Romans Study, Chap 14 at 7 eastern tonight

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in announcements, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Study, Chap 14 at 7 eastern tonight

Why won’t unbelievers come to church?

Sin. The real question is, our sin or theirs? It has become fashionable, and perhaps always was, for some believers to blame other believers for unbelievers choosing to be unbelievers. When Bill Hybels, building Willow Creek into one of the first mega-churches, sent pollsters door to door through Chicago neighborhoods asking people why they didn’t go to church they found a fairly narrow list of objections. Church, many said, was not relevant. Church was always asking for money. Church was boring. People in church were hypocrites and judgmental. They’d been hurt by someone in church in their past.

Do you notice anything missing? No one answered, “Because there I’d encounter the God I am in rebellion against.” There are at least two possible reasons that answer never came up. Either they’d never encountered God in church, or they had, and in their rebellion, didn’t like it.

The church is indeed full of sinners. It is crawling with hypocrites and the judgmental. The reason for that is simple enough- all people are hypocritical and judgmental, and the church is full of people. The church hurts people for the same reason, because people hurt people and the church is full of people.

Because we are all sinners the solution isn’t to no longer sin. Instead the solution is to recognize that the message of the church is the solution to our sin. The church is that place where sinners gather to learn about, celebrate and praise the one sinless man who gave us, as we acknowledge our sin and His life and death for us, peace with the living God. It is where we meet with Him.

Could there be anything less boring, or anything more relevant? On the other hand, could there be anything more useless than seeking to bring unbelievers into church through mimicking their music, their language, their ideologies? Unbelievers don’t need more of what they already have. The last thing they need is to be made to feel comfortable. Welcome, yes. Loved, of course. Comfortable? By no means.

The silly trope that the problem with the church is that it’s just not hip enough is a lie from the pit. Big screens, skinny jeans, and fog machines are not only not the gospel, but are distractions from it. More swear words, more wokeness, more comedy do not reveal the glory of Christ but expose the hunger for approval of His pathetic sheep.

Should the church seek greater obedience to the Lord? Of course. Our sinfulness is something to be repented of, turned from. What we ought not to do is flaunt it, to make unbelievers feel more welcome. Should we act better than we are? Of course not. We repent of our sin. We don’t deny it or hide from it. We confess it, in shame. May unbelievers come to know that church is where sin is exposed, and when repented of, completely and utterly forgiven. The only freedom anyone has from condemnation is at the foot of the cross.

Why won’t unbelievers come to church? Because as yet they don’t believe. What they need is not a comfortable place to stay in their sin, but the proclamation of the blood of Christ to cover our sin.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, evangelism, grace, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR, repentance, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

We Thirst

Our sins leave scars. First, they not only wound others but hurt us, damage us. Then, by His grace, and by His scars, they are healed. They are forgotten by the One who knows all things, the beginning from the end, but not by us. Because we are healed, our past sins cannot hurt us. However, because we are scarred, we do not forget.

David rightly bewailed that his sins were ever before him. How much more so must James’ sins have ever been before him? We, as James tells us, have His Word as a mirror, telling us who and what we are. James, the whole time he was growing up, had the mirror beside him at breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Every moment of his youth, there was his elder brother, not merely preferred, not merely more accomplished, but the One who literally never sinned. Not once. The comparison could not have been more stark.

James responded just as I would have, not by admiring his elder brother, not by aspiring to be like Him, but by rejecting Him, despising Him, by raging against his own exposure. Like his first elder brother, Cain, James, seeing how his brother pleased His heavenly Father, was filled with envy. And James murdered Him in his heart.

The Scripture tells us nothing of James’ rebirth. We know that on the cross, Jesus placed His blessed mother under the care of the Apostle John rather than her natural son, James, suggesting that James was brought to faith sometime after the resurrection, though this is merely conjecture. We cannot help, however, but imagine that his conversion must have been a dramatic one. To have known Jesus for so long, to have rejected Him for so long, to have not just a common life of sin but to be burdened by a seething cauldron of jealousy, only then to be awakened, was likely more unexpected and disorienting than even Saul’s conversion. Which is where the scars come in.

James did not enter the kingdom having thought himself a fine fellow who had a few minor weaknesses for which Jesus had to die. After a lifetime lived before the mirror, he knew his sin, which is why he is such a strident watchman against our own sins. As he carried his scars with him, he was unashamed to name what we are outside of His grace. He did not dance around sin, but named it— and its ugly fount.

What causes quarrels and what causes fights among you? Is it not this, that your passions are at war within you? You desire and do not have, so you murder. You covet and cannot obtain, so you fight and quarrel. (James 4:1–2a)

How did James know this about us? Because he first knew it about himself. He did not fail to see his own scars because he looked to the scars of others; rather, he saw the scars of others because he was all too familiar with his own. We want. We hunger. We desire. And when those desires are left unfulfilled, we quarrel, fight, and murder. At this point, it would seem that the solution would be to suppress our desires, to put them to death, to mortify them. If the desires are the root of the problem, we would be fools to merely lop the top off the noxious weeds. That leaves the root still there.

Which is why James gives us the wisdom of God rather than the folly of man. James 4:2 doesn’t end with stoic indifference, counsel on how to reach a point of imperturbability. Instead, he says, “You do not have because you do not ask” (v. 2b). All this hunger that leads us to hate our brother is wrong not because we are hungry, but because we consume what does not satisfy. If we are drinking water from the ocean, we will not slake our thirst by demanding the whole of the ocean for ourselves. Neither will we solve the problem simply by denying our thirst. Rather, the solution is to thirst after the water that satisfies, living water.

James’ envy of his brother, in turn, was not solved either by surpassing or by suppressing Him but by embracing Him. All the guilt that weighed him down, all the envy, they only go away when we become one with Him. The only way to be praised with Him is to be raised with Him, and for that, we have to die.

Jesus put it another way. When He spoke of all that we desire, He didn’t tell us to stop desiring. Rather, He told us to seek first His kingdom, His righteousness, and then all these things would be added to us. Everything we think we want, every petty thing we pursue to satisfy us is but a mirage, choking hot sand that we, in our madness, mistake for water. He, however, is that water by which we will never again thirst. The promise of God in Christ is not that He will take away our thirst—it is that He, and He alone, will satisfy it.

My elder Brother is everything I am not. He is everything, and I am nothing. My scars remind me of my lack. His scars remind me of His provision. My heavenly Father is satisfied. My longing is satisfied. And the miracle of it all is that Jesus is satisfied with James, with you, and with me. For He is beautifying us into His bride. Because the day of the marriage feast is coming, let us be satisfied. The Spirit and the bride say, “Come.” And let the one who hears say, “Come.” And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who desires take the water of life without price.

Posted in 10 Commandments, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, resurrection, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Trans Sport Nation or, Who You Gonna Call?

There are myriad reasons conservatives lose so many battles in the culture wars. Among them are the hunger for approval, the desire to find a middle way, ignorance on the issues, lack of backbone. We should not overlook, however, our propensity to miss the forest for the trees, our dandelion lopping failure to get to the root of the issue.

Consider the recent outrage over President Biden’s executive orders bringing the sexually confused under the protection of Title IX legislation. Among other things Title IX came into being a generation ago to ensure “fairness” to women at universities and colleges across the country. It sought to ensure that women’s collegiate athletics received as much institutional support at a given school as men’s collegiate athletics. Now it is being used to require schools to open up their women’s athletics programs to men. Cowardly, unmanly and confused men to be sure, but men nonetheless.

As is to be expected, since there are votes to be won among the sane middle, conservative heroes donned their armor and have gone out to meet this dragon in battle. Texas Governor Greg Abbott has led the charge. Five states have already begun the process of filing suit against the federal government. For which I give two cheers.

Why not three? I’m aghast and appalled at the notion of men competing against women. I reject trans ideology, along with every letter and symbol wrapped in the rainbow flag. I also, however, reject the unconstitutional notion that the federal government has any right to say anything to anyone about education. The 10th Amendment from the Bill of Rights explicitly states that if the Constitution doesn’t explicitly grant the federal government jurisdiction over something then it has no jurisdiction. What does the Constitution say the role of the federal government is with respect to education, college education, college athletics, or competitors in college athletics? The same thing war is good for, absolutely nothing. Huh.

The issue isn’t what rules Title IX adopts under this president or that. The issue is Title IX. If Title IX forbad a college from allowing men to compete against women it would still be wrong. It’s simply none of their business.

