A Fool Load- Cultivating the Spirit’s Fruit

Tell you a little story and it won’t take long
About a lazy farmer who wouldn’t hoe his corn.
The reason why I never could tell
For that young man was always well.

He planted his corn in the month of June
By July it was up to his eyes
Come September came a big frost
All that young man’s corn was lost.

Busy, like wealthy, is a relative term. My old friend Eddy used to marvel that I took a full load at seminary, while working a full time job. What he didn’t realize was that I had studied rather much of what was covered in seminary when I wasn’t busy, before seminary, as a teenager. Nor did he understand that once I took, “Lounge around the pool reading People magazine” out of my schedule, I had plenty of time.

We feel poor because we fail to be grateful for what we have. And we feel busy because we fail to be grateful for what we’re able to do. We lounge in our hot showers feeling cheated because we can’t eat at the nicer restaurants in town, and we lounge in that same hot shower thinking about how busy we are.

We suffer from the folly of Lot. He had received God’s richest blessing, and then got confused over what that blessing was. By living in close proximity to Abraham, Lot drank deeply from the collateral benefits that came his way. His flocks prospered. He had an increasing number of servants to tend those flocks. But those servants found themselves at odds with Abram’s servants, and Lot chose the lot next to the heathen.

He thought the wealth came from him. His shrewd business sense, his eye for fine grazing land, and his hard work brought forth his prosperity. He likely shook his head at Abraham’s failure to negotiate wisely when Abraham offered Lot the pick of the land. Proudly then he surveyed all that was before him, and chose the green place, conveniently overlooking the rainbow flag flying over the adjacent town. He noticed, no doubt, the lovely window treatments on the homes, but apparently didn’t notice that Sodom’s birthrate was 0%.

I’m not denying that God works through means. Rather while God was the source of Lot’s prosperity, the means He worked through wasn’t Lot’s hard work. Instead it was the character of his uncle. But more important still, it was the very wisdom of his uncle that was the wealth. What made Lot rich wasn’t flocks and herds, nor South Beach property, but his uncle’s wisdom and character. What made Lot a poor fool was that he failed to tend his soul.

Here too we have to see the connection between first and second causes, between means and ends. Laziness, a reluctance to hoe corn, is not the root but the fruit of the problem. It’s a noxious weed that grows in the garden of those who won’t cultivate the fruit of the Spirit. A man’s measure is found not in the size of his silos, but the yield of his heart.

C.S. Lewis got at this point in The Screwtape Letters. There Screwtape encouraged Wormwood to encourage his charge to think in grand categories, and to fail to think in the small. Anyone drinking deep of “love for humanity” but unable to love his pew neighbor has lost the battle. Cultivating a love for humanity, however, is like growing plastic fruit. One need not worry about root rot or bugs, and one can display the “fruit” of one’s labors, but the real deal isn’t there.

But Lewis missed an even bigger point. It isn’t enough for the wise man to move his gaze from the amorphous humanity to the neighbor in the pew. If he would do better still, he must turn his gaze inward. What he should be looking to, if he would love both his pew neighbor, and the body of Christ around the globe, is his own soul. The only way to be outward looking, in other words, is to look inward.

Of course there is a deadly and deadening navel gazing. Analysis paralysis is not what I’m calling for. It wouldn’t have done the lazy farmer any good had he, instead of frequenting the parties in the surrounding culture, instead stood in the midst of his growing corn just to look at it. No, we look to ourselves that we might be at work in ourselves. We look inward because what the world needs now isn’t simply one less sinner, but one less sin. The kingdom grows as we put to death the old man, as we put on Christ.

But there is still another layer of paradox, because, paradoxically, not only does Jesus work through paradox, but so must the devil. We lose our lives when we seek to save them; we become last when we seek to be first. In like manner, the devil is about the business of lulling us to sleep, or encouraging our spiritual sloth. A little sleep, a little slumber, a little folding of the hands, and we are as unconscious as the foolish virgins. The rest he seduces us with, however, is nothing but slave labor. When we are not diligent about the business of bearing much fruit, we are instead busy either making excuses, or pushing rocks up Sisyphusian hills.

The devil, who is more crafty than any of the beasts of the field, seduces us into waiting for that beast in the jungle, that one glorious moment of opportunity, where we will usher in the kingdom with our devastating argument, our best-selling book, our cinematic triumph, our Christian president. Meanwhile, the beast is at work in our hearts, where the real battle is, where he turns our gardens into jungles. Changing the world is chasing after the wind. Changing ourselves, in and through the means of grace appointed, is running the race.

Posted in RC Sproul JR | 1 Comment

The Word of His Power; The Power of His Word

I think we’ve got omniscience wrong. Yes, it certainly means all knowing. And yes, certainly God knows all things. It’s important to affirm as well that His knowledge overlaps with our knowledge. When we say 2+2=4 we are agreeing with Him, not saying something different from Him when He says 2+2=4. With all of these caveats in place we can begin to explore how we get omniscience wrong.

His thoughts are not our thoughts not because He can imagine a square circle or 2+2 equaling 5, but because the source of His knowledge and the source of ours are fundamentally different. Our knowledge, our understanding of the world flows out of our taking it in via our senses. We see, hear, taste, touch, smell what is out there and learn about what is out there. Reality is outside of us, and our minds, our knowing, is bowing before the reality that is external to us.

It would be quite a feat, worthy of our utmost praise, if God were able to take in the whole of reality. He would astound us if He knew not only what the rose in my vase smells like, but every rose, every daffodil, every cow, even every mountain goat that’s never crossed paths with a human. What if He knew the breadth and depth and height of every hair, even those on the backs of every fly? What if every sub-sub-sub atomic particle in every galaxy was pinpointed on the divine gps? That would not get at what God’s omniscience is all about.

The difference between His knowing and ours is that His knowing is right side in, ours inside out. We look at the reality outside of us and add to our minds knowledge. God knows, and reality happens. When we know, our minds match reality. When He knows reality matches His mind. Indeed it flows out of His mind. As Plato stumbled upon like a blinded squirrel tripping over the mother of all acorns, reality is the shadow, and the mind of God the reality.

I began to grasp this when I was in college. At a small Bible study my professor asked- “RC, what would happen if God were to say, ‘RC, you are a car’?” “Well,” I explained, “since the whole of the universe stands on His truth, His lie would cause the universe to collapse in on itself.” “Nice try,” he said, “but that’s not what I’m looking for.” “OK, I suppose that if God told a lie He’d stand against Himself, would instantly cease to be. The universe would freeze forever.” “RC, if God were to say, ‘RC, you are a car’ you would sprout wheels. Your nose would become a steering wheel, your chest an engine.”

God’s word is to reality what Midas’ touch was to gold. Whatever God speaks comes to pass unstoppably and immediately. When God called Adam to name the animals He called him to take something concrete, a hippo, and make something abstract out of it, the word, hippo. Adam reflected his Maker’s glory, copying Him. But just as the mirror flips perspective, the difference is that our Lord took the abstract word, hippo, and made the concrete reality. Adam names, moving thing to idea; God speaks, moving from idea to thing.

Which puts some perspective on the glorious truth that our Redeemer, our Savior, God the Son is called by John, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, the Word,

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made. In Him was life, and the life was the light of men. And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it (John 1:1-5).

John is here more stuttering than rambling. That is, first, there is a connection between being deity and being the Word. It is because God is self-existence, eternal, not dependent, contingent or derived, that all other things are creatures, dependent, contingent and derived. It is His eternal power and Godhead, remember, that we suppress in our fallen nature (Romans 1) but God is true and every man a liar. Word-ness, in short, and God-ness, are one and the same thing.

Second, because Word communicates, we should expect a plurality of persons in the Godhead. Words exist to communicate; communication requires a speaker and a hearer. Thus the Word was not just God, but the Word was with God.

Third, it is not just because He was at the beginning that all things were made, but because He is the Word. John is here, of course, echoing the language of Moses in Genesis 1, where God spoke the universe into existence. He is not called the Word because He made the world, rather He spoke the world because He is the Word. Reality awaits His command. He speaks and it is so. Light, the earth, indeed galaxies beyond number were not built, arranged, but spoken. He made it all. If it is made, He spoke it. If He did not speak it, it is not.

In Him was life. The whole of the creation stands by the word of His power. He sustains us, and all that is around us. It is because He is the Word that in Him we live and move and have our being. The Beatles, having claimed to be bigger than Jesus, told us to let it be. But Jesus, who is bigger than the Beatles, keeps us, and the Beatles, but telling reality to let there be. Let there be light, and there was light. Let there be paper and puppies and popsicles, and there was paper and puppies and popsicles, all because He is the Word.

Jesus is the Logos. He is the creator of all reality. He is all power. He is the ordering principle, the logic that drives out the chaos. He is the one who spoke us first into life, and then again into life anew by His Spirit, the very breathe of His Word. He is the Alpha and the Omega, not just the beginning and end of history, but the beginning and end of all speech. He spoke the light, and it was, and in the end, we will all bow. The Lord will be in His Holy Temple, and all the earth will be silent before Him (Habakkuk 2:20).

We are called to be a people of the Word. We not only do not heed the clamor of the world, but we will not buy the lie that we can separate the Word from His Word. We know all of God’s Word is the Word, that the verbum Dei is the vox Dei, the Word of God is the voice of God. We are students of the Word, believers of the Word, rejoicers in the Word, defenders of the Word, defined by the Word.

The world sees the world as the product of the world, a self-governing, self-sustaining machine. It’s good that we would stand against the claims of Darwin that the universe made itself, to affirm it as the handiwork of the Word. But it is better to remember that He also sustains it, moment-by-moment, one miracle after another. His mercies are not just fresh each day, but each moment, as He continues to sing, “Let there be.” May we, with the stars of heaven answer back, “Amen and amen.”

Our King has no need to muster His forces to go into battle. He need not place this regiment here and that battalion over there. We do not fight to secure the victory, but to display the glory. He speaks and it is so. He has spoken already this glorious truth, that He has already overcome the world. Let us therefore be of good cheer. His kingdom is forever. The grass withers. The flower fades. But the Word of our Lord endures forever.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Apostles' Creed, Biblical Doctrines, creation, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Latin Theological Terms, sovereignty, theology, wonder | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Word of His Power; The Power of His Word

Yes Gremlins, No Podcast, Apologies, See You Next Week Redux

The gremlins got us again. Technical difficulties keep us from posting a new Jesus Changes Everything Podcast today. We hope to have everything up and running next week if not sooner. As with last week, we offer instead this week’s Bible study on Being As Children, in which we explore how Jesus shows the way in His zeal to please our Father. “>Here.

Posted in 10 Commandments, announcements, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, communion, cyberspace, grace, RC Sproul JR, theology, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Yes Gremlins, No Podcast, Apologies, See You Next Week Redux

Growing Pains: Annihilating God’s Character

Our little corner of the interwebs is up in arms over actor Kirk Camerson’s recent admission that he is finding the doctrine of annihilation to be preferable to the doctrine of eternal conscious torment for those who die outside of Christ. The saints, including my beloved wife Lisa, have written many fine exegetical responses to this departure from orthodoxy. It’s not my intention to add to the list. Instead I’d like to address the real appeal of the doctrine to Kirk, that annihilationism seems more consistent with God’s character.

Before I do, a few words about Kirk. I have briefly met him, but would not say that I know him. I found his public work, whether with my friend Ray Comfort, and The Way of the Master, or my friends the Kendrick brothers, and Fireproof, the movie, excellent. I was delighted to hear years ago that he had left behind dispensational eschatology. Every time I’ve seen him on screen I’ve found him earnest, engaging and, well, excellent.

This recent mistake, not so much. While I don’t know that I’d claim being wrong on this issue is proof you’re outside the kingdom, neither it is some secondary matter that elicits a mere “ho-hum.” The so-called “evangelical pope,” John Stott likewise flirted with this error, which is far more troubling as he should have known better.

Here are three major issues I have with this kerfluffle.

1. While everyone is a theologian, not every theologian should have a wide audience when flirting with deviations from the faith once delivered. Speculation, if it has a place, isn’t out in public. The Federal Vision trainwreck’s destructive power was likely less the fruit of a few formerly Reformed thinkers becoming more Lutheran, more of them sharing their sloppy homework with the world. How is it that Kirk was confident enough to share his new thoughts, but not confident enough to take a hard stand? Did he first talk with a competent, orthodox theologian before making an ill-prepared pitch on a podcast? Maybe he did and we just don’t know about it. Could be. But…

2. If he had done so I can’t fathom how his reasoning could have survived. Any competent theologian would have been able to explain that we don’t make these decisions by suggesting God’s just too nice for hell. This is precisely the very form of reasoning used by sexual perverts who want to play church. “The Jesus I know loves love and would never condemn a man for loving another man” they reason. “Jesus is nice” trumps all that Jesus tells us in His Word about the righteous confines of sexual congress.

