No, You May Not Have This Dance

Suppose your love of dancing is known throughout your community. Suppose that at tonight’s dance you’ve not only waltzed and tangoed through the first five dances, but did so with a variety of partners and always with a genuine smile on your face. Comes now a young gentleman to ask if he might have the next dance with you. He follows every detail of the prescribed social niceties of the ask. His reputation is not that of a rake or a scoundrel. You say, “No, thank you.”

The young man has at least three choices before him. He can walk away politely. Or, he can “politely” pursue the issue, asking, “Are you injured? Perhaps you are tired and I might ask again in a while?” or he can have a meltdown like your three year old nephew who missed his nap and is denied cotton candy at the county fair. The third option we all reject. The first option we all recognize as a legitimate option. It’s the second option that is unclear. We can clear it up rather easily however, with one question- is the young man owed an explanation? No, of course not. That doesn’t mean I necessarily fault the man for asking. But if his probing questions are met with a polite albeit cards-to-the-chest response of “no” he is left with only the first and third choices. If he takes his “no’s” politely and politely walks away, no trouble. If, however, your answers push him toward a sputtering fit of frustration, well, he thinks he is owed something he is not.

Chances are this chain of events has not happened to you, from either side of the equation. Chances are they never will. But this exercise in imagination should remind us to, even with friends, guard our boundaries, and not cross theirs. We live in the information age, and google never says, “None of your business.” We are inclined therefore to think everything is our business. Too often we even think we are google, and owe an answer to anyone who asks. Which is just how the devil wants it.

When Cyrus sent Nehemiah to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem, Nehemiah went on his way to do just that. When Sanballat saw what was going on he was none too pleased. Did he send a message to Cyrus, “Dear Majesty, What gives?”? No, he went after Nehemiah. He sputtered and spewed. He threatened and falsely accused. He demanded that Nehemiah come and explain himself. Nehemiah just kept building. He had been given a job to do. He was faithful to his own vision and to the calling of his king. And he would not stop the work to explain to those who objected of its legitimacy. He just kept at it.

Our enemies, and even our friends can all too easily become the sand in our gears. Worse, we can become the sand in theirs. Perhaps we would all do well to put this as frontlets before our eyes, “Who are you to judge another man’s servant? To his own master he stands or falls. Indeed he will be made to stand, for God is able to make him stand” (Romans 14:4). To put it another way, “Dance with the One who brung you.”

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Lisa & I on Enneagram; Imputation & Infusion

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Roman Catholicism, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lisa & I on Enneagram; Imputation & Infusion

Should American pastors preach warning us of our growing police state?

It is not at all unusual for us to defend our own peculiar perspective by painting our opponents in the worst possible light. There is genuine disagreement over whether political issues have any place in preaching. Those who stand opposed, however, lob their arguments against those who wrap their sermons in the American flag, who create six part sermon series on why poll taxes are more biblical than property taxes. Those who are more eager for sermons dealing with political issues, on the other hand, argue against Gnostic preaching that seems to suggest that anything outside of prayer, preaching and the sacraments is worldly, off limits. Very few are that extreme, in either direction.

The answer to the question- what should pastors preach, is simple enough. They should preach the Bible. The Bible, according to the Bible, equips us for every good work. There is nothing of importance, and surely all would agree that liberty is important, that the Bible does not speak to. Where it speaks so so ought the preacher to speak. We don’t come to the Bible, or any of its texts, hoping it will support our own message. Rather we come hoping we will communicate its message.

The more difficult question is one of priorities. The question is not if we should preach against the grasping state, but how often ought we to do so? And that, I would argue, is answered not by knowing the Bible, but by knowing one’s congregation. Too often we tickle the ears of the flock not by speaking well of them, but by thundering against the sins of their enemies. A steady diet of “We are the oppressed minority who are being overrun by the state that hates us” may increase our blood pressure, but isn’t likely to increase our holiness.

Preaching should both call us to repent of our sins and look to God’s promises in Christ. That may mean calling a congregation to repentance for treating the state as an idol, looking to it to give us this day our daily bread. It may mean calling a congregation to repent of its indifference to the enslavement of their neighbors by the state. But it is likely also to mean calling a congregation to repent of worshipping mammon, or bowing before the god of personal peace and affluence. It might also mean calling a congregation to stop acting like Chicken Little, and implicitly denying that God raises rulers and brings them down for the sake of the sanctification of His bride. It might mean calling the congregation to repent of its pride, if we are given to thinking, “I thank you Lord that I am not like other men. I read Breitbart and have anti-government bumper stickers on my car.”

Or, as we consider the size and scope and tyranny of the state that ruled during the time of the New Testament church, we might preach like this- Do not be surprised when the world hates you. It hated Jesus, and we servants are not greater than the Master. They may persecute us. They may take our property. They may silence us. They may put us to death. But, we are princes in the kingdom of God, seated with Christ in the heavenly places. We have been set free of the greater Monster, our own sin. And we are to be of good cheer, for He has already overcome the world.

That will preach.

Posted in abortion, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Should American pastors preach warning us of our growing police state?

Bible in 5, I Kings; Dick Trammel, Hero

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Books, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, philosophy, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bible in 5, I Kings; Dick Trammel, Hero

Turning It Up to 11, or Why The Means of Grace Rock the House

The only thing worse than falling into a spiritual valley is the conviction that one must always be on a spiritual mountaintop. Though the Bible is the very history of the ups and downs of God’s people, God’s people go on thinking themselves immune, and that something is terribly wrong if their passion and joy today is not at the same fever pitch it was on the day they came to faith.

There is, of course, a ditch on the other side of the road. We can grow complacent, our ardor having all the vitality of lukewarm water. But cooler than it once was can be a long way from lukewarm. We ought to be taking our spiritual temperature. We ought to pray for passion, joy and gratitude. What we have to watch out for is when the devil comes calling like some diabolical pusher offering us his spiritual uppers.

When we are dissatisfied, when we are looking for more, the devil is more than happy to offer us what we think we need, and keep us from what we truly need. The history of the church is littered with sundry strategies to cure the spiritual blah’s. After Constantine turned down the heat and Christianity became acceptable, it got flabby. So monasteries were invented. You leave the world behind, enter into your vows, and become a super-saint. Not long after universities popped up, with much the same goal. Eventually contemplative prayer forms and then revivals, camp meetings stoked sundry fires, leading us to the annual tacky-fad-of-the-day in the broad evangelical world.

Pietism, Methodism, quietism, whatever-ism, all of these seemed to offer to the “plateau-ed” Christian a means to get to the next level, to relight the fires, to receive a second blessing, to stand out from the crowd, to draw nearer to the living God. The motive has much to commend it, the means not so much. What all these have in common is that the Bible says not a word about them. They are, every one of them, man made, human inventions to lift us up to God. Which is why they simply do not work. The Bible offers a gospel-infused answer to our problem. We do not labor to draw closer to Him, to stoke the fires of our passion. Instead He draws near to us. He lifts us up. And He does these things through His appointed means.

If we would be closer to God, we must give heed to His Word. We must attend to the preaching of the Word. If we would be closer to God, we must sit at His table, and feast in His presence. If we would be closer to God, we must grow closer to those whom He indwells. If we would be closer to God we must cease trying to be a special kind of Christian, and start crying out “Lord, be merciful to me a sinner.”

There are no special Christians, only a special Christ. We have no need to ask Him to give us more. We need only ask Him to help us see all that He has already given.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Turning It Up to 11, or Why The Means of Grace Rock the House

God in Control; I am the Lord; Scarlet Letter

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, communion, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, scandal, sovereignty, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on God in Control; I am the Lord; Scarlet Letter

New Theses, New Reformation

Thesis 44 We must practice a judgment of charity toward others.

“Judge not,” Jesus preached in His Sermon on the Mount, “lest you be judged” (Matthew 7:1). There are, typically, two reactions to this potent warning. Those outside the kingdom of God, despite refusing to bow the knee to Jesus, here cheer Him on. This is, without question, the favorite text in all the Bible amongst those who don’t heed the Bible. These folks find here a blanket condemnation of all judging in all circumstances.

Those inside the church, however, have a slightly more sophisticated understanding of the text. They, perhaps after having this verse used as a club by unbelievers against them, have enough smarts to know we’re being judged, and that rather harshly, by those fussing at us for judging them. We point out the hypocrisy of our unbelieving friends, and move on.

In both cases, I’m afraid, we miss the point. Jesus, contra those outside the church, is not telling us that we ought never to make any judgments. Jesus, contra those inside the church, is in fact saying something about judging. Refuting the unbeliever’s take on the passage may tell us what the text doesn’t mean, but it doesn’t tell us what it does mean. What is means, simply put, is that we can expect to be judged with the same level of care with which we make judgments. If, for instance, we rush to judgment, we can expect others to rush to judgment against us. If we mistake our subjective guesses of the motives of others as gospel truth, we can rest assured that others will confuse their guesses on our motives as gospel truth. Jesus is here calling us to judge, with both care, and with grace.

We judge with grace by not assuming the worst about others. We take our well developed skills at self-rationalization, and use them for good, for explaining in a gracious way the behavior of our neighbor. That is, when we snap at a friend, it’s because we’ve had a bad day. When friends snap at us, it is because they are horribly impious people who are lucky to have us for friends. What we ought to think instead is that we snap at our friends because we are the chief of sinners. Our friends snap at us because our sins would test the patient of a saint, because we are so aggravating.

The practice, of course, puts us in grave danger of being abused. Which is a good thing. When we remember that we are already unchangeably the children of God, when we remember that we are called to die to self, we are in a position to take chances like this. Our snapping neighbor may in fact be a big, fat, jerk, and we are making, in our hearts, excuses for his boorish behavior. The end result is still coals heaped upon our neighbors head (see Romans 12:20). This practice allows us, encourages us to rest in God’s strong right arm, to enter into battle confident that He has numbered our days, and is our strong tower. Not only that, it encourages others to practice a judgment of charity toward us, something we are sure to need before long.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Theses, New Reformation

Nebby-ism; Love Is; My Fav Bible Book

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nebby-ism; Love Is; My Fav Bible Book

What is the ad hominem fallacy?

Ad hominem may be the most common of all informal fallacies. We commit it when we reject an idea or an argument not on the basis of a flaw in that idea or argument but on the basis of a perceived flaw in the person making the argument. Ad hominem is Latin for “to the man” and we are committing the fallacy when our counter “arguments” are directed to the man rather than to the idea. If you say to me, “The moon is made of green cheese” and I respond, “No it’s not. Why should I believe you, when your mother wears army boots?” Note here that it matters not whether the original affirmation “The moon is made of green cheese” is true or not. Neither does it matter whether the accusation is true or not. Your mother’s boots have nothing to do with it.

Why then do people commit this fallacy so often? Because we’re terrible people who don’t like either losing an argument or actually engaging one. Ad hominem is a short cut. And because it works. Now, by works I don’t mean it answers the argument. But it will often silence the arguer.

Just last week I posted a tweet that ruffled a few feathers, asking if perhaps the increasingly public drift to the political left by evangelical leaders is not because their thinking has changed but that they were always left leaning but were afraid to reveal it as it would look like a betrayal of the unborn. It was a question, not an accusation. But it seems to have had some legs, bringing more response than anything I’ve ever tweeted. One person didn’t care for the insinuation, so he brought careful arguments to bear. Well no, that’s not what he did. Instead he posted, “It is always good when those who bring shame to the gospel throw stones.” That, friends, is an ad hominem. Unlike your mother’s footwear, the truth is that I do bring shame to the gospel. That reality, however, has no bearing on the truthfulness of what I said.

My accuser presumably posted his remark in an attempt to silence me. The implication seems to be, “People who bring shame to the gospel should not be ‘throwing stones.’” I’m supposed to blush, clutch my pearls and run for the hills never to be heard from again. And I would, were it not for Jesus. I can’t be shamed because I have no shame. I have no shame not because I’ve never earned it. I do that daily, like everyone else. I have no shame because He’s taken it all. Were I standing on my own goodness, my own reputation, I would flee with the speed of a thousand very fast things. But just as, in Christ I have no shame, in myself I have not a leg to stand on. Which means I can’t run if I wanted to.

It is important that we learn to stop using the ad hominem fallacy against those we’re arguing against. It demonstrates that we are plenty not so bright and more than enough not very nice. It is also important, however, that we learn to stop being felled by those who seek to use it against us. For such demonstrates that we are dim enough to think our reputation can withstand an attack and weak enough to think it matters.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Lisa and I begin a new series, Sacred Marriage. Check it out.

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments