Bargains in the Remainder Bin: (Mostly) Forgotten Bangers

Sometimes a book comes along, captures the attention of an audience, and then seems to fade away. They’re not quite classics but their usefulness far outlasts their market. The list below is nothing but such books. Sure, if you want to make the case this one or that is in fact a classic, feel free. Two simple requirements to make this list- first, the book must educate. Second, the book must be a good read. Away we go…

Modern Art and the Death of a Culture by Hans Rookmaaker.
I was introduced to this outstanding book as a student at Grove City College in the 1980s. Dr. Andy Hoffecker was my prof. I took every class he offered. This one was amazing. Rookmaker, a close friend to Francis Schaeffer, draws parallel lines following the progress (better understood as regress) of modern art and modern philosophy. He demonstrates how one shapes the other. Suddenly, modern art is revealed to be not just silly, but foreboding.

The Birth of the Modern by Paul Johnson.
Johnson was a well-respected conservative Catholic historian. He wrote perhaps a dozen books that could be on this list. I chose The Birth of the Modern because of the time frame he set his prodigious mind to here. If you want to understand the forces behind the modern world, how technology helped create a culture, this book is for you. Johnson’s encyclopedic scope brings the heat by zeroing in on those moments that shaped our world.

Intellectuals by Paul Johnson
I couldn’t choose just one of Johnson’s books. This one provides a chapter each to exploring the thought of those who shaped the 20th century, exposing the Romans 1 folly at work. You’ll find the intellectual giants are little more than pygmies.

Class by Paul Fussell
Fussell was a cultural and literary historian. He wrote on a variety of subjects. Class is a quick read highlighting distinctions among varying classes in the United States. He blows away the silly notion that class is a function of mere wealth. He is entertaining, and astute in showing each of us fish much of the water we’ve never noticed despite swimming in it. You’ll see yourself, and those around you, much more clearly.

Monsters from the Id by E. Michael Jones
Jones does for horror fiction what Rookmaaker did for modern art, tracing the parallel lines of cultural rot and macabre literature. He has an uncanny ability to tie specific incidents from specific artists to specific ideologies. He does much the same thing with music in Dionysus Rising, and architecture in Living Machines. Monsters from the Id begins with Shelley’s Frankenstein and ends with Alien.

Honorable Mentions:
These last two did not make the list not because they aren’t good enough, but because they’re too good. They truly are classics, but still don’t get enough love. First, Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman. Postman is like a wise uncle, seeing things most of us miss. In Amusing Ourselves to Death he explores the distinctions between an image based culture and a word based culture, looking at ours through the lens of television. Someone really ought to do something similar for our internet based age.

Finally, The Abolition of Man by CS Lewis. If you haven’t read this little book, well, let’s just say that’s not good. So read it. You’ll be astonished at the prescience of Lewis, seeing the crack-up of postmodernism at its birth. Typical Lewis style. Penetrating analysis, that reads like nothing more challenging than a fruitful conversation. If you have read it, read it again. And read the fiction version, That Hideous Strength.

Posted in apologetics, Education, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, on writing well, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Classic JCE- Isolationism; Honoring My Father; Writing Well

This week’s classic Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, Heroes, Jesus Changes Everything, Nostalgia, politics, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic JCE- Isolationism; Honoring My Father; Writing Well

I Am… Studies on the Attributes of the Living God

Just a note to let people know that we will begin our weekly Monday night Bible studies on September the 8th. We begin the study at 7:00, but local guests are invited to come for dinner too. That begins at 6:15.

For those of you at some distance, it it our habit to air the study on Facebook Live (RC-Lisa Sproul). In addition, within a day or two we post the video of the study right here for those who would like to watch on their own schedule.

We’d love to have you with us, in person if possible. We’d love for you to invite your friends. Our new study considers the attributes of God, unpacks just a hint of His ineffable glory.

Posted in 10 Commandments, announcements, Biblical Doctrines, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology, wonder, worship | Tagged , , | Comments Off on I Am… Studies on the Attributes of the Living God

Elders to the Rescue: Rooting Out Unbelief

I was ordained, for the first time, in the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. It’s an interesting institution with an interesting history. It is the oldest Presbyterian denomination in the nation to have never had a split. It is also one of those rare breeds of institutions, those who drew near to the brink of apostasy and then drew back.

Long after the mainline Presbyterians had embraced theological liberalism, the ARP stayed the course. They sidestepped the modernist-fundamentalist controversy that gave birth to the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and the Bible Presbyterian Church. Decades later, however, slowly but surely neo-orthodoxy began to creep into the denomination. The neo-orthodox were those whose stance against liberalism was, shall we say, more like standing right next to liberalism. In fact, within a decade or two of its founding its most influential proponents had clearly slip all the way into liberalism.

The ARP, perhaps wanting to avoid the perceived stodginess of the Orthodox Presbyterians and the fundamentalism of the Bible Presbyterians styled themselves as the safe middle. At least, that’s what its leadership sought to do. Neo-orthodoxy had the advantage of being perceived as reasonably intellectually credible. One could be neo-orthodox and still be allowed to play the academics’ academic games.

It was, however, the laypeople in the denomination who came to the rescue. Much like the later conservative resurgence in the Southern Baptist Convention, the ARP cleansed their churches and institutions of the unstable hybrid that was neo-orthodoxy. They came out the other side, to their credit, looking much more like the ARP of old.

In my lifetime some of the most faithful men of the church have served in the ARP or at ARP churches. Dr. Jay Adams pastored an ARP church. Dr. J. Richard deWitt was moderator for a time. Dr. Sinclair Ferguson and Dr. Derek Thomas served in the ARP. These, however, were all well after the resurgence had taken place. The laity in the denomination had the sense not to buy into neo-orthodoxy and the courage to root it out.

Which should teach us at least two things. First, academic attainment is no hedge against theological drift. In this battle, in fact, the bad guys wore academic gowns and the good guys wore overalls. Loyalty to the Lord, and indifference to the approval of the world, these were what enabled the laity to recognize that the emperor wore no clothes. Which means these are the qualities we ought to be pursuing for both clergy and laity alike.

Second, elders matter. The ARP makes a distinction in the callings of ruling and teaching elders. It makes no distinction between their respective authority. The ruling elders were the heroes of the story. How easy it is for us to see elders as a kind of board of trustees, successful businessmen tasked with making important business decisions but ill-equipped to wrestle with the text of the Bible. How wise of the heroes of the story to understand both their authority and their calling. Elders, as would be obvious if we would but read the qualities required of them in Scripture, must be men of character and integrity. Not perfect, but faithful.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Elders to the Rescue: Rooting Out Unbelief

What can I fulfill His command to be a peacemaker?

Jesus, of course, listed peacemakers among the blessed in His Sermon on the Mount. He is the ultimate peacemaker, first reconciling us, His enemies, with our Father. Second, this in turn reconciles us with each other. We, however, are called to follow in His steps. In a time of increasing rancor both within and without the kingdom, how can we better spread the blessings of peace?

First, we stay out of entangling alliances. How foolish that we think the way to end a fight is to join it. Viet Nam era peaceniks used to ask, “What if they held a war and nobody came?” They were on to something. More fighters will never make for less fighting. The Bible calls us to not grab a passing dog by the ears (Proverbs 26:17). The party of the aggrieved is all about recruitment. Don’t sign up.

Second, we focus on our own failings. Sin is a disturber of the peace. When we sin we disturb the peace. So let’s work on mortifying our flesh, putting to death the old man, fighting not against others but against ourselves. One of the advantages of this approach is it makes others less likely to attack us. When we are quick to acknowledge our sins, it kind of takes the wind out of the sails of the accusers of the brethren. What need have we to defend ourselves?

Third, we focus on the peace He has given us. Paul makes much the same point in that Spirit inspired ode to His sovereignty that is Romans 8-

Who shall bring a charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies. Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? (Romans 8:33-35).

Peace with God comes from resting in the work of Christ for us. Peace with each other comes from resting in the work of Christ for us. Peace with ourselves comes from resting in the work of Christ in us.

Fourth, we look at our brothers and sisters the way our Father does. When I look at myself in the mirror I see nothing but sin. When my Father looks at me He sees nothing but Jesus. When I look at others I’m called to see them in the same way. He loves them infinitely and immutably. Going to war against them is like going to war against Jesus.

Fifth, we look at those outside the kingdom as we once were. Every soldier in the Lord’s army was once a soldier in the devil’s army. By His power, in His compassion, He drafted us into His army (Genesis 3:15). Who knows if He might not do it for our enemies? I know of a man who virulently, actively persecuted believers, some even to the point of death. But God stopped him dead in His tracks, blinding him, gave him eyes to see the kingdom and sent him to my people with the gospel.

We are called to fight for peace, and to peace in the midst of the fight. May He grant us grace to be faithful warriors who rest in His peace.

Posted in Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on What can I fulfill His command to be a peacemaker?

Good News, Good News, Good News and Bad News

I’ve got great news — I just saved a bundle on my car insurance. This punchline might expose a problem in our Christian sub-culture: we don’t know what the good news is.

The confusion is understandable. God is good, gracious. We move from grace to grace, receiving gifts from Him all the time. God is sovereign, controlling all things. When He tells us all things work together for good for those who love Him, who have been called according to His purpose (Rom. 8:28), we learn that it’s all good news. His coming, that’s good news. His dying, that’s good news. His ascending, that’s good news. His sending the Spirit, that’s good news. The Spirit applying these things to His people, that’s good news. Even the trials we go through, they are good news as well. We are, after all, to count it all joy.

That everything is good news, however, does not mean that everything is the good news. The authors of their respective gospels were not merely publishing everything they came upon. While each had their own peculiar focus, each of them together, on the other hand, were seeking to make known the good news.

These four men, however, were not the first. Two other men before them labored diligently to make known the good news. One of those two was called by the Lord the greatest man born of a woman (Luke 7:28). The other was the Lord of Glory Himself. If we would understand the Gospels, we would be wise to understand that the good news they were reporting was the good news proclaimed not just about Jesus, but by Jesus. The good news is that the kingdom has come. This is the message of Jesus: the kingdom of God is here.

On the other hand, the bad news is that the kingdom has come. The life, death, resurrection, ascension and return of Christ is to us who have been called, the very aroma of life. To those who are still outside the kingdom, it is the stench of death. It is the same kingdom either way, but for the seed of the woman (Christians) it is blessing, and for the seed of the serpent it is cursing. That this one kingdom can mean one thing for one group and the opposite for another can help explain how we have come to conflate some terms over time.

The difference between seeing the coming of the kingdom as an event of joy or of dread is found in one simple distinction — do we trust in the finished work of Christ alone or not? The seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent began in the same place, as enemies of the kingdom. We are all by nature children of wrath. But it is as we are gifted with repentance and believe that we move from darkness to light, that we are adopted into the very family of God. That’s good news. Better still, the king who has adopted us, He is now king indeed. That’s very good news.

Our gospel is a truncated shell if the good news is merely that we don’t have to go to hell. It gets only slightly better if it means our souls go to heaven. The fullness of the gospel is found in the fullness of the kingdom. Jesus, the first-born of the new creation, is remaking all things, all the created order that groans under the burden of sin. He is remaking all the political order, as all kings everywhere learn to kiss the Son, lest He be angry (Ps. 2). He is remaking His bride, removing every blot and blemish. And He is remaking every one of us, reshaping us pots into vessels of grace. Jesus changes everything.

We are a part of this good news precisely because He came and lived a life of perfect obedience in our place. We are a part of this precisely because He suffered the wrath of the Father that is due to us for our sins. We are a part of this because He has given us each a new heart that responds to His calling with repentance and faith. We bring nothing to the table but our need. Jesus has done it all. We are His workmanship, judged innocent by His death, judged righteous by His life.

There is still more good news. We are not merely made citizens of that kingdom we are called to seek. Not merely judged righteous by His righteousness that we were called to seek. We are by the same Spirit made kings and queens with Him, not just subjects but rulers. Seated even now with Him in the heavenly places our calling is to believe these promises. We’re to be of good cheer, for He has already overcome the world (John 16:33). We do not wait for His kingdom to come, for it is here. Instead, we strive to make it ever more visible, as we make all things subject to His glorious reign.

Posted in assurance, Biblical Doctrines, eschatology, Good News, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, resurrection, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Tariffs and Inflation: And Never the Twain Do Meet

Economic pundits have been celebrating of late that thus far we haven’t seen a deep spike in inflation due to the imposition of tariffs on foreign goods sold in the US. In other news, thus far the lint in my pocket has had little impact on the WNBA standings. I am not a fan of tariffs, which I addressed earlier here. I’m certainly not a fan of inflation. I’m even less a fan of anyone who thinks the two correlate.

The confusion is partly driven by politics, partly by misleading measurements. People confuse inflation with rising prices in part because politicians cause inflation and prefer to blame it on business. The price of gas goes up and suddenly Bernie Sanders is screeching about greed in the C suite at Exxon. But the good people at Exxon don’t decide the price of gas. The people at the pump do.

The misleading measurement is found in the calculus of inflation. Every month of so we are treated to the latest numbers on “inflation.” These numbers are actually a measure of the change in price for a certain group of goods, the CPI, or Consumer Price Index. Last month a gallon of gas cost x, a loaf of bread y and a box of paperclips z. This month those same products are 1% more expensive, giving an annual inflation rate of 12%.

The truth is inflation is an increase in the money supply, something only the government can do. Such does cause prices to rise, for a simple reason that has nothing to do with anyone’s greed. It’s because there’s more dollars chasing the same goods. If an economy produced ten loaves of bread, and had ten dollars in circulation, each loaf of bread would cost a dollar. Add ten more dollars and the economy isn’t any richer. Now a loaf of bread costs $2.

What has this to do with tariffs? Everything. Tariffs do nothing, in themselves, to increase the money supply. Which is why they don’t cause inflation. They certainly, like any other cost of doing business, can raise the cost of doing business. Which doesn’t, contra general economic illiteracy, mean they can simply pass those costs on. Prices are still determined by what consumers are willing to pay. As noted, I’m not a fan.

Which is not a good reason to erroneously blame tariffs for inflation. Every bit of inflation can be traced back to government borrowing and printing money into existence. Not wealth, but money. If tomorrow the government told us we could all add three zeroes to our bank balance, we would not be any richer. We’d just add three zeroes to everything we want to buy.

Economics isn’t terribly complicated. It is just enough so that politicians and demagogues are equipped to fleece us year after year. Don’t invest in battles with the dimwitted. Instead learn a little and be equipped for battle.

For more lessons in economics from a biblical perspective, see my Economics for Everybody here.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Tariffs and Inflation: And Never the Twain Do Meet

Classic Sacred Marriage- Dissing Your Spouse

This week’s classic Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, friends, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Classic Sacred Marriage- Dissing Your Spouse

Our Bread and Circuses: At Ease In Babylon

While Christians martyred under the Roman empire died for their faith, I fear they didn’t die for our faith. First, we must understand what Rome had against these saints. Part of the genius of the Roman empire was their “broad-mindedness.” They didn’t roll into town after their conquest and rebuild from scratch. Instead it was their habit to assimilate.

As they did with the Pharisees, they cut a deal. We will rule over you, but you can, by and large, keep doing what you were doing. Keep your temple. Worship there. Keep your traditions, your way of life. All we ask of you is that you pay your taxes, acknowledge our authority. And this one other little thing- we need you to acknowledge that Caesar is Lord. Burn a pinch of incense, bow the knee, and then go back to what you were doing. You don’t even have to mean it.

The Christians’ problem was more political than narrowly theological. You see the very first creed of the church was just three words long, but managed to confront Rome at its heart. Christians were those who confessed Christ is Lord. They died by the thousands because they would not confess that Caesar is Lord.

Which brings us to our faith. We’re like the Pharisees. We have our worship services, our private convictions, and that’s where our faith ends. We submit to the world’s demands. As CS Lewis described it, “When the modern world says to us aloud, ‘You may be religious when you are alone,’ it adds under its breath, ‘and I will see to it that you never are alone.’” The rest of our lives are committed to the authority of the state, and to the diversions and distractions the broader culture provides. We are in no danger because we are no danger.

When the world calls our convictions “hate” we simply change them, insisting that our response to the wholesale turning over of God’s created order is more love, more appeasement, more assurance that we are not a danger. Some of us reinterpret our Bibles to get with the times. Some simply look away awkwardly when the Bible embarrasses us. We conflate the Biblical notion that all sin is rebellion against the living God and deserving of His judgment into something much safer. We embrace the notion that all sins are equal, making all of them innocuous, not worthy to be mentioned.

When the Supreme Court made its most wicked ruling, upending the natural, God created order of things, we ignored it. When we finally woke up, we found safe, reasonable, Rome approved ways of “fighting” it. 52 years later and still over 2,000 little babies are literally murdered every day, right in our own neighborhoods, with our full knowledge and with the full protection of the state. And we are more interested in our favorite football team.

We worship a Jesus who will save us from our sins, but whose reign we’re willing to negotiate. We worship a state that simply requires of us that we be nice and keep our convictions to ourselves. We worship distraction, so that we won’t have to face our idolatry. We worship the acceptance of the broader culture, and sacrifice all else to get it. We’re not like our fathers who died for Jesus, but like our fathers that killed Him and the prophets God sent to call us to repentance, because they, like we, worship the god of this age.

Until we stop repenting to the god of this age for the plain teaching of the living God, and start repenting to the living God for bowing before the god of this age, we will be trodden underfoot. Until we weep for our sin, until we tear down the high places, until we cease to hand our children over to Moloch we will burn with Rome. Lord be merciful to us, sinners.

Posted in abortion, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Our Bread and Circuses: At Ease In Babylon

How has the internet impacted journalistic integrity?

There are some of us still around who remember the pre-internet world. There was a time when if you wanted your thoughts to reach an audience you had to find a publisher willing to help you out. That publisher had his own reputation to guard. In addition, he had his own money on the line. This provided a significant hedge against reckless writing. The internet has ground that hedge down to the roots. Now we are all our own publishers, and our financial investment is little more than a monthly internet bill.

In the old days we chose who we’d read in large part on the basis of how trustworthy we found the publisher to be. We knew both William F. Buckley and Alfred Regnery were more trustworthy than whomever the imaginative fellow was down at the Weekly World News. The publisher listed his own name and the brick and mortar address of the office. The author listed his name as well. Now we have anonymous “publishers” publishing their anonymous writings, hiding their ip addresses through proxy servers. Now mysterious and arcane mathematical calculations determine what shows up first when we search out information. How now do we know whom to trust?

We trust those who confirm our biases. Credibility is now wrapped up in who hates the people we hate and who loves the people we love. Someone going after our friends online has an attack blog. Someone going after our enemies online has a discernment ministry.

Last week someone read something I wrote that they didn’t agree with. They replied with a link to an article about one of my scandals in my past. “This you?” he asked. “Yes,” I replied, “why do you ask?” On the same day I had another commenter falsely accuse, no, not accuse but convict me based on something he read on an anonymous attack blog. I’d like to think the first person was acting with integrity and wanted to check for himself. I suspect, however, that his true motive was to put me in a glass dog house.

In the first instance I can confess that yes, I was guilty. In the second it’s my word against the word of my anonymous accuser. How much weight should we give to an anonymous, or pseudo-nonymous accusation? None. Less than none. But we do, if they are going after those who already don’t care for. Oh, we might pride ourselves on how judicious we are.

How many times have you heard, or worse, said something like this, “Well, if he’s guilty of even ten percent of what is written here, he’s a terrible, awful, good-for-nothing so and so.”? What we should be saying is “Well, if he’s innocent of even ten percent of what is written here, his accuser is a terrible, awful, good-for-nothing so and so.”

My counsel? Why don’t we try to not only stop speaking ill of others, but stop listening to those who speak ill of others? Why don’t we look at gossip, whether spread over the backyard fence or across the world wide web as the Bible does, a destructive, vile sin-

They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil, covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, maliciousness. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless (Romans 1:29-31).

The internet didn’t create this problem. It is born out of our own hearts. Which means there is only one solution- repenting and believing His Word. That is counsel you can trust, because the Author is not just true, but Truth.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Books, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, on writing well, RC Sproul JR, scandal | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on How has the internet impacted journalistic integrity?