So the idea that some of the enemies of God, continuing eternally in their rebellion against the living God would forever continue to receive the just wrath of the living God doesn’t fit with…? What? God, or God’s justice, or God’s mercy? Despite the clear fact that God Himself affirms that He prepares vessels for destruction (Romans 9:22)? Despite God’s justice demanding it?

No, it’s God’s mercy, His compassion, that makes Kirk incredulous when faced with the claim the damned suffer eternally. But they, the damned, are not recipients of His mercy. His mercy is not universal, as He Himself boldly insists time and again. They receive His justice.

3. Perhaps worst of all, annihilationism destroys the justice of His mercy. If God’s character is such that any sin can be punished short of fully, then Jesus did not have to die. Or He died for the eternal life of believers, and for the ultimate non-existence of non-believers. Jesus suffered for the damned, to make their suffering finite. Or, if God can wave a magic mercy wand, then He died for nothing. Kirk wants us to take God’s mercy seriously. Amen to that. We take it seriously enough to know that, because it could not sweep away His justice, it cost His Son.

GK Chesterton wisely warns us that we should never tear down a fence until we know why it was first put up. Kirk would have been wise to keep this in mind. Embracing annihilationism isn’t a defense of God’s character, but an assault on it. May God in His mercy remind Kirk, and all those tempted to tinker with the Almighty, of Who He is.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Apostles' Creed, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, eschatology, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Bible Study, Tonight: To Be As Children: Aiming to Please

We continue our Monday Bible study at 7:00. Dinner at 6:15.

We air the study on Facebook Live (RC-Lisa Sproul). Within a day or two we post the video of the study right here for those who would like to watch on their own schedule.

Our study considers God’s call that we be as children. Tonight- Aiming to Please

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Bible Study, Tonight: To Be As Children: Aiming to Please

Does God Want Me to Be Happy? A Defense of Happiness

The Bible is replete with warnings. Those yet outside of His grace are warned of the certainty of judgment. Those weighing life and death are warned to consider the cost before taking up the cross. And those born from above are warned of persecution, hatred, and the many troubles of this world. We all walk the via Dolorosa.

Knowing these biblical doctrines, we are rightly put out by purveyors of popcorn prosperity. Vapid promises of health and wealth or smiling faces offering you your best life now. We scorn the notion that God wants us to be happy. There is a certain charlatan appeal to the merry mongers. Who doesn’t want to believe not only that they can be happy, but that someone will provide a map? But there’s another reason this dark distortion of God’s Word won’t die and go away- God’s Word.

The same Word that calls us to take up our cross tells us that He came to bring life, and life abundant. The Word that warns of persecution tells us that if we ask our Father for an egg, He’ll not give us a stone. The same Word that gives us the sorrows of Job tells us “Now the Lord blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning.” (42:12) One cannot choose either the idea that good times and pleasant circumstances are the will of God for all men everywhere, and every time, nor that God exclusively uses hardship and paucity to shape us for blessings that all reside on the other side of the vale.

The truth is that God’s will for His own is that we would be made ever more like Jesus. The glory of suffering and hardship is that it is potent to move us in that direction. It is a good thing to face dark providences and loss with joy precisely because such does the good work of making us more like Him. That doesn’t mean, however, that when we find ourselves in a bed of roses we are far from Him. He is the Great Gardener. He is the Groom who loves His bride and delights to shower her with every good gift. Hardship cleanses the bride. Blessed circumstances help the bride remember that she is His beloved.

Both are true, and both are beautiful. Does God want you to be happy? He wants you to both be remade into the image of His Son, and to feel His love and delight in you along the way, to receive the gifts of the bride. In hardship, remember the work He is doing in you, rebuilding you into the image of Christ, the express image of the glory of the Father. In blessing, know that He loves you, delights in you, rejoices over you, because you bear the image of the Son. In all circumstances rejoice, because He loves you.

Posted in 10 Commandments, ABCs of Theology, apologetics, Apostles' Creed | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does God Want Me to Be Happy? A Defense of Happiness

Beholding the Lamb of God: The Forever Gospel

Our hindsight encourages our arrogance. Rather than gratitude for all we’ve been shown we scoff at those who saw less. We expose our ingratitude for the full revelation of God’s Word by laughing at those who lacked it. Indeed we’re fools enough to believe that those who were witnesses to the life and ministry of Jesus had the advantage over us who have a mere book. Why, we seem to believe, had I been there, had I witnessed the miracles, had I heard Him declare “Before Abraham was, I AM,” I would have been on my face in worship.

We’re no better, and likely worse, than those who saw and didn’t believe, who heard, and didn’t understand. There is nothing new under the sun, and thus no reason to believe ourselves more astute than our often obtuse fathers in the faith. That we wouldn’t have seen it coming, however, doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have.

Genesis 3:15, that text that theologians call the “proto-gospel” reads- And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel.” This is the gospel in its least revealed form. God does not tell us about the incarnation, about the crucifixion, about the resurrection.

Instead He tells us two key points. First, the good guys win. The devil will be defeated. But the second point is a bit puzzling at first glance- the judgment on the serpent includes the news that the serpent will bruise the heel of the Seed of the woman. With our hindsight we know this speaks of Christ’s suffering on our behalf. The cost of our redemption will be great indeed. The notion that the savior would be a suffering savior is right here, where the notion of a savior is first mentioned.

The same principle, the idea that suffering, or the shedding of blood, must come to pass shows up again in the same chapter, as God replaces the fig leaf coverings Adam and Eve fashioned for themselves with with the skins of animals. The message of sacrifice, the shedding of blood, suffering, substitution, appeared first in the Garden.

It is a ram that shows up in the account of Abraham and Isaac on Mount Moriah. Remember, however, that when Isaac asked his father about the missing sacrifice as they made their way, Abraham noted that the Lord would provide. And so He did. Is it just possible, I wonder, if the ram was stuck in the thicket not only to make him accessible, but to prefigure the crown of thorns our Lord would be forced to wear?

The lamb, however, first comes into clear focus at the Passover. How easy, however, it is to miss even this. The first message of the Passover is something of a surprise. Throughout all the plagues that God sent we are reminded that God’s people are spared. The destruction falls upon the enemies of God, precisely because they had enslaved the friends of God.

The function of the Passover, however, the blood upon the lintel wasn’t merely to inform God the Holy Spirit that there were Hebrews in the house. The blood was no mere “Do not disturb” sign. Instead it communicated a vital truth- that those inside were likewise, in themselves, under the curse of God. The lamb was the substitute, the expression of the wrath of God poured out on the innocent.

This, of course, was why the lamb had to be spotless. The issue wasn’t merely that God is particular, that He wanted His people to give of their best. Rather the purpose was to represent the purity of the lamb. It had to be without physical blot or blemish because the One the lamb pointed to would have to be spiritually without blot or blemish. One could argue in turn that this at least is a hint of the necessity of the incarnation. While ewes give birth to lambs, sinners give birth to sinners.

Isaiah the prophet, of course, gave us still more clues about the nature of the Messiah and His work. Isaiah describes for us the suffering servant, the one by whose stripes we are healed. He even draws on the imagery at the very opening of the book that bears his name, as he, speaking for God calls us to come and reason together, and promises that though our sins be as scarlet they shall be as white as snow, though they be red like crimson, they will be like wool. The Lamb of God will make us white, like He is.

It should not surprise us, since such was his calling, that John the Baptist would be the one to make clear all that had been shrouded in mystery. The one who prepared the way of the Lord, upon seeing His Lord approaching the Jordan declared, “Behold the Lamb of God, who takes away the sins of the world.” Here John affirms that the reality of which all other lambs had been but types, has come. John affirms that the Lamb will take away our sins. And perhaps more shocking still, he affirms that the Lamb is the sacrifice not just for the Jews, but for all who would turn to Him. Thus Jesus’ earthly ministry begins.

It is near the end of His earthly ministry, however, that we see still more the lamb-like quality of our Lord. The One who is the conquering Lion of Judah, the One who carries a rod of iron with which to break the knees of kings and rulers, the One who is bringing all things under submission to Himself, the Lord of lords, goes to His death like a lamb to the slaughter. He opened not His mouth. He did not speak in His own defense. He did not call upon the heavenly host to come to His aid. With all meekness He laid down His life for us.

Those who loved our Lord longed to see Him as a devouring lion. They wanted fire called down on the Samaritans. They wanted Rome under their own boot. But for three years He had told them that things are not as they seemed. Those who wanted to be first get that way by going to the back of the line. Those who wanted to receive would only do so as they gave. The first would be last. And conquest happens by surrender, victory by defeat, exaltation by humiliation. Lambs, in the end, are lions. Behold the Lion of God, without blemish, gentle, and silent as a lamb.

In the first century they missed Jesus for the same reason that we do. They thought Him a perfect fit for their own agenda. They held on to their plans. For a time they dared to hope He would be the one to bring them to pass. Just like us. We are called however, to lay aside our agendas. To joyfully confess with Him, “nevertheless, not my will but Thine be done.” We are to give up on our leading, and take up our following. He is not just the lamb with blemish, but the Shepherd without flaw.

For the Lamb sits upon His throne. He rules and He reigns. And He does it all for the sake of His glory. Worthy is the lamb that was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom and strength and honor and glory and blessing. World without end. Amen.

Posted in 10 Commandments, ABCs of Theology, Biblical theology, Theses, typology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Beholding the Lamb of God: The Forever Gospel

This week’s study, To Be As Children- The Wonder of Wonder

Posted in Advent | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week’s study, To Be As Children- The Wonder of Wonder

Yes Gremlins, No Podcast, My Apologies, See You Next Week

The gremlins got us again. Technical difficulties keep us from posting a new Jesus Changes Everything Podcast today. We hope to have everything up and running next week.

Posted in ABCs of Theology, abortion, announcements, cyberspace | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Yes Gremlins, No Podcast, My Apologies, See You Next Week

Missing the (Decimal) Point

It’s a volatile real estate market out there. Prices have, in the past few years, shot through the roof faster than, well, faster than the last real estate bubble we had. And they have also come crashing down, when the bubble pops. How well you do buying or selling depends on whether it’s a buyer’s or a seller’s market. Or does it? Follow me through this scenario to see which part of the magic trick you missed.

Suppose I own a house that in this market could sell for a million dollars. It matters not how much I owe on it, if anything. It matters not what I paid for it, if anything. I sell it for a million dollars. Now, if I want a house in a similar neighborhood, or a similar size, you know, say an exact replica of the house I just sold, how much will I need to pay? Right, a million dollars. So how much have I gained through this supposed red hot market? Nothing.

Still not seeing it? Ok, let’s try it this way. Suppose I buy a house for a million dollars. Now suppose the market tanks. I sell my house for a measly $10,000. Calamitous, right? No. I’ve lost nothing. What would it cost me to buy an exact replica of the house I just sold? $10,000. Before the sale I had a house that the market valued at $10,000. After the sale and the buying of the other house I have a replica of the first house valued at $10,000. Samesies. What did I lose in this burst bubble market? Nothing.

In both scenarios I had a house and after selling it I’m able to buy a house that costs what I sold my house for. Moving from one market to another, moving from one sized house to another may change up things a bit but the bottom line is that whether it’s a buyer’s market or a seller’s market makes little difference if you’re both a buyer and a seller.

The key to understanding basic economics, it seems to me, is never leaving part of the equation out. Henry Hazlitt’s classic, Economics in One Lesson, which I commend most highly to you, upended the old saw that breaking things is the path to wealth simply by doing just that, showing the part of the equation we leave out. When we think we’re getting a free lunch, we can be certain we’re not looking at the whole thing. We know that because there isn’t such a thing as a free lunch. Wealth doesn’t come by invisible and unknowable forces but by creating it. That means working, producing, meeting the interests of consumers who will freely pay for what you provide.

Buying low and selling high is all well and good. But if you’re buying the same thing you’re selling and at the same time, you’ll not likely find yourself getting richer or poorer. Just be sure you don’t find yourself duped or deluded.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Economics in This Lesson, Kingdom Notes, politics, RC Sproul JR, work | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Missing the (Decimal) Point