Digging into Romans

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in announcements, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, grace, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Digging into Romans

Does God want nations to stay separate?

There is, and always has been, a level of tension between loyalty to a set of ideas and loyalty to one’s neighbor. That tension, for instance, is immediately apparent when considering Russell Kirk and Murray Rothbard. The former grounds his notion of conservatism in local peoples, the former in an abstract set of ideals that is libertarianism. Kirk’s vision is idyllic, Rothbard’s idealistic. Kirk would likely identify with his literal neighbor, Rothbard his ideological neighbor.

Christians feel that tension in part because we have dual citizenship. We are citizens of whichever nation we were born in and citizens of that nation we were reborn in. The United States is defined by both its geographic boundaries and its founding principles. The latter explains why it is a nation of immigrants and the descendants of immigrants, because people have come here from all over the planet who yearned to be free.

Some professing Christians have argued that because God established the nations as described in Genesis 10 that intermingling is at best pushing against His providence, at worst a sin, violating His law. As a reaction against those whose ideology would decimate the many in pursuit of the one, those seeking one world government, one world culture, one world religion, such is understandable. It is, however, still wrong. Our choices are not binary, between the one and the many. Rather we can have both. We don’t have to choose between a melting pot that turns diversity into a colorless sludge and strict separation of the children of Shem, Ham and Japheth.

The tension between loyalty to a set of ideas and to ones neighbor is nothing new. Ruth felt it. God did not judge Naomi for emigrating to Moab. Nor did He judge Ruth for immigrating from Moab. In the end the two were united in a common faith, and a common family. The Moabites didn’t displace God’s people. Neither was Ruth turned back at the border. A person’s national identity does not need to be set in stone. I am loyal to my birthplace, the greatest city on earth, Pittsburgh. I am loyal to my country, these United States. I am loyal to my ancestral home of Ireland. I am loyal to my ancestors’ ancestral home of Scotland. All of which is not worthy to be compared with my loyalty to my home in heaven.

Paul felt the same. At one and the same time, right in the Holy Spirit inspired words of the Bible, Paul wished damnation on himself if it would mean the redemption of his Jewish kinsmen (Romans 9:5), affirmed that in Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek (Galatians 3:28), and considered his ethnic identity to be mere dung (Philippians 3: 4-8). We ought to have the same perspective. We are called to love our neighbor. We are called to love our brother. We are called, in walking out the Great Commission, to labor to see that our neighbor would be made our brother.

Every single one of us are both descendants of Noah, and his descendants who were judged at Babel for their refusal to disperse. And every single one of us are descendants of ancestors from across the globe. We’re all nuts if we don’t know we’re all mutts. And all those who have been bought by the blood, we are one in Him.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does God want nations to stay separate?

The Victory Parade We Don’t Deserve


Though I didn’t think such was possible, my esteem for both my father and the Bible took a rather sudden spike. I was blessed to be sitting in a seminary class, while he stood, teaching. He mentioned, almost in passing, this notion that rocked my world. “Some scholars,” he said (and by the way he said it I had a strong suspicion that he was one of those scholars), “believe that the ‘man’ Joshua met outside the wall of Jericho was a pre-incarnate manifestation of the second person of the Trinity, a Christophany.” I was blown away as he went on to make the case. He encouraged us to remember that Joshua bowed and worshiped. Had he been with an angel from God, the angel would have forbidden such worship.

That the Father sent the Son further sanctified an already holy moment, as Joshua prepared for the first battle for the Promised Land. Better still, however, was the conversation itself. Joshua had only recently replaced Moses as the leader of God’s people. The wandering in the wilderness had come to an end. The Jordan had been crossed, and now between God’s people and the land stood Jericho and its impenetrable walls. Wouldn’t you have been frightened? Confused? Would you not have felt the weight of every brick in that wall on your back as you took up the mantle of leadership? In the midst of this turmoil, Joshua found himself facing a “man.” Joshua neither rashly attacked, nor did he shrink back. Instead, he asked what seems to us an utterly fitting question: “Are you for us, or for our adversaries?”(Josh. 5:13).

God the Son did not come, however, merely to honor the occasion. Neither was His goal merely to bring the victory. He came instead to sanctify His servant, to give Joshua the right perspective. To Joshua’s either/or question, God the Son replied, “No.” Just as Jesus would befuddle the Pharisees as they sought to trap Him with their questions, here He befuddles us. No? What does that mean? He then continued, “but I am the commander of the army of the Lord. Now I have come.” He explained to Joshua this most fundamental truth: “The question, Joshua, is not whether or not I am on your side or theirs. The question is whether or not you are on My side.”

Whether at war or at peace, in want or in plenty, whatever our circumstances, this is the question we all face each day. Indeed, when Jesus spoke from the Mount, He made much the same point. He did so because we, like Joshua, need to learn the same point. Like Joshua, we look at our obstacles in fear and confusion. Will we be able to win this struggle at work? Will we be able to tame this challenge in our homes? Will we be able to overcome this obstacle at our church? And in our prayer lives, as we meet with our Father, through God the Son, we ask — sometimes in hope, other times in despair — whether He is with us, whether He will come to our aid and win the battle for us. And in His grace and terrible sovereign power and authority, He tells us, “No.”

God is not a witness to history, choosing sides and cheering His favorites on. God is Lord of history, moving history forward as what it is — His story. God’s grace to us isn’t that He sides with us, but that He has put enmity in our hearts against the Serpent and his seed. God’s grace isn’t that He fights for us but that He, by the power of the Holy Spirit, gives us life so that we might fight for Him.

When Jesus tells us to stop worrying about what we will eat and what we will wear, reminding us that the Gentiles worry about such things, He, naturally, reasons in the same manner. His message isn’t “Don’t sweat it — God is for you. He’ll come to your aid to make sure you get what you want. God is on your side.” Instead, the command is not to worry about these things — our own interests and agenda — because we are called to passionately pursue the interests and agenda of the kingdom of God. He tells us, “No, but seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness.” The Truth, the Wisdom, the Word — He does not change and neither does His message to us. What He spoke to Joshua, He speaks to us.

Christ speaks the same message in both the Old and New Testaments because He is speaking to the same people — those who by faith are His. That He is Captain of the army of the Lord is grace to Joshua and grace to us because by the same grace we are made soldiers in that army. The same grace in turn ensures the victory. He is our Captain. He, not Joshua, brings down the walls of Jericho. He, not Joshua, brings His people into the Land of Promise. He, not Joshua, storms the very gates of hell. He, not Joshua, takes captivity captive. He, not Joshua, is Lord of lords and King of kings. And we, because He loves us, march in the victory parade with Him.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Biblical theology, church, eschatology, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

You Think You’ve Got Problems

While I am not foolish enough to think that thinking wisely will solve all of our problems, I am wise enough to know it will solve this one- our problem of misunderstanding our problem. We are utterly filled with foolish worries. We worry about the weather, about traffic, about our finances, about our reputations. We worry about the economy, tensions among nations, pandemics and the health of the planet. All of which are, if they are real problems at all, “under the sun” problems. Every one of them will come to an end, no matter what happens between now and the end. When our curtain falls, whether through our own death or His final return, not one of these problems will remain.

The only real problem you or I or anyone has ever had that won’t be solved by the passage of time is that we are sinners and God is holy. His judgment, while it begins “under the sun” will not cease with the setting of the sun. It will continue forever. His judgment will not only continue forever, but it will in no way be punctuated with moments of grace, of peace. Constant, eternal, immeasurable torment. That’s not a problem. That is the problem.

Quite apart from the glorious truth that the problem has been solved for all those who are in Christ, what business does anyone have worrying about these nothings? And how much less should those whose problem has been solved worry about these nothings? Those outside the kingdom embrace petty, temporal problems precisely to keep their minds off mammoth eternal problems. What excuse though do we have?

Believers should be people of joy. When Paul commands joy of us, “Rejoice in the Lord always. Again I will say, ‘Rejoice’” (Philippians 4:4), we often wonder how such is even fair. We think joy is something that alights upon us like a magic butterfly rather than something we strive for. If, however, we kept in mind the only true problem we’ve ever had, and kept in mind the glorious truth that it has been solved in Christ, and kept in mind all the blessings we have already received, and all those we are certain to receive, joy would descend on us like a tsunami. Worry would be washed out with the tide.

The truth is, not just the things we worry about, but when those things don’t go our way, we still should be worry-free. Paul tells us, “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment is working for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory (II Corinthians 4:17). Even the hardships redound to blessing in eternity.

I don’t need my circumstances to change. I need my perspective to change. The joy I’m called to, the joy I enjoy, is within reach if I would but look at reality rightly. Forgive me Lord my failure to rejoice, and lead me to rejoice in Your forgiveness.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, covid-19, creation, Devil's Arsenal, eschatology, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on You Think You’ve Got Problems

Lisa and I on No Idols; Christian Nationalism and More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, Nostalgia, politics, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism, Sacred Marriage, That 70s Kid, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lisa and I on No Idols; Christian Nationalism and More

Digging into Romans 5

Posted in 10 Commandments, announcements, assurance, beauty, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, communion, grace, Holy Spirit, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Digging into Romans 5

The Devil in the Details

The Christian is engaged in a three-front war. The Bible, replete with martial language, bears this out. The great evil trinity against which we fight is the world, the flesh, and the devil. In our day, sadly, we have made friends with the world, and we have reduced our flesh down to a few psychological crossed wires. We have lost sight of these two battlefields, I would suggest, precisely because we have lost sight of the third, and therefore have lost the battle. In other words, we miss that we are at war with the world and our flesh because the devil has defeated us in battle— such that we have forgotten that he exists.

C.S. Lewis, in the preface to his great work The Screwtape Letters, posits this nugget of wisdom: “There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors, and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.” As wise as Lewis and this particular quote may be, I do have a little bit of a quibble. No doubt the devil is able to accomplish a great deal of mischief among those who see him as some sort of evil god, those with a morbid interest in him and his minions. That’s where they can cause some mischief. That said, I would suggest that he is able to cause far greater damage among those who give him no thought at all. That is to say, both the materialist and the magician are bad, but the materialist is worse.

We have pretty much the same problem within the Christian subculture, and for much the same reasons. On one side of the spectrum is the extreme wing of the spiritual warfare movement. Some of these folks claim to see a demon behind every bush. They don’t catch colds; they are under attack by the sniffle demon. They don’t have wandering eyes, but are at war with the lust demon. I’m afraid that often those in this camp are looking for demons behind every bush, because they can prove quite useful for excusing our sin — as Flip Wilson used to say, “The Devil made me do it.”

This, however, is not the danger we face in Reformed circles. We tend to be on the opposite side of the spectrum. Unlike the true materialist, we do indeed believe in the demonic realm. I mean, we read our Bibles, and the Bible, after all, talks about such things. But we tend to believe that demons exited the human stage with the apostles. Demons exist, we are willing to confess, but they have been sitting on the celestial sidelines since the apostolic age. What drives this perspective, I’m afraid, is less a careful exegetical study of the matter, and more an embracing of the modernist worldview. We look down our noses at our brothers who pay attention to the spiritual realm not because we find such to be unbiblical, but because we find it unsophisticated. We think Martin Luther’s habit of shouting at the devil, of throwing his inkwell at him, is a sign that Martin was on the psychological brink, when perhaps we ought instead to conclude that he exhibited here the same wisdom that led him to declare, “Here I stand!” It may be that Luther mined the truth that our God is a mighty fortress from the same source where he discerned that this world is with devils filled, namely, the Bible.

That we rarely give the devil a thought, let alone his due, ought to confirm for us this important spiritual reality — that the devil is sitting on our shoulder, whispering folly into our ears. He is active not only in the dark corners of Africa, but in the dark corners of our hearts and minds. If we would seek first the kingdom of God, we will have to come to grips with the reality that the devil is trying to stop us.

His forces, we ought also to remember, are not only arrayed in the political and cultural battlefields. He does not have his hand in the Democratic National Committee only, nor does he work his magic only in Hollywood. He is also about the business of growing in us his diabolical fruit. He is at work when we are filled with envy, malice, fear, selfishness. He is waging war when he encourages us to spend our energies not pursuing the kingdom, but pursuing personal peace and affluence. He is practicing his dark magic when he encourages us to defend not the honor of Christ, but our own reputation and dignity. The war between the seed and the serpent is the same thing as our war with the world, the flesh, and the Devil. May God give us the grace to win great victories in the little battles we fight each day. May He grant us the eyes to see the epoch-changing battles in our very ordinary lives.

Posted in RC Sproul JR | Comments Off on The Devil in the Details

Do I need to confess my sins to those I’ve sinned against?

Of course you do. We all do. Many years ago I read an advice column wherein the writer was wrestling with some twenty year old sin he had committed. He was considering confessing to his wife what he had done, until Abby or Ann argued otherwise. She said that confessing would only add hardship to the one confessed to, that it was in fact a selfish move by the man to unburden. I got her point, and in fact bought her point at the time. Not so now.

When we wrong someone we have an obligation to seek the forgiveness of that person. Not necessarily to secure it, but to seek it. That can’t be done if we keep our wrongdoing a secret. By all means we must confess to our heavenly Father for everything we do wrong to anyone bearing His image we do wrong to Him. And failing to seek the forgiveness of that image bearer is akin to failing to seek forgiveness from Him.

Abby’s or Ann’s calculus was profoundly pragmatic. And as always happens when we do such calculus, she got it wrong. We don’t decide what to say on the basis of what we think will happen, but on the basis of what God says. He says in James 5:6 that we are to confess our sins to one another. This isn’t a call for the Roman confessional. This isn’t even a call to accountability groups. It’s a call to confess to those we have wronged.

Neither, however, is this a call to confess to all those who believe they have been wronged. While we ought to be swift to confess, and not feel the need to calculate our exact level of guilt before confessing, we ought not feel the need to repent to those we haven’t wronged. There is this notion out there that when people face the public that they not only have a responsibility to publicly repent of private sins but have the responsibility to do it over and over with each new person they “meet” in public.

Several of my sins are widely known within the evangelical church. They were real sins for which I needed to repent. I repented to my family, my church, my co-workers and openly acknowledged my sins before the public. I didn’t, however, seek the forgiveness of the “public” as I did not sin against them. That doesn’t, sadly, keep many from taking up an offense against me, from publicly accusing me of not being repentant, from throwing what I’ve already been forgiven of in my face. For that they need to publicly repent and privately to me as well.

The great thing about repentance on the horizontal plane is that it creates opportunity for forgiveness on the horizontal plane. Such blesses both the forgiving and the forgiven, and brings glory to the God who specializes in forgiveness. Confession doesn’t make you guilty again. Neither does it do away with your sin. Jesus did that, which is why we can know that if we confess our sins He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness (James 1:9).

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, ethics, grace, kingdom, prayer, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Do I need to confess my sins to those I’ve sinned against?

Motive Power

I’m on a diet. Oops. I’m not on a diet. I’m on a lifestyle change. This has led me to become acquainted with any number of new friends on my plate. I had, until now, heard of vegetables, but had never met any — or at least not any I’d like to invite over for dinner. The more surprising guest at my table, however, has been guilt. Before I went on this lifestyle change, I ate what I wanted. I knew I wasn’t as healthy as I would like to be, but I also took the view that whatever changes needed to be made wouldn’t be made on what I eat. I love food like some people love their pets.

My lifestyle change has changed my lifestyle. Now I have to find foods I like that won’t cause me to overspend my “points.” A nice bowl of ice cream or a hot plate of French fries is the equivalent of blowing the paycheck at the racetrack. When I eat well, I enjoy better-fitting clothes, compliments on my slimmer self, more energy, better sleep. When I eat poorly, I lose all those benefits and gain both pounds and guilt.

What, then, is the proper motive? Some gurus remind us that we cannot change until we want the change for ourselves. Others encourage a kind of pragmatic calculus, saying that what drives us is net gains in the things we want and net losses in the things we don’t want. Still others encourage us to look outside ourselves, to do well for the sake of those whom we love.

God, from a certain perspective, isn’t terribly particular with respect to our motives. Inside the church there are those who argue that the right and heroic thing to do is the right and heroic thing because it is right and heroic. Spiritual maturity is measured on the Stoic scale. Others suggest that our driving goal must be simply — and alone — to please God. Still others, crasser still, take the view that we should do right in order to do well, that good things happen to those who do good. The thing is that the Bible presents all three motives before us.

Consider Moses’ parting sermon. Deuteronomy ends less with a long catalog of the grace of God in the lives of His people and more with a series of promised blessings and cursings. Moses, speaking the very words of God, is impenitently and flamboyantly crass — obey God and He will bless you in the city. He will bless you in the country. He’ll bless you when you are young and when you are old. He will, if you obey, bless your flocks, your household, your kneading bowl, and your wok. Your goldfish will have baby goldfish that all make the honor roll. Disobey God, on the other hand, and there is no end to how badly things will go. Your cell phone won’t work when your car breaks down in the middle of the traffic jam on your way to see that important client who holds your company’s future in his angry hands.

Jesus, on the other hand, from time to time seems to pick up on the Stoic theme. He reminds us that those who follow after Him must be prepared to pick up the cross. We have to consider the cost. We must deny ourselves. Later on, however, He reminds us that He came to give life abundant, that He is the Good Shepherd. As for His example, Jesus seemed driven by, more than anything else, a desire to delight His Father. He glorified the Father who was glorified in Him.

Is it possible that all these motives have their place? When Jesus commanded that we seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, He told us more which direction to go and less what fuel to use to get there. That said, one motive should have no place with us — guilt. As we seek to grow in our obedience to His law, we must always do so mindful that we fail, mindful that Jesus alone succeeded, and mindful that He succeeded for us. God is through being angry with you. His wrath is gone forever, as far from you as the east is from the west. Fearing His anger, then, won’t be much of a goad toward the good.

Indeed, seeking to keep God’s law in order to keep at bay His wrath is evidence that we are indeed under the law and under His wrath. It is seeking the kingdom of God and our righteousness. Those foolish enough to go this way will spend eternity weeping and gnashing their teeth. Using God’s law to escape His wrath is like using His grace to escape His law — foolish, destructive, and counter-productive. This is how the Gentiles live.

Trust in Him because He commands it and, as Lord of heaven and earth, He is due our fealty and allegiance. Trust in Him because He delights when you do so. Even the angels in heaven rejoice. Trust in Him because at His right hand are pleasures forevermore. Trust in Him because He is altogether trustworthy. And all these things will be added unto you.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Motive Power

Dumb Phone Sunday

It is not all that uncommon for some blogger, podcaster or other user of social media to go through some kind of media fast, only to come back and report to us his experience. Here’s another. My “fast” was not, on its face, all that challenging. I simply made the decision that for Sunday my phone would be only that, a phone. I kept it within earshot should anyone call, but did not carry it about with me. What, I wondered, would happen to my state of mind, if I didn’t have my phone by my side, if I couldn’t check social media or even the news?

My state of mind was at one and the same time at peace and agitated. It was at peace because of what I wasn’t reading. It was agitated as I was going through withdrawal. Which made me think my brief fast was a good thing. The day after I used my phone to navigate me to a meeting. I used it to do a Sudoku or two. I used it to read up on the Steeler’s draft picks. In other words, I went back to my normal habits. I haven’t reached any grand conclusions. I’m not advocating that anyone follow my lead. I’m not hanging up my blog or my podcast.

I will, however, likely do Dumb Phone Sunday next Sunday. I will likely take up and re-read, as I did last Sunday, more of CS Lewis wonderful collection of essays, God in the Dock. I will likely reach the same level of peace and a lower level of agitation. Perhaps in a few weeks I may move to Dumb Phone Weekends. And who knows what from there?

When I was a younger man I saw any questioning of the goodness of any technology as inherently leftist, an assault on the blessings of liberty. As I’ve gotten older I’ve come to understand that sometimes in our liberty we allow technology to diminish our liberty. It’s true enough that as a technology the smart phone is morally neutral. How it is used is what matters. One of the ways it is often used, however, is as a ball and chain we put on ourselves. One way to test if we’ve fallen into that trap is to disconnect for a time. Paul reminds us both of the moral neutrality of many things, and the danger of being ensnared, “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any” (I Cor. 6:12).

The Lord came to set us free. Those He frees are free indeed.

Posted in creation, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments