American Idols

We are made in God’s image. The sheer fact that we could spend the rest of our lives contemplating what it means to be made in God’s image, without beginning to scratch the surface, reminds us that we are God’s image, not gods. We are, in some ways, to God as our mirror image is to us. There is a resemblance, a connection, but the difference is one of ontology, dimension. Thus, God creates, and we create. But when we look at creation more closely we find that He speaks things into reality, while we merely rearrange what He has already created. I’m stringing words together; He spoke language into being. Adam named the animals, but God formed them.

God also, we remember, named Adam. Naming, whether from God or man, is the exercise of dominion. It is rule and authority. Naming has the capacity to shape not the thing in itself, but our perception of the thing. This is why we find the conjugation of adjectives so amusing- I am thrifty; you are cheap, and he is miserly. Each adjective lives in the same neighborhood, and could, in some sense be used to describe the same behavior. But the choice of the name impacts the perception of the reality.

This is the game that the devil plays with us. He, because he is merely a creature, hasn’t the power to create. Instead, he has only the power of naming, without the authority. We are seduced by him when we think his thoughts after him, when our perceptions are his perceptions. His very first assault was undermining the very words of God, “Hath God indeed said…” That’s his game.

We are told, for instance, that we live in a “secular” society. To be sure there are a few religious holdouts, most of them living in what is derisively named (there it is again) “fly-over” country. But the “real” world, the world that counts, exists on two coasts. On the east coast, in what we have named the “power’ corridor of Washington D.C., Philadelphia, Boston, New York, we have titans of industry and governance. On the west coast we have the professional namers, the visual mavens who form our culture through entertainment. Where it counts we are supposed to be secular, that is, beyond worship. This, supposedly, is where culture is formed, and thus we have a secular culture.

This too, however, is but the devil’s slight of hand. Renaming isn’t the same as remaking. And one thing man will never be is secular. When someone claims, “I’m not a very religious person” one ought translate it to the more accurate, “I’m not a very truthful person.” We are all religious people. That we name our worship something else doesn’t change its true nature. We are still worshipping. The trouble is that the things we don’t call gods, but treat as gods, are merely his image bearers. We worship the creation rather than the Creator, and none more frequently than that two dimensional copy of God, man.

Here I am not referring to philosophical humanism, though such would fit. My point isn’t that those who will not have God in their thinking will instead worship man in the abstract. Rather, we worship men in the flesh. What is Beverly Hills, but our own Mount Olympus? We stand and gawk while they walk sundry red carpets. We build shrines to them on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

We even have established religion in this country. Local and state politicians live or die by whether or not they are willing to gather the funding to build temples to the gods of this age. Yankee Stadium is less a copy of the Roman Coliseum than it is the Athenium. It is where we gather together for worship, where we hoot and holler for the home team, as if our souls depended on it. These gods never fade away; instead they simply retire to their respective halls of fame.

If that isn’t compelling enough, simply remember back to when the Beatles first appeared on The Ed Sullivan Show. Those who were actually in the studio recall that the screaming not only didn’t let up during the entire performance, but that those in the studio couldn’t hear even a note of the music, the hysteria was so great. That it is Dionysian worship doesn’t mean it wasn’t worship.

To note that we treat our celebrities like gods isn’t merely saying that we treat them better than we ought. Rather it gets to the heart of the issue, the heart that Calvin rightly called a fabricum idolarum, an idol factory. Calling it cheering, calling it appreciation for the art of filmmaking, doesn’t change what it is, worship.

The bad news of the world out there is that these gods cannot save. They are deaf and mute. The bad news for we in the church is that we too are idolaters. We gleefully blend together our worship of these gods, with the worship of the living God and praise ourselves for our cultural relevance. There is, however, only one thing relevant to nationwide idolatry, the call to put away these gods, to repent and believe the gospel of Jesus Christ. We worry that God might judge us because of our national failure to keep the second table of the law. With abortion we murder over a million babies a year. With tax and spend policies we live by stealing. With our eyes we commit adultery, even as we worship the gods of Hollywood. And we fuel it all with the envy of consumption. But we are fools if we think the first amendment trumps the first commandment. Our only hope is that we would worship the living and true God, and bring no other gods before Him.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, sport | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on American Idols

We Have Met the Censors and They Are Us

Not long ago I tweeted this:

Things you cannot say without getting into a lot of trouble-
“Bomb” in the security line at the airport
“Fire!” in a crowded, fire-less theater.
“He’s a he” about a man in a dress.

We live in a world that seems to have gone mad. If we would, however, be as shrewd as serpents we would remember that there is a method to their madness. The seething, screeching screeds of melting snowflakes have a specific purpose- to get us to censor ourselves. Like a baby that knows it can get the candy it craves at the grocery store by having a meltdown, so Gramsci’s warrior children know that their ideological opponents, us, don’t care for drama, being hated on, scenes, and will do just about anything to steer clear of them. Including censor ourselves.

If I’m in a room full of conservatives I know that if I raise the slightest question about some proposed military action all reason and decorum will flee the room instantly. So I censor myself. If I’ve wandered into a meeting of egalitarian Christian ladies I know I won’t get out alive if I opine that John Piper’s writing has blessed me. So I censor myself.

Neither war hawks nor theology hens, however, can hold a candle to left wings when it comes to raising a ruckus. Just ask JK Rowling. She was kind enough to the left in 2007 to put Dumbledore into the closet so she could let him out. This wasn’t enough to protect her from Cancel Culture’s guillotine when she recently had the temerity to suggest that only women menstruate. The vitriol against her was off the charts.

The goal, here, however, isn’t to stop JK Rowling. The goal is to stop you and me. Just as totalitarian regimes put on show trials to frighten the innocent, so the left uses its capacity and willingness to spew bile in the name of safe spaces to keep sanity silent. They don’t care what Rowling says. They do care that the rest of us learn to never say it.

We, as we are wont to do, rationalize our sin. We call our cowardice compassion. We remember that we are to be humble, to not give undue offense, to have our language seasoned with salt, to walk the extra mile and turn it all into an excuse to stay safe from the maddening crowds. We refuse, in our sin, to call sin sin, and therefore have no reason to call anyone to repent and believe. We censor ourselves.

Our Lord went silent to His slaughter. That slaughter came to Him, however, because He faithfully preached the message His Father gave Him. We, on the other hand, use our silence to escape slaughter and preach not at all. He has warned us that He will not confess us if we will not confess Him. Lord, open our lips, that our mouths might proclaim Your praise, and that we might receive the blessing of suffering for and with You.

Posted in apologetics, church, cyberspace, evangelism, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on We Have Met the Censors and They Are Us

Lisa Joins Me to Discuss Bandits, the Movie, I Consider Sanctification and Relevance Pottage

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lisa Joins Me to Discuss Bandits, the Movie, I Consider Sanctification and Relevance Pottage

Ask RC- Does the Bible consider homosexuality to be a grave sin?


No, the Bible does not make this claim. Neither does the Bible consider alcoholism to be a sin. The Bible, in fact, knows nothing of homosexuality or alcoholism. The Bible does, however, clearly condemn the practice of that peculiar perversion Paul addresses in Romans 1, “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one for another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due” (verses 26-27). In like manner, of course, the Bible time and again condemns drunkenness, but knows nothing of the disease model we have learned to embrace, where we turn sinful behavior into an illness, and seek instead of repentance, perpetual recovery from a disease.

Certainly it is likely that any sinful temptation that we give in to time and again will one day become a besetting sin. There is in turn nothing wrong with noting a given weakness to a given temptation. The problem is when we turn the temptation into an excuse for the sin. Drunkards, biblically speaking, do not drink too much because they are drunkards. Instead they are drunkards because they drink too much. Sodomites, in turn, do not practice their perversion because they are perverts. Rather they are perverts because of the perversion they practice.

Those who seek to justify their sin on the basis of their temptation often will in turn in their sin seek to undo the plain teaching of the Bible as to the sinfulness of their behavior. In our day we have seen more and more brazen attempts to muddy up the plain judgment of God on the sodomite perversion. Both liberal and even some neo-evangelical churches have negotiated away God’s condemnation, and thus brought God’s condemnation on themselves. The exegesis that argues that God only judges ceremonial acts of perversion, or promiscuous acts of perversion is an eisegesis of desperation, akin to suggesting that drunkenness is only a sin on the Lord’s Day, or only for those who don’t like the taste of alcohol.

The Bible affirms that those who practice the works of the flesh, which include sexual perversity and drunkenness, will not inherit the kingdom of God (see Galatians 5: 19-21). These are among those sins that are compelling evidence, when they are practiced, of unbelief. This, however, does not make those caught up in these sins beyond the power of the grace of God. The answer to these problems is the answer to every sin problem, repentance and belief. Our job as believers then is to call those caught up to repent and believe. We in turn must remember that we too must repent and believe. We have to remember that whatever the sin, no matter how odd it might seem, there but for the grace of God go we. And sometimes, even with the grace of God, go we.

We must remember our own sins, even as we faithfully call sinners to repent. Whether with ourselves or others, we must allow the Bible to define sin, turning neither to the left nor to the right. We condemn what God condemns, and affirm what God affirms. He condemns perversion, and affirms that such were once we, but we have been called out of the darkness into His marvelous light. May He grant us the grace to call other sinners like us out.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ask RC- Does the Bible consider homosexuality to be a grave sin?

The God Who Judges; Dave Hawley, Hero & More

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on The God Who Judges; Dave Hawley, Hero & More

Playground Wisdom

There is wisdom in the playground adage that every time we point a finger at others we have three more pointing back at ourselves. It’s true for adults too, who are given to hurling accusations against those who are just like us. Christian A complains to Christian B about what a horrible gossip Christian C is, and neither one smells the odor of irony. Or Christian Writer skewers the whole of the Christian church for its abominable judgmentalism. Then there’s the one about what dishonest and lazy laborers Christians are. We have all heard, and likely passed on urban legends about the curse of the Ichthus. The Ichthus, you will remember, is the little fish symbol that was once used by early Christians as a sort of code language to recognize each other. Now we see it in one of two places. Either it adorns the back of our cars, letting those whom we have cut off in traffic know that they have just been cut off in Jesus’ name. Or, we see it in advertising. Here, as with its ancient use, the idea is to communicate to other believers that our business is run by believers. The legendary curse is that both Christians and non-Christians in the know about the symbol actually see the symbol as a sure sign to work with someone else. Putting the Ichthus in your webpage ad, or on your billboard, or on your work truck, the story goes, tells experienced people to not use your company, because, everyone knows that Christians are notoriously lazy, dishonest and greedy.

Now my goal here isn’t to argue with the accuracy of this perception. Truth be told, I find it a little hard to believe. I’m perfectly willing to believe that Christians can be lazy, dishonest and greedy. I’m skeptical, however, that as a group they are any more lazy, dishonest or greedy than others. Even if such an assessment is accurate, however, what puzzles me is the giddy speed with which Christians are willing to point out this supposed flaw. What kind of Christian speaks this way about “those Christians”?

In the first place, the speaker, if the assessment is true, is likely one of those Christians that are likewise given to laziness, dishonesty and greed. If these weaknesses are pandemic in our midst, how can we be so confident that we too haven’t been infected? Do these brothers actually think that the lazy, dishonest and greedy Christians are aware that they are lazy, dishonest and greedy? If instead they are unaware, shouldn’t we be a little more diligent about checking ourselves before accusing amorphous others?

Second, how did lazy, dishonest and greedy Christians become a them problem, instead of a we problem? That is, why are we so quick to complain about this reality, rather than mourn for it? Even if I as an individual do not struggle with sin x, if my people do, then it is our problem together. When, for instance, I point out the foibles of Reformed people, and they are many, I am pointing out where we tend to go wrong, not where they tend to go wrong. If we Christians are lazy, dishonest and greedy, the proper posture isn’t pointing but praying. The proper posture isn’t accusing but repenting.

I pray there will come a day when even those outside the kingdom will be able to say of us, “If you ever need to hire someone, try to find one of these Christians. They’ll work until the cows come home.” I pray with even greater fervor that there will come a day when even those outside the kingdom will be able to say of us, “Say what you will about those lazy, judgmental Christians, but they sure do stick together, and they sure are quick to repent.”

Posted in apologetics, church, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Playground Wisdom

A 3rd Look at the 7th Commandment, Knowing God and the Marks of the Church

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, communion, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A 3rd Look at the 7th Commandment, Knowing God and the Marks of the Church

Last Night’s Study on The Holiness of God

Posted in Bible Study, Books, creation, Facebook Live, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, theology, wonder | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Last Night’s Study on The Holiness of God

New Theses, New Reformation


Thesis 36- We must be faithful to our spouses in thought, word and deed.

One of the great evils of decline in the broader culture is the effect it can have in the Christian culture. As the broader culture becomes more and more morally slipshod, immorality is defined downward. Christians tend to be comfortable if we can manage to stay ahead of the world’s curve. Sadly, when it comes to marital fidelity, it seems we are not even doing that. Evangelical Christians, or so the scuttlebutt goes, are virtually just as likely as their unbelieving counterparts to commit adultery.

Our infidelity, in one sense, is much worse than the infidelity of the infidel. In both cases, of course, families are torn asunder. In both cases the lives of children are turned upside down. But in the case of professing Christians, we add to that that we are lying to the watching world about who Jesus is, and who the church is called to be. That is, when a man is unfaithful to his wife he says that Jesus is unfaithful to the church. When a wife is unfaithful to her husband, she says that the church is free to be unfaithful to Christ. This follows from Paul’s connection of the husband and wife and Jesus and the church in Ephesians 5.

These lies are no small things. It is, after all, one thing to lie about how big the fish that got away was. But it is entirely another thing to lie about Jesus and His bride. We ought to be modeling for the world what fidelity looks like. We of all people ought to understand this call. Jesus, after all, was faithful, even to death on the cross.

We fail here, in the end, because we are worldly. While the world walks into marriage seeing it as something temporary, and we walk into it thinking it designed for permanence, what we have in common is how we view the purpose of marriage. We both, believers and unbelievers alike, walk down the aisle believing that marriage exists for the sake of our own happiness. When our marriages no longer provide the level of happiness we believe is our due, our eyes, our hearts and our bodies begin to wander. We begin to look for excuses to escape our marriages. We walk into adultery step by step.

We will not improve here corporately until we recognize and repent for this scandal. God will not forgive us until we show forth a broken and contrite spirit. The solution is not more marriage retreats. The solution isn’t more careful premarital counseling. The solution is not a repeal of no-fault divorce laws. Those may be good things. But we will change only when we see that we are one flesh with our spouses, that infidelity is a failure to be faithful to ourselves, that hurting our spouse only hurts us. We will change only when we remember that God gave us our spouses as a gift, not a burden. We will change only when we recognize that physical adultery isn’t a new sin, but is merely the end of the road we begin traveling when we look at another with lust, whether that other is a pin-up girl, or the hero in a romance novel, or that nice person at work. May God have mercy on our marriages.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, Theses | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on New Theses, New Reformation

Dogmatism, Election Advice and Rabbits Out of Hats

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dogmatism, Election Advice and Rabbits Out of Hats