Wait, you say. I’ve left something out of the equation. Title IX only applies to colleges and universities that take federal funds. Yeah, well, what about that? Doesn’t that give them jurisdiction? I’m so glad you asked. Let me remind you of something you may have forgotten since two paragraphs ago- the 10th Amendment. The federal government, violating the Constitution by writing checks to colleges, is not now exempt from the Constitution’s prohibition against intrusion into college athletics. Biden’s rules are out of line because Title IX is out of line. Federal subsidies change nothing because, you guessed it, federal subsidies are out of line.

When my alma mater, Grove City College, refused to affirm its compliance with Title IX back in the 1980s, the feds took our case all the way to the Supreme Court. There Grove City emerged victorious on 10th Amendment grounds. We refused to king’s money and were thus free of his dictates. In the end who controls the government is far less important that what the government controls.

Posted in Economics in This Lesson, Education, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, logic, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, sport | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

More Conversation with Doreen Virtue; COVID Nuremberg & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, covid-19, cyberspace, ethics, interview, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, Nostalgia, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on More Conversation with Doreen Virtue; COVID Nuremberg & More

Sober Minded

All of us, I presume, from time to time change our minds. We know that we err, and we know that we grow in grace. At least part of that growth happens when we no longer believe the errors we once believed. Sometimes we add new information to what we believe. Sometimes we jettison old information. And sometimes we do both. I used to believe, decades ago, for instance, that the universe is many millions of years old. I now believe that it is less than ten thousand years old. That is progress.

Paul commands of elders that they, among other things, be sober-minded. I suspect that many of us give precious little thought to this command. Too many of us dismiss all of Paul’s qualifications. Even if we try to apply them, however, we often slide right over this one. We may assume “sober-minded” means the same thing as “not given to much wine.” We may assume that we don’t want elders who are given to whoopee cushions, joy buzzers and oversized clown shoes.

To be sober-minded, however, is to treat truth seriously, and to have a healthy doubt as to our own understanding of truth. It is all too easy to get confused here. Many churches have their fair share of “theology wonks.” These are usually young men who, happily, have a passion for theology. They read substantial books, and they engage in substantial conversations. You’ll usually find them at the church picnic, smoking a pipe, with a small cadre of acolytes sitting around them as they share their wisdom. They are contemplating the tug and pull of Nestorianism and Eutychianism. They are wondering out loud if maybe the hyper-preterists have it right, that Jesus may not be coming back again. They are expositing the proper procedure for stoning rebellious children.

A sober-minded person should think through the challenges of the incarnation. A sober-minded person should know the claims of all sorts of heretics, including hyper-preterists. A sober-minded person ought to contemplate the law of God. But there are two things a sober-minded person doesn’t do. He doesn’t practice experimental theology right in front of people. And he certainly doesn’t veer from this bedrock position to that one, dragging his sheep behind him. Indeed a sober-minded man, if he finds himself questioning some fundamentals, will grow frightened rather than excited, will grow more careful rather than more reckless, will encourage the faithful to look away, not to draw near.

If a man, for instance, suddenly “gets” covenant theology and now believes in baptizing covenant children he does not now take up this holy cause with the same zeal with which he defended the Baptist view just weeks before. A sober-minded man doesn’t, when he gives in to the biblical weight of Calvinism crusade for it just as he once crusaded against it. A sober-minded man instead thinks- “Wow. I once was so passionate about what I now know is error. Perhaps I ought not to lay hands on myself and become webmaster of www.don’t-listen-to-old-me-listen-to-new-me.com.”

One need not be the theology wonk to fail here. Neither does one need to be or aspire to be an elder to heed the call to sobriety of mind. Those who follow theology wonks are likewise not sober-minded. They are instead drinking a dangerous brew. If you are following someone who gives you intellectual whiplash, you would be wise to get off that bus. If your local guru is telling you about all the exciting things he saw on the other side of the Tiber, walk away. He leads sheep to slaughter, not to green pastures. It makes no difference whether it be sensual or intellectual delights. Only fools heed the call of the seductress. Her paths lead to death. Wisdom, on the other hand, is sober and steady. Heed her.

Posted in Apostles' Creed, Bible Study, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Romans Study Tonight, Ch. 13, part the second

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in 10 Commandments, announcements, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, Facebook Live, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Study Tonight, Ch. 13, part the second

How can we disarm those we are witnessing to?

When the believer interacts with an unbeliever, seeking to share the good news of Jesus Christ, we have one great advantage- we’ve read their mail. That is, before the conversation even begins we know the unbeliever already knows God exists, and that they are under His judgment. This unpleasant truth they seek to suppress. But we know it’s there. We’ve read Romans 1. We know their objections are insincere smokescreens.

We don’t, however, announce our inside knowledge. Such only makes them more defensive. Instead we use it to their advantage. We can chip away at their bulwark before we even begin to make our case. I’d suggest that for most unbelievers the foundation of that bulwark consists of two “truths.” The unbeliever believes the believer is first, not as smart as your average bear and second, more mean than your average snake.

What if, when we approach the unbeliever, we seek to bring doubt on those two gratuitous conclusions? We start by adopting a position of humility about ourselves. We are not telling the unbeliever how they can be good like we are. We are instead telling them about the one good man redeemed bad people like us. We acknowledge what is already obvious to everyone around us, that we not only were sinners before but we, even as saints, continue to struggle with sin. We rejoice that in Christ we are deemed righteous, and beloved of our Father, as are all who repent and believe.

With all due humility we also strike at the second part of that foundation, the premise that believers are stupid and unbelievers smart. Here our advantage is that this premise is only half true. We believers are stupid, but no stupider than anyone else. Our stupidity, like everyone else’s, flows out of our sin. We all face the temptation to believe what we want to believe, not what is obviously true.

The unbeliever, for instance, likely embraces the creed of western civilization- there is no such thing as objective truth. The problem is, going back to Romans 1, they already know this truth isn’t true, and, ironically, if it is true, then it’s not true. This epistemological bedrock is self-referentially absurd. It contradicts itself. If it’s true, it’s false. If it’s false, it’s false.

The unbeliever knows there is truth, even when he denies it. That he is engaged in the argument with you is all the proof you need. He’s trying to persuade you that “his” “truth” is the real truth and “your” “truth” is false. Don’t, though it can be hard not to, embarrass him. Acknowledge that you too have been known to embrace some pretty silly ideas, that you too are sometimes mislead by your own emotions. However stupid we may be, truth is knowable. And he knows that.

We haven’t yet come to the place for explaining or defending God’s existence, the Bible as truth, Jesus as God our Savior. What we have done, however, is prepare the way. We have made low every mountain and raised up every valley. We have been John the Forerunner. That is a good start.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, grace, logic, philosophy, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Hard Book

There are at least two different kinds of hard sayings in the Bible. On the one hand, there are texts that are just plain terribly hard to understand— texts to which we respond, “What in the world could that mean?” Peter himself acknowledged that Paul was often difficult to grasp (2 Peter 3:16). On the other hand, there are texts that are not at all hard to understand but that are hard to submit to— texts to which we respond, “This text couldn’t possibly mean what it says, could it?” See the disciples wrestling over Jesus’ saying about rich men and needle eyes.

Among the many snippets of wisdom I remember learning from my father was this one— when you are reading in your Bible and you come across a text that troubles you, that doesn’t quite sit right with you, don’t move on while saying to yourself, “All the Bible is helpful. I’ll just move on to something else helpful.” Instead, he encouraged, slow down, set up camp, and dig in. It is these texts that are most needful for us. Where we are in tension with the Word of God is just where we need to change, for His Word is always right.

Which brings me to my caveat about “hard sayings.” The truth of the matter is that the Bible is a hard book. It does not merely contain hard sayings—what it says is hard from beginning to end. It calls us to absolute and total obedience to the God who made us and made the world we live in. It then exposes our utter failure to obey. Indeed, it recounts the history of God’s people so that we might see our own failure in theirs. It shows us in Jesus what we are supposed to be, and then it shows us killing Him for being what we are supposed to be. It shows the Father pouring out His wrath on Jesus, the wrath we earned with our own sins. It calls us to acknowledge our sin, to turn from it to Him. And then again calls us to obey all that He commands.

If we have been reborn, we are stuck with all of this. The Bible, that book that is in part and in whole hard, is His Word. We, unlike those outside the kingdom, are not free to deny that it is true. But we are, like those outside the kingdom, made uncomfortable by it. What we do with the Bible is less denying that it is true, and more denying that it speaks. Our skepticism doesn’t defy God’s Word; it mutes it. We take the shocking demand for obedience and turn it into an ethic soft enough that we are capable of keeping it.

Perhaps more important, our ethic is soft enough that our unbelieving friends won’t complain. We remove not just the offense of the gospel, but the offense of the law.
It is, of course, fear that drives our weakness. We don’t want to lose our social standing. We don’t want to trouble our own consciences. We don’t want to rock the boat of our well-ordered lives.

Jesus, however, gives this hard saying to us: “Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness” (Matt. 6:33). Note how we soften this terrifying command. First, we turn the kingdom of God into something invisible and otherworldly. If the kingdom is invisible, or in a distant future, there is no reason I can’t at least appear to be normal to the watching world. Seeking the kingdom— this radical call to set aside our own agendas, this radical call to be set apart from the kingdom of this world— becomes vague and empty.

But we are also told to seek His righteousness. We can, however, dial down the dread even on this command. We begin by defining righteousness down to a bland niceness that, again, even the world approves of. Indeed, we are tempted to take all of the Bible’s commands and reduce them down to “be nice, like the Jesus that the world believes in and loves.” Jesus, however, the real Jesus, was and is hated by the world, and He promised us that as we are like Him, we too will be so hated. And we end by turning the glorious gospel truth that we receive by faith, His righteousness, into a soft pillow to loosen us from the demands of the law. We do receive His righteousness by faith. This, however, grounds, rather than replaces, our call to become more obedient to His law.

We are called to take up not just His cross, but ours, to embrace not just His shame but our own. The hard truth is that the Bible tells us that we are called to hard lives, to be hated by the world and to walk the via dolorosa. If we are not crying out for His mercy and His strength, we may just be on the wrong road.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, hermeneutics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Clickety Do Daw

One of the troubles with inward sins is that they are inward. (The other trouble is that they are sins.) With inward sins, those we cannot measure objectively, it is all too easy to claim we have them whipped. When I covet my neighbor’s car, no alarm goes off. When you hate your brother without just cause, no one calls 911. That’s why it’s so easy to pretend we’ve mastered what has actually mastered us.

We not only pat ourselves on the back for having won these invisible battles, but we all get together and mock those losers that we assume are failing. Everyone knows that social media gives us the opportunity to present ourselves in our best light. Everyone knows that people tout their victories rather than their defeats. Everyone assumes that this is everyone else, when it’s really everyone. As one wise comic put it, “You’re not stuck in traffic. You are traffic.”

“Man pleasing” is another of those internal sins that are invisible, unless they reach the most obnoxious extreme. One need not be an obsequious lickspittle to like it when people think your vocabulary level proves your high intelligence level. All one has to do, like me, is look for the clicks, the likes, and the shares. All one has to do is keep an ear out for notifications, harbingers of tiny little dopamine releases.

I may belong to the most ironic and pathetic class of man pleasers. Some of us wouldn’t think of softening a position to maintain respectability. Some of us would never seek out gentle words to communicate hard truths. No, we’re the ones who proudly earn the reputation of being prophetic, bold, uncompromising. We hunger for the most precious of accolades, entrance into the Untouched by the Approval of Men Hall of Fame. We want people, lots of people, to think we don’t care what people think.

The problem isn’t the hunger, but its object. That is, we only begin to win this battle when we seek satisfaction in the love of our heavenly Father. Strangers on the internet cannot fill that yawning belly, no matter what our analytics report. We will never be truly alive until we are dead to ourselves. The trouble with our solution, as with so many solutions, is getting there is so much easier said than done.

It is a good thing to want to do great things for the kingdom. It is a bad thing to want to be great in the kingdom. It is a difficult thing to tell these two apart. We get there, I suspect, when our Father does a good thing in us. We need His grace to put to death in us our hunger for the approval of men. We need to implore our Father to bless us in this way, knowing that He is our good Father who loves us, who gives us good gifts. He has shown His love for us, not by growing our reach, or building our brand but by hiding us under the shadow of the cross.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments