Sacred Marriage; Immaculate Reception; Revivalism & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Nostalgia, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sport | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Back Up: Rethinking Rebukes From a Friend

It is because we are saved by grace that we sinners are able to confess publicly that we are sinners. It is because we are sinners, however, that we are so quick to get defensive any time someone accuses us of a specific sin. Why the disconnect? Because being a sinner is a condition, a universal condition, an oddly antiseptic descriptor of humanity. Sinning, however, that requires acknowledging that we have done wrong. And we can’t have that.

Years ago I wrote a brief piece wherein I argued that practicing a particular voting strategy was a sin. A friend replied to my piece with an argument and a judgment. The argument was simple enough- unless I was prepared to quote chapter and verse, to provide a proof-text, I had no business calling said strategy a sin. The judgment was this- that my piece was wrong, uncaring, harsh, judgmental, reprehensible and not so good at all. Happily, he refrained from calling my piece sin, lacking a proof-text and all.

That was when I first learned of our aversion to call sin sin, especially when it is directed at us. Sin is vile, cosmic rebellion, worthy of God’s eternal judgment. But what it’s not is unusual, rare. While we in one sense of course ought to be ashamed of our sins, we ought also to remember that the only way for them to be covered is if we repent of them. And to do that, we have to acknowledge them. Getting our back up when someone points out a sin, I fear, exposes the all too living Pelagian inside of us. We need to put him to death. We need to own our sin.

Some years ago I received a letter, well, a copy of a letter. An old friend had written my then boss to point out her unhappiness at some of my sins, and was honorable enough to send me a copy as well. Truth be told, it stung. A lot. I went through a long list of replies I wanted to give. I wanted to object that her characterization of me was unfair, dated, unbalanced.

As the sting remained I begin to wonder over why it hurt so bad. The answer was staring me in the face- it’s because the accusations were true. Specifically she faulted me for a propensity to be flippant and sarcastic. If, to you, that doesn’t sound like me, you must be new here.

The defenses I concocted were true enough- that tone is hard to grasp with mere written words, that she was hearing me through ears that knew me better when I was younger, that sarcasm has its place, that a well spoken prophetic word can be just a subtle but important shade away from flippancy. All true. Just like the accusation. Better to own the sin, confess the sin, to seek forgiveness. After all, the man who defends himself has a fool for a client.

What, after all, are we afraid of? My heavenly Father loves me. He forgives me. His love and forgiveness are immutable. They do not ebb and flow based on my obedience in a given day. Rather they are built upon the Rock of His Son’s perfect life and sacrifice. I can own my sin, because He owned my sin. It must be my reputation with others I’m trying to protect. It must be their approval I fear losing. That sounds like me, a sinner. Better, by His grace, to back down.

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, friends, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

New Study Begins Tonight, Truth You Can Count On

Before Christmas we finished a six-part series on our call to be as children. For more on that theme, see my book The Call to Wonder. Today, January 19, we begin a new Bible study called Truth You Can Count On. We will explore together the nature of God’s revelation, how our knowing relates to His knowing, how sin has impacted our capacity for understanding, the role of the Holy Spirit in our knowing and more.

Each Monday our study begins at 7:00 PM eastern time. We stream it on Facebook Live (at the account Lisa and I share, RC-Lisa) for those who wish to attend via the interwebs. You can usually also find a link to the week’s study a day or two later right here in this space. We welcome conversation from all in attendance, whatever form it takes. The atmosphere is casual, though the study itself is serious.

Our goal, however, goes well beyond learning. We also want to grow as a community. That’s why each Monday night we are delighted to feed our local guests dinner at 6:15. We enjoy a time of conversation, and typically, a time of prayer after the study has ended. All are welcome to attend. It would, however, be helpful if you’d let us know in advance so we can be sure to have enough food for everyone.

As much as is possible we meet weekly. Occasionally providence dictates otherwise. Such doesn’t mean, however, that if you miss a week we won’t let you come the next week. Come when you can; come when you like. We have some who have attended for years and some newbies. Either way, all are welcome. Please, plan to join us. We think you’ll be glad you did. We’ll certainly be glad to see you.

Posted in announcements, apologetics, assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, RC Sproul JR, theology, wisdom | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What about reparations? Reparations, Guilt and Justice

I’m in favor of reparations. Because the Bible is in favor of them. When God established His nation, when He delivered that law which was to govern His people, He established reparations as the fitting punishment for those who were guilty of theft or negligence. They didn’t call it reparations, but restitution, but the principle is the same.

The thief, or the negligent, had a responsibility to make things right for their victim. One could even argue they were required to go beyond making things right. Sometimes they might have to return twice what was taken, or even more. One thing they never had to do. In that era considered harsh and inhumane by postmoderns, imprisonment was off the table. God’s law provided for no such punishment. There were only two kinds of punishments, restitution, or death.

Long before God told Ezekiel He will not punish children for the sins of fathers, God required that the guilty be punished. That the victim be recompensed not those who are not victims. Which is not to say that the Bible has no room for the concept of corporate guilt.

When Achan took of the accursed things God’s judgment lead to many dying at the battle of Ai. Clearer still Achan’s family was put to death. During the days of the kings it wasn’t at all uncommon for God Himself to pronounce a judgment on a wicked king that he would die and all his children. How do we deal with that? By simply remembering this foundational truth- we are all, in ourselves, because of our own sin, under a death sentence from the living God. Ever soldier at Ai, every family beyond Achan’s, every king, prince and every pauper are all guilty before God.

Which should lead us to this conclusion which is as plain as something remarkably plain- the call for, even assuming we could know who was whom, descendants of slave owners to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves is a cry for injustice. What is stranger still, however, is that any Christian, whomever his ancestors may be, would think it prudent to demand justice. Every last one of us has stolen from others. Every last one of us have treated others at one time or another as property. The very evil that resided in the hearts of slaveowners resided in the hearts of slaves.

Which is why it doesn’t surprise me that the racism that justified slavery (“these Africans are the descendants of Ham and therefore it is right to enslave them”) or even genocide (“these Jews should be put to death because they killed the Messiah”) is at work in the hearts of the descendants of Africans and the descendants of Jews. It’s what we all are. There are two kinds of people in this world- those who think other people are wicked and those who, by His grace, know that we are all other people to other people.

I know of a man who was enslaved. His master was a believer. The slave ran away. He became a believer. The same man led them both to Christ. That man sent the slave back to the master, carrying a letter not demanding reparations, not even demanding that the slave be freed, but rather asking that, in light of their shared liberty in Christ, who paid all that we all owe, he be welcomed not as a slave but as a brother.

And all three of them now live happily ever after. We are all the servants of the One who paid all our debts. We are all His, and each other’s brothers as well. May we cease giving demands and ever more give thanks.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rules For Our Reformation: Learning from Luther

The Protestant Reformation is called the Reformation for a good reason. It is not called the First Reformation or Reformation II, as if they happen every so often. I have never been asked, when referencing the Reformation, “Of which Reformation do you speak?” Renewals? Of course. Revivals? Who could doubt it? There has been only one Reformation, precisely because they are rather hard to come by.

Those of us who long for another, then, might be wise to search out that spark that started the Reformation. Where did it all begin? Was it with Martin Luther’s stirring speech at the Diet of Worms, his firm resolve to stand on the Word of God? Perhaps. Did it start earlier, in Luther’s study, as he exegeted key texts on justification? Maybe. Did it start with his fiery speech before he dropped the papal bull announcing his excommunication into the flames? One could so argue.

Most of us, however, celebrate Reformation Day on October 31, not the anniversary of any of the above but the day Luther nailed the Ninety-five Theses to the door in Wittenberg. That hammer striking the nail ignited the spark that started it all. If we want a new reformation, and such we ought, we should look no further than the very first of those theses, which reads, “When our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said ‘Repent,’ He called for the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.”

If we would find reformation again, we must repent of our failure to live lives of repentance. We will change the world out there when we change the church in here. We will change the church in here when our own hearts are changed. That happens only as we repent and believe the gospel.

One of the great blessings of the Reformation was the destruction of that perspective that cleaves the world in two. Rome divided the world into a spiritual and a natural realm — one good, the other at best neutral. The Reformation carried with it the notion of the priesthood of all believers and the principle that all our lives are lived coram Deo, before the face of God. The Bible became for our fathers the sourcebook for wisdom not just on how to get one’s soul saved but on how to justly govern a culture, how to understand work, how to raise up godly seed.

That creation-affirming spirit drove both the Pilgrims and the Puritans across the ocean to fulfill their errand in the wilderness. In more recent times, heroes of the faith such as Abraham Kuyper and Francis Schaeffer have carried the banner of reformation into broader and broader spheres. For all this blessing we must give thanks. We ought also, however, to be on our guard.

In reaction against the dangers of pietism — the view that suggests that all we ought to be concerned about is our own souls and not the world around us — too many of us have dishonored the blessings of piety. Worse still, we have missed the hard truth that it is piety that drives the engine of reformation. That piety that drives reformation, however, is Reformation piety.

We’ll get nowhere if we seek to change the world by our own spiritual bootstraps. Reformation piety is not a mere commitment not to dance, drink, or chew, and not to date girls that do. No reformation could be built by our own spiritual ardor. Reformation piety breathes the very air of repentance. It sets aside the camel-swallowing, gnat-strangling propensity we have of looking at our own sins through a microscope and at other’s through a magnifying glass. We instead ought to be, as Luther was before us, haunted by our own sin long enough to cry out for the grace of God. And then we believe.

It was, in the end, faith that brought us the Reformation, and only faith will bring us another. We did not change until we learned that we cannot change ourselves. We did not enter into purity until we understood, by His grace, that only His purity would do. That Reformation faith, however, did not end with our own salvation. Neither did it leap from our own salvation to remaking the world. Instead, it moved from saving faith to sanctifying faith, from repenting to believing. Then, all heaven began to break loose.

Jesus said much the same thing. He told us to stop our fretting and worrying about this thing and that. He reminded us that this is how the unbelievers behave. We are called to faith, to seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness. Repenting and believing is the very pathway into the kingdom, the coin of the realm. It is how possess that righteousness that is His rather than our own. When we do this, and stop our incessant worrying and plotting about everything else, it turns out that everything else takes care of itself. All these things are added unto us.

The life of repentance and faith — this must needs be our only “strategy.” Repent and believe, and reformation will follow. Jesus said so. Luther said so. Here we stand. We can do no other. So help us God.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How were people saved in the Old Testament?

The only way there is to be saved, by trusting in the work of Christ alone. Because God is just, sin must be punished. Because we are sinners, that is bad news for us. God’s promise to Adam and Eve, however, was that the Seed of the Woman would have His heel bruised. While He crushes the serpent’s head. God took the man-made coverings our first parents fashioned and gave them animal skins for cover. Thus foreshadowing the need for the shedding of blood by a substitute.

These shadows continued throughout the Old Testament. With each passing generation, however, the shadows of the promise began to recede. The gospel, in its most nascent form, was given in Genesis 3, but it grew in clarity. Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, Joseph’s multiple deaths, burials, “resurrections,” Moses striking the rock pointed to the substitute. The sacrificial system God gave His people made the promise still more clear.

We are all, however, given to confusing the sign with the thing signified. Animal skins did not redeem Adam and Eve. The blood of bulls and goats saved not a soul among the Israelites. Were such sufficient, Christ would not have needed to come. Instead they pointed to the future hope, the future hope that secured redemption for those who believed. The work of Christ that was to come redeemed the saints in the Old Testament. This they appropriated by faith. As we look backward to His finished work for us, and rest in it, so they looked forward to His coming work for them, and rested in it.

For Adam and Eve the object of their faith was that first simple promise. They likely had no deep understanding of what the promise meant, but I believe they believed it was their only hope. For the earlier generations in the Promised Land the object of their faith included a better understanding of what the sacrificial system meant, and they believed it was their only hope. With the prophet Isaiah the meaning of the promise became more clear still, as he described for God’s people the suffering servant who would be bruised for our healing.

There is but one people of God, those covered by the blood of Christ. These became such through the one way to peace with God, resting in the work of Christ. There is but one gospel, the promise of God that He has reconciled us to Himself in pouring out His wrath for us upon Him. As they looked forward through the sacrifices, so we look backward through the table of the Lord. To rest in either would be deadly. To rest in the One each represents is to be at peace with the living God, to be adopted into His family, to eat as His children at His table. There are not two ways into the kingdom, just one.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Biblical theology, church, communion, grace, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Lisa & I on Noah’s Wife; Blindspots & Race; and More

This week’s all new Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, announcements, appeal, Biblical Doctrines, cyberspace, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

And It Came To Pass: The Tapestry of Providence

I was not, as a kid, a particularly gifted athlete. It’s true I enjoyed sports, however, and so my hours were determined by the seasons: football, basketball, baseball. I realized early on that my gifts were limited, while my desire to compete was boundless. My solution- will. I determined to will myself to victory, to be the dog in the fight with the most fight in the dog. The Rocky movies resonated with me. I would take a punch, and come back for more.

That same perspective survived my childhood, and is still with me. But it has matured. I went against Goliaths on the gridiron, faced Apollyon staring me down from the pitcher’s mound, but before the hand of God I have been humbled. My will wilts before His. As one wise theologian has been wont to say, “You have free will. God has free will. Whose will is more free?”

God’s revealed will is found for us in the Bible. He commands, and we are to obey. He forbids, and we are to abstain. His hidden will, however, is unhidden through circumstance. He not only commands what He will, but brings to pass what He will. Pharaoh’s army defied God’s revealed will in chasing after God’s people. But the tumbling walls of the Red Sea defied Pharaoh’s defiance. God won.

He always wins. When the Son of Glory hung in shame upon the cross, He won, just as much as He won when the Son walked into a garden, the firstborn of the new creation. In circumstances that are not going the way we wish, when providence frowns upon us, there is no shadow on Him. Not because He is disconnected, not even because the light will defeat the darkness, but because these are His ordained means.

History, whether as narrowly conceived as how my day is going, or as broadly considered as the rise and fall of nations through all time, is God ultimately moving all the pieces on the chessboard. How such relates to evil is a great mystery. We must never besmirch His character. Neither, however, may we negotiate away His ultimate, absolute control over all things.

We are called to pray both as Jesus taught us, “Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done” which reminds us of our duty to submit to His revealed will, but also as Jesus prayed, “Nevertheless, not My will but Thine be done.” It is here that we remember and rest in His sovereignty, remembering that nothing comes to pass that He does not ordain (Lamentations 3:37).

God brought famine in the land, and Elimelech fled to Moab. Elimelech and his sons went the way of all flesh, leaving behind three widows. Dark providences indeed. But Boaz spied the young woman as she gleaned. Boaz awoke from his slumber on the threshing room floor. But Boaz and Ruth begat a son, who begat a son who begat a son, whose “son” and Lord would be both the Son of David, and the Son of God. Do not lose heart in the dark providences. He brought us from death to life. He will do the same with our lives, in His timing.

Posted in 10 Commandments, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Study Begins Next Week, Monday Jan. 19

Before Christmas we finished a six-part series on our call to be as children. For more on that theme, see my book The Call to Wonder. One week from today, January 19 we will begin a new Bible study called Truth You Can Count On. We will explore together the nature of God’s revelation, how our knowing relates to His knowing, how sin has impacted our capacity for understanding, the role of the Holy Spirit in our knowing and more.

Each Monday our study begins at 7:00 PM eastern time. We stream it on Facebook Live (at the account Lisa and I share, RC-Lisa) for those who wish to attend via the interwebs. You can usually also find a link to the week’s study a day or two later right here in this space. We welcome conversation from all in attendance, whatever form it takes. The atmosphere is casual, though the study itself is serious.

Our goal, however, goes well beyond learning. We also want to grow as a community. That’s why each Monday night we are delighted to feed our local guests dinner at 6:15. We enjoy a time of conversation, and typically, a time of prayer after the study has ended. All are welcome to attend. It would, however, be helpful if you’d let us know in advance so we can be sure to have enough food for everyone.

As much as is possible we meet weekly. Occasionally providence dictates otherwise. Such doesn’t mean, however, that if you miss a week we won’t let you come the next week. Come when you can; come when you like. We have some who have attended for years and some newbies. Either way, all are welcome. Please, plan to join us. We think you’ll be glad you did. We’ll certainly be glad to see you.

Posted in announcements, apologetics, Bible Study, Lisa Sproul, prayer, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Not a Sin, But Not the Ideal: A Cautious Warning

We all are prone to both legalism and antinomianism. When we want to do something God’s law forbids, we become antinomian. If we want someone else to not do what we think they should not, we become legalists. We add to God’s law to try to restrain the other guy.

Eve was the first legalist, even before she ate the fruit. She told the serpent she and Adam were not to eat the fruit, true, but also they were not to touch it. False. God said no such thing. She added to God’s law. One could argue that not touching it would have been wise, but not that it would have been sin.

That distinction, “Doing X is not a sin, but it is unwise” or “Doing X is not a sin, but it’s not ideal” likely has some legitimate applications. Were I to live on a diet of twinkies someone might try to say I am in sin by reminding me that our bodies are the temple of the Holy Spirit (I Corinthians 6: 19-20). That argument, I’d argue, would fall to the ground on the basis of Colossians 2:6. There Paul commands us not to judge one another over what we eat or drink. What we’re left with is unwise, or not ideal but not a sin.

This solution carries with it, however, a bevy of dangers that come along for the ride. Too often, “The Bible doesn’t say X is a sin, but I believe X is unwise” translates to “You are in sin, and I don’t need to demonstrate it from the Bible.” I’ve seen it a hundred times. “I’m not saying it’s a sin to divorce an unfaithful spouse, but God hates divorce.” “It’s not a sin to marry someone from another culture, but it’s generally unwise.” “Smoking cigars isn’t a sin, according to the Bible, but it isn’t ideal.”

Though this is decidedly impious, I call this approach being more pious than God. Those who speak in this way are essentially saying, “God doesn’t forbid this, but I do.” We are the Pharisees. Too often we succumb to those who would spy out our freedom (Galatians 2:4). We take on the yokes of men.

Some years ago I received a call from a pastor friend. I was, at that time, serving as editor of Tabletalk magazine. My friend was quite upset with me because I had tapped a man in his presbytery to write an article for us. That man, he explained, was undergoing a divorce that the presbytery had not yet ruled on, whether it was biblical or not. While they spent time trying to answer that question, they advised the man not to do any public ministry.

My reply was simple. First, how could I have possibly known that? Second, where is the sin on my part, or his part? “Well, he didn’t submit to the presbytery” he said. “Oh my,” I replied. “I must have misheard you. I thought you said presbytery advised him to not do any public ministry.” “Yes,” my friend said, “that’s exactly what I said.” “Where then is the failure to submit?” “Writing the article was the failure to submit.” “Did the presbytery,” I asked, “forbid him or advise him?”

I went on to explain to my friend that if the presbytery was unwilling to give the writer a command, they can’t grumble if he doesn’t take its advice. We all want the power to control people without the responsibility of defending it. People are eager to judge others for sins they can’t find in the Bible.

My advice to you. No, God’s command to you is that you not put burdens on people that He does not require. That you not judge others for having differing preferences from your own in adiaphorous places. That when the Bible calls us to prophetically thunder God’s Word, “Thou shalt not…” that we thunder it. Otherwise, judge not.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, hermeneutics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments