Too Easily Distracted, Too Easily Satisfied

We live in a world where work gets done tomorrow. All deadlines must be flexible, negotiable in our day, lest we have no deadlines at all. Excellence has gone the way of the dodo. We are, in the words of one unwise son of a wise father, “addicted to mediocrity.”

There are two raging rivers, culturally speaking, that converge to form the lazy river of mediocrity. First, we do not know the excellent. Goodness, truth, and beauty, as the great triad of virtues, are so much more demanding, not simply to create, but to even enjoy, than okay-ness, funny-ness and pretty-ness.

Entering into that towering poem The Wasteland by T.S. Elliot requires of us a higher aesthetic than we have obtained. It requires a greater familiarity with that which was great in the past than we are willing to acquire. It requires training and work. To enter the more familiar wasteland of our culture all you need is a remote control.

To put it another way, one of our great problems as we receive culture is that we are too easily satisfied, too easily entertained. We get mediocrity in large part because that is what we ask for. Ninety-eight percent of us in the past year consumed a “meal” at McDonalds, not because we were reaching higher, but because it would do.

The second great river at the source of mediocrity is one that precedes our particular culture. It is a problem, a weakness, a sin that has been with us since Adam first led Eve east of Eden. The problem is sloth. The medieval theologians, when compiling the list of what would come to be known as “The Seven Deadly Sins” included in their list things we might expect, like lust, or even gluttony. But sloth? Where did that come from? How did it make the list?

The list had two fundamental criteria. First, the list would include those sins that are most apt to beset most of us. It is almost certainly a sin to smash your car up with a sledge hammer. Not many of us, however, fight desperately against that temptation. Lust, gluttony, and sloth, however, have wide appeal. The second criteria, however, is that these sins were believed to be root sins, sins that were apt to sprout still more sins. It may be that sloth is what gives rise, for instance, to theft.

That list, we must remember, was concocted during the Middle Ages. Things moved pretty slowly then. Surely the same warning wouldn’t apply to us. We live in America, home of the Puritan work ethic. We have smart phones and tablets so we can carry our work around with us wherever we go. We put in long hours so that we might climb the corporate ladder. We burn the midnight oil and the candle at both ends. How can sloth get a toe-hold on us? Because there is a great chasm that separates feeling busy with being busy, and an even greater chasm between being busy and working hard.

We feel busy because we schedule too much stuff. If I can’t miss my weekly golf game, my monthly poker night, my five favorite television programs, the Braves game, and a little “me time” here or there, I will surely feel busy. The trouble is, I feel busy because work creeps into my insatiable demand for play time. But even if that doesn’t describe me, if I am busy checking my social media, looking up the stock indexes, going to meetings and scheduling things on my app, I still haven’t actually produced anything. Work means getting real things done that actually help people. And that is a far greater challenge than being busy.

It has been said that any given job can be done with two of three qualities. It can be done quickly and cheaply, but not well. It can be done quickly and well, but not cheaply. It can be done cheaply and well, but not quickly. We have, as a culture, chosen quickly and cheaply. And having chosen thus, we find ourselves diminished, for we find that we like it that way. We find that we are not merely willing to accept mediocrity, but that we crave it.

The Bible offers a different call. We are to do our work “as unto the Lord.” We should be known by the world around us as the most diligent of laborers and craftsmen. We ought also, however, be known as those with the most discriminating tastes. For we are to seek out those things that reflect the Lord, that show forth His glory.

We are to surround ourselves with “whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things” (Phil. 4:8). May our work and our play be suffused with excellence, that our Maker’s name might be praised.

Posted in beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, music, on writing well, poetry, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, wisdom, wonder, work | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

These Are the Days of Our Lives; Another World

Dear Bob,

What do you suppose that John means when he tells us, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit “Do not love the world, or the things of the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him” (I John 2:15)? Does that passage frighten you? It does me. I’m pretty sure he’s not talking about the planet, you know? It’s not like the really spiritual people think, “Gee, if only we could get to Pluto.” And I don’t think it’s the creation either. To admire a mountain range or a sunset should not damage your assurance. It’s smaller than both those things, but bigger, I think, than we think.

Most of us try to salve our consciences here by imagining the most depraved things that the world has to offer. Worldly is the man who gets excited about walking down Bourbon Street in New Orleans. Or Jeffrey Epstein. As with all our Christian lives, we figure if we can avoid the really big sins, then we’re probably doing alright. And if we don’t avoid them, there’s the grace of God. We treat the gospel like some safety net there to catch us, in case we do any of the bad sins, the worldly ones.

But it’s bigger than that. We love the world Bob when we are comfortable in it, when we think like the world thinks, when we act like the world acts. Whether we are failing to love our wives because we’re off somewhere with our secretary, or if we’re just too busy with softball and work, and tinkering with the ‘65 Mustang, either way we love the world.

The world, that is the world that John is talking about, is under the spell of the devil. It’s not some neutral benign thing out there. It’s a tarbaby, and designed that way. Drinking in the world is like drinking from the ocean; it just makes you more thirsty. The difference is that the world tastes good.

I’m not saying you should just sit and meditate. There’s another world out there besides the one we’re supposed to hate. That’s the world that God said we are to exercise dominion over. I’m not against culture; I’m against our decadent culture. Making music, making art, growing flowers and vegetables, building chicken coops, these are good things. It may even be a good thing to take back a ‘65 Mustang and undo the ravages of our sinful world.

Here’s a clue as to the differences in these worlds. Ours says to build, to create. Theirs says to watch. Ours looks to God in thanks; theirs seeks to glorify man. Remember, it’s not only important to understand what you’re against, but also what you are for.

The Christian faith is counter-cultural. It is the work of making visible the invisible kingdom of God. It’s more than witnessing to your neighbor. More than bowing for prayer in a restaurant. It is building homes, mixing chemicals, designing pill bottles, changing diapers. It’s all glorious work, because it seeks to show forth the glory of God.

Remember that we do not battle with flesh and blood. And the culture is one arena of the battle, a battle going back to the Garden. And I pray that as you begin to build God’s culture you’ll find that the world has lost its appeal. It’s nothing but a Potemkin village constructed of wood, hay and stubble, and destined for the fire that never dies.

RCJR

Posted in abortion, Biblical Doctrines, creation, eschatology, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, work | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

As Promised, This Week’s Hosea Study

Posted in 10 Commandments, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Last week’s Hosea study. This week’s hot on its heels…

Posted in 10 Commandments, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Spiritual Mothering II; Trump, Tariffs, & Trade; Plus More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Reformation Doctrine of A Catholic Love

“I know I have to love him, but I don’t have to like him.” There’s something to this, well, rationalization. That is, it contains both truth and rationalization. Our call to love one another doesn’t mean we can’t have some friends closer than others. That we can’t choose to spend more time with our friends than others. It doesn’t mean we won’t find ourselves in Paul, Barnabas and John Mark situations.

That said, it’s quite easy to confuse a refusal to murder those we are commanded to love as acting in love. Love for the brethren may not flatten our affections out. It means, however, significantly more than merely steering clear and leaving them alone.

In the broader church we have our various and sundry tribes. Sometimes those tribes are marked by theological differences on secondary and tertiary matters. Sometimes they are marked by more subtle differences in subcultures. That ornithological creatures of similar plumage tend to congregate in close proximity isn’t anything to be ashamed of. But when we are honest we have to admit we take it too far. If there would be Reformation in our day, that needs to change.

Which is why the loss of privilege, the increasing cultural hostility toward the Christian faith may be a great blessing. I’ve served the church under deep persecution, in a nation under martial law, where Christians are a small and despised minority. I found that they were sustained by involved arguments over whether infralapsarianism or supralapsarianism represented a more biblical view. No, that wasn’t it. I found the heat of persecution softened them toward each other. Persecution fulfilled its good office of making the true church a melting pot. It burned off the dross of the divisive. Perhaps this is what God has in store for us in our day.

That means the church down the road, where they are stiff and have all sorts of cultural rules, and your church, are family. Your church, doctrinally imprecise, loose, embracing many of the culture’s mores, is family to the uptight church down the road. Charismatics and Presbyterians, Baptists and non-denoms, Lutherans and the Reformed, we’re all in this together. We’re all bought with a price. We all have the same elder brother, Jesus who died not just for our sins but for our quirks and foibles. Jesus, who died for our brothers just as much as He died for us, who loves “them” just as much as He loves “us.”

We must stop putting up with our brothers and start lifting them up, stop begrudgingly admitting we’re related, more eagerly embracing them as beloved kin. Reformation of the church happens as we are re-formed, not separated shocks of wheat out in the fields, but one loaf, the body of Christ.

Posted in "race", Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Continuing Study Tonight: Hosea- The Bride Wore Red

Tonight we continue our study exploring God’s book of Hosea. As always, all are welcome in our home for dinner at 6:15 eastern, and the study begins at 7:00. In addition, we will livestream on Facebook Live, RC-Lisa Sproul, and eventually post said livestream right in this cyber space. One way or the other, we hope you’ll join us, as we will feed upon the Word of God.

Posted in RC Sproul JR | Leave a comment

Should women be allowed to serve the sacrament of communion?

Symbols can be tricky things. They are often a great help to us, communicating difficult to express truths in difficult to forget ways. They can, however, get a touch uppity from time to time. Sometimes the symbol loses all sense of proportion and thinks itself more important than the thing symbolized. Remember that the children of Israel thought themselves safe, chanting “The Temple of the Lord, the Temple of the Lord.” The temple should have been a symbolic reminder of God’s presence with His people. But once the people looked to the temple, rather than God Himself, trouble was coming and quick.

The Bible doesn’t tell us who ought to serve communion. Churches have elders serve to connect symbolically their call to guard the table, with the service of the table. The elders are called to determine if the claim to faith made by those under their care is legitimate. If a man is living in gross and unrepentant sin, and claims to be a Christian, it is the job of the elders to say to that man, and to the church, “This man, until he repents, does not look to us to be a Christian. Therefore he is not welcome at the Lord’s Table.”

It is good and appropriate then, to connect the office of the elder with the Table of our Lord. If elders are serving the sacrament, then of course women should not serve the sacrament, not because of the sacrament, but because women are not to be elders. That is, if you are in a church with women elders, the trouble isn’t that a woman is handing you the body and the blood. The problem is that a woman is ruling in the church, something not just symbolically wrong, but forbidden by the plain language of Scripture (I Timothy 2:12).

On the other hand, if a given church is unconcerned about connecting the call of elders to guard the flock with the call of elders to guard the table, it is not such a big issue. God never said, “Though shalt not receive the tray from a woman, unless she is the woman sitting beside you in the pew.” There are some wings of the evangelical church that are just flat uncomfortable with the symbols God Himself gave us. What is so interesting to watch is how man’s symbols always sneak in to fill the void.

Some churches celebrate the sacrament only once a year. Every week, however, they have an altar call. Every week they call on the lost to repent, and the found to repent and recommit. Which is just what is happening when we come forward to the table. The Lord’s Table the Lord commanded. The altar call He did not. These same kinds of churches are often uncomfortable with the clear lines of authority God has established with deacons and elders. So instead they begin worrying about whether so and so’s walk is good enough for him or her to be on the praise team. Or serve as a Sunday School teacher, as if these are offices in the church.

“Serving communion” is neither an office, nor a calling in the church, according to God’s Word. Would the symbolism be more fitting for a man to serve? Perhaps. Would it be more fitting for an elder to serve? Almost certainly. Is it fitting to judge one another on our differing guesses about what is fitting and what is not? Of course not. Instead let us encourage one another to submit to all that God commands. In short, in essentials unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, charity.

This is the thirty-first installment of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more. Remember also that we at Sovereign Grace Fellowship meet this Sunday February 9 at 10:30 AM at our new location, at our beautiful farm at 112811 Garman Road, Spencerville, IN. Please come join us.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, RC Sproul JR, worship | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Evangelizing, Amidst the Ruins, Our Barbarian Hordes

Our strategies are often rather far from God’s strategies. Indeed, the simple fact that we sit down to strategize may be a sure sign that we are far from God’s chosen path. We are plotters and planners, who believe that the only way to get to place “z” is to work our way first from “a” through “y.” We want a road map and then a machine to take us where we think we are going. We put one foot in front of the other, and too often find ourselves trodden underfoot.

We have embraced the gradualism of both the Enlightenment and of the Marxists. We think history moves forward with all the speed and deliberation of an amoeba growing into a fish. We think the way to build the kingdom of God is like the Colorado River etching away for age after age until the canyon has become grand. That we make known His reign through the long march through the institutions. But the kingdom of God not only is taken by violence, but can grow in violent paroxysms of His providence. It’s happened before, and it will happen again.

B. K. Kuiper, in his fine work The Church in History, tells us, “Jerome was sitting in his cave in Bethlehem, writing his Commentary on the Prophecies of Ezekiel, when he heard the news [of the fall of Rome to the Goths in 410]. He was overwhelmed with anguish and consternation. He believed that the antichrist was at hand. He said: ‘The world is rushing to ruin. The glorious city, the capital of the Roman Empire, has been swallowed up in one conflagration. Churches once hallowed have sunk into ashes.’ ”

The Goths weren’t the last to tread upon the city of Rome, nor was Rome the lone city to feel the wrath of the barbarians. It was less than one hundred years after Constantine “converted” the Roman Empire, and the glory that was Rome became nothing but rubble. The Goths were joined by Vandals, Ostrogoths, Visigoths and Huns. Barbarian horde after barbarian horde swept over Europe, and began the “Dark Ages.”

Culturally speaking, we had moved into houses we did not build. We had drunk from wells we did not dig. We feasted on vineyards we did not plant. Constantine had led us to a short-cut to the city of God, and God Himself destroyed it all. For what possible reason? For His glory, and for the good of His people.

God brought the barbarians to the Christians for one great purpose, that they, the barbarians, might hear the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What we consider calamity was, from a more biblical perspective, the Gentiles coming into the kingdom. What we consider defeat and destruction God meant as bringing His elect in from the four corners of the earth. For while the barbarians conquered the western world, Jesus conquered the barbarians. The good news of the kingdom of Jesus spread through sundry barbarian camps with all the speed of barbarians sacking a city.

Like Augustine and Jerome before us, we are watching yet another twilight of Western civilization. We live amidst a new barbarism. In Europe today once great cathedrals stand nearly empty each Lord’s Day for want of a congregation. Sodomites parade their perversion down our city streets. Entire neighborhoods are controlled by modern barbarians, thugs selling pharmaceutical bread and circuses.

God’s name cannot be mentioned in the lower halls of learning. Our children grow up learning that they are the accidental by-product of time and chance. A bankrupt government sponsors “art” comprised of a crucifix in a jar of urine and dung besmirching the mother of Jesus. And in the midst of our neat and tidy cities, on this day twenty-five hundred mothers will murder their babies, all out in the open.

Does this mean then that we have a long row to hoe? Must we first join forces with the enemies of Christ who share with us a disgust of our cultural decline? Do we work first to build a society of decency? Is it our project to gain control of the institutions of learning or to grasp the engine of political power so that we can begin to turn, inch by inch, this listing ship? Should we boycott and protest our way to a G-rated culture to set the stage for some distant Gospel campaign?

No, the barbarians have been let inside the gate so that we can now tell them about Jesus. The barbarians have toppled and conquered our world so that we might proclaim the Gospel of the kingdom of Christ. The barbarians have come to teach us to toss our petty stratagems and to give up our hope in princes, so that we “the civilized” might rest upon and serve alone our great king.

When trouble comes, it is not difficult to hear the Master’s voice. He is telling us what He is always telling us, “Repent, and believe the Gospel.” Perhaps were we to obey Him, then we might next not only repent and believe, but proclaim the Gospel. And our enemies, the children of darkness, might be brought into His glorious light. Then the violent just might take heaven by storm. This, after all, is what happened with us. We were strangers, foreigners, barbarians, but now we are the people of God, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, as long as we know where our citizenship is.

Posted in abortion, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, eschatology, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, politics, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Stubborn Hearts: Biting the Hand That Feeds Us

You know the drill. Small child asks for eggs for breakfast, scrambled, with cheese. You happily prepare just that for the child. Said child sits for a bit looking at the eggs, then gets down from the table. You ask the child to sit down and eat, and the child sits down, not at the table, but on the floor. The child begins to whine, refuses to get up. “I don’t want to sit there. I don’t like scrambled eggs with cheese.”

You are baffled. You not only didn’t start this battle of the wills, you want no part in it. You just wanted to make a good breakfast. But the child is intent on doing the wrong thing, not because it’s fun, not because it tastes good, but because it’s wrong. We’re not talking about a hardened teenager but a little child. Where in the world does this kind of nonsense come from? From us.

One of the problems with our typical misunderstanding of God’s law, that He is testing our loyalty to Him, that He wants to rob us of pleasure, is that it casts a blasphemous shadow on His character. He’s not a stingy narcissist. He is a loving Father. His law is good, good for us, the very pathway to joy. This backward view of the law, however, also misses the pure folly of our own sinful inclinations.

We sin not merely because we lack the self-control to say “no” to whatever pleasure is put before us, but because we’d rather do the wrong thing. Like the child slouched on the floor refusing to eat breakfast, we are empty, and not having any fun. We stubbornly cling to our disobedience as if it were a table laden with delicious delicacies. We trade beauty for ashes.

This reality is captured most poignantly by Augustine in his Confessions. There he waxes eloquent about a time he and his peers raided a man’s pear orchard, loading up on the stolen fruit. The punchline comes when Augustine confesses that he didn’t even like pears.

The good news is that our Father is bigger than our folly. Yes, we are called to acknowledge our sin. We are called to sorrow over our sin. But just as much as He delights to give us His wise law, He delights to give us His good grace for our rebellion against it, when we repent. The good news is not only that He forgives us when we repent, but that He blesses us with the very repentance we need. He makes it all better.

Our childish rebellion may be one reason why we can only enter into the kingdom as children (Matt. 18:3). We have to acknowledge our own inability to fix ourselves, our absolute dependence on Him. We have to hold up our little child arms, asking Him to take us up into His arms. And so He delights to do.

May the Spirit indwelling us lead us to put aside our senseless rebellion. May He teach us to trust our heavenly Father. And may the Holy Spirit continue to show us more each day how to rest in our elder brother.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments