better to Have Loved and Lost- Burying Duke

We buried Duke. We had not known him long. We didn’t have a great deal in common. His illness came on suddenly. Lisa and I had visited him, sought to comfort him, and prayed for him. When the sun rose the next day, however Duke had gone the way of all flesh. There were some who warned me against becoming close, knowing this death was, sooner or later, inevitable. But Duke was so friendly, so fun, so handsome, we had little choice.

Duke was a young bull Lisa and I had purchased at auction just a few weeks ago. A beautiful red calf, we brought him to our farm to raise him up for meat. That’s why people warned us. “How are you going to be able to eat an animal you’ve named?” I didn’t heed that counsel. I explained, in fact, that I would have no trouble eating him when the time came. That’s the strange, but I’d argue, wonderful place farm animals put us.

Proverbs 12:10 tells us “A righteous man cares for the needs of his animal.” Nathan the prophet, in II Samuel 12, in his allegory that exposed David’s guilt with Bathsheba, describes a man who so loved his lone lamb that she was like a daughter to him. In both instances we see that it is fitting for a man to care for his animals, understandable. We don’t take a coldly efficient perspective on our animals. We don’t treat them like living automatons, like fleshy machines.

Instead, we care for them, meet their needs, even love them. None of which undoes the great gap that separates man from animals. Grown adults referring to their pets as “fur babies” is lunacy on the level of a boy who thinks he’s a girl. But that doesn’t mean there is something wrong with loving our pets, or our farm animals. We don’t elevate animals above their station, but we do stoop down to it.

The gap between man and animal, however, is microscopic in comparison to the gap between Creator and creature. We exist for His glory. We belong to Him. We are not merely sustained by Him, but it is in Him that we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28). We are, apart from His grace, nothing more than dust and rebellion. And yet, He loves us, every mother’s son of us.

This doesn’t make us His equal. It doesn’t change our purpose, which is always to make manifest His glory. But it reminds us that one way He is glorified in us is by how He condescends to us. Perhaps nothing sets Him apart more from us than that He draws near to us.

We should not be surprised to find His transcendence and His immanence would be inseparably bound together. The Lord our God, after all, the Lord is one (Deut. 6:4). What has surprised me these past few days is the blessing of getting just a taste of this in the midst of the hardship of losing our beloved friend Duke.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, creation, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Better to Have Loved and Lost- Burying Duke

Kamilli Vanilli; Marcia Montenegro; Sodom; Prayer & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in "race", Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, Good News, Jesus Changes Everything, Month of Sundays, new age, politics, prayer, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Kamilli Vanilli; Marcia Montenegro; Sodom; Prayer & More

Resenting Grace: Parable of the Miserly Son

It is counter-intuitive, but nevertheless, there it is. We all, from time to time, take offense when grace is offered to us. We all, even more of the time, take offense when grace is offered to others. Two different circumstances, one reason to rule them both.

It is not, strictly speaking, receiving grace that offends us. Rather we take offense at the notion that we are in need of it. When it is offered, either by the God whom we offend daily, or another person that we offend less frequently, we recognize that to accept it is to acknowledge we have done wrong, that we have failed.

We don’t want grace, pity, charity because such means we cannot do what needs to be done on our own. And that hits right in our most vulnerable spot, our pride. We prefer to live in the most dangerous delusion, that we got this. We are not just waving off the lifeguard in the midst of our second drop below the surface; we wave off the Live Giver while dead at the bottom of the sea.

Why though do we resent the offering of grace to others? Such says nothing whatsoever about our own need or lack of need. Yet we grumble, complain, even respond in bitterness when we see others receive grace. Jesus even gave us the parable of the vineyard workers to show us this (see Matthew 20:1- 16).

The root of this, despite the different circumstances, is the same as above- it hits us in the pride. Here the issue isn’t our need to be self-sufficient, but our felt need to be treated as special, inviolable. When others receive grace it leaves us open to be mistreated. If people aren’t punished for treating others poorly, I will end up being treated poorly. And surely I’m too important, valuable, precious to have anyone get away with harming me.

The solution in both instances should not surprise us. What we need is humility. We need, in the first instance, to give up the barking at the moon lunacy of thinking we don’t need God’s grace. The pride that says, “I got this” is the equivalent, and just as embarrassing at the emperor’s pride in his new set of clothes. I don’t need a little grace. I need all the grace there is. I’m not dependent on God to get me through the last twenty yards of the marathon. I need Him to carry me.

When the unbeliever accuses us of using God as a crutch denounce such nonsense with vigor. A crutch? A crutch? Of what use is a crutch to a dead man? I don’t need a crutch. I need life itself, given to me by the Lord of Life.

