Romans Study Tonight- All Things Work Together for Good

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Study Tonight- All Things Work Together for Good

Can sin be my identity?

No, and yes. One of the strange results of efforts made to shoehorn homosexuality into the church is the claim of many at best celibate and at worst actively practicing, that they are “gay Christians.” The latter try to claim their sin is no sin. The former claim their inclination is no sin, but it is a good way to center their identity. We ought to say no to both. Paul is quite clear that those who practice unrepentantly sexual immorality, homosexual acts, as well as the greedy, idolaters, drunkards and more will not inherit the kingdom (I Corinthians 6: 9-10). That excludes the latter group. The former group is excluded by the very next verse as Paul reminds his readers, “Such once were you” (vs. 11). Not, such are you, but were you. You once practiced those sins, but they do not define you now. Your identity is in Christ. You may struggle with this temptation, battle that besetting sin, but if you are in Christ He is your identity. It is how God sees you, and He is the decider.

I understand the temptation. My own webpage has as a header to describe me, “Sinner saved by grace.” When, however, I refer to myself as a sinner I’m not naming my identity. But my propensity. That is, I am one who sins. My identity, however, is in Christ. I battle the besetting sin of temper. But in Christ I am meek. I don’t want to forget what I am in myself, but cannot forget who I am in Christ.

That said, because we do still sin we are often tempted to define ourselves as we are in Christ and others as they are alone. There is a relatively well-known Christian journalist on the internet whose area of expertise is to expose what she deems to be the sins of others. I’ve been covered by this woman, who, nearly every time she refers to me she includes this juicy adjective, “Disgraced.” As in, “Disgraced Former Pastor RC Sproul Jr. Plants a Church” or “Disgraced Former Pastor RC Sproul Jr. Opens Pastoral Training Center” or words to that effect. In some sense, she is quite correct. I have scandals in my past, and sins in my present and future. I have brought shame on my Redeemer and His church. That, however, is not who I am, because I am in Christ.

Some years ago this same journalist published a book in which she openly and honestly gave an account of the, in her words, unhealthy and dangerous, emotionally dysfunctional relationship she had with an adult (19 years old) member of the youth group the journalist served while in her thirties. This is to her credit. Better still, more recently she acknowledged that her account didn’t emphasize sufficiently the power dynamic in the relationship, that she could have done better. That’s honorable. What I’m puzzled by is why she continues to identify those she doesn’t care for by their past sins, but doesn’t do the same to herself. Why is her site not called “The Disgraced Mrs. So and So Report” when she publishes pieces on those she defines in terms of their disgraces?

I’m glad she doesn’t, to tell the truth. Because that’s not who she is in Christ. That she feels comfortable describing her brothers in Christ as “disgraced,” however, is disgraceful. Such too, however, is covered by the blood of Christ. No, we don’t define ourselves by the sins we’ve committed or still struggle against. We also don’t define our brothers and sisters by the sins they’ve committed or still struggle with. Sinners? Yes, in that we sin. Saints, most assuredly because of the beautiful gospel of Jesus Christ.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Let No Man Tear Asunder

My favorite theologian of all time was wont to argue that the defining task of the theologian is to make distinctions. That’s what we do. We bring clarity through precision, precision through distinction. The man who may well have been my favorite theologian’s favorite theologian, Francis Turretin, published his three-volume work The Institutes of Elenctic Theology as a sort of systematic theology by contrast. Each point is broken down, compared and contrasted, and examined in light of its opposite.

One could argue that theologians are here following the path of their Maker. We serve a God who delights in distinctions. Reading through the creation account, for instance, we see not only the creation of light, but the separation of light and darkness, not only the creation of land, but the separation of land and sea, and land and sky.

On the other hand, the same God who delights in distinctions warns us against tearing asunder what He has brought together. He is a God who brings people of every tongue and tribe together into a holy nation, a royal priesthood. He makes of many grains one loaf.

Reformed theologians especially are given, at least when dealing with the critical issue of our salvation, to razor-thin distinctions. The links in our chain of the ordo salutis, or “order of salvation,” are strong, unbreakable, but nevertheless rather small. There is good reason for this, but also some danger. Sometimes the wedges we drive between concepts go too deep.

Consider faith and repentance. There is good reason to see these as two distinct things. With one, we look with hope to the provision of God in Christ. With the other, we acknowledge and confess our need for that work. Hypothetically, one could affirm that Jesus died for sinners and miss the glaring truth that the one making the affirmation is a sinner. One could more easily recognize the reality of his sin but know nothing of the provision in Christ. Thus, the two are two, and both equally needful.

On the other hand, one could argue that the two things are actually one, or at the very least that they flow from the same source. Faith is indeed the coming together of understanding, agreement, and trust. But on a more fundamental level, faith is simply this— believing God. Faith is displayed when God speaks and we say, “Amen.”
The devil, of course, knows that God is true. He is quite informed on the sacrifice of Christ. He knows to his very core, from the very longing of his heart by which he misses those who slipped through his fingers, that Jesus came to save sinners. He is also quite well aware of what and who he is—a sinner. All of this knowledge will make his eternity that much more painful.

Faith and repentance, then, might be at their closest when we confess that, as He says, we are sinners, and as we cry out, as He has commanded, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner” (Luke 18:13). God says, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23), and we say, “Lord, Your judgments are true.” When God says, “The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost” (1 Tim. 1:15), we do not merely affirm our agreement, but we sing it with hallelujahs and amens.

For all the important nuances, for all the valuable precision, the simple truth of the matter is we fell in the garden because we failed to believe God. All sin is a failure to believe God. The good news is that we are rescued from our sins by believing Him, both His judgment and His promise. That is, we are gifted with faith and repentance.

Just as we can make theology more complex than it need be, just as we are called, in seeking orthodoxy, to say our amens to what God has revealed about Himself, so we can make the living of our lives in faithfulness, the seeking of orthopraxy, more complex than it need be. Here, too, we are to say our amens about what God has revealed about His promises for us, about His law. He commands that we not worry about what we will eat or wear, and we are called to repent of our fears and believe His promises. He commands us to seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and we are called to repent for our pursuit of personal peace and affluence, and to believe His promises.

It is true that God is true and all men are liars. It is true, in turn, that every man is miserly while God is extravagant. Were we wise, we would repent expansively, even as we would believe with both deep conviction and broad expectation. Our sin is simple—we do not believe God, and so do not obey God. The solution is simple—believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you and your household (Acts 16:31). We do not merely believe this once and then nevermore; rather, we believe it both evermore and evermore.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Let No Man Tear Asunder

Public People, Private Lives

There has been of late a rather embarrassing battle going on on social media between competing tribes of Bible believing Calvinists who come down on different sides of what God commands for civil governments. There are good men on both sides, and men whose rhetoric tends to lack grace on both sides. As noted last week in this space, these two groups will argue about just about everything, including the relative merits of physical fitness.

In this context one young man determined to score points for Team Fitness by noting how good it is that Dr. John MacArthur is still with us, and how much better it would have been if Dr. Sproul were also still with us. A broad brushed medical history was provided for both men, with the clear implication being that Dr. MacArthur wisely pursued fitness while Dr. Sproul, unwisely did not. I will not suggest that the claim was made that Dr. Sproul was foolish, as the author made a valiant effort to make his point without disparaging my father. (And to his credit reached out to apologize and has been happily forgiven.)

My beef isn’t that the author was intentionally unkind or intentionally dishonest. My beef is that such speculations are just that, and they are on their face inappropriate. I’d suggest that those to whom it seems appropriate have a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between what is public and what is private. I understand that my father was a charming man and an engaging teacher. As such many people who did not know him think they did know him. Which is why it feels perfectly natural to opine on his exercise and dietary habits, despite knowing nothing about it.

