Chickens, Eggs and Roman Catholicism

One should not, after centuries of such folly, be surprised when Roman Catholicism exposes its shameful pride. As our senses have grown dull, they’ve become more brazen with each passing year. They, after all, are the one true church. They are the source of an infallible tradition. They hold the checkbook to the treasury of merit. Heck, their patron saint, Mary, is supposedly the Queen of the Universe.

Tradition, that mysterious unnamed repository of revelation, according to Rome, is equal in authority to the Word of God. But it gets still worse. The Roman church, according to the Roman church, stands over God’s Word like a colossus. They don’t just claim to have a perfect understanding of the Bible. They don’t just claim to be equal in authority to the Bible. They claim that they gave us the Bible. Rome saves us. Rome vets God’s Word.

Here is how the argument goes. When controversy arose early in the life of the church over whether this book or that belonged in the canon, the church convened a council to settle the matter. They settled the matter. Ipso pronto, hey presto, and QED, the church “gave us” the Bible and is therefore its master. Yeah, no.

First, the good Roman Catholics back in the time of this council, were better than their children. They did “finalize” the canon, but even they recognized the Bible was their authority, not the other way around. The language they used to affirm the canon was “Recipimus,” Latin meaning, “We receive.” “We receive these books to be the authoritative Word of God.” They affirmed not that they made the canon, but that they recognized it. They did not give it its authority, but recognized the authority it already had. Rome no more gave us the Bible than I crowned the Lord Jesus when I “made” Him Lord. He was Lord long before I was born. I just, by His grace and power, recognized it.

Second, when you challenge Rome, asking where they got the authority to give the Bible its authority, they will inevitably turn to Jesus, Peter and Caesarea Philippi. There Peter affirmed that Jesus was the Christ. There Jesus said that Peter was the Rock. And there Jesus said He would build His church upon the rock. There are nuanced arguments about what Jesus must have meant, Rome affirming this was Jesus anointing Peter as the first Pope, most Protestants affirming the rock is the declaration of Peter, that Jesus is the Christ, not that Peter is the pope. Trouble is, even if we stipulate Rome’s position, we still have an inescapable problem. If this is that place where Rome gets its authority, then Rome’s authority rests on the authority of the Bible. Uh-oh. The Bible’s authority rests on Rome whose authority rests on the Bible. Both feet planted firmly in mid-air.
The Bible is the alone Word of God. And those who think they gave Him His voice, those are not the people whose voices we should be listening to.

Don’t believe the hype.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bible Study Tonight, 7 est on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul.

Posted on November 14, 2022 by RC


We will once again be sharing our home Bible study through Facebook Live (RC-Lisa Sproul) this evening, 7 eastern. Those who’d like to meet face to face, you’re also invited for dinner at our home at 6:15. Tonight we consider the promise of God that all things work together for good for those who love Him, who have been called according to His purpose.

Join us, one way or the other, and we pray your faith will be strengthened.

Posted in announcements, assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Facebook Live, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bible Study Tonight, 7 est on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul.

What’s the difference between Pilgrims and Puritans?

Not much. Both groups had their roots in the Church of England. Both groups had a deep commitment to the doctrines of grace. Both groups were filled with men and women passionate about the gospel and the Lordship of Christ over all things. Both groups were deeply troubled by the broad latitude within the Church of England. The difference between them was how they dealt with their concerns with the Church of England.

The Reformation in England was a profoundly messy affair. It was sparked less by a recovery of the gospel, more by a king’s pursuit of a male heir. England then flipped from Protestant to Catholic to Protestant depending on who sat on the throne. In the end the church became, as it is to this day a wide tent, with room for Roman Catholic doctrine minus papal authority, strong Calvinists and others including, in our day, theological liberals who deny the deity of Christ and more.

Both Pilgrims and Puritans were among the strong Calvinists. The former took the view that the Church of England was beyond saving and left the established church while the latter took the view that the Church of England remained part of the true church but needed to rid itself of every remnant of Romish doctrine and practice. Pilgrims wandered from the established church while Puritans labored to purify it. Both groups wanted the same thing, a healthy, faithful and thriving church. They simply disagreed on the best way to get there.

The caricature of these faithful believers, that they were sour faced killjoys could not be further from the truth. They recognized their call to gratitude for all that God had done, to redeem them, provide for them, bless them. They, as Thanksgiving reminds us, loved to feast before the Lord. While they sought theological and biblical clarity, they were never an austere people.

The same commitments that marked these two groups, as well as the same differences, remain with us today, even outside the immediate context of the Church of England. For a modern look at how this played out in the 20th century I commend to you the inimitable Iain Murray’s amazing book, Evangelicalism Divided. I would consider this to be one of the ten most important books I’ve read in the past 25 years. Murray takes the occasion of Billy Graham’s London crusade and its decision to align with Roman Catholics and compares how three influential evangelicals in the United Kingdom responded to this. Martin Lloyd Jones represents a more Pilgrim like response, J.I. Packer a more Puritan response while John Stott fills to role of representing the established church. The book is published by Banner of Truth.

Pilgrims and Puritans together served as the driving force of the colonization of what is now the United States. They were men and women of courage and conviction, who in turn lived daily in light of their dependence on God’s grace in Christ.

Posted in Big Eva, church, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Of Mice and Men

To suggest that wisdom is always balanced seems to me to be a bit, well, unbalanced. Whoever first uttered the words of wisdom, “moderation in all things,” should, I believe, have healed himself. All things? Isn’t that a bit extreme? In like manner, wisdom is almost always balanced. We need to measure the wisdom of looking before we leap with the equally potent conviction that he who hesitates is lost. We need to remember, as we loudly affirm that we ought not answer a fool according to his folly lest we be like him, that we ought to answer a fool according to his folly lest he become wise in his own eyes (Prov. 26: 4–5).

Jesus, who is wisdom incarnate, wisely tells us that we must consider the cost. Only a fool would set about the business of building a tower without first determining if he had the resources to complete the job. Planning, according to Jesus, is good and proper. Out of this wisdom we have with all due wisdom extrapolated our calling to set goals before us, to look beyond today, to discern the times. This same Jesus, however, speaking through James His brother, says, “Come now, you who say, ‘Today or tomorrow we will go into such and such a town and spend a year there and trade and make a profit’ — yet you do not know what tomorrow will bring. What is your life? For you are a mist that appears for a little time and then vanishes. Instead you ought to say, ‘If the Lord wills, we will live and do this or that.’ As it is, you boast in your arrogance. All such boasting is evil” (James 4:13–16).

It is a great thing to plan, to lay down your hopes and aspirations. It is a great thing, in fact, not just to hope for a particular destination but to map out the steps that will get you there. It is, however, incumbent upon us to do this as creatures, as vapor. We must remember our frame. We must remember that we simply propose while God disposes. If the Lord wills, we will do this or that. If, however, the Lord wills differently, His plans will supersede our own. Not only ought we to pray, “nevertheless not my will but Thine be done,” but we ought also to pray knowing that His sovereign will, in fact, will be done.

If we would plan in accordance with God’s plan, we must first know what God’s plan is. He has not told us that we will go into such and such a city, buy and sell and make a profit. He has not told us that our five-year-old daughter will marry her eight-year-old neighbor, and the two of them will build their home on the back side of our property. He has not told us that our ten-year-old son will thrive in a particular line of work, and will, along with his own as yet unborn children, seize that whole industry for the kingdom of God. He has not told us that once we have seized this industry we will cooperate with the plan set in motion by Brother Jones fifty years ago so that we can together seize that other cultural doodad for Jesus. It is a shameful thing to be shortsighted. It is likewise an arrogant thing to boast that you can see far into the future.

God’s secret plan is just that — secret. We don’t know His strategy, how He will move in this coming year, decade, or century. God’s revealed plan is, well, that which has been revealed. He has told us what is required of us — that we do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with Him (Mic. 6:8). He has told us the sum of the matter — that we should fear Him and obey all that He commands (Eccl. 12:13). He has called us to go into all the nations, baptizing them, teaching them to obey all that He has commanded (Matt. 28:19–20). He has told us that we ought not worry about what we will eat or about what our great grandchildren will eat. The Gentiles worry about such things. No, our calling is to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness (Matt. 6:33). My prayer and my plan is that every day I would grow more faithful in this calling.

This, we highly resolve — that we would seek first His kingdom and His righteousness. If we would but keep this one resolution, we would witness worldwide revolution. Better yet, we would enjoy a new reformation. May God give us the grace to be extremists where we ought to be, that we would always seek out wisdom and rest in His finished work.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, eschatology, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Of Mice and Men

Giving Offense

When the world embraces as truth the postmodern notion that all truth claims are a hidden exercise of power we ought not to be surprised when counter-offensives come in the form of self-victimization. OK, let me try that again. When you think everyone else is a wicked tyrant it is rather easy to see yourself as a helpless hero. And to use that “helplessness” as the cudgel by which you seize power.

Here’s how it works. First, you decide that language is inherently abusive. Second, you decide that you have been abused. All the snowflake yammering about “safe spaces,” “micro-aggressions,” and “triggering language” is just so much soccer style flopping. It is Dennis the Peasant whining about the violence inherent in the system. A decent person, of course, has no desire to hurt another person. When said other person squeals in pain our first instinct is to apologize. We’re embarrassed, like our tongue just stepped on someone’s toes. So we retreat. We redouble our efforts to be extra special winsome and gentle. We even join the protests against those troglodytes who won’t get with the program. In short, we surrender.

It is certainly possible to give unnecessary offense. In a normal world the likelihood of doing so is roughly equal to the likelihood of taking unnecessary offense. We’re not in a normal world anymore, Toto. The Christian needs to learn three important truths in this blunderful world of ow’s. First, we must remember that the message that we carry is an offense. The Bible tells us this, over and over. To seek to bring that message while avoiding the offense is like trying to go downstairs while staying upstairs. Our message begins with the very truth that unbelievers, as we did when we were still dead in our sins, labor so diligently to suppress, that there is a God and that we fall short of all He requires of us.

Second, they will insist the offense is precisely where it isn’t so as not to have to think about where it is. When he/him starts screeching at us because we tell she/her that she must repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ we’re doing it right. We don’t mock her dysphoria, neither do we enter into it. She wants to live in a pretend world where she can be a he and need not fear God’s wrath. Our message to her is that she must be a she and can be free of God’s wrath through Jesus.

Third, we need to remember that our calling is to joyfully receive the hatred of the world for loving them. We are the ones who are willing to be falsely accused of giving offense because we care about those who accuse us. We are the ones who are willing to be thought fools because we know well and good, as anyone can see, that the Emperor is an Empress. We are the ones who are willing to be actually victimized by the ones crying “victim” because our lives and our treasures are secure in Christ in heaven. We are the ones who rejoice when all men revile us for His name’s sake.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Giving Offense

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, Good News, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, prayer, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Casting Mountains Into Seas, a Bible Study

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, persecution, politics, prayer, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Casting Mountains Into Seas, a Bible Study

We’re So Vain

Some things we never quite leave behind this side of the veil. Try as we might to mature and to grow beyond this peculiar brand of foolishness, I’m afraid that at heart we are still junior high girls. Our problem isn’t, I trust, that we talk on the telephone too long, or that we go through life still having a crush on David Cassidy or some Back Street Boy. No, our problem is we think ourselves masters of motives. You remember either saying, or hearing someone say, “I was at the mall, and Susie was walking the other way. So then I smiled and waved and said, ‘Hey Susie,’ and she wouldn’t even look at me. She just walked on by. She is just so stuck-up.” We, I hope, wouldn’t say this anymore, but we still practice the same kind of foolishness.

We conclude, for instance, that such and such a family never comes to pot-luck suppers because they think they’re better than us. We conclude that this other family bought a new car because the husband works too hard or charges too much for the work he does. We think the pastor preached the sermon he preached because he has assumed the worst about us, when he doesn’t even really know our situation.

The root of this isn’t simply immaturity, but pride. The pride has at least two conduits through which it flows. First, we think ourselves far too clever. What we actually know is that family A doesn’t come to pot-luck suppers, family B has a new car and pastor C preached a sermon. There are equally plausible explanations for each of these events. Perhaps family A has one child with horrible food allergies, another child who will fall into a tailspin if he doesn’t get a nap, and a third child that doesn’t need an excuse to fall into a tailspin. Maybe family A, rather than thinking they are better than others, is actually ashamed of their family’s behavior in this kind of setting. Maybe they don’t come because they don’t think they measure up. Perhaps family B was given the new car by friends or family. Perhaps it’s a company car. Perhaps some other business cheated them, and with the settlement money they bought a car. Perhaps, and don’t let this shock you, God has prospered family B, and they bought a new car. As for the pastor, maybe he was preaching the next text, and in God’s providence it hit a sin you think others might perceive in you.

There is a second way this folly flows from pride. Not only are these sinless explanations plausible, but it is likewise probable that these plausible answers have nothing to do with you. That is, we fall for junior high girl syndrome only when we begin to think the world revolves around us. We’re so vain, I bet we think this post is about us, don’t we, don’t we?

God, though He might very well be surprised by the existence of junior high schools, is not surprised by the existence of junior high girls. He has given us the antidote. The antidote is love. Love, God tells us, suffers long and is kind. It does not envy, nor does it parade itself. It is not puffed up, and does not behave rudely. Now these are all great things about love. But they are only tangentially related to our concern. But then comes these three- love does not seek its own, is not provoked, and thinks no evil. This first, does not seek its own, is rather more sophisticated than not wrestling for the television remote. It means spending less time thinking on how our loved ones have hurt us, and more time thinking through how we might help our loved one. “Is not provoked” doesn’t mean that we take our emotions and clamp them down to avoid a reaction. We do not, because so far we haven’t said anything about the record of wrongs we are keeping, pat ourselves on the back. We instead keep no record at all. We avoid being provoked simply by following the next injunction, thinking no evil. That is, if we practice a judgment of charity, which is rather easy to do once we have died to self, then it takes no effort to keep cool.

It’s true enough that we are to be wise as serpents. There are bad guys out there who want our money, and will cheat to get it, who want to borrow our reputation, and will manipulate to get it. But it may just be that the path to getting beyond junior high girls is to become elementary school girls. What we need is an innocence that simply believes that others love us, and want what’s best for us. What we need is an innocent trust that God will protect us and take care of us. May He give us the grace to grow younger as we grow closer.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, friends, friendship, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Bible Study Tonight, 7 est on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul.

We will once again be sharing our home Bible study through Facebook Live (RC-Lisa Sproul) this evening, 7 eastern. Those who’d like to meet face to face, you’re also invited for dinner at our home at 6:15. Tonight we consider throwing mountains into the sea, and our calling to believe Matthew 21:21.

Join us, one way or the other, and we pray your faith will be strengthened.

Posted in announcements, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Bible Study Tonight, 7 est on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul.

Why are so many wealthy people pushing for socialism?

It seems there is not a left-wing cause that isn’t supported by billionaires George Soros, Bill Gates, or others of their ilk. It seems as well that such a position would be counter-intuitive. The rich, we tend to think, want to hold on to their wealth while socialism wants to take it away. This anomaly is profoundly telling, revealing the ugly truth about socialism.

Over the years I’ve been blessed to serve from time to time outside local killing centers. I go not to protest but to proclaim the gospel, to call on those about to murder their own child to repent and embrace the cross. I do so knowing that the powers of darkness actively proclaim their anti-gospel. One very simple argument I often make goes like this- there are people out here like me who are not paid to be here bringing you the message of Jesus. These people stand ready to help you in every way possible- clothes, diapers, counsel, rent, cribs, for free. The people inside that are trying to persuade you to go through with this are all here to get paid. The moment you tell them you have no money they will kick you right out of the door. Which group do you think is more trustworthy? Which group do you think has your best interests at heart?”

What then is in it for limousine liberals? Power. The ugly truth is that socialism isn’t about a more equitable redistribution of wealth, and never has been. It is always about increasing the power of those in positions of power. George Soros isn’t driven by a desire for more money. Bill Gates doesn’t go to work each day to earn another buck to buy another trinket. They seek greater power, more control over the lives and decisions of people like you and me. Socialism isn’t so much an economic system built on “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” as it is a political system built on, “The state will decide what you do, what you have, where you go, how you live.” Or, to put it as the World Economic Forum, a hive of the hyper-wealthy, puts it, “You’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy.”

Truth be told there are some wealthy people, billionaires even, who labor to promote free market economics. These are people who believe that greater freedom would allow for greater wealth for themselves. They also believe it would allow for greater wealth for everyone. More important still, what they seek is less government making decisions for a free people. Free market proponents want people to be left alone to make their own decisions while socialism proponents want people to never be left alone nor allowed to make any decisions. The latter seek tyranny. The latter seek liberty. The former “prosper” by controlling what is not their own. The latter prosper by meeting the desires of the market.

Do not be fooled. Socialists are not seeking fairness, but raw power. As George Orwell put it, “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Devil's Arsenal, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, kingdom, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment