Ask RC- Why is the church so full of phonies?

It is my habit when asked “Why is the church…” to look for what is often the obvious answer, that the problem is people, and not at all exclusive to the church. This is certainly true in this case, that not only is the church full of phonies, but so is the world. The world is full of phonies because the world is full of people and we people are phonies. One could argue that the astonishing success of various social media outlets is driven by this reality- these all exist to fill our need to present ourselves to the world as better, happier, more wonderful than we really are.

The church, however, has an added impetus to phoniness, as well as a sound reason why phoniness should not ever be found there. The church has become that place where we display just how good we are. We ought to know better. The Bible warns us time and again about this propensity. Jesus describes the scribes and the Pharisees as those who parade their spirituality with all the demure spirit of a carnival barker. And we, because we are Pharisees, thank the Lord that we are not like them. Friends, these rebukes against them are not there so we can feel better about ourselves, so we can look down on Pharisees, but so that we can see our inner Pharisee. To apply the wisdom of Paul Washer, He is talking about us.

In the church we want the everyone to know not how many followers we have on Instagram, but that God is on our side. And so we have to keep up the illusion of having it all together. Oh, we do it in our casual clothes, showing our brothers that we’re not like those shallow people who care about such things. We do it without being judge-y, like those horrible judge-y people over there, you know the ones. But we do it nonetheless.

And we are without excuse. For the very door into the church is repentance, our confession of our brokenness, our sinfulness, our ugliness, our inability, our instability, our fears. The very sign and seal that God is with us is not our success, but our acknowledgment of our failure. We come to eat the body that we confess we broke, for we know without it we would starve. We come to drink the blood that we spilled, for we know without it we would die of thirst. We are not the ones who have it together, but the ones who wander off.

Our pretending is not merely comically absurd, like the emperor with no clothes, but is the worst affront possible to the Emperor who has dressed us in the righteousness of His Son. Phoniness is not some petty sin that we can laugh about. It is instead an implicit denial of our need for His grace. Does it take courage to shed our phoniness? It does. But it is foolhardy not to. Let us lay aside our attainments, our cheap masquerade masks and run to our Rescuer.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ask RC- Why is the church so full of phonies?

Sports, Activism and the NFL; Bible in 5, Ruth

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sport | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sports, Activism and the NFL; Bible in 5, Ruth

Unearned Praise

When I served as editor in chief of Tabletalk magazine I committed my share of gaffs. I received more than a few sweet natured but school-marmish notes about why this semi-colon should have been a colon, or why further was the better word in context than farther. But there were bigger blunders as well. Once, I allowed the magazine to go out with one word of its two word title misspelled. Happily we received virtually no feedback on that one because the misspelled word was in Latin.

Only once, however, can I remember receiving high praise for a mistake. I had written something about the parable of the prodigal son. And by accident I referred to it as the story of the prodigal Father. The letter I received was chock full of high praise, “I can’t believe someone finally said it. I always think this is what the story should be called. Thank you for having the courage and the insight to make this point…” He went on for so long that it started to feel pretty good, until I remembered again I made a mistake, not an insight.

As I read, however, I came to see the wisdom of the man’s perspective not on my editorial skills but on the parable. It is indeed the story of the prodigal father. It is true enough that prodigal can refer to wasteful, or careless. It can also, however, refer to someone who is extravagant in giving, overflowing in graciousness, abundant in tenderness and love.

It is good and wise that we should learn to recognize ourselves in the Bible. I always encourage people with this rule of thumb- if you want to know who you are in a Bible story, you are the sinner. And then, in part because of this very parable, I add this, “If the story has more than one sinner, you are both of them.” Because we are sinners and know it not we are both of these brothers. We squander the gifts given to us by our Father. We dishonor, and disobey Him. We pursue our own ends, seeing Him as merely the source of our needs so we can get on with acquiring our wants. On the other hand, we are like the older brother as well, thinking ourselves rather fine fellows. We don’t sin as outrageously as the heathen we see on television. We aren’t hedonists like the prodigal. We, because we are sinners, somehow manage to be both libertines and Pharisees, self-indulgent and self-righteous.

The story, however, doesn’t end there. It is a good thing to come face to face with the depth and scope of our sin. It is a better thing, however, to come face to face with the grace of God. The parable tells us how bad we are. But it ends with robes and fatted calves. It ends with a heartfelt embrace with the prodigal, and a gentle, loving call to repentance for the older brother. The story ends, just as our story ends, with the grace of God for us.

A wise theologian more than once said that the great question plaguing those outside the kingdom is this- what do I do with the my guilt? Romans 1 argues that it is precisely the desperate need to forget that guilt which leads the lost to folly and perversion. We worship the creature because it won’t judge us. We exchange the truth, that we are under judgment, for a lie, that we are perfectly safe. We determine that what we need to be safe is more stuff. And so instead of worrying about the judgment to come, we worry about what we will eat and what we will drink, just like the prodigal in the pigsty.

The answer to both problems, however, is found in the Father. We ought never, in dealing with those outside the kingdom seek, for the sake of winning them, to diminish their sin. We must not belittle their rebellion. We must never nuance their moral crimes into mistakes, errors, lapses in judgment. We must never seek to diminish in their eyes the reality of the wrath of God. We must, however, be quick to point them to the one and only solution to their problem- the overflowing grace of God. God forgives the repentant. The answer to our guilt is not to deny God, to flee from Him, but to run to Him.

We are to seek first the kingdom of God. As we do, however, we would do well to remember that we woke up, and began our journey their because He breathed life into us. We would do well to remember that while we were yet afar off, He girds up His loins and runs to us, crying, “My son, my son.” We would do well to remember that when we feast with Him at His table, we receive a foretaste of the feast to come. Because we move from grace to grace, we would do well to move from amazed to astonished. If you are in Christ, your Father loves you, forgives you, and is even now pouring out His grace on you. Rejoice, and be exceedingly glad.

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, Doctrines of Grace, evangelism, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, preaching, RC Sproul JR, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Unearned Praise

Voting Pro-Life?

While it is disheartening to me to see so many who self-identify as evangelicals open to the notion of voting for Democrats, the silver lining in that blue cloud is found here- that many evangelicals, aghast at this development as they should be, have responded by vehemently insisting they would not vote for anyone who wasn’t pro-life.

As always, however, the rub is in defining our terms. Suppose a man took the position that late term abortions should be illegal. Sex selection abortions should be illegal. Down syndrome abortions should be illegal. Abortions of babies conceived by a husband and wife should be illegal. But he also takes the position that some abortions should be legal. Babies who are conceived in the context of a crime, rape or incest, their murder should be protected by law. Is this really a pro-life position? Isn’t this, properly speaking, pro-abortion with exceptions? This hypothetical candidate, however, isn’t hypothetical. It describes the position taken by every Republican nominee and President going back to Nixon. That, in case you are wondering, includes Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, Bob Dole, George W. Bush, John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Donald Trump.

This is not my first rodeo, and so I know what to expect. Comes now every argument as to why Christians should have cast their votes for each of the above listed men. And the same people making those arguments will insist that Donald Trump get our votes this election. It is not my intention here to argue that point one way or another. I have no desire to deny that President Trump has done much for the cause of life, more than his predecessors. Praise God. My question is this- why would we think this is voting pro-life?

Again, not my first rodeo. I’m aware that there are those who seek to justify voting for Democrats on the grounds that “pro-life” needs to be broader than merely being “anti-abortion,” that pro-life encompasses being opposed to capital punishment, and being in favor of the welfare state and that with a broad enough definition, one could argue voting for this Democrat or that is voting pro-life. That’s not at all what I’m suggesting. I find such arguments disingenuous, ignorant and just plain silly.

Rather, when I use the expression “pro-life,” and I suspect when most use it, we mean, “Believes the state should protect the right to life of all unborn children.” Isn’t that what the term means? And since that is what the term means, what business do we have using that term to describe politicians who expressly deny that the state should protect the right to life of all unborn children, who in fact expressly affirm that the state should protect the “right” of some parents to murder some unborn babies?

If Christians want to take the view that the biblical way to vote is to vote for candidates who would legally protect the “rights” of some parents to murder their babies but who would legally protect the “rights” of fewer parents to murder their babies than their opponents would, then why not say so? Why pretend that pro-abortion with exceptions, which is what each of these Republican nominees have been, means pro-life?

What is worse, how many Christians over the past few months have had the audacity to argue that voting for a candidate who is pro-abortion is proof said voter isn’t a Christian, have voted, each and every election cycle, for a candidate who is pro-abortion with exceptions. Didn’t Jesus say something about being judged by the same standard we judge others?

To re-iterate. I haven’t ever voted for a Democrat, and don’t expect I ever will. I believe it is wrong to do so. I believe men of good will can disagree over whether or not we should vote for the Republican who wants to protect the legal right to murder only tens of thousands of babies a year rather than a million. I’m not angry at anyone for voting for the Republican. All I am saying is that don’t kid yourself into thinking you are voting pro-life. Don’t paint yourself in a corner. And those of you so quick to declare that “No Christian could ever vote for a Democrat,” don’t be surprised when some are willing to doubt your salvation, since you vote for candidates who promise to protect the murder of some babies.

What to do? On how to vote, I don’t have counsel. My counsel above is about what not to say. Let’s think before we speak, especially before we speak about the condition of the souls of others who name the name of Jesus.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Mr. Deeds; Grey Areas in God’s Mind? & More

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Mr. Deeds; Grey Areas in God’s Mind? & More

Ask RC- Does God want everyone to be healthy and wealthy?

Yes, and no. I have often said that one thing the prosperity preachers have right that so many of us miss is this- because of Jesus our heavenly Father delights to bless us. What they have wrong is they have too narrow a view of what blessing means. Can it include health and wealth? Of course it can. There too the prosperity preachers have got something right we too often have wrong- they agree with God that health and wealth are good things. Where they err is in thinking they are the only good things.

The Bible tells us, as does my blessed experience with Lisa, that finding a good wife is a blessing from God. The Bible also tells us that being single is a blessing from God. The Bible tells us that God sends trials to bless us, and the Bible says God rescues us from trials to bless us.

What God wants for us is to grow in grace and wisdom. That may come through the blessing of strong and healthy bodies. Or it may be brought to us through thorns in our sides, a life in a wheelchair, or eyes growing dim. When that journey is complete, when we pass through the vale we receive the blessing of moral purity and perfection. And when our Redeemer returns, we receive the gift of resurrected bodies which will know neither sickness nor death.

What God wants for us is to inherit the world. That may come through prudent investing, hard work, serving well the needs of others, all of which can bring prosperity. Or, it may come through bitter financial hardship, through monumental losses. What we have, however, either way, is that which we would joyfully trade all the wealth in the world for, the Pearl of Great Price. We are already immeasurably wealthy. When we die our spirits will go to where our Treasure is. And when our Redeemer, the one with whom we are joint heirs, returns, we will indeed inherit the earth, an earth remade, reborn into perfection.

What God wants from us is joy and gratitude. He wants trust and patience. He wants us to believe that the Husband He has given us loves us perfectly, in sickness or in health, in plenty or in want. That we have already been given more than we could want or ask, and that what lies ahead of us is too much for our minds to imagine. He wants us to set aside our grumbling and to take up the mantle of praise. He wants us to acknowledge our dependence on Him, and to give thanks for His perfect care, whatever circumstances He calls us to walk through.

A day is coming when by the standards of this world, all of us who are in Christ will enjoy perfect health and immeasurable wealth. This day, and every day between now and then, however, all of us who are in Christ enjoy perfect standing in the eyes of God and irrevocable possession of the Pearl of Great Price. We have much to give thanks for.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

God is Near to the Hurting; Sharon Bertram, Hero; God’s Moral Law

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR, theology, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on God is Near to the Hurting; Sharon Bertram, Hero; God’s Moral Law

Compassion on the Cheap

We all think in shorthand. That is, we carry with us sundry mental shortcuts that move us from one thought to another swiftly. These give us license to dismiss some ideas quickly so that we might be free to mull over others. Which is why these shortcuts, when they are wrong, can be so wrong and destructive. This in turn explains why we are called to be deliberate in our thinking.

Consider this nugget of conventional wisdom: Free markets are fueled by greed, whereas socialism (sometimes called social justice, progressivism, leftist thought) is fueled by compassion. It is bad enough that non-Christians think in these terms. Christians, however, too often find themselves caught up in this folly. We, after all, in submission to our Lord, rightly oppose greed. We, in submission to our Lord, rightly cultivate compassion. Given a sound heart on greed and compassion, and a misguided mental shortcut we will find ourselves turning into the ditch every time. Perhaps we should take a closer look at this nugget, to see if perhaps it might be fool’s gold.

First, is it true that free markets are fueled by greed? No, not true. I am more than happy to concede that one can find greedy people where one finds free markets. On the other hand, one will also find greedy people in controlled markets. Greed exists not because of this economic system or that, not because of great wealth, but because of sinful hearts. In short, the problem is in our hearts. Getting rid of liberty, or getting rid of wealth will not rid the world of greed. Only ridding the world of us will do that. A free market is not fueled by greed, but by service. That is, the only way to succeed in a free market is to serve your customers better than others serve them. You can only win insofar as you help your customers win, by meeting their needs and desires.

But what of compassion and socialism? Don’t they go together? Nope, not in the least. Here are three simple reasons. First, taxing one group of people to give the money to another group of people is bad for the people who receive the money. When Paul says, “If anyone will not work neither shall he eat” (II Thessalonians 3:10) he isn’t being mean, but gracious to those who would not work. When we subsidize not working we get more of it. And when we don’t work we become less what we are made to be as God’s image bearers. It is also harmful to the recipient because it is damaging to the economy, which hits those on the lowest rungs first.

Second, taking from one group to give to another fails the compassion test because it is not compassionate to those who are having their wealth taken. We tend to be okay with this, however, because of the shortcut we’re examining. We think it’s okay to not show compassion to the person with more than us because their having more than us is a sure sign that they are greedy. But we are all wealthy compared to someone. If we want to keep what is ours, being understanding of others would mean we would want them to keep what is theirs, no matter how much they have.

Finally, and most importantly, asking the state to take from one group to give to others isn’t compassionate because we are not the ones making the sacrifice. I am not demonstrating a giving heart if I steal my neighbor’s car, and give it to a struggling single parent. You can’t, in short, be compassionate on someone else’s dime. Christians are called to be compassionate, which means we give what is ours, not what is our neighbors’. We give in the name of Jesus, not in the name of Uncle Sam. Christians are those who sacrifice themselves, not who use the state to sacrifice others.

The next time you are tempted to take this mental shortcut, remember that the Bible is our map. It says we all struggle with greed. And it says we are called to give of our own wealth, not the wealth of others. This in turn, leads to prosperity, for those who have less than we do, for us, and for those who have more.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Compassion on the Cheap

Columbo, Apologist, 10th Commandment, Bradbury’s Martians

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Books, evangelism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, on writing well, preaching, RC Sproul JR, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Columbo, Apologist, 10th Commandment, Bradbury’s Martians

New Theses, New Reformation

Thesis 41 We must not discipline our children in anger.

Paul encourages fathers to raise their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. He then warns us not to provoke our children to wrath. The serpent would have us believe that the first command is that we would encourage our children to be obedient, and the second is a warning that we not take it too far. If we’re too strict, psychologists tell us, we will only encourage rebellion. The psychologists ought to know a fair bit about rebellion, because here they are in rebellion against God’s Word. It is a failure to raise our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord that leads to rebellion, not being too strict.

That failure, more often than not, flows out of our own sinful motives in how and why we discipline our children. When our Father in heaven disciplines us, He does not do so to punish us, to even the scales of justice. That punishment happened nearly 2000 years ago. While retribution has its place, it is not a part of family discipline within the church. God’s goal with His children is what ours ought to be with ours, to see them grow in grace and wisdom. We punish for the purpose of sanctification.

When we punish in anger, however, we are merely pulling rank. We are merely asserting our greater power over the child. When we punish in anger we communicate to the child, “You have wronged my royal person, and you must be made to pay.” If we would raise them in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, we would already know this about ourselves- we’re dead. We’ve died to self. As such, we cannot be wronged. If our child mistreats us our concern, if we are dead, isn’t that we have been mistreated, but that the child that we love has given opportunity for sin. Our concern is that our child hasn’t yet put to death his or her sin nature. When we are wronged, (and this is true of the whole body of Christ, not just true in our individual families) our concern should be more for the one doing the wrong, rather than ourselves.

We are called to discipline our children. We are told by God that the rod will drive folly far from a child (Proverbs 22:15). Our desire for them is that it would go well for them in the land. God tells us that this will come to pass as they learn to honor their fathers and their mothers. If, however, we use the rod in anger, we not only will not drive folly far from the child, but will drive it into the child. Our folly will provoke our children to wrath. And if we drive them to wrath, we can rest assured that it will not go well for them in the land. If we would bless our children, we must treat them as blessings, and teach them to seek the blessings of God by honoring those in authority over them.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Theses, New Reformation