Is homosexuality “unnatural”?

Certainly. There is one way this is so, and one in which it is not. As per always, it helps if we define our terms. It is not uncommon for apologists for this particular perversion to argue that it is not unnatural since we witness similar behavior among certain animals in the wild. This is the sense in which it is not unnatural, when we define “natural” as “that which we can see in the creation.”

Such, however, has never been what we mean by “natural.” Rather natural in this kind of context refers to the nature of the thing. The nature of a man and the nature of a woman isn’t something we find simply by studying the behavior of bucks and does. You’ll never learn whether it is right or wrong to be racist by studying the habits of red ants and black ants.

“Natural,” in the context of ethics alludes to the nature of thing being considered. While a toaster makes heat, and while I person might want to warm his bathwater, it would be foolish to drop the toaster in the tub. It is against the nature of a toaster to heat water. It doesn’t matter whether the bathtub is in a high rise in Tokyo or in the middle of the Grand Canyon. In civilization or in nature, it is unnatural.

Men are designed, it is their nature, to be with women. Women, in turn are designed to be with men. This is how God made the first man and the first woman. This is why He established marriage the way He did. This is why He designed procreation the way He did. This is why He Himself says,

“For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due” (Rom. 1: 26-27).

One could argue that there is yet another way that homosexuality is “natural.” It is consistent with our fallen natures. There is a connection between this sin and our rebellion against the living God. When a man desires a woman not his wife, it is sinful, but consistent with the God given nature of man. God made men to desire women. When a man desires a man, it is not only sinful but an affront to God’s design. It is shaking one’s fist at God Himself.

There was a time not long ago that most everyone knew these truths, especially within the church. For decades now, however, the broader culture has been at war with nature, with God’s design, and with biblical thinking about these things. More is coming, not just more perverse behaviors but more cultural pressure on believers to embrace the twisted thinking of unbelievers. We would be wise to settle these matters firmly in preparation for the ongoing onslaught. Let God be true, and every man a liar.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, creation, ethics, persecution, philosophy, politics, RC Sproul JR, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The End of the End

When Alice found herself at a crossroads in Wonderland, she looked about for help. There in a tree nearby was a smile. Just a smile. Soon though, the full body of the Cheshire Cat appeared. Alice asked the cat which way she should go. The cat asked her where she was headed. Alice explained to him that she had no particular destination, and then the cat spoke words of wisdom—”Then it doesn’t matter.”

If we are going nowhere we cannot go wrong. You can only get lost if you have a destination. Which is why eschatology matters. Rightly understood, eschatology, the study of the last things, is the study of where we are headed.

Trouble is, more often than not, we find ourselves going down a dead-end road because we’ve gotten distracted by mileposts along the way. We end up arguing about where we are or where we almost are, and we utterly lose sight of the real end of the story.
The Bible speaks of a millennium. It does so in the midst of a profoundly difficult bit of inerrant literature—John’s Apocalypse, the book of Revelation. And all that the Bible teaches is understandable. God doesn’t waste His time or ours telling us about things we can’t possibly understand. So there is a sound view on the millennium that is biblical, knowable, and valuable. We should seek to affirm and grasp that view.
The millennium, however, is not the end, in either sense of the word. It is not the reason for all things; neither is it the last of all things. It should not, therefore, deeply divide and separate us.

Some views assert that we are in the midst of the millennium, that this language refers to the time between the ascension of Christ and His return. Some views affirm that the world will grow progressively worse, and then Jesus will return to rule for a thousand years. Still others affirm that the world will grow increasingly faithful to God’s Word, that we will enjoy a thousand-year golden age before Jesus returns. That’s rather a lot of differences between millennial views.

But do you notice what one thing each of these views shares? Whatever position one might take, in the end we all agree on one thing: Jesus wins. When history is complete, every knee will bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. When history is complete, all His enemies will have been made into His footstool. When history is complete, there will be no more tears, no more sickness, no more death. When history ends, that which we now are called to seek, the kingdom of God, will be consummated. What we seek will have been found in all its glory, in all its fullness.

