Sophisticated Lady or, The Blushless Bride

We’ve all heard the horror stories. First there was the church that offered visitors a free oil change during the “service” if you would come. Then we heard of simple cash rewards. More recently a church raffled off a new Harley Davidson motorcycle. You couldn’t buy raffle tickets; you could only earn them either by visiting or bringing visitors in. Tetzel is spinning in his grave, but only because he is appalled that he never got this sophisticated.

We have our standard ways of measuring the worldliness of the church. We can note that the divorce rate within the evangelical church is roughly equal to the rate among the lost. In one mammoth evangelical denomination, the rate is actually higher. We can look at it ideologically and note that over half those polled who consider themselves evangelical also affirm that there is no such thing as objective truth. Or, we can see the fruit of that affirmation.

In a time of philosophical crisis in ancient Greece, when two competing schools of thought found themselves in a Mexican standoff, a new school arose. The Sophists did not take a side in the titanic struggle between Heraclitus and Parmenides, between the many and the one. Instead they argued that arguing was a waste of time. This school was interested in persuasion, not proof. In fact, like modern relativists, they believed that proof was impossible.

In the modern, or perhaps postmodern West, we are sophists once again. We have added this Western twist — pragmatism. Now persuasion is no longer in the pursuit of rhetorical laurels, but is in the service of selling things. Indeed we live in such a sophisticated age that we are told that the key to success is selling even ourselves. And once again the church has fallen prey to the wisdom of the world. We think that our pathway to success lies in selling ourselves, in presenting ourselves not just as a product, but as a superior product.

What was once the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church has become now Oakmont Family Worship Center. The trouble is that there are no oaks, no mountains, few families (that is, the families all split and go their separate ways as soon as they enter), no worship, and precious little center.

What Oakmont Family Worship Center offers instead is a series of bulletpoint benefits that fit the demographics of the area. They have a gym, a wide array of twelve-step programs, youth groups, women’s groups, men’s groups, singles groups, and, of course, their own coffee bar right in the narthex, I mean, the “greeting center.” Which in turn means that not only are there no oaks, mountains, families, worship or center, but neither is it one, holy, catholic, and apostolic.

It is not one because, unlike the true church, its being isn’t centered on the work of Christ. It spits on the liturgy, on the music, even on the convictions of our fathers. It is the first church of what’s happening now, and thus is untethered from the church in history.

Neither, of course, is the church holy. It not only is not set apart, but labors diligently to mimic the world. It is unholy on purpose, because its reason for being is pleasing the lost, rather than the One who finds the lost. It moves from embracing the wisdom of this world in embracing a sophist agenda, which, in turn, leads it into embracing the wisdom of the world, because that’s what attracts the world. The church begins with the assumption that it can be whatever it wishes and concludes by wishing to be just like the world.

The prototypical Oakmont is not catholic either. Not only does it begin with a marketing strategy, but that marketing strategy is to reach a particular niche (virtually always yuppies, not coincidentally). “Oakmont” is focused on bringing in upwardly mobile professionals. Its vision of the church extends only as broadly as the demographic it is seeking. When we affirm the catholicity of the church we are not only affirming that the church encompasses every tongue and tribe, but that it unites every tongue and tribe. And, as noted above, it transcends time, uniting this century and the last, and the one before that, all the way back to the Garden.

Worst of all, Oakmont is not apostolic. It rejects not only the faith once delivered unto the saints, but likewise it rejects the messengers who delivered that faith. It takes its cues from modern-day church growth gurus, who, in turn, take their cues from the madmen of Madison Avenue. Oakmont isn’t concerned with what the apostles said because they make their decisions based on what the market says. And one thing the market cannot bear is sound, old, demanding doctrine. When demographics divide, that’s good marketing. But when doctrine divides, that’s bad marketing.

Sophistry in the church, then, not only guts the church of her defining marks but gives her a new identity. Now she is no longer the bride of Christ, but a painted lady. When the church hustles the world, it becomes a worldly hustler. In short, like Israel before her, when the church cavorts with the world, she finds her lamp stand removed, she finds herself divorced and alone.

The world is a cruel lover, but more important, God is a jealous God. When the church plays to consumers, she will find herself consumed by the One who is a consuming fire. Praise God, however, that the church itself, the true church, will never fall. For her Groom has promised, despite her wandering eye, to remove every blot and blemish. And all His promises are yea and amen.

Posted in 10 Commandments, church, ethics, evangelism, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, music, post-modernism, preaching, RC Sproul JR, worship | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sophisticated Lady or, The Blushless Bride

Happy Dependence Day

We all are prone to putting people we love and admire on a pedestal. We are also often prone to being skeptical, even cynical about those we don’t love and admire. We make angels out of some mere men, devils out of others. We overlook the clay feet of our heroes and overlook the humanity of our enemies.

This is true not only of people but of peoples. That is we can elevate one nation above all proportion, or demonize a nation. Today one nation celebrates the anniversary of its founding. America is exceptional in world history, and we have much to give thanks for.
Our founding principles, of limited government, equality before the law, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are all wonderful things. Liberals, however, hate those principles. Which is why they hate our country.

We would be fools, however, if in reaction to that hatred we were to blind ourselves to weaknesses in our founding fathers. Our fathers claimed all men were created equal, but were comfortable with some men being the property of others. They, like the rest of us, did not live up to their noble aspirations.

We are a nation that finally freed those being held in bondage. But did so through violence that left millions dead. We are a nation that welcomed some yearning to be free to Ellis Island, while also a nation that locked up Japanese Americans in internment camps. We are a nation that created more prosperity than the world has ever known, and also a nation that confiscated the gold of its own citizens. We are a nation that was founded on limited government but now enforces empire around the globe.

Worst of all, we are a nation that fought the genocidal Nazis, murderers of 6 million and less than a generation later determined that unborn babies are not worthy of legal protection, that they are less than human, with more than 60 million unburied. The same flag represents both the Greatest Generation and the Never Born Generation.

We are a nation where the state subsidizes “artwork” of a crucifix in urine and jails those burning rubber on “pride” flags painted on our highways. We are a nation that is as far from our founding as Israel was from its founding when God sent them into exile.

To be sober-minded we need to remember the full reality of both our history and our present. We need to not throw out the baby of biblical wisdom in our founding principles with the bathwater of our national rebellion against those principles. Let us celebrate everything good that God in His grace blessed our country with.

Let us also, however, repent for every failure we’ve had along the way. Let us in turn repent for all our rejection of His blessings in our own day. And let us pledge our allegiance to the Lord Jesus Christ who reigns over all principalities and powers. He has never let us down, nor will He ever. On this and every Independence Day, let us remember and give thanks for our dependence on Him.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Nostalgia, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Happy Dependence Day

Marcia Montenegro; Debate & Supremes; Sara’s Pleasure & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, In the Beginning, interview, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, new age, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Marcia Montenegro; Debate & Supremes; Sara’s Pleasure & More

Heresies, Damned Heresies, Goldilocks and Elisha’s Bears

Too Hard

There are at least three working definitions of heresy. First is the view that all error is heresy. This view has as an advantage that it recognizes the unity of truth. Because God is one, and God is truth, truth is one. Any error that we hold, if carried to its logical conclusion will lead us to wicked, damnable errors. If we adjust all that we think to make it consistent with the error we hold, we will enter into heresy. The disadvantage to this view, like many broad definitions, is that it draws the circle too wide. If we are all guilty of error, and if all error is heresy we are certainly all guilty. Which makes no one guilty. Definitions exist to differentiate, not to be all-inclusive.

Too Soft

A second view holds that heresy is holding to any doctrine specifically condemned as heresy at an ecumenical council. The Arian heresy, which denies the deity of Christ, was condemned as heresy in the first half of the first millennia of the church. The Pelagian heresy was likewise condemned. This view has as an advantage being tied to the labors of the church at its broadest. That is, it is the church as the church that names the heresy, rather than each of us as individuals. It has as a disadvantage the hard truth that there have been no ecumenical councils in quite some time. Such would be rather hard to pull off in our day. Heresy, however, is rather easy to pull off. This view ends up with too narrow of view of what heresy is.

Just Right

My own view is in the middle of these too positions. I agree with the second view that all those views which have been condemned as heresy by ecumenical councils are in fact heresy. I would add, however, that any denial of any element of any ecumenical creed, including the Apostles’ Creed, is heresy. That is, to avoid the charge of heresy, one must not only not embrace what the councils call heresy, but must affirm what the councils call orthodoxy. In light of the inability to put together an ecumenical council, indeed in light of the inability to reach agreement among all those claiming to be Christian churches, I would also add, though it is in the Apostles’ Creed only by implication, that one must affirm justification by faith alone in order to not be heretical. This doctrine Luther wisely called the article on which the church stands or falls.

Most of those councils which included condemnations of heresy dealt with issues of the incarnation and the Trinity. These are, of course, critical issues to the church. They should not, however, be given a privileged position about all the other affirmations of the Apostles’ Creed. To deny the resurrection, for instance, is as much heresy as to deny the humanity of Christ. To deny the virgin birth is as much heresy as to deny the two natures of Christ. Which means of course, that we have no unity with those who deny any of these things, whether we find these heresies in mainline denominations, or as in the case of denying the resurrection, whether these are held by those who would otherwise describe themselves even as “Reformed.” That is, among some of the hyper-preterists.

If my perspective is accurate on justification by faith alone, that too sets us apart from both Rome and Eastern Orthodoxy. Rome, which while in substantial agreement with Eastern Orthodoxy, but which speaks to the matter with greater clarity, not only does not affirm that we are justified by faith alone, but formally and unchangeably affirms that all of us who affirm that a man is justified by faith alone, apart from the works of the law, should be damned. See the sixth session of the Council of Trent.

To name heresy what it is is not to be unkind or unloving. It isn’t bigoted or narrow- minded. It is instead to guard the wisdom that has been handed down to us, and to protect His sheep from wolves. Truth be told, everyone, no matter how broadminded, draws lines somewhere. The only question is, are we drawing lines where God would have us draw lines? The answer to that, in the end, is found in His Word.

Posted in Apostles' Creed, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, justification, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism, theology | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Heresies, Damned Heresies, Goldilocks and Elisha’s Bears

Why is it important to be a member of a local church?

While it is true enough that the concept of the invisible or universal church has its place, that place is not where a believer can hold membership. The Word of God calls on us to not forsake the gathering together of the saints (Heb. 10:25). This precludes the common foolishness of those who say they can worship God alone, or at their favorite spot. We have to gather, together, with other saints. But, it could be argued, one could gather with the saints without joining a particular body.

That’s true. What one cannot do without being a member of a local church is this:

Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account. Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would be unprofitable for you (Heb. 13:17).

For whom will those who watch out for souls give an account? The souls under their care. Who are the souls under their care? The members of the local body. We can love, labor beside, preach to, sing with any believer. But we will only give an answer for those under our care. If you can’t name the men whose care your soul is under, then you can’t be in submission to this text.

Joining a church is not like buying stock in a company. The defining quality of membership is not being eligible to vote on church matters. It is being under the authority of elders. What’s that you say? Elders are power hungry? Hypocrites? Incompetent? Bullies? Craven? Perhaps so. Perhaps you’ve even been hurt by the authorities over you in a previous church. None of which undoes the command in Hebrews.

The author of Hebrews doesn’t say, “But in this situation or that, forget about it. Don’t sweat it.” When we make excuses, which we all do, elders and laymen alike, for why we can’t obey the Word of God we’re making an argument we can’t win. All the “what if’s” in the world can’t topple a single jot or tittle of the Bible.

Joining a church doesn’t mean you can never leave. There is a great chasm between a sheep that moves from one flock to another and a sheep that wanders off on its own. The former never loses sight of the truth that it is being watched over. The latter never submits at all. Neither am I saying there are no hard choices to be made. Every church, every group of elders will have plenty of issues. Just like you do. As the saying goes, if you find a church without issues, don’t join it, because you’ll ruin it.

Trying to follow Jesus as a “Lone Ranger” isn’t merely asking for trouble. It isn’t merely unwise. It is sin, a failure to follow Jesus. Whoever wrote the book of Hebrews wrote it both under and with the full authority of Jesus. Hebrews, like the rest of the Bible, should all be in red letters. Let your elders watch over your soul, with joy. And let your joy match theirs.

This is part of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, communion, ethics, RC Sproul JR, theology, wisdom | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

The Dance of Life, or The Devil in the E’Gals

The fall of Adam and Eve is one of the stickiest theological wickets we encounter in the Bible. How could both of them, whom God had declared good, do bad? But there is a stickier wicket still, perhaps made so by the fact that it’s not in the Bible. For an event of such cosmic proportions, the Bible is surprisingly silent. How did Lucifer, the angel of light, come to be the Serpent, the father of lies? Some suggest that it was pride that got in his way, that he aspired to the very throne of God, and when he could not have it, he was cast down.

Along a similar note, some suggest that it was his pride, but that it was a being lower on the chain that tripped him up. That is, it wasn’t that he wanted to be God, but that he refused to serve man. Some suggest that he balked when God revealed His plan, including the call of the angels to serve man. Man, after all, was made lower than the angels. Why should the greater serve the lesser? It seems it was the devil himself who first determined it’s better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.

If the latter theory is the right one, we know who was the first to confuse ontology and economy, being and doing. But he was by no means the last. There is something in all of us that makes it seem somehow not right for the greater to serve the lesser. That something is pride.

The modern feminist movement, whether secular or “evangelical” suffers from the same sort of pride. The rejection of the plainly biblical affirmation that wives are to submit to their husbands (Ephesians 5:22) is driven by this objection- how can I be equal to my husband, if I am called to submit to my husband? Equals do not submit to one another, the reasoning goes; they are equal.

Sadly, too often husbands reason the same way. They also see the plain teaching of Ephesians, and conclude that since their wives are called to submit to them, that they as husbands are the superior being, that they are imbued with greater dignity and worth. That foolishness also feeds the foolishness of the feminist movement.

Egalitarianism in all its forms flows out of the same notion. We are a culture that is fast losing any sense of manners, indeed any sense of honor. We seem to believe that showing respect to another is a denial of the equality of men. Worse still we seem to go out of our way to show disrespect, that we might prove our own equality. We even go out of our way to push away the respect directed toward us. When addressed as “Sir” and “Ma’am,” too many sirs and ma’ams respond, “Oh, please don’t call me that. It makes me feel so old.”

Of course some older folks are foolish. On their merits respect is the last thing they would deserve. In like manner some husbands are buffoons. But without exception every older person is an older person, and every husband is a husband. Role relationships do not exist in a way that perfectly mirrors objective qualities. The race doesn’t always go to the swift. Every soldier knows that not every superior officer is actually superior. But every soldier is taught to “salute the uniform.” Honor is due to the office, even when not due to the man in the office.

If we would dispel the destruction of honor in our day, we would do well to start by dispelling the myth that to serve is to be less, and to be served is to be greater. And there is no greater argument against such folly than God. One of the benefits of a careful study of the covenant of redemption is that it makes this very point.

God the Father not only does the work of electing a bride for the Son, but He does the job of making the assignments. With the respect to the persons of the Trinity, He is in charge. The Son, we confess, proceeds from the Father. The Spirit, we confess, proceeds from the Father and the Son. But we also confess this, “That these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory” (Westminster Shorter Catechism, question 6).

The Son does not proceed from the Father because the Father is smarter than the Son. They, along with the Spirit, know all things. They are all equally omniscient. Neither is it because the Father is stronger than the Son. Each of the members of the Trinity are equally omnipotent. With respect to their ontology, or their being, each member is the equal of the others. But with respect to their work, there is genuine submission. If the feminists are correct, that submission means unequality of being, then the Unitarians are also right. There can be no trinity.

If then, these roles are not determined by ability, by what are they determined? Both the covenant of redemption and the covenant family operate the way they do because such is what manifests the glory of God. For the dance to proceed, one must lead, and others must follow. Anything else may seem more “fair,” but it won’t seem like a dance. And that, more than anything else, was what enraged the devil.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Dance of Life, or The Devil in the E’Gals

“A Young Lady,” An Old Story of Ongoing Sin

Like so many others I find myself taken aback by the recent resignation of Robert Morris, senior pastor of the massive Gateway Church in Texas. Morris resigned his position after it was made public that when he was a young, married pastor he had sexually abused a girl under his care over the space of four years. It’s bad enough that it was sexual sin. Worse still that it was sexual abuse of a child.

What is truly shocking, however, is that none of this is news. The sin came out right after it happened. Morris repented. Those in authority at the church affirmed their forgiveness. They removed Morris from the pulpit for two years, put him through a program of rehabilitation and restored him.

Over the years two things happened. Morris planted Gateway in 2000, starting with a flock of 180. It grew exponentially. Second, Morris occasionally made reference in his preaching and teaching to his moral failure. His references were admittedly vague. He acknowledged having engaged in sinful sexual behavior as a young, married pastor. He referred to the girl as “a young lady.” His confession wasn’t merely vague- it was a lie. She was no more a young lady than a drag queen is a young lady.

The leadership at the original church knew that the girl was 12 when this started. The leadership at Gateway says they did not know. The police knew nothing because they were never told. Not by Morris. Not by the girl. Not by her family. Not by the leadership of the church. No one told the ones who had proper jurisdiction over the crimes. Morris went on his way, now equipped with a nice story about his humility and God’s grace. The girl grew up, became a young lady, and languished, hung out to dry.

Pundits tend to say that the cover-up is always worse than the sin. That is not the case here. The cover-up, however, a deep and grievous sin, lasted not 4 years but 40 years. This secret sin endured the whole of his public ministry. This is the shame that rests on Morris and the elders of his first church.

It is true enough that things were handled differently back then. Sweeping these things under the rug was quite common. It just wasn’t talked about. All of which is likewise deep and grievous sin. One can no more excuse this cover-up on the grounds of it being a different era than one can excuse any other sin, like racism, that shamefully got a pass in another era.

No, the solution was never blaming the culture of the time, pretending a 12 year old girl is a young lady, hoping the whole thing would just go away. The solution then and now is repentance. From Morris, to the Lord who reigns, to the now woman, her family and the elders at Gateway. From the elders of the previous church to the Lord who reigns, the now woman, her family and the elders at Gateway.

We find, whether we are utterly unknown or pastor of one of the largest churches in the nation, forgiveness when we confess, judgment when we deny. May God be pleased to expose all our deepest failures, and may we all cry out for His mercy.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, Big Eva, church, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Grace Reformed; Pride Religion; First Fleece; Me & My Needs

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, hermeneutics, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Grace Reformed; Pride Religion; First Fleece; Me & My Needs

Evil Employees and Saintly Corporations

It is a common but dangerous business, our propensity to make ourselves the heroes of our own stories, and to see all who stand in our way as wearing the black hats. As a person with an interest in all things economic I see it in the realm of our buying and trading all the time. We all want to sell high and buy low. And we are all sellers and buyers. We all sell our labor in the marketplace. And we buy what we buy. The ones in the black hats, we think, are the ones keeping us from selling high, and from buying low.

First, when we sell our labor we all want to sell high. We might insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to hire anyone for less than what we think we ought to earn. We might simply grumble that we are being taken advantage of. We might cheat our employer on the ground that we are not being paid as we think we ought to be. In any of these cases the employer is wicked and must be punished.

Second, when buy goods and services we all want to buy low. We might insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to charge more than what we think we ought to be charged for the good or service. We might insist that the state give us money so that we can more easily buy what we want. We might simply grumble that we are being taken advantage of. We might steal from the business we are buying from on the ground that we believe they are charging more than they ought. In any of these cases the business is wicked and must be punished.

Trouble is, of course, that because we are all sellers and buyers we are all also buyers and sellers. Why should our employers not insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to work for more than they want to pay? Why should they not insist that the government give them money so they can more easily afford to pay us? Why should they not simply grumble that they are being taken advantage of? Why should they not steal from us, on the ground that we are charging them more for our labor than we ought? We may be, in selling our labor, a corporation of one, but we are a corporation.

Or, why should the business we buy from not insist that the government make it illegal for anyone to pay less than they are willing to sell for? Why should the businesses not insist that the government give them money so they can charge less? Why should they not grumble that they are being taken advantage of? Why should they not steal from us, on the ground that we are paying less for their goods and services than they believe we ought?

There is an economic lesson here, but as is so often the case with economic lessons, there is also a life lesson- we are adept at justifying ourselves and castigating others. Our moral compasses are out of whack because we think we’re the center of the galaxy, because we believe in our own innate goodness and the innate badness of all who oppose us, even if what it means to oppose us is charging more, or paying less, than we would like. The truth is that prices, for both labor and goods and services ought always to be determined solely by the free interaction of those making the deals, by agreement of both parties.

When I pull up to the gas pump that reads $4.00 a gallon I am reaching an agreement. When the Kansas City Chiefs write Patrick Mahomes a check for $40 million, they are reaching an agreement. When I pick up my spatula at the local Burgers Cooked By People Making $5 An Hour joint, I have reached an agreement. When those deals don’t get made, we’ve just agreed to disagree. No one needs to be vilified. No need to call the feds.

What we all need to do is own our own sins. We’re the hero of the story when we keep our agreement. And those who use the force of theft or the state to get their way, those are the ones in the black hats.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, Kingdom Notes, logic, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

What’s the ideal size for a local church?

The Bible doesn’t say. So neither will I. I will concede that different sizes have differing advantages and disadvantages. We live in the era of the mega-church. Churches that measure their membership in the thousands are positioned to support many missionaries, to serve their unbelieving neighbors, to create helps to the broader church.

Where they tend to be weaker is in strong relationships between leadership and laity and among the laity. Accountability is lost in the sea of faces, which sadly is part of what draws so many of those faces. Finally, such churches tend to let slip, remain silent, or seek safe spaces on the issues of the day, so as not to offend.

Churches that measure their membership in the tens, not surprisingly, tend to have the opposite strengths and weaknesses. They tend to be cash poor, unable to pay their pastor, often without a building to meet in, and often invisible to the broader world. They tend to be stronger in pastoral care and the blessings of community. Accountability can, however, slide over into a church body full of busy-bodies.

It may be that what works best is shaped largely by the state of the church as a whole, and the state of the broader culture. When the Christian faith is strong and the broader culture is less hostile, big churches may be more effective. When, however, the church is both given to worldliness and being overrun by the world smaller might be better. The church in our day is less effective and more worldly which in turn makes the world more worldly. Compromise with the world doesn’t bring peace but greater aggression from the world.

Smaller churches do not have to face mass departures and budget deficits when they confront the sexual insanity of the world, or sexual shenanigans inside the church. Smaller churches have smaller targets on their backs when the state encroaches on our call to gather for worship.

As the world becomes more hostile to the Christian faith, as it descends deeper into its madness large churches will either stand firm and become small churches or flee from the battle and remain large and largely insignificant. Thus far, it seems, we’re seeing far more of the latter than we are of the former.

I suspect smaller churches will become increasingly common in the coming years, and that such is a good thing. That doesn’t mean large churches are sinful and small ones pious. I haven’t forgotten where I began- the Bible doesn’t say how big churches should be. I do believe, however, we would be wise not to assume that which is normal right now is how things always ought to be.

Remember this- ear tickling preachers have large flocks precisely because both sheep and goats like having their ears tickled. Even the pew-sitters long to be on the winning team. The winning team, however, just may be the twenty faithful folks who just got kicked out of the local YMCA for not being inclusive enough. Give some thought to how you think about your church.


This is the first of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more.

Posted in Ask RC, Big Eva, church, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments