The Greatest Evil

What if I told you that on September 12, 2001 terrorists in the United States killed 3000 people, and the story didn’t even make the news? What if I told you that on January 7th, 2021 terrorists killed 2500 people in the United States and it didn’t even make the news? What if I told you that every day in between terrorists killed between 3000 and 2500 people in the United States, all with the full knowledge and legal protection of the United States federal government, and it didn’t even make the news? What if I told you that every voter in the country, for both parties, knew this was going on?

When my wife and I watched President Trump’s first press conference on COVID I came away shocked. The sheer audacity of suspending travel, of ordering lockdowns was like nothing I’d seen before. Then, some months later, protestors not only took to the streets across the nation, in a few jurisdictions they took control of the streets, establishing their own autonomous regions. That was something I’d never seen before. A few months later an election left us wondering not only who had won, but if we would ever know. That question culminated in violence at the Capitol Building, fed led or not. Something I’d never seen before. All of which, added together and multiplied ten times is not worthy to be compared with the ordinary, banal truth that over the past 51 years more than 60,000,000 times parents hired trained assassins to murder their own child with the full legal protection of the federal government.

What we accept we have every reason to expect. A culture that hasn’t the moral capacity to end the greatest atrocity in its history is not a culture that can expect peace on its streets, an orderly transfer of power, the blessing of the God of heaven and earth. We got in this mess because we determined that the state had an obligation to protect our right to pursue our sexual appetites as we see fit, without a thought for our victims. We got in this mess because we refused to submit to His created order. We got in this mess because we think we know better than He does. We got into this mess because from top to bottom, in our streets, in our churches, in our homes we are in rebellion against God.

It was a great shock to me and to just about everyone else to see violence at the Capitol Building. It was not, however, a shock at all to the living God. First, He planned it from before all time, for His glory and the well-being of His children. Second, every one of His children, and every one not His child daily seeks to break into His most august chambers and wrestle Him from His throne. We all do this with every sin. January 6th, 2021 may be remembered for some time in this country, but for all the wrong reasons. The great evil, the true affront, the most wretched display of lawlessness was the legally protected murder of unborn children. Pearl clutching over the Capitol is just one more manifestation of our guilt.

Accuse me of “what about-ism” all you like. Until babies are safe in their wombs from the assaults of their parents, nothing else should shock us. Until this greatest evil ends we can expect nothing but judgment. How do we get out of this mess? We repent, and believe the gospel.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Big Eva, covid-19, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Romans Study Tonight- Ch. 12, Renewing Your Mind

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, Doctrines of Grace, ethics, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Study Tonight- Ch. 12, Renewing Your Mind

Why is the church so biblically illiterate?

Because of the church’s failure to teach the Bible. It’s no great mystery. Teaching the Bible has at least two strikes against it for the church looking to prosper. First, it is not easy. The Bible is a book of books, which books were written over the course of more than a thousand years, written by men who lived in cultures foreign to our own, written in languages few of us speak. Its subject matter touches on profoundly difficult matters, the intersection of the eternal and the temporal, the tri-une nature of the living God, the incarnation of the second person of the trinity. This is not “See Spot run. ‘Run Spot, run.’” Even Peter, who authored two of the books of the Bible, in one of them acknowledged that Paul’s writings in the Bible could be profoundly difficult to grasp. The church’s biblical illiteracy, in this instance, is not that distinct from the general illiteracy our culture suffers from. We’re watchers, not readers. And what we watch we watch for entertainment, not learning.

The second strike may be even more detrimental. Teaching the Bible works against the local church “prospering” because its message is abundantly clear- we are sinners, and under the judgment of God unless we rest in the work of Christ for us. When the church sees the unbeliever as their “market” and research shows the market is averse to your message, well then, you have to change the message. It is not, however, just the unbeliever who prefers not to be taught what the Bible teaches about our sin. None of us like it.

The trouble is, if you remove that truth from the Bible, that we are wretched sinners apart from God’s grace, you a. have removed a high percentage of the content of the Bible and b. removed the reason to know the rest of the content of the Bible. Why would someone want to learn about substitutionary atonement who has no idea he needs an atonement? Who would have an interest in imputation who doesn’t know he stands guilty before God?

In the end we have both teachers who won’t teach and disciples who won’t learn. We have ear-tickling hirelings scratching behind the ears of goats. Pastors sell what they sell because parishioners buy what they buy, and parishioners buying what they buy because pastors sell what they sell.

Romans 1 teaches that God speaks truth to all men everywhere. And all those to whom He does not give ears to hear, suppress that truth. They deny it, push it away, seek out a message more soothing. Romans 7 teaches, however, that when God is pleased to give ears to hear, when He gives life to we who denied Him, and we respond in faith and repentance, our sin patterns do not disappear. We too suppress the truth of God, now not just what He reveals through His world but what He reveals in His Word, in unrighteousness. May He give us then both ears to hear, and mouths that would hunger for every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God.

Posted in Ask RC, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Education, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Why is the church so biblically illiterate?

Vox Dei

There’s something odd about the West’s shift from modernism to postmodernism. On the one hand, we would be wise to remember that the two are kin to each other. We can debate over whether they are father and son, older brother and younger, but no one can deny the family resemblance. Both worldviews share a fundamental common conviction: the Bible is not true. On the other hand, whatever the family relationship, this is not a happy and peaceful family. While both systems affirm that the Bible is not true, they diverge as to their reasons why. Modernism tells us the Bible is not true because science is true, and the Bible is not science. Postmodernism tells us that the Bible is not true because there is no truth, because nothing is true.

Because of the similarities, it is all too easy to confuse the two perspectives. Because of the differences, it is vitally important not to do so. A modernist assault on the authority and trustworthiness of the Bible is radically different from a postmodern assault. The former is a direct attack, a blitzkrieg to the very heart of our defenses. God says He made man out of the dust of the ground; the modernist tells us this is false— man evolved from lower life forms. When dealing with the modernist, we can expose his false assumptions, challenge his affirmations, provide evidence for the truthfulness of God’s Word. We can marshal archeological studies, march through propositions, all while raining cannon fire on the foundations of his strongholds.

The postmodernist, however, is far more subtle, crafty, slick. By flying the false flag of truce, offering a gentlemen’s agreement that we can all agree that none of us is right and none of us wrong, he requires that we lower our banner of truth. He turns straightforward affirmations and truth claims into weaselly, slippery internal matters of the heart. He judges a given statement not on the basis of its accuracy but its emotional potency—”How does that statement make you feel?”

Forty years ago, at least in the church, we were still facing the fading dinosaurs. Angry men denounced the accounts of miracles as primitive ignorance. Through the faithful work of the International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, however, the inerrancy of Scripture was maintained and championed. From a sheer numbers perspective, the “Battle for the Bible” was a rout and evangelicalism stood firm, and mainline churches and institutions bled members and lost influence.

The serpent, however, is both crafty and persistent. His current assault on the inerrancy of the Bible is more postmodern and therefore more indirect. Now we have people who try to affirm their belief in inerrancy while teaching that the Bible accommodated its message to its audience, that the Bible affirms things that we now know are not true. We have people who try to arm their belief in inerrancy while teaching that what we thought were historical narratives are actually myths. We have people who affirm inerrancy but go on to affirm that we should correct the sexism Paul imbibed from his surrounding culture.

In short, we have people who affirm both that the Bible is inerrant and that it, or at least some of it, is not to be believed. The serpent’s goal from the beginning has been to get us to doubt God’s Word. That he changes the weapons he uses doesn’t mean he’s changed his aim.

This highlights the real issue. Yes, inerrancy as a doctrine is vital. Certainly, inerrancy as an apologetic defense is critical. But ultimately, winning or losing the Battle for the Bible rests here: Do we believe God? That, above all, is what we need— to believe God. Our calling is to believe everything He has said, to believe it in our minds, in our hearts, and out through our fingertips. We are called to ever and always give our humble but exuberant AMEN to His every word. We are not merely to affirm the truthfulness of His Word in general but are called to submit to His Word at every particular. We are, in short, to seek first His kingdom and His righteousness.

We seek His kingdom best as we hear His voice most. That is just what the Bible is— the vox Dei, the “voice of God.” We are not to worry about our respectability or our reputations, but rather are to be focused on the one needful thing— His direction in His Word. We seek His righteousness as we submit to His law. When it is unfashionable, we submit to His law. When it is difficult, we submit to His law. When it swims against the cultural stream, we submit to His law.

In the end, inerrancy is less about our conclusion about the Bible and more about our submission to the Bible. We do not stand above it in judgment, even when we give it a perfect grade. Instead, it stands above us in judgment. And, to His everlasting glory, it gives those in Christ a perfect grade, despite our pride, our folly, our disobedience. For we are in Him, who is the Word of God incarnate, without error, and without blemish. His Word can no more err than He, the Word, can err. We are in ourselves liars. He is in Himself true.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, inerrancy, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Latin Theological Terms, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Christian Nationalism

My father told a lot of jokes. That’s what dads do. One I remember goes like this. There was a monk that had allowed nicotine to get ahold of him. Given the amount of time spent in prayer he thought it wise to go to the abbot and ask, “Is it wrong for me to smoke while I pray?” The abbot, not liking the idea of tainting prayers with smoking, said “no.” A week later the monk happened upon a brother monk hard at his prayers, smoking like a chimney. “Brother,” he said, “you better put that out before the abbot catches you.” He replied, “The abbot gave me permission.” “He did? I asked him not long ago if I could smoke while I prayed and he said ‘no.’” ”There’s your problem,” the second monk replied. “I didn’t ask if I could smoke while I prayed. I asked if I could pray while I smoked.”

Which, QED, brings us to Christian nationalism. If you were to ask any thoughtful Christian if he would like to see our nation better reflect the reign of Christ over all things, to see law built on the wisdom of God as revealed in the Bible, abortion outlawed, boys being boys, riots and not Psalm sings being broken up by the police, most would say “amen” if not “huzzah!” What Christian wouldn’t want these things? It’s the very road to living in peace and quietness with all men. Count me in.

If, however, we mean by Christian nationalism the concept of nationalism wrapped in Christian garb, well that’s a mule of a different color. If we mean saluting a Christian Franco, complete with Christian xenophobia, Christian megalomania, Christian inquisitions, we are supposed to respond something like Paul responding to the notion we should sin all the more that grace would abound. We need something with a little more gusto than an George H. Bushian “wouldn’t be prudent” like maybe a bellowing, “Heck to the no!”

The trouble is precious few of us are crystal clear about which one of these two scenarios everyone’s talking about. This is due in part both to our own vincible ignorance, having last given any thought to questions of government in 9th grade civics class but also to the nuances in rhetoric among the purveyors of Christian nationalism. Depending on the audience Christian nationalism is sometimes dressed up as 1950s style civic religion no more offensive than baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and Chevrolet. And sometimes they, when not punching but pitching right, sing the glories of a “Christian Franco.” You know, just like Franco, only Christian.

I’ve been fooled before. I actually once believed that a league of southern sympathizers who claimed to reject racism rejected racism. That doesn’t mean anyone who identifies with Christian nationalism is similarly dishonest. As noted above, any Christian would want to see every nation better acknowledge Jesus as Lord. Now, however, is less a time for building alliances, more a time for a clear trumpet blast calling out fascism from both those in power and those aspiring to it. Where the reign of Jesus is acknowledged, freedom reigns.

Posted in "race", abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Nostalgia, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Christian Nationalism

Romans 11, Part the Third

Posted in "race", apologetics, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, Doctrines of Grace, eschatology, evangelism, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans 11, Part the Third

Marital Woes; Alabama & Tiny Babies; James & Paul; & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, Good News, Jesus Changes Everything, justification, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Marital Woes; Alabama & Tiny Babies; James & Paul; & More

Now Play Nice

It is bad enough that we are such suckers for the bait and switch. The devil has been playing this gag on us for millennia. We should have learned by now. When the angel comes along and says, “You know, God is love. And what He wants you to do is to love one another,” the devil doesn’t show up on the other shoulder and say, “Love, ah, that’s for suckers. What you really need to do is some good hating.” He’s not that dumb. Instead he shows up on our shoulder and says, “Of course, I want nothing more than for you to love everyone. Love is my favorite thing as well. Why, just the other day I was composing a haiku about love. Let’s see here, how did that go? Love one another; If your lover is not there, love the one you’re with.” He fills God’s words with his meanings, and, because we miss the switch, we end up tied in knots.

What is worse, however, is that he sometimes comes along and actually gets us to substitute a whole different word for the good one. He switches not just the meaning, but the word itself. Nice, though some have called it the cardinal evangelical virtue, is not, I’m afraid, a command from the Bible. God never said, “Whatever else you do, be nice.” Instead it is a command from the culture. And like love, it is a command we have allowed the devil to define.

There is only one thing required to be nice, and only one sin against niceness in the culture. You certainly never have to go out of your way and be a neighbor to anyone. You never have to make personal sacrifices of any sort. All you have to do is repeat the mantra of the age, “If that’s the way you see it, that’s fine.” See how non-threatening that is? It allows both of us to keep our pride, to keep our convictions, to keep our sins. And it costs so little. In short, to be nice is always and only to embrace relativism. Once you’ve swallowed this one, nothing else will ever get caught in your throat.

Actually though, you’re only half the way home. You have to study the other half of the nice rulebook, the side they only talk about when they have to. You see, there is one thing that still must stick in your craw. That, of course, is when some blamed fool refuses to play nice, to abide by the rules. When someone says, “It doesn’t matter how I see it, or how you see it, or how a billion Chinese see it. What matters is how God sees it, because He is the one who determines reality. Our job is to get our own perceptions in line with His, which are of necessity true. And all perceptions which do not match His are of necessity false,” you are not nice if you respond with a polite, “If that’s the way you see it, that’s fine.” Here, according to the devil, and he ought to know, the correct, and only nice response is, “Crucify him.”

If you can accuse all those who don’t abide by the nice rules of relativism of being mullahs, and terrorists and Nazis and threats to our way of life and fanatics who must be hunted down like rabid dogs, then you earn that most coveted of sobriquets, “Nice.” It’s not enough to be relatively relativist. You must be absolutely relativist. It’s not enough to have some humility about your or my convictions. You must arrogantly assume that all convictions, by their very nature, must be false. As a nice relativist you must be absolutely certain that any and all absolutists must be stopped, no matter what the cost. Otherwise you may as well be a fellow-traveler with those who just aren’t nice.

It’s important for us to remember this the next time we feel the sting of the accusation that we somehow aren’t nice. The answer isn’t to protest, to get out our relativist credentials, and show how up to date they are. Our response the next time some syndicated columnist tries to connect the dots between us and Hamas is to say, “If the objection is that both of us affirm objective truth, objective right and wrong, we’re flat guilty.” If the reason Islam is hated is not because it is false, but because it simply claims to be true, we ought to be in a panic that we as Christians aren’t the most hated group on the planet. If the powers that be insist on hanging all those who reject relativism, then our calling is to charge the gallows, not to tear them down, but to place our own necks in the noose of the not nice.

We can’t play nice with those who define niceness this way. We cannot keep both their rules, and the rules of Him whom we say we serve. When Jesus said, “If you confess me before men…” He didn’t mean standing up at some flag pole and saying, “This is what Jesus means to me…” When Jesus said, “Blessed are you when they revile and persecute you, and say all kinds of evil against you falsely for my sake,” He didn’t mean that we should do everything we can do to change their word, nice, into one that we can affirm, and act upon. He didn’t mean that we should tone down His exclusive claims so that we can wear our nice pins to the nice meetings. He meant we will be blessed when they throw us out.

If we will serve Him our goal ought never to be that when we are gone they say of us, “You know, that so and so sure was nice.” The epitaph we should seek for our grave marker should be Faithful. Instead what needs to be buried is the virtue they call nice, that the name of Christ might live on in the west.

Posted in abortion, apologetics, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, logic, persecution, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Now Play Nice

Going Homesteady- Homesteaders vs. Preppers

Posted in Going Homesteady, politics, RC Sproul JR, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Going Homesteady- Homesteaders vs. Preppers

What’s with all the homesteading stuff?

I recognize that these pieces get read through various and sundry venues. In addition to rcsprouljr.com, I post links on social media, including the Facebook I share with Lisa. You may have seen there any number of live films and reels from our farm and our cabin. My wife is in her element overseeing this work, and it is my joy to see the joy she finds in it.

A little more than a month ago we, Lisa and I, started a new youtube channel. It is called Going Homesteady, and you can find it here. While some might see such as a departure from other things we have been teaching through the ministry of Dunamis Fellowship, we see it more as an extension.

Our podcast is rightly named Jesus Changes Everything. Including us. Part of the reason for Going Homesteady is we believe first that there are great spiritual blessings than can come from, to one degree or another, going back to our garden as a means to head back toward the garden. We find working the land He has blessed us with a fertile soul for cultivating the fruit of the Spirit. Such is not to suggest city folk are less spiritually mature. It is to suggest that God not only uses us where He puts us but also uses where He put us.

Second, in seeking to cultivate this land we are learning much about the unexamined presuppositions that too often shape our thinking. We are both stepping out of our comfort zone. We are finding that many of the trade-offs we make, giving up the authentic for the convenient, the organic for the constructed don’t give the return on investment we thought they did. We’re reaping blessings we weren’t even looking for.

Third, we like it. As with everything else there are plenty of thorns and thistles along the way. My brow has experienced more sweat than it has in a long time. But it’s so much fun. Watching our five -year old granddaughter munching on a tomato as she checks on the growth of the pumpkins is better than watching the latest blockbuster movie. Eating the zucchini relish that Lisa grew, harvested, made and canned is a delight I didn’t expect. (You know, because of the zucchini.)

My advice for you is two-fold. First, subscribe to our channel. Share it with your friends. Join us on our journey of organic growth. We’re not experts downloading information but students learning together. Second, take a step or two with us. Maybe you don’t have acreage to support a cow. Maybe keeping bees doesn’t meld with your allergies. But try something, a little something. If you’ve got a fireplace, don’t buy your wood, but learn to cut, split, stack and season. Try a few more meals that are not heated in the microwave but that are made with ingredients.

If nothing else, let’s learn to not merely mouth our gratitude for God in giving us this day our daily bread, but enter into that gratitude, giving joyful thanksgiving for every feast.

Posted in creation, Education, Going Homesteady, Health, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments