RC Sproul Jr

The Christian is engaged in a three-front war. The Bible, replete with martial language, bears this out. The great evil trinity against which we fight is the world, the flesh, and the devil. In our day, sadly, we have made friends with the world. We have reduced our flesh down to a few psychological crossed wires. We have lost sight of these two battlefields. Precisely because we have lost sight of the third, and therefore have lost the battle. We miss our war with the world and our flesh because the devil has defeated us in battle. Such that we have forgotten that he exists.

C.S. Lewis, in the preface to his great work The Screwtape Letters, posits this nugget of wisdom:

“There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them. They themselves are equally pleased by both errors, and hail a materialist or a magician with the same delight.”

As wise as Lewis and this particular quote may be, I do have a quibble. No doubt the devil is able to accomplish a great deal of mischief among those who see him as some sort of evil god. Those with a morbid interest in him and his minions can cause some mischief. That said, he is able to cause far greater damage among those who give him no thought at all. That is to say, both the materialist and the magician are bad, but the materialist is worse.

We have pretty much the same problem within the Christian subculture, and for much the same reasons. On one side of the spectrum is the extreme wing of the spiritual warfare movement. Some of these folks claim to see a demon behind every bush. They don’t catch colds; they are under attack by the sniffle demon. They don’t have wandering eyes, but are at war with the lust demon. Those in this camp look for demons behind every bush, because they prove quite useful for excusing our sin. As Flip Wilson used to say, “The Devil made me do it.”

This, however, is not the danger we face in Reformed circles. We tend to be on the opposite side of the spectrum. Unlike the true materialist, we do indeed believe in the demonic realm. I mean, we read our Bibles, and the Bible, after all, talks about such things. But we tend to believe that demons exited the human stage with the apostles. Demons exist, we are willing to confess, but they have been sitting on the celestial sidelines since the apostolic age.

What drives this perspective, I’m afraid, is less a careful exegetical study of the matter, and more an embracing of the modernist worldview. We look down our noses at our brothers who pay attention to the spiritual realm not because we find such to be unbiblical, but because we find it unsophisticated.

We think Martin Luther’s habit of shouting at the devil, of throwing his inkwell at him, is a sign that Martin was on the psychological brink, when perhaps we ought instead to conclude that he exhibited here the same wisdom that led him to declare, “Here I stand!” It may be that Luther mined the truth that our God is a mighty fortress from the same source where he discerned that this world is with devils filled, namely, the Bible.

That we rarely give the devil a thought, let alone his due, ought to confirm for us this important spiritual reality — that the devil is sitting on our shoulder, whispering folly into our ears. He is active not only in the dark corners of Africa, but in the dark corners of our hearts and minds. If we would seek first the kingdom of God, we will have to come to grips with the reality that the devil is trying to stop us.

His forces, we ought also to remember, are not only arrayed in the political and cultural battlefields. He does not have his hand in the Democratic National Committee only, nor does he work his magic only in Hollywood. He is also about the business of growing in us his diabolical fruit. He is at work when we are filled with envy, malice, fear, selfishness. He is waging war when he encourages us to spend our energies not pursuing the kingdom, but pursuing personal peace and affluence. He is practicing his dark magic when he encourages us to defend not the honor of Christ, but our own reputation and dignity.

The war between the seed and the serpent is the same thing as our war with the world, the flesh, and the Devil. May God give us the grace to win great victories in the little battles we fight each day. May He grant us the eyes to see the epoch-changing battles in our very ordinary lives.

Reductio ad absurdum is a rather potent tool. You take the premises of someone’s flawed argument and push them to their extreme. Everyone can see it doesn’t work, and you’ve destroyed the argument. Consider minimum wage laws. As long as the legal minimum wage is below the market wage, no harm no foul. When it raises above the market wage it messes everything up. “But,” the economically illiterate cry, “everyone deserves a living wage. People need to make at least $15 an hour. Let’s pass a law.”

OK. If the law can create jobs that pay above a certain level, why stop at $15? Shouldn’t the government, if they really cared about us, make the minimum wage $15 million an hour? Whatever objection you have for the latter will apply to the former.

The same principle applies to tariffs. I admit they look like a brilliant idea, if you’re only looking at part of the equation (just like a $15 million an hour wage requirement). It’s terrible that those Japanese sell better cars for less money than American manufacturers. It’s evil that Canadian lumber costs less than American lumber. How dare those Germans build superior, cheaper cuckoo clocks to our American made ones? Something must be done.

You should be able to see the problem already. Tariffs are built on the premise that the way to prosper a nation is to have its citizenry pay more for inferior goods. If foreign goods, without tariffs, dominate a market, what explanation could there be other than the foreigners who made the goods do it better and/or cheaper? And wouldn’t it help the economy for us to buy goods that are better and/or cheaper?

But wait. There’s more. Every good that is imported to this country has a corresponding good that is exported from this country. Those trucks bringing lumber, those ships bringing cars and cuckoo clocks to the United States do not return empty. They return with the goods that Americans are able to produce better/cheaper than those nations that import our exports. Every job you “save” by driving out foreign competition is a job you lose for a company that beats foreign competition overseas. You are losing better jobs to save worse jobs.

Back to the experiment. If tariffs are such a boon to the economy, why these petty halfway measures of 25% or 50% tariffs? Why not charge Japan $1 million per car they wish to import here? Why not charge Canadian companies $1 million for every two by four they want to send here? Think of all the tariff income we’d bring in.

The free market is that market which will always and everywhere maximize prosperity. Every form of tinkering with it by the clumsy hands of government will throw sand in the gears, every, single, time. You might make a case that this form of taxation is less destructive than that form of taxation. What you cannot do is claim that any form of taxation creates a net gain for the economy. Tariffs are intrusive, expensive, oppressive government over-reach, something I thought we’d decided to put behind us.

This is part and parcel of what it means to love your neighbor. You don’t ask the government to make them pay an extra tax so that your business can beat his business. You encourage the government to stay out of your neighbor’s business.