As for the second circumstance, humility acknowledges that we are not special. We are not true special treatment of special protections. We are not the priceless china in the shop but the bull. We are not God, but God is. Though we can be and have been wronged, no wrong we have ever received is worthy to be compared to the daily wrong we do to our Redeemer. We have been forgiven much. Surely we should rejoice in forgiving others little.

The church is not the fellowship of those fighting over a small serving of grace. We are those celebrating being invited to feast upon that grace that covers not only us, but every one of our brothers and sisters, and all who are afar off. Let us acknowledge our need and proclaim His provision, putting pride on the run.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, parables, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Resenting Grace: Parable of the Miserly Son

What does it mean that the church is the bride of Christ?

When a writer makes an analogy he seeks to draw out truths about one thing by drawing out its similarities to the known qualities of the thing to which it is compared. If I say, “Life is like a roller-coaster” I’m not suggesting that life is something you find at an amusement park or that life is something closed in the winter. Instead I’m suggesting life has a lot of ups and downs, that it comes at us fast.

In like manner, when Paul tells us that the church is the bride of Christ he’s not saying the church wears something borrowed, something new, something old and something new. Such may be true of a bride, but is not essential. What defines a bride?

A bride loves and honors and delights in her groom. Which is precisely what we are supposed to do. This is surely the center of Paul’s point in Ephesians 5. Wives there are called to submit to their husbands as the church is to submit to Jesus. The groom is the focus of the attention of the bride. She is not distracted by anything or anyone else. So the church must be toward Jesus.

A bride is the glory of her groom. All the fuss and investment, the bridal gown, these things exist that the glory of the bride might be a glory to the groom. This is why all those in attendance turn and watch as the bride makes her way down the aisle. That trip isn’t designed for efficiency. Nobody is wowed by the torque a bride’s ankles can handle. She is made to be beautiful.

This is why the groom stands with her, filled with pride as the pictures get taken. Wives reflect their husbands, just as the church is to reflect Jesus. As the church walks out the character of Jesus she fulfills her bridal calling.

A bride is beloved of her groom. Bride and groom belong with and to each other. Love and marriage go together like a horse and carriage. It is, in both marriage and in the church’s relationship to Jesus, the love of the groom that beautifies the bride. The love of the groom is what defines the bride.

How might I be a different man if I truly believed, from top to bottom, with fervency, that Jesus loves me from top to bottom, with fervency? Remembering that we are together the bride, the same question arises with respect to the church. How might the church be different if we all together believed fully that Jesus loves us?

When the marriage feast comes, by His grace, we will so believe. We will not only be His bride, but will be spotless, without blot or blemish. As we now grow in grace and wisdom we become more and more what we will be. He has gone to prepare a place for us. Let us prepare, by the power of the Spirit, for that place. Let the Bride say, “Come, Lord Jesus.”

This is the eighth installment of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more.

Posted in Ask RC, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, eschatology, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What does it mean that the church is the bride of Christ?

Patience, Now or, Fools Rush In

The devil presents us with something of a paradox. On the one hand, when he is introduced we are told, “Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made” (Gen. 3:1). On the other hand, he is likewise the biggest fool to ever walk the planet. If insanity is rightly defined as the propensity to try the same thing over and over again, all the while expecting different results, then our nemesis is certifiable. He has been on a losing streak since day one, and it will go on forever. That he fights is foolish. How he fights is crafty.

Satan, despite the interesting parallels in how we spell their names, is not some sort of bad Santa, carrying around a sack full of illicit goodies by which he seeks to tempt us away from our calling. It is decidedly less than crafty, then, to take such a straightforward approach. We would, of course, be on our guard were he so crass. Instead, the devil delights to work in the background, and to work on the background. That is, he likes to lay low while laying the foundations for our thinking.

Consider for a moment (but only for a moment, for I know how busy you must be) the biblical virtue of patience, that fruit of the Holy Spirit that seems always to be just outside our reach. What would you do if you, like the devil, wanted to squash this fruit of the Spirit, to turn it into a bruised mess fit only for the dumpster?

Surely you would see that it would do you precious little good to try to create a crusade in favor of impatience. You would have to look long and hard to find a political action committee or a secular advocacy group that seeks to promote the virtue of impatience. You’d be more likely to find a brigade of zealots in favor of tooth decay. The devil is smarter than that. He does not preach the virtues of impatience. He just puts us in a world where it doesn’t make sense.

Sociologists often speak of what they like to call “plausibility structures.” These are not particular ideas that are self-consciously being promoted by advocates. Instead they are systems, so to speak, that encourage a particular way of looking at the world. The pro-abortion lobby has glommed onto this idea in how it sells its morbid view of the world. We are pro-life, but they do not present themselves as pro-death. Rather, they describe themselves as “pro-choice.”

Early in the pro-life movement we tried to make the case that unborn children were just that, unborn children. Surely once they see what they are doing, this would all stop. Except we won that debate, and blood still runs in our streets. “Choice” resonates with Americans. Not because of careful, thoughtful reasoning among Americans, but because of toothpaste. “Choice” makes sense because we live in a world of choice, where we choose not only among forty different brands of toothpaste, but among ten different sizes. This creates a “plausibility” structure, a world in which choice just makes sense to us.

What has this to do with patience? Be patient — we’re getting there. “Choice” is not the only unspoken assumption that so often directs our conclusions. We live in a world not only where you can choose among so many toothpastes, but a world in which you can get that toothpaste whenever you want. You can get instant cash, and use it to buy instant coffee, all within the confines of your car. And lest that car should trouble you, you can get your oil changed, and be on your way in ten minutes or less. If that doesn’t help, you can get instant approval on a loan for a new car.

Instant service in many ways is a great blessing. But it can encourage us to be impatient, even about the good things. If I can be an instant winner with the lottery, why can’t I be an instant winner in my race toward sanctification? Why is God taking so long in teaching me patience? Perhaps because He delights to do so. Perhaps because you not only can’t hurry love, but you can’t hurry joy, peace, and patience, or any of the fruits of the Spirit. Virtues are things we are called to cultivate, not order online. They don’t come with the option of overnight shipping for a mere twenty dollars more.

If we would cultivate these virtues, however, we must eradicate the weeds that choke it out. It isn’t enough to try to bootstrap our way to more patience. We have to dig deep into these plausibility structures, and see where they are leading us. In short, we need to live in light of the culture to which we have been called, not in the dark of the one from which we have come. We must not have our minds conformed to this world. Instead, they must be transformed by the renewing of our minds.

Such wisdom doesn’t come from an instant cash machine. You won’t cook it up in a microwave. There is but one source, “If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him” (James 1:5). If we ask Him for wisdom, He will give it to us. If we receive wisdom, He will give us patience. But it may take a while. Such is the wisdom of God, and such is His patience with us.

Posted in Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

To and From, or Into Our Father’s Open Arms

It may be the most overlooked moment of deep horror in all of the Bible. Not the eating of the fruit itself. Plenty of horror there, but it’s not overlooked. Rather it was the response of our first parents to the drawing near of their Father. Adam and Eve hear God coming to them, and they flee. We’re not in paradise any more. The God who crafted them both, who blessed them with paradise, His love, love one for another comes to them and… they run away.

The horror of sin isn’t merely the immediate destruction that comes from it. It is instead it propensity to separate us from our Father. We sin. We feel shame. The Holy One approaches, and we seek escape. It doesn’t, however, even require sin itself. It is sufficient that we are sinners.

Consider the encounter Peter had with Jesus in Luke 5. Like Adam and Eve, Peter was profoundly blessed with an astonishing haul of fish due to Jesus’ intervention. Rather than thanking Him however, the manifestation of Jesus’ power, and the knowledge of his own nature led Peter to cry out, “Depart from me for I am a sinful man, O Lord” (Luke 5:8).

True enough that Peter was a sinful man. But there is no immediate sin recounted in the story. Still, Peter wanted to get away. Peter would go on, of course, to commit multiple egregious sins against His Lord. None more horrific than denying Jesus three times through the night of His arrest. Here too Peter sought to distance himself from the Holy One of Israel, but this time to save his skin.

The solution to this problem, however, is not that we would not sin. That avenue is not available to us on this side of death. Rather, the difference between running from Him and running to Him is found in repentance. After the betrayal, when Peter is once again fishing, and Jesus stands on the shore, Peter doesn’t so much run as swim to Him. He does all that he can to get close quickly.

And Jesus, like our heavenly Father, welcomed him. Such reflects the father in the parable of the prodigal son. When the son comes to himself the first thing he does is go toward his father. His father, however, does not merely wait for his son, but runs to him. He doesn’t merely forgive him, but rejoices over him. His arms are always open wide for those who acknowledge the reality of sin in our lives.

The difference between sheep and goats isn’t the sheep are good and goats bad. The difference is that goats always seek to get away, while His sheep know His voice and follow. We all fall short. Goats think the problem is His holiness. Sheep know the solution is His grace. He does not wait for us to get it together, to clean ourselves up. He waits for us to be changed by His Spirit such that we know both how dirty we are and that He is the one solution.

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Marcia Montenegro; Olympic Blasphemy; Loving Wisdom & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, communion, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, Month of Sundays, new age, persecution, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Marcia Montenegro; Olympic Blasphemy; Loving Wisdom & More

The Scandal of the Gospel in a Graceless World

All of us, both within and without the church, face the temptation of being legalists when dealing with others’ sins against us, and antinomians when dealing with our sins against others. We want those we have perceived to have wronged us to pay for what they have done, while reminding our own tender consciences that we all deserve a little grace.

The two propensities come to a head as we seek to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ to the walking dead all about us. The first objection, typically, comes from the antinomian side. The sacrifice of witnessing to our enemies is that we know we will be hated for pointing out the reality of their sin. We’ll be pilloried as narrow, bigoted, judgmental, medieval. We will run smack into Romans 1. The unbeliever, in his unrighteousness unrighteously suppresses his knowledge of his unrighteousness. He, in short, doesn’t want to hear it.

The irony, of course, is that what we are trying to tell them is just what they need to deal with their guilt. We would be wise to remember that when we fall under the onslaught of their wrath. They want to hide from their sin, while we are trying to tell them how to make it go away.

The second problem, however, arises when we get to the promise of God. As we preach, “Repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved” they will find “believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved” to be almost as incredulous as “Repent.” In fact I’ve often heard this objection- “What a minute. You’re telling me that if Adolph Hitler had simply said just before his death, “Jesus, forgive me” he would have entered into heaven at his death? That’s all it takes, just saying you’re sorry?”

Of course that’s not all it takes. Though our repentance is never the ground of our peace with God- that is, God doesn’t forgive us simply because repenting is such a wonderful thing that it covers our sins, it is necessary and necessary that it be genuine. Saying something and meaning it, because we are sinners, often means two different things.

Second, the ground is not in our repentance, but His provision. “All it took” was for God to put on humanity, to live a perfect life, and to suffer the wrath of the Father due to all those who would believe. The passion of Christ is not a small thing.

The scandal, in fact, is less that we who are sinners should get off scot free, but that God should pay such a high cost for our redemption. Had Hitler repented at the last moment he would indeed now be enjoying the blessings of eternity. Not, however, because his sins would have gone unpunished, but because his sins would have been punished on Christ. And such are we.

I wonder if perhaps those outside the kingdom would be less tempted to think of the gospel as a cheap get out of jail free card if we were more faithful in grasping that we are Hitler, and Jesus suffered for us. The gospel is not for good people who fall a bit short, but for evil people. Jesus did not come to rescue the beautiful princess. He came to rescue the ugly hag that killed Him, because He laid His life down. Perhaps the gospel would scandalize the world less if it scandalized the church more.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, grace, justification, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Scandal of the Gospel in a Graceless World

How Does a Church Develop a Sense of Community?

There are two kinds of church goers in this world, those who simply want to be left alone, and those who long to be a part of a community. There are plenty of churches out there that cater to the first group, and are proud of it. It’s not a bug, but a feature. There are churches out there that cater to the first group, but don’t want to. They just don’t know how to fix the problem. Then there are, albeit few and far between, churches that actually are a community.

Those people looking for community in the church often don’t find it, mostly because it’s not something you find. Imagine you are walking through the woods as the sun begins to set. The temperature drops; the shadows lengthen. You begin to reminisce about earlier times, and soon you have an intense craving for a campfire, complete with graham crackers, chocolate and marshmallows. Would you increase your pace, in the hopes that if you cover more ground you might find these things?

Community isn’t something you find. It’s something you build. And you have to do it organically. Turn it into a program and you’ll find rain coming down, matches that won’t light and graham crackers infested with bugs. You don’t, contra the churches in the second group, program community, selling small groups from the pulpit, hawking progressive dinners, and reminding congregants whose last names end in A-L to bring a main dish, and M-Z a side dish and dessert.

Here’s what you do. Are you ready for the secret? You invite a family over for dinner. The whole family. It doesn’t matter what you serve. Hot dogs are fine. Soup, even though everyone knows soup’s not a meal, is good. You don’t have to dress up, wear an Armani suit. Just spend time together around the table, or around a campfire that you build.
That’s step one.

Step two is this- do it again. Invite another family over. There doesn’t have to be an occasion. You don’t have to plan a bunch of party games. Step three, if someone invites you, go. It may feel awkward; it may be inconvenient. You might miss the premiere of season three of your favorite show. But go. Remember also that they will be sinners, just like you are. Remember also that they, like you, are infinitely, immutably, by name, beloved of the Father.

Here is what will happen. You will get to know each other. Next, you’ll come to care about each other. Third, you’ll come to serve each other. Finally, you’ll find yourself naturally and joyfully living out all the “one another’s” Scripture gives us. And you’ll wonder how you ever survived without it.

If your schedule doesn’t have room for shared meals, change it. Take things off your plate that are normal, but don’t feed your soul or serve your brother. If you fear your home or your family doesn’t measure up, do it anyway. It’s not a competition. The prize doesn’t go to the person closest to Martha Stewart but to the one with the warmest welcome. In short, don’t make excuses. Get to work at making joy, and blessing the body.

This is the seventh installment of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, friends, friendship, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on How Does a Church Develop a Sense of Community?

The Moral of the Story- On the Obedience of Christ

Everybody loves Jesus. Marxists love Jesus, because He was such a radical revolutionary. Unitarians love Jesus, because He befriended the social outcasts. Liberals love Jesus because, well, because He was liberal. Even some conservatives love Jesus, because He was so conservative. Mark Twain quipped that God made man in His own image, and ever since man has been returning the favor. The same is true with respect to God the Son. We make Him out to be just like us, only, everyone will concede, slightly better. Jesus, in short, is universally loved because He, just like us, is deemed to be such an upstanding man.

Which is true enough. Jesus was in fact an upstanding man. His moral character was impeccable. He was, as it is increasingly controversial to say, a great moral teacher. This even garners Him some minimal level of authority. Quoting Jesus will score you at least as many points as quoting Confucius, at least if you choose the right quotes.

There is, however, a profound chasm that separates a “great moral teacher” from a perfectly obedient man. It is one thing to believe Jesus was better than we are, another to affirm that He kept the law of God perfectly. To affirm such is to affirm a law. They refuse to recognize a law, any law. To the Greeks the cross was foolishness. To the Jews it was a stumbling block. To the post-modern, however, the problem isn’t the cross, but what preceded it, the obedient life.

Theological liberalism can handle the cross. The purpose of the cross, according to those who think Jesus stayed dead, was to set an example, to show us how far we ought to go to love our neighbor. There is, in this thinking, no atonement. There is no atonement, however, not because such would be too much for Jesus, but because it would mean we have sins that need to be covered. It would mean that outside of Christ, we are under the wrath of God. To think in terms of atonement, we would have to think about the unthinkable.

The righteousness of Christ, however, is a little more difficult for the world to squeeze into its self-righteous wineskins. It burns as it goes down. Which is why the world speaks not of the life of Christ, but of His teachings. His teachings can be made amorphous enough that with just a pinch of dishonesty, and a smidge of deconstructionism, we can turn them into our own teachings. But we cannot turn His absolute obedience into our own, at least, without conceding that God has a law, that we don’t keep it, and, well, without trusting in His complete work and becoming a Christian.

This is, however, the dilemma of the postmoderns. Without a standard, how can one distinguish between a great moral teacher and a reprehensible moral cretin? Without a moral measuring stick, Jesus and Hitler are not only on the same moral plane, but they are on the same moral plane with all of us, because there is only one plane. If there is no target, no one is closer to it than anyone else.

Therein is the offense of the Gospel in our age. Postmodernism’s very reason for existence is to escape a transcendent moral law. It is a philosophy that was created not to remove the guilt of sin, to remove the stigma of sin. We who profess Christ are wrong, because we profess that there is a right, even as we confess that only one Man ever attained it.

What separates our peculiar age from that which Paul faced isn’t, however, the different offenses that the world takes to the gospel message. Rather it is the response of the church. It was the Cross that offended the Greeks and scandalized the Jews. But it was the Cross that Paul preached. In our day the obedience of Christ offends, and so we never speak of it. The church in our day seeks to hide the offense, and in so doing, puts its light under a bushel. Jesus the hero upon the cross is just fine. Jesus the obedient Son must never see the light of day.

The Scripture calls us the first born of many brethren. In a show of the depth of the grace of God, we are told that Jesus is not only the husband of the church, but our elder brother as well. If, in fact, we belong to Him, we must profess Him. We must declare not only the glory of the cross, but the glory that led to the cross. We must profess His obedience, His righteousness that by faith is ours.

We must remember that He was not crucified because He was a great moral teacher. Rather, He was crucified because He obeyed His heavenly Father. They hung Him because they could convict Him of nothing. And because He is the firstborn of many brethren, we must in turn see the cross not only as the only atonement for our sins, but also as our example.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Moral of the Story- On the Obedience of Christ