Where in the We Are We?

My father was a gracious man. He believed, and as per most of the time, I agree with him- a tri-partite view of man isn’t in itself a terrible thing. My father, however, was no dummy. He believed, and as per once again, I agree with him- often a tri-partite view of man is accompanied by dangerous error. The Bible talks of men being bodies and souls. It talks of men being bodies, souls and spirits. It talks of men being bodies, souls, spirits and minds. Most of the time those who choose body, soul and spirit end up, just like when you have three kids playing together, pushing one to the fringe of the circle. And then they try to dump all the bad stuff there. My body and my soul are fine. My spirit man, though, struggles with this sin. But, the real me is my body and soul. Or, my body and my spirit are fine. My soul, however, struggles with this sin. But the real me is body and spirit. We’re willing to acknowledge the family resemblance, but we push our sins off on our most distant “relative.”

The real me, however, has more than enough sin to cover two, three, four or a bazillion parts of me. When I sin, that’s me. Yes, it is the old me. Yes it’s the old me that will be left behind when I am glorified. But for now, it’s me. Simul Justus et peccator and all that. That I seek to distance myself from the reality of my sin is more proof that my sin is still with me. The better move is to own it, and repent for it. The better move is to learn to recognize the real me. I’m not the slightly flawed good man that I pretend to be. I’m not the morally superior exemplar I’d like others to think I am. I’m the sinner. Declared to be righteous, indwelt by the Spirit, a saint, growing in grace, certain to one day fully be what I am today declared to be, yes. And still, today, a sinner.

The good news, the great news, is that nobody knows the real me more completely than the One who redeemed me. He’s too wise to buy into any nonsense that would diminish the reality of my sin. He’s aware of it more than me, more than my most harsh critics, more than those who have seen me at my worst. He, in fact, faced the wrath of the Father for every single one of my sins, whatever dark corner in me they came from. And He loves me. He identifies with me. He promises me that He will lead me into the Promised Land, that He will never leave me nor forsake me. He will never let me go.

The glory is that the me isn’t in me at all, but in Him. Where all my treasure is hidden. And if you are in Him, the same is true of you.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Slitherlip’s Smears and Tarnishtongue’s Tales

Dear Slitherlips,

As you well know, the Enemy has a rather unfair advantage in that He can, and delights to make things out of nothing. Our powers lag well behind, being limited to perversion. He takes what is not to make what is. We can but seek to distort and disorder what He has made. This has not kept our father below from doing astonishing things. He has learned to take the worst thing, God’s glory in His creation, and turn it into pride, and then take pride and turn it into an infernal combustion engine. On the day of our great victory in Eden he offered the woman the opportunity to be like God, knowing good and evil. Since that time we have distracted our foes by making them think that the greater problem and the deeper temptation is in the evil, rather than in the knowing. The seduction wasn’t principally to experience evil, but rather the pride of knowing a secret.

Our Gossip division has played off of this. While the enemy devoted verse after verse to speaking against the “sins” of the tongue in general, and gossip in particular, we have counter-assaulted by presenting His pleas as an attempt to protect the guilty. “Yes,” we whisper to the pious imps, “you must be careful not to gossip, lest you harm his reputation, or sully her honor.” This keeps them completely off guard against the real danger, their own pride. Gossip flowers first in the rich soil of our pride in knowing, second in the warm sunshine of having knowledge that others lack but crave and third in the slating rain of being in the inner circle, which together form the very trinity of pride. That they baptize their folly by feigning to be concerned for their brothers, or frame their gossip as passing along prayer concerns only gives our father fits of the giggles.

Remember then the basics. First, more important than the person about whom we gossip, more important than the information itself, is that that there is secret knowledge to be had. Second, do not lose sight that this knowledge can be made up of whole cloth. That is, humans have an insatiable desire to reach conclusions. Insufficient evidence never seems to slow them down. Third, don’t forget that the hungry ear is as valuable to us as the eager tongue. Or, in the case of the internet, may its destructive powers multiply, the eager eye. Remember last year’s mantra for the entire gossip team- Google is our friend.

Keep at it. I have been hearing some disturbing things lately about your work ethic. Very disturbing indeed.

With Deepest Concerns,

Tarnishtongue

Posted in cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, scandal, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Slitherlip’s Smears and Tarnishtongue’s Tales

The One and the Many, Facing the Giants and Coming Up Eyeore

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The One and the Many, Facing the Giants and Coming Up Eyeore

Ask RC- Could Jesus have sinned?

Yes, and no. How we answer depends totally on how we are using the word “could.” Augustine explored the issue well, and both Luther and Edwards followed after him in distinguishing two different kinds of abilities. We could say that Jesus had the liberty to sin, but did not have the ability, or alternately, that He had the ability but not the liberty.

The freedom, or the “yes” of the answer comes down to this- there was no outside force restraining Jesus from sinning. It’s not as though if He had tried to speak a stone into bread during His temptation that His lips would not cooperate. There are situations where outside forces do take away our choices. When I was arrested outside an abortion mill in 1989 the police restrained me with cuffs, ran an ax handle under my armpits, lifted both ends and dragged me on to a waiting bus. There was no option where I could stay in front of the door to the mill.

The no, or the “inability” of Jesus to sin isn’t an external restraint, but an internal one. The reason Jesus could not have sinned from this perspective is that He did not want to. Jesus was without sin, altogether righteous. His sole, ultimate desire was to do the will of His Father in heaven. Given that unshakable and immutable desire, there is no way that He could have chosen sin.

Some have argued that the nature of the incarnation precludes the possibility of His sinning. Others have argued that the promises, the plan of God would preclude the possibility of His sinning. I would argue in the first instance that while the incarnation is vitally important as a doctrine, it doesn’t force the issue one way or the other. The Father and the Spirit can, and cannot sin in just the same way. That is, there is no power above them that forces them not to sin. But there is an utter lack of desire to sin within them. The same is true of the saints in heaven however. Which means the principle applies to deity, to humanity, and to Jesus in His incarnation. On the certainty of God’s promise, they certainly are sure. And it was sure that Jesus would fulfill His calling. But the certainty of the promise isn’t the means by which Jesus kept from sin. Rather it is His pure, sinless nature.

Does this make the test a farce? Again, yes and no. From one perspective, the devil didn’t have a chance. Had I been able to make a bet on the outcome I would have gone all in without a moment’s doubt. But the reason it wasn’t a farce is precisely because it was a test of His character. The reason I would have had no fear is because of His character. Jesus is the Holy One, the lamb without blemish, the true Son. And we who are in Him, to the everlasting glory of the Father, are the same. He could no more have failed than He could now let us go. Give thanks.

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

ABC’s of Theology- N is for New Bodies, Lisa’s Purpose Driven Wife segment on A Godly Woman and More…

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything

Posted in ABCs of Theology, Biblical Doctrines, creation, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, Westminster Shorter Catechism, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on ABC’s of Theology- N is for New Bodies, Lisa’s Purpose Driven Wife segment on A Godly Woman and More…

A Man Has a Right to Own Her Body


You lust and do not have. You murder and covet and cannot obtain
– .

Seeking to stop the slaughter of the unborn by merely declaiming abortion is like building a bridge by starting in the middle. James reminds us that we murder because we lust. Statistics tells us that nearly nine of ten women who get an abortion in America are unmarried. That is telling.

Too often we in the evangelical church have taken a binary approach to the problem. Either we separate the sin of abortion from all its related sins and give our time and attention there, or we decide it’s a heart issue, and our only hope is mass conversion. (Forgetting the hard truth that one of six abortions in America is procured by a professing evangelical.)

Abortion, in the end, is a heart issue. And it is a good thing to seek its end. But in between these two poles we have the great evil of feminism. Now please don’t misunderstand. I’m not saying we have abortion because the women folk have gotten uppity. Nor that the central claim made by movement feminists, that “reproductive freedom” is the lynchpin of women’s liberation, is at fault, however foolish the idea might be. Rather feminism is the bedrock of our culture of death because it was designed by men to remove obligation, and any barriers to our sexual desires, our lusts.

The sexual revolution more broadly had the same goal. Give men access to multiple sexual partners who would in turn have no claim on the man’s loyalty, provision, responsibility. The lie that sex can be separated from procreation gave birth to the lie that sex can be safely separated from the covenant of marriage. Abortion is nothing more than the backstop to this premise, what you do to keep the machine running even when birth control fails.

The truth is that when a woman begins to sleep with a man not her husband she is already in grave danger. She is giving herself to someone who isn’t giving himself back. She has chosen a man who has already determined that he can and will take from her. Which is why it should not surprise us that he ends up being the kind of man who puts his girlfriend in danger and murders his own child. That’s the kind of man that sleeps with a woman he has not committed to. That’s the kind of man who, after his crime, leaves the scene. Eighty percent of relationships will end within two months of procuring an abortion.

One morning at my local abortion mill a young man brought his girlfriend and child to have the latter murdered. He confessed his uneasiness on his way in the building, but went in anyway. A few hours later he came back out, confessing that he could feel the wickedness, the oppression, the evil in the building. So he drove away, leaving his girlfriend and soon to be butchered baby behind. He turned tail and fled.

We murder babies because our men are boys. We lust and do not have, and murder follows in the wake.

Posted in abortion, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on A Man Has a Right to Own Her Body

Thousands of Babies, Hundreds of Souls Saved Through John Barros Preaching Jesus

John Barros, Hero to the Unborn on Today’s JCE

Posted in abortion, apologetics, church, evangelism, grace, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR, scandal, sexual confusion, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Thousands of Babies, Hundreds of Souls Saved Through John Barros Preaching Jesus

New Theses New Reformation

Thesis 9- We must learn to love one another.

More important than minding your p’s and q’s may well be minding your we’s and you’s. That is, when the Bible starts using pronouns, we, that is, Christians, ought to be careful to know which nouns they are pointing to. Consider, for instance, Jesus promise, “By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another” (: 35). Sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? People will know that Christians are Christians if people will love each other, right? That’s not what the text says. There are in this text three groups of people, the lovers, the loved, and the witnesses. The witnesses are those who are outside the kingdom. The lovers and the loved are inside the kingdom. Those outside (the world will know that you (Christians) are mine if you (Christians) love one another (Christians.). The call here isn’t to a generic love of humankind. (To be sure there is a sense in which Christians are called to love those outside the kingdom. We are, after all, called to love our enemies. But that isn’t the point in this text.) Instead this is a call to love within the body of Christ.

Do not miss the power here. Jesus does not merely say it is a good thing for brethren to dwell together in unity. He does not merely say the church will be a more joyful place when we love one another. The promise is that those outside the kingdom will know we are His. Jesus gives us here a potent apologetic, one born not out of an abstract philosophical argument, but one born out of our love. If we love one another, others will know the truth.

Love, however, isn’t so easy. The object of our love here is other Christians. Other Christians are sinners. They (see, we need to know our pronouns), that is, we are full of pride and envy, selfishness and malice. Wouldn’t it have made more sense if Jesus said they would know we are His by our love for Him? Jesus, after all, is easy to love. He redeemed us. He indwells us.

And He, the One who is easy to love, calls us to love one another. Jesus warned the Pharisees that you could not love the Father and not love the Son. In like manner, you cannot love the Son, and not love His bride. We can only do this, however, as we learn to see our brothers the way our Father sees them. Yes, in themselves, we are sinners. But we are not by ourselves. Our Father looks upon us and sees Jesus. We must do the same.

Christians are full of bad motives, bad theology and bad breath. We are likewise full of the Holy Spirit. We are covered by the Holy Son. We are beloved of the Holy Father. So let us love one another, even as we are loved. And maybe, just maybe, God might use our love to show forth His glory to those outside. Maybe by our love, some who are they will become we who are we.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, evangelism, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on New Theses New Reformation

We Will Inherit the Earth

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, grace, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Meeting with Jesus, Larry Mininger, Hero and the Scandal of Grace

Today’s JCE Podcast

Posted in apologetics, assurance, church, grace, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Meeting with Jesus, Larry Mininger, Hero and the Scandal of Grace