There is, however, one more step before the end, one part of the story we are wont to miss out on. The real end, the true end, is not found in the final chapters of Revelation but in Paul’s first letter to the church at Corinth, chapter 15. There we read, “Then comes the end, when he delivers the kingdom to God the Father after destroying every rule and every authority and power” (v. 24). The end is when the Son, after bringing all things under subjection, delivers the kingdom to His Father. Then the last Adam, having completed the calling given to the first Adam, that the earth would be filled and subdued, will hand back to His Father the creation that had been put under our stewardship.

How can we miss that? How has our story left out this great climax? The Son returns the kingdom to the Father. We must come to grasp this, as it is precisely this glorious truth that animates our labors here and now. The kingdom that we seek first is this same kingdom that the Son returns to the Father. Our labors in the here and now, insofar as they reflect and flow out of our commitment to the reign of Christ, no matter what happens between now and the end, will survive. Our work matters into eternity. Or, as one wise theologian is apt to describe it, right now counts forever.

Our efforts, our labors in raising our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord, in calling out the elect from the four corners of the earth, of taking God’s dust and molding and shaping it into widgets, this is not just pursuing the kingdom of God but manifesting it. It is neither what we do while we wait for the end, nor what we do to bring to pass our favorite millennial view. Rather it is what we do to move the story to the end of the end, the Son returning the kingdom to the Father.

And that, of course, is also the beginning of the beginning. From there we will enjoy in the true and eternal Mount Zion—in the New Jerusalem—the very presence of the living God. We will take in the beatific vision, beholding His glory. We know the end, both the purpose and the goal of the story—Jesus wins, to the glory of the Father. And by His grace, He takes us with Him. That’s our reason for living, and our hope in dying.

Posted in Apostles' Creed, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, Biblical theology, church, creation, eschatology, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, resurrection, sovereignty, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Rome Not Home

Sigh. I’ve just learned that another old friend has chosen to swim the Tiber. “Swim the Tiber” is a humorous euphemism for the deadly practice of leaving the Christian faith behind and embracing Roman Catholicism. As tragic as it is, this is by no means the first time this has happened. I, in fact, seem to attract future Tiber swimmers like flies. When I was in high school I was discipled by a fire-breathing Calvinist who had just graduated from Gordon-Conwell Seminary, where my father had once taught. His name is Gerry Matatics, who went on to become a leading apologist for Rome at Catholic Answers. That only ended when Gerry swam the Tiber’s Tiber and became a pre-Vatican II sedevacantist. These are those who, like Mel Gibson, reject all popes since Vatican II, while still claiming to be a part of the one true church.

In college I was discipled by another young Gordon-Conwell grad who was likewise a fire-breathing Calvinist. Until he swam the Tiber and became the most well-known of all ex-Protestant Catholic apologists, Scott Haun. While teaching at Grove City College Scott gathered a cadre of ten disciples, of which I was one. Eight of them, my friends, likewise went to Rome.

This latest friend to swim the Tiber has spent a lifetime doing good apologetic work, mainly through the medium of film. From watching those videos, to appearing in those videos, to becoming friends I always found the man to be both intelligent and thoughtful. So I’m sad once again. I’m not, however, in the least bit moved into a place of doubt about Rome. I understand some of the appeal, that while they have a many internal disagreements as Protestants, they keep them internal. I get the appeal of ancient history and ancient liturgy. I get the appeal of the relative intellectual vigor. My own shelves are weighed down with Chesterton, Kreeft, and E. Michael Jones. The trouble is the story just doesn’t add up.

Consider today Rome’s appeal to its own authority. Their apologists love to cluck over the thousands of Protestant denominations, arguing that sola Scriptura will always devolve into a kind of theological relativism. They, they boldly claim, have authority. Indeed they claim they have more authority than the Bible. It was, in their reasoning, though contra to the actual language of the ancient creeds, the church who created the canon in the first place. The Bible, according to Rome, can’t trump Rome because, according to Rome, Rome made the Bible.

Where, you ought at this point, to be asking, did Rome get this authority? And Rome’s apologists will happily take you to Jesus’ response to Peter at Caesarea Philippi, “Thou art Petros and on this rock I will build My church” (Matt. 16:18). Or, I Timothy 3: 14-15 where the church is called the pillar and ground of the church. All of which begs this simple question- how do we know these texts belong in the canon? The very same Rome that claims the Bible derives its authority from Rome claims the Bible gives its authority to Rome. They are, as the saying goes, hoisted on their own petard.

Rome is neither sweet, nor home. She has all the authority of any other self-appointed dictator. The irony is we don’t even need the Bible to know Rome is false. Any institution that claims to be above the Bible has immediately and irredeemably disqualified itself. The Tiber is shark infested water, and on the other side is only death and destruction.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, logic, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, Roman Catholicism | 2 Comments

Technical Problems

Sorry friends but I am unable to upload today’s this week’s podcast due to technical problems beyond my ken.I will keep trying as opportunity allows.

Posted in announcements | Comments Off on Technical Problems

Contextualizing Missions

It is just about the time that we begin to mock our fathers that we find ourselves slipping on the banana peels they have left behind. Consider our fathers’ failure to contextualize in missions. Generations ago great heroes went forth carrying the good news of Jesus Christ to unreached people. That’s good. They also, at least we are told, carried with them deep into untamed interiors, musical organs. Because, you know, these new converts had to, in order to be Christian, sing western music with western instruments. Like Christians do.

I’m afraid we haven’t quite gotten past this. We may not send out organs, but we do send out our own traditions, our own way of doing things, and perhaps too often, our own people. I’m not, of course, opposed to going. That’s a good thing. But when we go we go to grow and encourage the church of Jesus Christ. Which means we go to grow and encourage the local believers. Which means we encourage them to follow Jesus, not follow us.

We know how churches operate. A man is gifted and called to serve as its pastor. He sets up his shop, and works to persuade consumers to shop at his store. As he succeeds the church grows and the pastor then begins to think in terms of franchising himself. More church plants. Fancy letterhead and a whiz-bang website. When we go overseas, however, we find something different. We find pockets of believers, oftentimes in hiding. We find them struggling to put food on their tables. And we find them well served by pastors with whom they share a common life.

Now I believe it is a good and fitting thing to pay a pastor (I Timothy 5:17). But I think we just might be guilty of cultural imperialism if we determine this is necessary, or even helpful in all circumstances. Worse we do the same thing with any number of western traditions that have even less biblical support. We send off missionaries to train locals on how to host a youth group. We raise money to build church buildings. Or we establish seminaries to make the local pastors as petty and confused as we are. All because this is how we do it here.

It ought to tell us something about how we have done things here that now third- world, poverty stricken countries are sending missionaries to us. They are concerned for the weakness of our churches. They do not come with programs, but with the gospel. They do not come to remake our churches or cultures in their image. They come to win the lost. Too often when we go overseas we see ourselves as the savior. Instead when we go overseas we should go remembering, and therefore preaching, our need for a Savior.

He is the great missionary. He came to a desperately weak and wicked people carrying not an organ, but a cross. And He calls us to pick up our cross and follow Him. Perhaps we would do well to become the pupils rather than the teachers of our brothers around the world who know the difference between a cross and an organ.

Posted in Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, preaching, RC Sproul JR, wisdom, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Contextualizing Missions

No study tonight. Back next week, God willing.

Posted in RC Sproul JR | Comments Off on No study tonight. Back next week, God willing.

Is it wrong to have more than one needs?

Of course not. Some years ago I talked with a friend who was concerned that he was guilty of gluttony. The problem wasn’t persistent hangovers, or missing work after being up all night partying. No, he was worried because he sometimes continued to eat after he had had sufficient. That ethic, that eating after you’ve had what you need was gluttony he had learned from a former diet guru whose empire collapsed when she embraced heresy. Still, the idea persisted.

It is not wrong to eat more than you need, nor is it wrong to have more than you need. There are, of course, gluttons, people whose entire lives center around the pursuit of sensual pleasure, who move from party to party. And there are people guilty of being acquisitive, of having an insatiable desire for more stuff, and who have the debt to demonstrate it. Neither the person who had two donuts during coffee hour at church, and who could afford to lose ten pounds, nor the person whose wrist watch cost more than a month of groceries for a family of four fall into those sinful categories.

The devil delights to lay traps for us in the ditches on both sides of the road. That way he can encourage behavior in one direction while pedaling guilt in the other. The Lord has laid on us a set of obligations. This is His law. Such requires of us that we return to Him a tithe of all He has blessed us with. It requires that we be good stewards of what remains. It also requires that we set aside a tithe so that we can purchase whatever our heart desires, steak and lobster dinners, well aged single malt, a wrist watch that costs more than a month of groceries for a family of four. Think I’m crazy? Read Deuteronomy 14: 22-27. It’s in there.

Just as there are those who tend to see wealth as a sign of God’s favor, so there are those who equate poverty with godliness. Proverbs, in its proverbial way, does say that God tends to bless those who are diligent and wise in their labors, and to bless them financially. And there are those who give up financial opportunities that are perfectly legitimate, for the sake of the kingdom. Just a few weeks ago I visited with a medical doctor whose wife is a medical doctor. Those two incomes would surely make this family “wealthy” by almost any standard. But they are giving all that up, and trying to raise money to serve as medical missionaries in western Africa. Good for them I say. Just as I would say if they ditched their medical careers to make a fortune investing in gold mines.

It is true that sins usually come with opposite sins. It is true as well that non-sins might lean us in the direction of real sins. But such cannot make sins of non-sins. Having nice things is no sin, and refusing nice things is no virtue. Ingratitude is a sin. Envy is a sin. Pride in one’s financial standing, on either side of the spectrum, is a sin. Godliness with contentment, that is great gain (I Tim. 6:6).

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, politics, RC Sproul JR | Comments Off on Is it wrong to have more than one needs?

Giving Tuesday Held Over Indefinitely!

It has always been my prayer that God would put the gifts He’s given me to good work. I assume the same is true for you. Some pathways to fruitfulness are laid out clearly. You go to school, get certified, grab the ladder and start climbing. Other pathways are more clouded in mystery. Just how does one become a talk show host?

Dunamis Fellowship is my teaching ministry. It is my effort to put the gifts God gave me out there to serve the body. My desire is to be effective, to help believers believe more fully the fullness of the gospel. To that end, I publish every week four blog pieces. Typically Mondays I post an Ask RC, answering questions of readers. Tuesday, Thursday and Fridays I post pieces I call Kingdom Notes.

Wednesdays our weekly Jesus Changes Everything podcast goes up. Each episode includes a conversation on marriage with my precious wife, biblical insight, political commentary and from time to time, some nostalgia and humor and even an occasional guest. Monday evenings we host a Bible study online and in our home, welcoming local guests with a meal beforehand, fostering relationships. In addition to livestreaming, the study is made available at my website.

In addition to the above that is available to all, I’m continuing the challenging work of planting a church. I meet weekly with a young man for theological training. I engage in counseling young men. Each quarter I speak to a cadre of men seeking to mature as Christians and as men through the work of Warriors’ Week and my dear friend Sam Falsafi. I endeavor always to make myself available to the body.

In 2024 my prayer is not only for more opportunities but that God would be pleased to bless me with help where my strengths do not lie. The production side, the business side, the growth side, these are challenges for me. Nevertheless, we continue to press on.

Would you prayerfully consider supporting the work of Dunamis Fellowship? If we have been of some service to you in your walk, if you look forward to reading, listening, watching, attending, if you want to bless others who are blessed by our work, would you come alongside us? We have still more projects in the works for 2024, including a teaching video applying the ten commandments to the challenges we face in our work, and a book looking at the grace of scandal and the scandal of grace.

We are grateful for any and all gifts. Year-end gifts help us start the new year strong. Monthly commitments help us better plan out our year. All donations are tax deductible and enable us to continue to provide so much of what we do for free. No pay walls. No subscriptions.

Above all else, please remember that our desire is to serve. Please don’t let this gentle reminder of our needs stop you from enjoying any of the things we provide. Freely we have received and freely we delight to give. May God bless you and yours this holiday season.

PS If you are reading this at rcsprouljr.com there is a donate button on the homepage. If you are not, well, you can find a donate button on the homepage of rcsprouljr.com.

Posted in announcements, appeal, Bible Study, Big Eva, church, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, shepherd's college, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Giving Tuesday Held Over Indefinitely!

Sacred Marriage, Ps. 64:10; Propaganda Barrage; & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, Good News, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, persecution, politics, prayer, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage, Ps. 64:10; Propaganda Barrage; & More

The Gates of Hell Advancing

The feint is a rather critical part of any battle strategy. There are few occasions where a direct, unambiguous assault will work out well. We want instead to keep our enemy guessing, unsure as to whether we will be coming at this flank or that, whether we will circle around his troops, or if our dive bombers will descend from the clouds. The devil is no different. He too wants to tie up our attention, our resources, defending land he is not attacking. Long after modernism lay in the ash heap of western civilization, too many Christians were still firing sorties against it. While we were guarding against Darwin, Derrida slipped between our lines.

The same is true in the church. We who are the far right side of the evangelical spectrum have stood guard over the past several decades, watching out for weaknesses in our theological defenses. We have rightly strengthened our bulwarks on the inerrancy of Scripture. We have wisely strung razor wire around the pure message of justification by faith alone. We have done our apologetical spadework on both the past resurrection of Jesus and the future return of Jesus. These are all good things, even necessary things. Despite these defensive maneuvers, however, the gates of hell have marched right into our sanctuaries, and raised up its banners in our holy places. We have not guarded that place where we are always the most vulnerable, our character, our integrity, our holiness.

Were we honest we would recognize that in our day at least, churches have been torn asunder less by sloppy theological thinking and more by sinful hearts. Church splits are rarely over an honest disagreement over a discreet biblical (or unbiblical) doctrine. Neither, despite the cliché, are they over the color of the carpet. Instead church splits happen because trust is lost, because suspicions thrive, because factions multiply. Churches are torn asunder more by roots of bitterness than they are by heresies. And it all starts with unguarded tongues. These are the flaming arrows that the seed of the serpent fires into our midst, turning the beauty of the body into ashes. While we were pulling sentry duty against Socinianism, while our floodlights searched the skies for German liberalism, whispers infiltrated the camp and we were undone.

Gossip is real. And gossip is precisely as destructive as the Bible says it is. It begins with an unguarded word, the raising of a simple question, “Do you think the elders are being sufficiently attentive to x?” What follows is open-ended speculation, “I wonder why the elders haven’t sufficiently looked into x?” The next step is a more tentative accusation, “Could it be that they aren’t paying enough attention to x because they are split on the issue?” Then we choose sides even where there are no sides. “I’m sure Elder Jones has brought this to their attention. After all, when I mentioned x to him he paid attention to me, and promised to bring it up at the next session meeting.” Eventually, either Elder Jones adds fuel to the fire by joining up with Mrs. Grundy and her complaint, or he too gets tied to the same stake, for having allowed himself to be won over by the wicked faction on the session. It doesn’t much matter what x is. It doesn’t much matter which side we are on. The hunt is afoot, and we are swept away in all the pathos. Our hunger for drama, our need to be in the know, our insatiable appetite to be engaged in the great battle will not be sated until the entire church has burned to the ground. Then we sadly move on to the next church, and start it all over again. We walk on to the next battle convinced that we have boldly defended the faith, no matter the cost.

It is not a hard thing to cast yourself as the hero. It is not a challenge to stand firm on your convictions. It is not a hard thing to pick up the prophetic mantle and expose those we think have lost their way. What is hard is keeping on the path. What is difficult is cultivating the fruit of the Spirit, like love, and patience. What stretches our faith is the practice of humility. We all want to be Luther, when God has instead called us to be quiet.

Jesus promised the disciples that the gates of hell would not prevail against His church. This, of course, is because Jesus builds His church upon the rock. That rock, contra Rome, isn’t Peter, but is instead the profession of Peter, that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God. As we plant ourselves on that truth, then we can fight back. First, we remember that Jesus is the Messiah. He is the one who came to save us from our sins. When our focus is what Jesus has done with our sins, it is difficult to focus on the sins, real or imagined, of others. I’m not the Christ. I wasn’t put on the planet to save anyone. I’m the one that needs to be saved.

Second, we remember that He is the Son of the living God. He is almighty, all powerful. He sees all things and knows all things. If our elders are plotting evil, He is able to stop it. We are to look to Him, rather than to take these things upon ourselves. Our calling is to pray, and to pray in all confidence. We pray that the church would be pure, knowing that Jesus has promised to purify His church. Our calling is to rest in Him, to be still and know that He is God.

This too we must do when, despite our best efforts to stay outside the fray, our local church implodes. It is a tragedy when this happens. But the church moves on, carried forward by the prayers of its people, and by the power of its Lord.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Big Eva, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, resurrection, scandal, wisdom | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments