At Ease in the Land of Moloch

Suppose for a moment that the sky were falling. Now while you have your imagination engaged, imagine that Chicken Little was actively trying to sound the alarm, not that the sky is falling, but that a rat has successfully broken into the feed bin. Rats in the feed bin, that’s not such a good thing. Raising the alarm, all things being equal, would be a good thing. But if the sky were falling, concerns about rats and feed bins would be not just misguided, but dangerous, a genuine distraction of a truly calamitous event. Now suppose that Chicken Little suddenly hatched a bevy of baby Chicken Littles, all of whom became conservative pundits.

There we are. The danger of the day is war with Russia. Last month it was inflation. Before that it was vax mandates and before that, COVID itself. Talk radio is all abuzz with the awful things the President is doing to our economy. The ghost of inflation present is haunting us. Doom and gloom is everywhere. It is true, terribly true, that the Biden administration is spending us down the river at rates far more rapidly than his predecessor did. Socialism is a dreadfully dangerous and destructive practice. Who could have guessed that money for nothing and checks for free would prove to be a disincentive to work? It is more horrible than even the pundits know.

There are, however, two things that are far worse. The first is our relative indifference to the second. That is, that Christians, and the radio talkers and social media mavens who lead us, are up in arms, running about like Chicken Little over the President’s handling of the economy is shameful. For we have forgotten the real tragedy of our day. Today, nearly three thousand mothers will murder their own children. Tomorrow it will be the same. Under President Trump, every day three thousand babies were intentionally murdered, even when Republicans controlled both houses of Congress. Murder.

I believe in liberty. I long for limited government. I believe in fiscal wisdom, in hard money. But assaults on these things are so many rats in the feed bin while the sky is falling. Babies are being murdered while I type. Billboards advertise these services. Salesmen visit these offices, hoping to land an account. Landlords rent to these grisly customers. Policemen are standing guard at the door. Nurses are scrubbing implements of infanticide, and medical school graduates are putting on surgical gloves. Moms and dads have paid their cash, and wait. And Christians are listening to Fox News complain about the economy. Sadly, because the sky has been falling for forty-nine years, we no longer seem to notice. We are comfortable with murdered babies, at ease in the land of Moloch. I understand that we cannot look too closely at this horror. It is too terrible. But we need to look more closely, more often, more honestly, and with more repentance. We need to stop allowing ourselves to be distracted and outraged by the rats. The sky is falling, and the blood is rising.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Literalism; Planet Perfect

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, Books, eschatology, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Literalism; Planet Perfect

Meeting Jesus Meets Tonight

Dunamis Fellowship and Sovereign Grace Fellowship continue our weekly Bible study at 7 eastern. Meeting Jesus consider our Lord’s ascension. All are welcome to attend. Come early (6:15) and we’ll feed you. You can also watch on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you join us.

Posted in announcements, Biblical Doctrines, eschatology, Facebook Live, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Meeting Jesus Meets Tonight

What are the noetic effects of pride?

It is a common question among theologians, how sin impacts human thought. Does it remove from us any possibility of knowing? Are we doomed to epistemic darkness? Pride, however, is close kin to sin. I’m not certain there are any sins that don’t include within it some element of pride. So I ask, how does pride impact our thinking?

First, it encourages us to think too highly of ourselves. In understanding the impact of sin on the whole of our being, part and parcel of what we mean when affirming total depravity, we understand that we use our minds to excuse ourselves. God has given us the capacity for thought and we think up rationalizations for our sins. We excuse ourselves and create a self-image that is airbrushed by our pride.

Second, it encourages us to think too lowly of others. We use our minds to assess the character and behavior of others not in the interests of accuracy but in the interest of making us feel better about ourselves. We watch, observe, infer until we get to the point that we think we can safely say, “Yup, that person is no good, unlike me.”

The key is found in the inferring. Here we slip in speculation that our minds determine is actually information. We, in our pride, think we are insightful enough, educated enough to peer into the dark hearts of others and diagnose their sins. We conclude this one is a narcissist because a. we think we’re not only outstanding students of the symptoms and b. think we are outstanding pathologists of the behavior. To put it more clearly, we skew our perception of behavior, make our own self-serving assessment of motives, pronounce our subject guilty and then decide it is our God-given duty to herald this person’s guilt far as the curse is found.

The pride truly kicks in, however, when some people fail to embrace our judgment. Anyone responding to our pronouncement of the guilt of another with, “Well, first I’m not sure this is any of my business and second if it were it would be wise to hear the other side before I make any judgment” is a wicked enabler, an ostrich chewing sand, complicit in the crime or worst of all, one who, likely because of the patriarchy, refuses to believe victims. I understand that victims can be hurt when they are not immediately believed. I also understand that false accusers can act hurt when they are not immediately believed. Finally, I understand I can’t always tell the difference between the first and the second. Neither can you. We don’t know who the victim is until we know if a wrong was done.

Pride is what drives us to think we not only have to have a take on every accusation floating through the cyber-ether, but that we all have the wherewithal to reach a sound conclusion from afar. No call to be a voice for the voiceless, no insistence that we embrace the task of “raising awareness” should prod us into announcing conclusions we don’t have the evidence for. Embracing the silence in uncertainty may leave you with enemies on both sides of the courtroom. Rushing to judgment, however, displeases the Judge.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What are the noetic effects of pride?

Dumb and Dumber

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, church, Devil's Arsenal, Education, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dumb and Dumber

Answering Fools

When I was a young man I came to understand the brilliance of my father. Like millions of others I learned at his feet. I watched him lay down careful arguments like so many dominoes destined to reach a predictable end. Which is why I spent so much time trying to coax him into entering the fray with every error I ran across in the church. His response demonstrated not just his knowledge, but his wisdom. He would explain to me, “The last thing anyone needs to do is to engage that particular fringe group. No matter how badly you might refute them, all you end up doing is increasing their visibility.” He knew both how to answer a fool according to his folly, and when not to.

I would argue that not only is it a foolish thing to answer obscure folly but also to answer widespread deep folly. Doing so, in both instances, grants credibility where it doesn’t belong. Some ideas, another wise man once said, deserve only to be hooted off the stage. Which is not always easy for us.

For one thing, when the earnest unbeliever makes his outrageous claim and we laugh it appears we are not playing nice. While nice isn’t a fruit of the Spirit it is understandable that others might think so. We are held by the Lord to a certain standard of behavior toward His enemies. Which is not at all the same thing as being held hostage by the standards of His enemies. I fear, however, that our commitment to being nice, to not hooting nonsense off the stage, is grounded in the fact that doing so gets us hooted out of polite company. We are cowed cowards. We’re willing to fight, politely, which just plays into their hands.

It is not a bold and heroic thing to stand up and say that while there may confused boys and confused girls there are still, in the end, only boys and girls. The reason it is not bold and heroic is not because they will not screech and gnash at us for saying so. It is not bold and heroic because everyone, everyone, even the screeching and gnashing, know good and well that there are only boys and girls. Just like every fawning, flattering, lickspittle subject of the slow streaking emperor knew good and well that he was altogether in his altogether. Their rage isn’t because you won’t believe the lie they believe. It is because you won’t affirm the lie they know is a lie.

My father once overheard a conversation on a train. At a table near his on the dining car one woman was telling another woman about her amazing time at an ashram, how she came to understand that she was God, and how that changed everything. Noticing my father’s interest in the conversation she welcomed him in, asking, “What do you think?” My father smiled, softening the blow, winsomely bursting the bubble and asked, stifling a laugh, “You don’t REALLY think you’re the almighty do you?” She laughed too, confessing, “No, no I don’t.” He had no need to present a compelling apologetic with footnotes and nuance that she could ignore. He simply had to acknowledge what everyone already knew, that she was just another creature.

Be careful. Don’t believe the lie that they believe the lie. And don’t give it credibility by treating it as credible.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, church, covid-19, ethics, evangelism, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Answering Fools

Forever Friend; Dissing Our Mother

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Apostles' Creed, church, friends, friendship, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Forever Friend; Dissing Our Mother

Confessing Faith

While it may be true that there are two kinds of people in the world, (those who like to divide the world into two kinds of people and those who don’t), there are in turn myriad places to draw these dividing lines. God Himself in Genesis 3 speaks of the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. As history moves forward toward the coming of the second Adam, the world is divided into Jews and Gentiles, who are, in fulfillment of God’s promise to Abraham, ultimately brought together by the work of Christ, leaving us at the end of the story with two kinds of barnyard animals: sheep and goats.

Sometimes, I’m afraid, we draw with crooked lines. J. D. Hunter, a sociologist at the University of Virginia and a professing Christian, wrote an incisive and insightful book a decade or so back called Culture Wars. He argued therein that the world is divided into two kinds of people, the progressives and the orthodox. The progressives, whether they were raw secularists, new age devotees, non-observant Jews or mainline Protestants, agreed on one thing, that God had not spoken. They denied together that there was any transcendent truth. The orthodox, on the other hand, again whether Muslim or Christian, Mormon or Christian Scientist, agreed that God had indeed spoken. They agreed that there was a transcendent source of truth and morality. They just couldn’t agree on what that source was.

It’s a perfectly appropriate way to divide the world, as long as you realize that there are plenty of goats still on our side. Co-belligerancy in the culture wars may be a good thing, an appropriate battle strategy. Wisdom requires, however, that we remember that it comes with a peculiar temptation. It is all too easy to delight in what unites us, and diminish what divides us. It is all too easy to forget that our allies in the battle are our enemies in the war. That temptation is particularly grave when the barbarians are at the gate, when all the world is crumbling down around us.

Charles Colson argued that we have entered into a new dark age. But this time it’s different. The barbarians are no longer at the gate. Instead they sit upon thrones within. They aren’t marauding hordes, but polished assassins. What does a collapsing civilization look like? Because we are worldly we think it is found in the thundering hoof beats of Ghengis Khan and his army. We think it comes by way of Viking longboats, landing on our shores. We think we see civilization ebbing as the Roman army pulls back from the frontiers to defend the core. The truth of the matter, as the barbarian Pogo understood, is that we have met the enemy, and we are it. Here is the sign not of the coming destruction of civilization, but the current destruction: millions of dead babies, killed by medical professionals, hired by mothers, all enjoying the sanction and safety of the state. Judgment is here, and we are judged all the more that we do not know it.

Saint Augustine rightly drew the line. He wrote, in the dusk of the Roman Empire, of two cities. Some were citizens of man’s city. But by God’s grace, some looked for a city whose builder and maker was God. What separated these two cities, and the citizens therein, however, wasn’t what we think. Man’s city wasn’t simply that place that would not acknowledge God. The city of God isn’t that place where everyone is a theist. Instead Augustine’s explanation of these two cities reflected another important part of Augustine’s work, his battle with the heretic Pelagius. The battle between Augustine and Pelagius was the same battle that rages between the two cities. What separates the citizens of these two cities is the same thing that separated the two men praying in the temple. One prayed, “God, I thank you that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all that I get” (Luke 18:12). The other prayed, “God be merciful to me, a sinner” (v. 13). There are, as such, two kinds of people in this world, those who know they are sinners, and those who think otherwise. This is the great divide.

The culture wars call us to forget this distinction — to exchange it for another. This is why we keep finding ourselves embracing assorted power-grabbing schemes. Our neighbors hope in princes, and we hope with them. We are yoked with the unrepentant, which means we will always receive judgment. The penitent in Jesus’ parable, on the other hand, wasn’t a mere pietist. His prayer wasn’t merely private. He wasn’t so heavenly minded that he was no earthly good. Instead, this is the very power for the battle. We will not change the world by drawing perfect lines. We will only change the world by confessing that all we ever do is draw crooked lines. It is repentance that will bring down the walls of Jericho, that will establish the walls of Jerusalem. I tell you the truth, the penitent went out from the temple justified. Still more, he went out a soldier of the king. As Jesus ended this parable He reminded us of the weapons of His warfare: “For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, but the one who humbles himself will be exalted.”

We are a people of unclean lips, and we dwell in a land of unclean lips. What separates us from them is simply repentance. Our exaltation, after all, is simply to rule with Christ. It is His kingdom we seek, His glory that we pursue. And all these things will be added unto us.

Posted in abortion, apologetics, Big Eva, church, communion, creation, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

All Quiet; Ask RC- Could There Be Sin in Heaven?

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, appeal, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, eschatology, Jesus Changes Everything, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on All Quiet; Ask RC- Could There Be Sin in Heaven?

What is incense for and why do Protestants not use it?

The use of incense by God’s people goes at least as far back as the sacrificial system established by God for the nation of Israel. The incense symbolized the sweet aroma of the prayers of God’s people rising up into heaven, which prayers were a delight to God. This same practice and symbolism was a part of the church at least up to the time of the Reformation.

Calvin and those who followed him took the position that the use of incense was a part of the Old Testament ceremonial law, and thus should not be allowed. The book of Hebrews explains how the Old Testament sacrificial system was a shadow, a type, and Christ the reality or anti-type. To go back to the shadow is to implicitly deny that Christ has come once for all. As Paul warned the Hebrews against going back to the shadows, so Calvin warned Protestants against going back.

The English Reformation eventually birthed the Puritans whose desire it was to purify the church of the remains of Roman theology and worship. They vehemently rejected the use of incense, and eventually exercised influence beyond the Church of England. As such most, but not all, Protestant churches reject the use of incense.

While I understand the reasoning of Calvin, the Puritans and those who follow after them I take a different perspective. It is absolutely right and proper that we should never go back to a sacrificial system that pointed us toward the finished work of Christ. His work is finished, and there is no reason for going back. That said, we ought not to reject everything that was established in the Old Covenant. The Psalms were sung in the Old Covenant, but we certainly may and I would argue should still sing them today. God’s people gathered in the Old Covenant, and we do not deny the coming of Christ by gathering together in the New Covenant. We should have a deep fear of reinstituting Old Covenant sacrifice, but not be afraid to repeat any and everything they might have done.

They, and we, for instance, pray. What is it, I wonder, about the glorious reality of the finished work of Christ, that is implicitly denied by continuing to symbolize our prayers ascending in the incense? We still pray. God still delights to hear our prayers. We can be confident that they are indeed still a sweet aroma to Him. So why not the incense?

We ought to reject what became Rome’s false gospel. We ought to reject man-made additions and sundry forms of strange fire. We ought to reject sacrifices. I cannot see, however, how all of these truths mean we may no longer use incense in worship. Indeed I would suggest that if and as we use incense we remember that the faith did not begin with us, with the Puritans, with Calvin, not even with the New Covenant. We remember that we are a part of the one people of God that stretches all the way back to the Garden. That in turn is not just a sweet aroma to God, but a sweet aroma to us as well.

Posted in Ask RC, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, prayer, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on What is incense for and why do Protestants not use it?