ABCs of Theology Study Tonight

Tonight, 7 eastern, we continue our ABCs of Theology Study, looking at V is for Vim, Vigor and Vitality. All are welcome in our home or on FB live, RC-Lisa Sproul. We pray you’ll join us.

Posted in ABCs of Theology, announcements, Bible Study, church, Facebook Live, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on ABCs of Theology Study Tonight

Why are we so awful to people on social media?

First, because we are so awful to people. We are so awful to people because we are awful people. Technology does not create fresh wickedness in us. It can, however, invite our wickedness out to play. There is something about social media that seems to encourage the worst in us.

Some suggest that it is the social distance. We say things about and to others that we would never say about and to their faces. There is the blessing of shame when we are actually in the presence of others. This is one reason why pornography consumption has skyrocketed since the advent of the internet. Now you can get to it without having to look in the face of the clerk who knows how you’ll be using it.

Some suggest that it is the lack of non-verbal communication that would otherwise help to soften our discourse. Emojis are not up to the task of filling in that gap. In addition, when you are limited to 280 characters it’s tough to wrap your criticism in encouraging words. That in turn can create a response not smothered in grace and the flame war begins.

Some suggest the issue is the ease of reply. When I was a younger man and I got angry with someone and wanted to communicate it to them I had to first find paper and a pen. I had to write. Then I had to find an envelope, a stamp, and the address to send it. By then my jets had usually cooled. Now we can send off our thoughts before they’re even formulated.

While these suggestions have something to do with the problem, I believe they miss what may be the most important point. Social media, in contrast to email or discussion boards, come equipped with voting mechanisms. Shares, likes, re-tweets all feed us where we are often most hungry, in the ego. Every post becomes a referendum not just on the issue we post about but on us.

It’s not enough that I tell those closest to me about my disappointment with someone. Now I have to tell the whole world. It’s not enough that I tell the whole world about my disappointment with someone. I have to get them to share my disappointment. Which means I have to paint that someone not just as someone who let me down, but as someone the whole world needs to be warned about. I have to make this person out as a monster so your need to virtue-signal meshes with my need for social media approval. Soon enough I see myself as the heroic crusader against this movement, that person, or this other sin.

Here’s the tweet-sized version. We’re awful to each other on social media because we’re awful. We’re awful because we’re prideful, and, like our first parents, are not satisfied in Him. The solution is humility and rejoicing in all that we have in Christ. Moral indignation, more often than not, is just the veneer under which we try to hide our pride. But it always shines right through.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | 1 Comment

Sacred Marriage, For Richer or For Poorer; Bible in 5 Minutes, Acts

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage, For Richer or For Poorer; Bible in 5 Minutes, Acts

A Matter of Life and Death

We live in strange times. It used to be said that the only two things we could be certain of were death and taxes. Taxes you can still be pretty sure of, but death has recently become rather more cloudy. With the advent of assorted technological wonders in the field of medicine we can watch as a patient’s heart continues to beat, but whose brain shows no activity. With the advent of widespread organ transplants we are all the more eager to say of the donor that he or she is dead in one sense, while keeping him or her “alive” in another for as long as we can. Add to this the strange reports we read from those who claim to have “died” but who have “returned.” They claim to have been dead enough to have been embraced by the light, but nevertheless they walk among us. Death has become for us more like dusk than that dark night.

There are, however, limits to this lack of clarity. While dusk seeks to evade the question, is it night or is it day, we do know that midnight is night, and noon is day. And while the comatose, brainwaveless, but still breathing patient may confuse us, we know that the nurses who tend to the patient are alive, and the bodies that have been in cold storage for days down in the morgue are dead. That the bridge across the chasm is shrouded in fog doesn’t change the reality that there are two distinct mountains.

It’s important for us to understand this truth, to not be drawn into the beard fallacy (where one argues that the removal of one, then another, then another whisker will provide no definitive moment from beard to non-beard.) It’s important because central to our faith is this conviction, Jesus died. We are not affirming that the brain wave monitor went blank for a while. We’re not arguing that the Roman medical authorities broke their own rules and continued administering CPR for over half an hour. Jesus was all the way dead, midnight dead.

It may be so that we would know that the God ordained the course of this time. God ordained that the Messiah should hang from a tree before anyone had ever heard of crucifixion. We now know what crucifixion does to a person, the slow suffocation that makes the nails seem like kid’s play. God ordained that Jesus would be pierced on His side. We see there the water and the blood flowing out, a sign of a burst heart, both literally and figuratively. And then three days in the ground. That is the one that has always puzzled me. God didn’t need three days to put Jesus back together again, any more than He needed six days to make the universe and all that is in it. It doesn’t take three days for God to muster the strength for such a miracle. But it might take three days to prove that the resurrection was a miracle, to make us see that this death was not just dusk, but midnight dark.

Paul tells us in “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins” (I Corinthians 15: 17). If there is no resurrection, our faith is vanity. And if there is no death, there can be no resurrection. The death of Christ, and the resurrection of Christ are inescapably bound together. You cannot have one without the other, and you have no Christianity without both. Our faith is a historical faith, grounded not in our own efforts, not in the mystical powers of an object-less faith, but in historical events. We have peace with God because of what we believe about events that happened on a particular hill, and in a particular tomb outside Jerusalem two thousand years ago.

We affirm first, contra the ancient docetists and their modern heirs, that Jesus was born a man. To die one must first be alive. Jesus was no ghost, no phantom who only appeared as a man. Second we affirm that this Jesus lived not only in complete obedience to the law of God, but that He did so in history and in full view of His enemies who could lay no charge against Him. Next we affirm that this Jesus wrought miracles in particular places, and for historical people. The water was truly water, and it became truly wine. Jesus even brought life from death, most dramatically in the life of Lazarus, dead four days, decomposing, and not merely flat-lined for a moment. And then He, who had the power of life in Him, died, laying down His life for the sheep. He did not swoon. He did not fall into a coma. He died. There was only darkness.

He did not, however, stay dead. Three days later this same Jesus, to be sure with His body now glorified, one that was in one sense continuous with His old body, but in another very different, threw off the bonds of death, and emerged as the first fruit of the new creation. It was not that hope was raised, as too many unbelieving liberal wolves will proclaim on Resurrection Sunday. It was not some sort of spirit body as gnostics both ancient and modern have claimed. As Thomas discovered, it was an altogether human body, once dead, but now alive.

These historical truths also have theological meaning. The life He lived He lived vicariously for His elect. He obeyed so that we might have His righteousness. And He died for our sins, taking upon Himself the wrath of the Father for us. He was raised in vindication, to prove His own innocence, and to begin the new creation, to ascend on high to put everything under His feet. When that work is complete, this same Jesus, with this same glorified body, will return to consummate His kingdom. The theological meaning not only does not undo the historical reality, but requires the historical reality to even have meaning. This is the light of resurrection morning, a light so brilliant as to be unmistakable.

A Jesus who did not die, a Jesus who was not raised, such is a Jesus that cannot save. Such is a Jesus that is foreign to the inerrant Word of God. To negotiate with these truths is to negotiate with our own souls, with our own eternity. And such is neither right, nor safe. Christ has died. Christ is risen. Christ will come again. Here we stand. We can do no other.

Posted in apologetics, Apostles' Creed, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Matter of Life and Death

Be Careful Little Children What You Hear

There is a steep penalty to pay for our steeply declining level of discourse. As a culture we have grown radically more emotive and radically less thoughtful. We communicate in 280 characters, through memes, with the broad brushed strokes of the hurried and the harried. Nobody has time to listen. Check that, nobody takes the time to listen. We disparage nuance and then wonder why everything feels as well formed as a boulder.

Here are just a few examples I’ve had to live through in the past few weeks. I wrote, “It’s possible that X.” I got angry pushback saying, “How dare you say X.” I didn’t dare. I didn’t say X. I said X was possible. If, when I say “It’s possible that X” I should expect people to hear me say “X” then communication is virtually impossible. I know it’s possible for me to miss-speak, miss-write, miscommunicate. But I also know it’s possible for me to miss-listen, miss-read, miscommunicate.

Second, I wrote, “X is like Y in that both demonstrate Z.” I got angry pushback saying, “How dare you say X and Y are the same.” I didn’t dare. I didn’t say X and Y are the same. I said that have this in common, they both demonstrate Z. To draw a parallel is not to equate two differing things. I’m sorry I have to say that. That is, it saddens me that people don’t know this. That, however, is where we are. We think words, if they have any shape at all, are hopelessly muddy and amorphous, that they can be shaped into anything at all.

I’m perfectly willing to concede that words are not as laser focused and precise as numbers. But they do have meaning. Think I’m wrong? If they don’t, a. you can’t even know what it is you’re disagreeing with and b. you can’t even communicate your disagreement. We’ve all heard the old saw, when appealing to the Bible in an argument, “Well, you can make the Bible say anything you want it to.” No, you can’t. You can misunderstand the Bible in an infinite number of ways. You can only understand it rightly in one.

There are rules for how we understand words. These rules involve definitions and grammar. That schools no longer teach these things, either because they’re too boring and difficult or because such is too western and “white” doesn’t make it not so. Grammar doesn’t go away when you ignore it. Instead it turns conversation into the wild, wild west.

Postmodernism holds that all language is about wielding power. There is, however, no greater power than imposing what we want to hear over what was actually said. If I can make you mean whatever I wish I can make you say whatever I wish, and in turn, blame you for what I wished you to mean. And there’s not a thing you can do, or say about it.

In our day we must not only guard our tongues but our ears.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, creation, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, on writing well, persecution, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Be Careful Little Children What You Hear

Preach the Kingdom; The Shepherd’s College; Forever Friend, Brian Drevets

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, friends, friendship, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Preach the Kingdom; The Shepherd’s College; Forever Friend, Brian Drevets

Where are we evangelicals “wrong” on the Bible?

The evangelical position on the Bible, that it is inspired, inerrant, and infallible, true in all that it teaches is true, from top to bottom. Our orthodoxy (right doctrine) on the Bible is orthodox. It is our orthopraxy (right practice) where we fail. Here then are several ways we in this camp tend to practice wrongly what we rightly confess.

First, we tend to believe the whole Bible is not for us. The great bulk of evangelicals are haunted by the spirit of Marcion. Marcion was an ancient heretic who wanted to excise from the Bible the mean and nasty God of the Old Testament. We, thankfully, do not go that far. We simply ignore the Old Testament, seeing it as a helpful collection of religious stories that, when it embarrasses us, can be safely swept away.

Second, we tend to see the Bible as a religious book from which we should glean our religious convictions. We miss that the Bible gives us true history. We might stand firm on Adam and Eve, on the flood (or we might not) but we miss that Adam and Eve were real human beings, just like you and me. That Abraham woke up grumpy some mornings, and might have had bad breath. We look at the people in the Bible as characters in a story that matters to us, rather than our ancestors, our actual family.

Third, we tend to see the law of God as simply sage counsel on how to be more nice to people. “Be nice” is the cardinal law to the evangelical. Our sermons thus reduce down to- “Here’s a story from the Bible. Here’s a story I found in a sermon illustration book. Here’s your application- don’t be the mean person, be the nice person.” Now I’m all in favor of being nice, when we’re supposed to be nice. But God’s law is so much broader, richer, even so much more nuanced than “Be nice.”

Fourth, we tend to see the Bible as a map to heaven. The Bible most assuredly tells us how to have peace with God. We are to repent of our sins and trust in the finished work of Christ on our behalf. It’s a good thing, a vital thing to grasp that He died for us, our sins imputed to Him on Calvary, and that He lived for us, His righteousness imputed to us. But we are not the center of the story. He is. The Bible is the story of Jesus Christ, the second Adam, bringing all things under subjection, and must be understood that way. The Bible is not just a mine from which we pull out proof texts for our systematic theologies. It is the true story of the victory of our King.

Finally, we tend to see the Bible as an aid to our piety. It is that, to be certain. But it is not a devotional. It is that by which we, His bride, are washed and purified. It is the message from the Maker of heaven and earth. It is not just to be affirmed but cherished, fed upon, breathed in, and lived out. May He give us the grace to do so.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Where are we evangelicals “wrong” on the Bible?

Atin-Lay, Credo ut intelligam; Appeal; Parable of the Fig Tree

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, appeal, Atin-Lay, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Latin Theological Terms, parables, philosophy, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Atin-Lay, Credo ut intelligam; Appeal; Parable of the Fig Tree

The Institute for the Obvious

If you find yourself in a grand quandary, chances are you are missing the obvious. No, I don’t mean that all difficult questions come equipped with easy answers. The point isn’t that every complex question can only be reached through muddling up simple questions. Instead what I mean is that most of the time we spend on real brain teasers would be better spent on kid’s play. Children, as a rule, don’t feel the need to understand the reasoning behind a rule. They only need to know the authority of the one making the rule. We are His children, and His reasoning is always perfect.

Consider the Christian and the homosexual lobby. We feel flummoxed, off-balance, precisely because it seems as if embracing what the Bible says on this issue will mean that the broader culture will hate us, be mean to us. It will mean being seen as hopelessly ignorant, behind the times and mean. Surely, we reason, there must be a way to look at this issue that will allow us to affirm our commitment to God’s authority while steering clear of the hatred of the world. I mean, how are we supposed to win the world to Christ if they hate us?

The reason we find the issue complicated is because we’ve already rejected the wisdom of God. He told us, over and over again, that loyalty to Him will mean the hatred of the world. He told us, not once, not ever, that the way to win the world to Him is to be sure we’re liked by the world. He told us, over and over again, that His Word is not only true but clear. He told us, not once, not ever, that God’s judgment on perversion is a thing of the past. To put it another way, when it comes to faithfully following Jesus, the hatred of the world is not a bug but a feature.

My point here isn’t to make yet another argument against the homosexual lobby. Rather my point is about we believers and our propensity to miss that which is clear and simple because we carry unbiblical and selfish presuppositions along for the ride. We deny the perversion of perversion because we’ve already perversely denied that we’re to be hated by the world.

If you’re thinking too hard, you’re trying too hard. Go back to the beginning and do the simple things. Not only is Jesus’ yoke easy and His burden light, but you don’t need a Ph.D. to know how to carry it. It is light because we don’t carry the burden of figuring it all out. It is easy because it calls us to simply trust Him, the one trustworthy being in all the universe. Trust Him. Give up on the dream of being loved by the world. Rejoice and give thanks when you are hated for His name’s sake. It’s simple.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Institute for the Obvious

The Gospel at Work, Robert Wolgemuth

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Books, friends, interview, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Gospel at Work, Robert Wolgemuth