The truth is that the great bulk of you did not know him. I wish you did because he was a wonderful man. If you didn’t, however, it’s unwise to act as though you did. And if you did, it is unwise to parade that information publicly. One young man, a friend of mine, asked for some time with my father to discuss theological issues. My father was quite surprised, not long after, to find snippets of conversation between the two show up on the young man’s blog, presented as if the conversation were an interview. The point isn’t that the young man played “Gotcha” journalism. One, he wasn’t trying to. Two, nothing my father side was anything he regretted saying. What he was frustrated with was the misleading nature of the invitation to talk.

Public people, like my father, long before they are public, are people. Which means that every biting comment they hear, every trust that is betrayed, every tidbit of speculation stings. Not because public people expect everyone to love them, but because they expect people to treat them with the same respect they would show less public people. “RC was fat and smoked for many years and therefore abandoned his post by dying, unlike John MacArthur. Be like John MacArthur” isn’t how you would treat your personal enemy, let alone your friend. But because my father was a public man, it’s fair game.

I don’t ever want to hide the blessings of my relationship with my father. That’s why I wrote Growing Up (with) RC. Neither, however, do I want my openness to be the occasion for others to take shots at RC Sproul the Public Theologian as if they wouldn’t wound RC Sproul, my father. My father didn’t deserve this, not because he was a great public theologian, but because he is a brother in Christ.

I write this not to scold my brother, but to encourage us all neither to treat public people like they can do no wrong, nor like they are open targets.

Posted in Big Eva, church, cyberspace, ethics, friendship, grace, Heroes, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

Sacred Marriage, The Good; Foreign Alliances; Babel & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in ethics, In the Beginning, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage, The Good; Foreign Alliances; Babel & More

The Lord of Darkness

I am the Lord, and there is no other; I form the light and create darkness, I make peace and create calamity; I, the Lord, do all these things” (Isaiah 6b-7).

It was Millenium Bug season, and many of my friends thought I was sick. They feared for me that my manic concern about the potential for untold hardship at the turn of the new year, 2000, not only was evidence that I suffered from Chicken Little Disease, but that I was giving up my commitment to the Reformed faith. We Reformed folk, if we believe anything, believe in the sovereignty of God. How, these friends worried, could I have even the slightest concern about this grave hardship befalling us, when I supposedly believed in the sovereignty of God? I told them often, “It’s because I believe in the sovereignty of God.” My friends reasoned in this manner- Cultural meltdown is a bad thing. God is in control of the future. Therefore bad things cannot happen. I reasoned this way- Cultural meltdown is a bad thing. God is in control of the future. Therefore “bad” things can happen. The difference in our views was that each of us believed competing unspoken premises. They believed God could not will for bad things to happen. I believe He not only could so will, but likely one day would.

Isaiah the prophet is, if only parenthetically, making the same point. That is, his larger point, which is in point of fact on point, is that God is God. He is the almighty one. To suggest that anything would come to pass that He did not sovereignly orchestrate is an affront to His sublime deity. To get us to more fully grasp this hard truth Isaiah, speaking for God, speaks an even harder truth. That is to say, neither is content to merely affirm that God is sovereign over all things, but both go the extra mile to affirm, yes, that includes the bad stuff too.

The easier version of the problem of evil addresses not the question of how men became sinners, but instead addresses the question of the fruit of that sin- why do bad things happen? Those outside the kingdom are wont to ask why bad things happen to good people. Those inside the kingdom don’t have such a pressing question for we know there are no good people. But we still struggle with the whys of hurricanes, pandemics, and in the case of Isaiah, oppression by foreign powers. Indeed we are so perplexed by the reality of suffering that we find ourselves in a rather bizarre position- trying to get God off the hook. We deny implicitly that we deserve the suffering we experience (which is true enough- we deserve far worse than any suffering we ever experience on this side of the veil) because we feel the need to justify God, to put distance between Him and our suffering lest He be found guilty for treating us unfairly.

My friends, thankfully, didn’t want to go in that direction. They were not willing to negotiate God’s sovereignty. God is sovereign, they rightly affirmed. God is good, they rightly affirmed. God won’t let these United States become a wasteland, they wrongly concluded. My friends’ real problem is that they confused these United States with the kingdom of God and they confused a pleasant and safe life with a good one. It is precisely because we were a wicked nation that worshipped affluence in 1999 that I feared for our safety. Though God spared us an earth-shaking calamity that time, does that mean He always will? Have we as a nation come to repentance? Have we owned our sin and turned from it?

That is not to say that I am now once again breaking out my “The End is Near” sandwich board. I don’t know now any more than I knew then what God was going to do in the near term future. I don’t know if our currency will go the way of the German mark, circa 1923. I don’t know if the ship of state will veer so far to the left that we’ll take on water and sink. I do know this however. If God sends a new and surprising kind of calamity upon us, it will be God who sends it. I know that His goodness and His sovereignty are not hedges against this. For we together stand guilty before Him. The very ground cries out because of the innocent blood.

More important, I know this. Isaiah’s prophecies end with the promise of the fullness of the kingdom. I know that because our God reigns, that if He sends calamity He sends it always for His glory, and for our good. Nothing truly “evil” could ever befall we who are His own. Hardship, yes. Cross bearing, by all means. Even death, of course. All of which are tools in His hand to make us more like Jesus. That, in the end, is not only not a calamity, but is the very height of glory. Fear not. He has already overcome the world.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, covid-19, creation, eschatology, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Romans Tonight, Still More on Chapter 8

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, eschatology, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Tonight, Still More on Chapter 8

Should Christian men labor for a good physique?

Proxy wars have a long history. Viet Nam was less about Viet Nam, more about the United States and the Soviet Union. Hamas may well be doing the bidding of Iran. Conservative Christians on twitter have of late been treated to the great war over Christian Nationalism. Issues of eschatology, kinship and right government have led to not just disagreement, but snark and arrogance. Who knew, however, that physical fitness would be dragged into the war?

On one side we have those who argue that physical fitness is a. good stewardship of the bodies God has given us, b. fruitful in keeping up a fighting spirit in the culture wars, c. counter-cultural d. reflective of godly masculinity. On the other side are those who argue that physical fitness is a. not directly commanded in God’s Word, b. deemed to be of little profit compared to spiritual fitness, c. culturally defined and d. reflective of an arrogant demeanor.

It is not my intention to chime in as the wizened old fat cat to call for maturity and balance over every issue coming down the pike. The problem is that every issue that comes down the pike is running on empty when it comes to maturity and balance. This one is no exception.

A few decades ago the esteemed Dr. John Frame argued that those of us who argued for the great hymns of the faith over against praise choruses and who used arguments built on the relative aesthetic virtues of each were forced to conclude that we could only sing one song, the best one. If Amazing Grace is the ultimate in objective beauty, and Holy, Holy, Holy the penultimate, that makes Holy, Holy, Holy simply the first loser, and thus to be rejected as swiftly as Reckless Love. To which I said, hogwash. Two can play that game. If beauty is really subjective, we could sing Jesus Loves Me to death metal or to the sounds of screaming babies, and it would be fine.

In like manner, the physical fitness mandate doesn’t have bright, shining lines on either side. The bros who don’t even lift would surely acknowledge that sitting all day while downing nothing but donuts is a bad thing. The bros who do lift, on the other hand, surely wouldn’t argue that eating a grape is sinful, bad stewardship because it has sugar, even if it is natural. No one is saying you can only eat kale and can never sit down.

Which means, at the end of the day, all we’re left to argue about is relative emphasis. Which means we shouldn’t argue. The Bible explicitly says,

“For one believes he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats only vegetables. Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him. Who are you to judge another’s servant?” (Rom. 14: 2-4a.).

Exercise is a good thing, and like all good things it can be underappreciated and overappreciated. Sitting around judging your neighbor, on the other hand, is a bad thing. Let him who lifts lift, and him who doesn’t lift, not lift. Neither the lifter nor the non-lifter is superior to the other and arguing otherwise is nothing more than the disciples bickering over their standing in His kingdom.

Posted in "race", Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, ethics, grace, music, politics, RC Sproul JR, sport | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Should Christian men labor for a good physique?

Blood in the Streets

How prone we are to miss the drama. The tyranny of the urgent, the plainness of our patterns, and our propensity to look inward rather than outward all push us to regard our callings, our surroundings, and our souls as rather dull affairs. We read of the great upheavals of history, then find ourselves scraping the burnt remains of casseroles off dishes. We watch Hollywood make believe about terrifying invaders from outer space, then go home to balance our checkbooks. We, according to Jesus, construct foolish drama by worrying about what we will eat or what we will wear while missing the battle of eternity that is going on right before our eyes.

When Jesus calls us to cease worrying about those things the heathen worry about, He isn’t inviting us to heave a sigh of relief and flop down on our hammock with a glass of lemonade. No, we put down our petty concerns that we might take up the one vital concern, the kingdom of God.

Our Lord reigns. His kingdom knows no bounds, for all authority in heaven and on earth has been given to Him. But there remains in His realm rebellion. There is work to do. In this country, we continue to deny the humanity of an entire class of people—the unborn. In so doing, we have shown forth our inhumanity. What may be worse is that this great evil demonstrates our lack of humanity. How twisted, how distorted, is a state that God ordained to punish evildoers, but that instead uses the sword God gave it to guard the grisly practitioners of this crime? How twisted, how distorted, are men who were made to protect and defend women and children, but who now drag their girlfriends, wives, or daughters to killing centers? How twisted, how distorted, are women who were made to nurture their babies, but who now hire assassins to kill them?

This, beloved, is the battle. Here is the drama. Souls of men and women are being twisted and slowly dragged into the very pit of hell. Babies are being burned alive, on purpose. And we, even though we have been made alive, even though we are indwelt by the Holy Spirit, worry more about stock markets and football teams.

Right now, in our own neighborhoods, people’s lives are at stake. Every one of our neighbors, young or old, male or female, believer or not, will die. And when they die, they will become fully, finally, and forever one thing or another.

C.S. Lewis, in his classic work The Weight of Glory, reminds us what is at stake. He reminds us what is wood, hay, and stubble, and which jewels will shine evermore. In turn, he helps us see what this means for our todays—that forever counts right now.

It is a serious thing . . . to remember that the dullest and most uninteresting person you talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree, helping each other to one or other of these destinations. It is in the light of these overwhelming possibilities, it is with the awe and the circumspection proper to them, that we should conduct all our dealings with one another, all friendships, all loves, all play, all politics. There are no “ordinary” people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilisations— these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub and exploit—immortal horrors or everlasting splendours.

We don’t seek the kingdom merely when we read our Bibles or sing our hymns. We seek the kingdom when we love our wives and cherish our children. We seek it when we weep and mourn for the murder of our neighbors, and when we weep and mourn for our neighbors that are murderers. We seek the kingdom when we call on men to be men and women to be women. We seek the kingdom when we welcome the least of these into our lives, into our homes, and into our families.

The righteousness we seek for our justification is ours by the imputation of Christ’s righteousness—the sole ground of our right standing before God. Yet righteousness is also becoming ours in our experience through sanctification. We in Christ, despite all for which we have to repent, are being made into everlasting splendors. Despite all for which we must repent, despite all over which we mourn, despite all the horror of what we as a nation have become, we rejoice to know that we are citizens of another kingdom. We are a royal priesthood, a holy nation. We once were not a people, but now we are the people of God. We are those who have tasted and seen that the Lord is good. May we then keep our conduct among the Gentiles honorable, so that when they speak against us as evildoers, they may see our good deeds and glorify God on the day of visitation.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, eschatology, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hear O Israel, In the School of Christ

It is not hard to complain about the government’s schools. The government, at least during every election cycle, seems less than satisfied with its own product, ever promising us that it will improve. Atheists complain about prayers before football games. Christians complain about the teaching of sexual (im)morality. Everyone complains about graduation rates and test scores.

What precious few complain about, however, is where the schools succeed. A cursory study of both the founding fathers of the modern American educational system and its most esteemed pundits in our own day demonstrates that schools are not actually designed to train up scholars, that their goal is neither intellectual nor moral giants. Rather, they function to prepare men and women to work. School-to-Work programs, Vision 2020, No Child Left Behind- these are just rehashings of the original Frankfurt School philosophy. Schools exist to create workers. It is less important, in this model, what is said between the bell that rings at 8:30 a.m. and the bell that rings at 9:20 a.m., and more important that the bells ring. We learn to think about an artificial, hermetically sealed body of information for a time. Then, when the bell rings, we turn our attention to some other artificial, hermetically sealed body of information, until another bell rings to tell us to go home. The entire system looks at children as if they were widgets, entering the education factory as toddlers and coming out the other side when they are grown.

This is not how God designed the rearing of children. To be sure, our children must learn things. But they are not so much widgets in a factory as they are plants around our tables (Psalm 128). They are not products to be manufactured but lives to be nurtured. The Bible presents the raising of children in natural and organic terms, rather than mechanical or industrial terms.

This is why we are called, according to the Shema, to speak to our children of the things of God when they lie down and when they rise up (Deut. 6:7). This poetic expression should itself be seen organically. That is, Moses is assuredly not saying, “Don’t speak to your children of these things when they are seated,” or, “Do speak to them when they walk by the way, but if they are jogging, be silent.” That is, Moses is talking about an immersive educational experience—we are to talk about the things of God with our children always and everywhere.

The things of God are to be the very warp and woof of our daily conversation. God does not here call us to be sure to have or add Bible curricula to our educational programs. He does not command us to sign our children up for Bible memory programs at our local churches. He does not require that we hire others to teach them their catechism answers. Instead, He tells us parents that we are to speak with our children about the things of God all the time.

In order to do this, of course, we who are parents first must be thinking about the things of God all the time. Most of us are the products of schools that taught us to divide our lives, to separate what we think about Jesus and what we think about our work, to separate what we think about our work and what we think about our play. We give time to Jesus on Sundays, perhaps on Wednesday nights, and, if we are peculiarly pious, every day during our quiet times. These all may be terribly good things, but not if they are hermetically sealed. We dare not believe that Jesus matters only during these times while He is beside the point the rest of our days.

When Jesus calls us to seek first His kingdom, He is not narrowing our focus. He is not saying: “Set aside kingdom building for your best hours of the day. Then, when you are tired, you can go about your own business.” Jesus does not reign in one kingdom that we pursue through the means of grace and in another kingdom that we pursue some other way. He does not take His world and slice it into class periods. Rather, He ever, always, and everywhere reigns. How we live our lives must not merely acknowledge that, but subsist in it. Therefore, how we train our children must not merely acknowledge that, but subsist in it. It is not enough that we say a blessing over our days and go on as if the One to whom we have prayed can be ignored.

The Shema tells us not only of the God of the covenant, but of the first law of the covenant—that we are to teach the covenant to our children. The Shema, in a new covenant context, calls us to acknowledge and proclaim the lordship of Christ over all things. It is a clarion call to all God’s people to rejoice in God’s reign over all things. It is a constant reminder that Jesus is not a subject to be mastered, but the Master we are to be subject to. The school of Christ never takes a weekend. The school of Christ never takes a vacation. The school of Christ never takes a snow day. And the school of Christ hands out diplomas only when we die.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, Education, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, RC Sproul JR, theology, wisdom, worship | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hear O Israel, In the School of Christ