What’s our biggest weakness in understanding the Bible?

Logic, or a lack thereof. There are plenty of other weaknesses we have. We not only don’t come to the Bible as first century Jews but we do come as twenty-first century Americans. We are largely ignorant of the geography, culture, economy of the cultures into which the Bible was written. We are largely ignorant of the Old Testament background that is so vital to understanding the New Testament. We are likewise given to a relativist understanding of the Bible, believing we can assign our own meaning as we wish. We also tend to come to the text carrying this foundational principle, “Whatever the text is saying it isn’t saying I need to change.”

Despite all those lesser troubles I still affirm that our weakness in practicing basic logic is our foundational problem. We often fail to understand God’s written Word because we fail to understand written words. The heart of logic is the law of identity, A is A. Next is the law of non-contradiction, A cannot be A and non-A at the same time and in the same relationship. We try get around it, to make words not mean what they mean. We demonstrate in so doing that we are fools.

In turn, logic can help us cool our jets. While we try to make the Bible not mean what it says we also are prone to trying to make the Bible mean what it doesn’t say. We jump to conclusions. How many times have you heard, for instance, that Jesus, in His resurrected body, could walk through walls? The Bible doesn’t say this. It does say that the disciples were afraid and hiding, with the door locked, when Jesus appeared amongst them. How many different ways could that have happened? Maybe Jesus asked the disciples to open the door. Perhaps Jesus had a key. Perhaps His glorified body can’t walk through walls, but can pick locks. Perhaps Jesus teleported into the room. The Bible simply doesn’t say. So we shouldn’t either.

The Westminster Confession of Faith rightly says of believers that we are to believe every word that the Bible explicitly teaches, and more- every good and necessary consequence of what it explicitly teaches. We often fail to follow all that the Bible says to its logical conclusion. We often get lost on the way to the logical conclusion. Our failures in logic, more often than not, stem from our failure to fear God. Wisdom begins with fear because fear leads us to submission to every word that proceeds from His mouth. Yes, given our fallen minds we can simply make mistakes. Given our fallen wills, we often willfully make mistakes.

A study of basic logic would prove to be helpful in understanding God’s Word. It’s not as scary as it sounds because what we study is simply how our minds are supposed to think. Logic, as my father used to say, is the truth cop. When we fail in it, it lets us know we’re doing it wrong. So we try again. If you aren’t committed to logic, dcjgkeslhd, *^ salbj.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, Education, hermeneutics, logic, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s our biggest weakness in understanding the Bible?

Alone with My Thoughts

It is, of course, a sound and biblical truth that what comes out of our mouths reveals what is in our hearts. And, in turn, it is true that what is in our hearts is desperate wickedness. To be sure we are regenerate, indwelt by the Holy Spirit, but the old man is still kicking and screaming. Because of the deceit that remains in our hearts, however, we are wont to miss what actually comes out of our mouths. We end up thinking our hearts are rather sunny places because we find rather sunny things coming out of our mouths, at least when people are listening.

I know this because I live this. It’s not uncommon for me to find myself alone in my car, and thus alone with my thoughts. That, sadly, doesn’t mean I have been driving in silence. If my windows could talk, well, parental guidance is suggested.

When we assess our hearts via assessing our minds, I suspect we tend to pick those memories which are the safest, the tamest recordings we can remember. We think that how we spoke to that sweet old woman at the library with the big cross around her neck reflects what is actually in our hearts. In truth, it may be what we say when no one is listening that reveals us most fully.

This is because of common grace. It, along with the spread of the gospel in Western culture, has created notions of manners, chivalry, and discretion. We understand that some things are just not said in polite company. Or at least most of us do.

There are both psychological and physical ailments that can restrain whatever mechanisms we have that restrain our speech. Some folks are missing that filter that greases social discourse. They are the ones who are quick to point out that you’ve put on some weight. Children, in turn, can be slow to develop these nuances. They aren’t afraid to ask why two of our sons have skin that is so much darker than my own.

Most of us also are missing the nuances when we are engaged in internal conversation, when we are just talking to ourselves. We think it is safe to be honest in the quiet of our own minds. There we admit our dislike of our neighbor. There we confess to our own assurance that we are quite gifted with this skill, that we are the ones deserving of this honor or that. We seem to think that these things can’t hurt us as long as we don’t speak them, as long as we keep them inside.

Oh, the lies we tell ourselves. What comes out of our hearts reveals what we are. What goes into our hearts, that creates what we are. Our internal dialogue is not meaningless background noise. It becomes instead the soundtrack of our lives.

We are blessed to live in an age and a culture which has easy access to the Word of God. And we are cursed to live in an age and culture which has easy access to the Word of God. Our fathers had to internalize the Word of God. They sang the Psalms so they would learn them. They learned them so they could sing them, even if it was only in the quiet of their own minds. We, on the other hand, are more apt to have the wisdom of last night’s big winner on American Idol reverberating in our minds. We have Bibles in every room in our homes and apps on our smart phones, but we don’t hide it in our hearts.

When I was driving down the highway yelling and sputtering, I did so reflecting the wisdom of the world. What I was saying was: “I am important. I have important things to do. I have to hurry. You all are failing to understand how to treat me properly.” What I should have been thinking was more like this: “If the Lord wills, I will get there on time.”

The song I should have had playing in my mind was “The Lord is my Shepherd; I shall not want.” What I should have been rejoicing over is the glorious gospel truth that when I am stuck in traffic, I am already where I need to be, that no matter how many more miles I have to drive, the kingdom I am called to pursue first is already with me.

What I and we all need to remember is that whether we are alone in the car or alone with our thoughts, there is no thought in the woods that no one hears. The Word Himself hears every word, and every word of ours that is not an Amen to every word of His will burn up as wood, hay, and stubble. What I should have thought about in that traffic was not a resigned but a joyful reminder: “Where else can I go Lord? You alone have the words of eternal life.”

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, music, prayer, psalms, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Buckle Up

In little more than a year, unless things heat up more than even I can imagine, these United States will have an election. Every four years we’re told that this election is the one that really counts, that the future of the nation depends on the outcome. Such is never true, as the future of the nation is not dependent on who sits in the White House but Who sits at the right hand of the Father.

I will suggest, however, that this election is rather unlike what we are used to, because the world we’re living in isn’t what we’re used to. One of the reasons genuine conservatives are skeptical of giving the federal government more power is that they realize that either there are no genuine conservatives in Washington or, if they are, they won’t be there long. Law and order conservatives, after 9/11 were eager to set NSA free to snoop for our protection. Soon enough they were spying not for us but on us. There is supposed to be restraint on each side of the aisle because each side realizes eventually the other side will be in power.

Over the course of the last few election cycles we have witnessed hanging chads and an election determined by the Supreme Court. We have seen the left screeching that that 2016 election was stolen only to see the right screeching the same four years later. We have frontrunners being dragged into court and gagged. In short, we are seeing the trappings of civility and the orderly transfer of power disintegrating before our very eyes. These trappings, more than a well armed citizenry or a well educated electorate are the very bulwark of civilization.

A country where disappointment over a legal verdict leads to mass looting and riots is not a stable country, even if it’s the most powerful nation in the world, even if it has been around for more than two hundred years. That instability, by its very nature, does not stay hermetically sealed from those who had nothing to do with it. Which means that it is likely we are going to have a bumpy year. Maybe not an “Everyone is on house arrest for two weeks to flatten the curve” bumpy, but plenty bumpy.

What do we do? A prudent man sees trouble coming and prepares. While that preparation might include stocking up on a few things, more important still is that we get our hearts in the right place. Preparation means nestling in deep in our peace in God’s sovereignty. It means peeling away the sticky affections we have for the pax Americana and embracing the glorious truth that we are being faithfully led by our Lord to a city whose builder and maker is God. It means stiffening our spines that we might be found faithful by the King when we are found to be scapegoats by the empire.

Eternity remains in birth pangs. The future, however, is secure in the scarred hands of our Redeemer. Be at peace as war looms on the horizon.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, abortion, church, covid-19, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Buckle Up

All Things Work Together- Romans Study from 10/30/23

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on All Things Work Together- Romans Study from 10/30/23

Sacred Marriage, Truth; Gov’t Temples; The Good Fight & More

This Week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Economics in This Lesson, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, Nostalgia, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, That 70s Kid | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Seeking Christ

Neil Postman, in his compelling book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, argues that we have moved as a culture from one wherein the printed word drives us, to one wherein the image drives us. With the advent of the printing press, we became better able to think in abstract terms, to follow arguments, and to reach conclusions. Now, in a world driven by images on screens, we think less and feel more. Now we emote on the basis of images, rather than think on the basis of arguments. We are more likely to be moved, than we are to be persuaded.

As is so often the case, however, what we are called to here is balance. We do not want to be carried away with our emotions, nor by what we see. Neither, on the other hand, do we want to suppress our emotions and live like robots. Our goal is that we would think rightly, that our minds would be renewed, and having had this happen, that we would be changed in our hearts, that we would be transformed.

That same balance is reflected in how the Word reaches us. Far too often in the history of the church theologians have pitted the sacraments against preaching, failing to see their organic connection. The Bible is the Word of God. Jesus is the Word of God. Jesus is the bread and the wine. The bread and the wine is the Word of God. To put it better perhaps, in the worship service we are blessed by the Word preached, as we are blessed by the Word touched, and tasted, at the table.

To push our analogy a step further, we must also remember that the church is the body of Christ, and the bread is the body of Christ. God has not given us just words on a page. He has given us the Word visible in the sacrament, and in the church. Our calling is to seek to see Him in both. We need to see Him in our brothers and sisters in the pew, and when we come to His table.

In both instances we are changed. In both instances we draw near to Him. In both instances we are changed, in our whole being. Jesus told us that the world would know we were His by our love one for another (John 13:35). Given that we are still sinners, how can we rightly love one another? Because we grow in our capacity to see Jesus in one another. He indwells each of us, and He is altogether lovely. We in ourselves are merely dust and rebellion. But Christ in us, that is glory and beauty and all that is lovely.

Our calling is to keep our eyes on the prize. Jesus not only secures our reward, but is our reward. As we look to Him, whether we find Him in the Bible, at the table, or in the pews, we move toward our eternal home. Jesus promised that lo, He is with us always, even to the end of the age (Matthew 28:20). We ought then always to see Him with us.

Posted in beauty, Biblical Doctrines, Biblical theology, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Romans Study Tonight- All Things Work Together for Good

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Romans Study Tonight- All Things Work Together for Good

Can sin be my identity?

No, and yes. One of the strange results of efforts made to shoehorn homosexuality into the church is the claim of many at best celibate and at worst actively practicing, that they are “gay Christians.” The latter try to claim their sin is no sin. The former claim their inclination is no sin, but it is a good way to center their identity. We ought to say no to both. Paul is quite clear that those who practice unrepentantly sexual immorality, homosexual acts, as well as the greedy, idolaters, drunkards and more will not inherit the kingdom (I Corinthians 6: 9-10). That excludes the latter group. The former group is excluded by the very next verse as Paul reminds his readers, “Such once were you” (vs. 11). Not, such are you, but were you. You once practiced those sins, but they do not define you now. Your identity is in Christ. You may struggle with this temptation, battle that besetting sin, but if you are in Christ He is your identity. It is how God sees you, and He is the decider.

I understand the temptation. My own webpage has as a header to describe me, “Sinner saved by grace.” When, however, I refer to myself as a sinner I’m not naming my identity. But my propensity. That is, I am one who sins. My identity, however, is in Christ. I battle the besetting sin of temper. But in Christ I am meek. I don’t want to forget what I am in myself, but cannot forget who I am in Christ.

That said, because we do still sin we are often tempted to define ourselves as we are in Christ and others as they are alone. There is a relatively well-known Christian journalist on the internet whose area of expertise is to expose what she deems to be the sins of others. I’ve been covered by this woman, who, nearly every time she refers to me she includes this juicy adjective, “Disgraced.” As in, “Disgraced Former Pastor RC Sproul Jr. Plants a Church” or “Disgraced Former Pastor RC Sproul Jr. Opens Pastoral Training Center” or words to that effect. In some sense, she is quite correct. I have scandals in my past, and sins in my present and future. I have brought shame on my Redeemer and His church. That, however, is not who I am, because I am in Christ.

Some years ago this same journalist published a book in which she openly and honestly gave an account of the, in her words, unhealthy and dangerous, emotionally dysfunctional relationship she had with an adult (19 years old) member of the youth group the journalist served while in her thirties. This is to her credit. Better still, more recently she acknowledged that her account didn’t emphasize sufficiently the power dynamic in the relationship, that she could have done better. That’s honorable. What I’m puzzled by is why she continues to identify those she doesn’t care for by their past sins, but doesn’t do the same to herself. Why is her site not called “The Disgraced Mrs. So and So Report” when she publishes pieces on those she defines in terms of their disgraces?

I’m glad she doesn’t, to tell the truth. Because that’s not who she is in Christ. That she feels comfortable describing her brothers in Christ as “disgraced,” however, is disgraceful. Such too, however, is covered by the blood of Christ. No, we don’t define ourselves by the sins we’ve committed or still struggle against. We also don’t define our brothers and sisters by the sins they’ve committed or still struggle with. Sinners? Yes, in that we sin. Saints, most assuredly because of the beautiful gospel of Jesus Christ.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, ethics, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Let No Man Tear Asunder

My favorite theologian of all time was wont to argue that the defining task of the theologian is to make distinctions. That’s what we do. We bring clarity through precision, precision through distinction. The man who may well have been my favorite theologian’s favorite theologian, Francis Turretin, published his three-volume work The Institutes of Elenctic Theology as a sort of systematic theology by contrast. Each point is broken down, compared and contrasted, and examined in light of its opposite.

One could argue that theologians are here following the path of their Maker. We serve a God who delights in distinctions. Reading through the creation account, for instance, we see not only the creation of light, but the separation of light and darkness, not only the creation of land, but the separation of land and sea, and land and sky.

On the other hand, the same God who delights in distinctions warns us against tearing asunder what He has brought together. He is a God who brings people of every tongue and tribe together into a holy nation, a royal priesthood. He makes of many grains one loaf.

Reformed theologians especially are given, at least when dealing with the critical issue of our salvation, to razor-thin distinctions. The links in our chain of the ordo salutis, or “order of salvation,” are strong, unbreakable, but nevertheless rather small. There is good reason for this, but also some danger. Sometimes the wedges we drive between concepts go too deep.

Consider faith and repentance. There is good reason to see these as two distinct things. With one, we look with hope to the provision of God in Christ. With the other, we acknowledge and confess our need for that work. Hypothetically, one could affirm that Jesus died for sinners and miss the glaring truth that the one making the affirmation is a sinner. One could more easily recognize the reality of his sin but know nothing of the provision in Christ. Thus, the two are two, and both equally needful.

On the other hand, one could argue that the two things are actually one, or at the very least that they flow from the same source. Faith is indeed the coming together of understanding, agreement, and trust. But on a more fundamental level, faith is simply this— believing God. Faith is displayed when God speaks and we say, “Amen.”
The devil, of course, knows that God is true. He is quite informed on the sacrifice of Christ. He knows to his very core, from the very longing of his heart by which he misses those who slipped through his fingers, that Jesus came to save sinners. He is also quite well aware of what and who he is—a sinner. All of this knowledge will make his eternity that much more painful.

Faith and repentance, then, might be at their closest when we confess that, as He says, we are sinners, and as we cry out, as He has commanded, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner” (Luke 18:13). God says, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23), and we say, “Lord, Your judgments are true.” When God says, “The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost” (1 Tim. 1:15), we do not merely affirm our agreement, but we sing it with hallelujahs and amens.

For all the important nuances, for all the valuable precision, the simple truth of the matter is we fell in the garden because we failed to believe God. All sin is a failure to believe God. The good news is that we are rescued from our sins by believing Him, both His judgment and His promise. That is, we are gifted with faith and repentance.

Just as we can make theology more complex than it need be, just as we are called, in seeking orthodoxy, to say our amens to what God has revealed about Himself, so we can make the living of our lives in faithfulness, the seeking of orthopraxy, more complex than it need be. Here, too, we are to say our amens about what God has revealed about His promises for us, about His law. He commands that we not worry about what we will eat or wear, and we are called to repent of our fears and believe His promises. He commands us to seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and we are called to repent for our pursuit of personal peace and affluence, and to believe His promises.

It is true that God is true and all men are liars. It is true, in turn, that every man is miserly while God is extravagant. Were we wise, we would repent expansively, even as we would believe with both deep conviction and broad expectation. Our sin is simple—we do not believe God, and so do not obey God. The solution is simple—believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved, you and your household (Acts 16:31). We do not merely believe this once and then nevermore; rather, we believe it both evermore and evermore.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Let No Man Tear Asunder

Public People, Private Lives

There has been of late a rather embarrassing battle going on on social media between competing tribes of Bible believing Calvinists who come down on different sides of what God commands for civil governments. There are good men on both sides, and men whose rhetoric tends to lack grace on both sides. As noted last week in this space, these two groups will argue about just about everything, including the relative merits of physical fitness.

In this context one young man determined to score points for Team Fitness by noting how good it is that Dr. John MacArthur is still with us, and how much better it would have been if Dr. Sproul were also still with us. A broad brushed medical history was provided for both men, with the clear implication being that Dr. MacArthur wisely pursued fitness while Dr. Sproul, unwisely did not. I will not suggest that the claim was made that Dr. Sproul was foolish, as the author made a valiant effort to make his point without disparaging my father. (And to his credit reached out to apologize and has been happily forgiven.)

My beef isn’t that the author was intentionally unkind or intentionally dishonest. My beef is that such speculations are just that, and they are on their face inappropriate. I’d suggest that those to whom it seems appropriate have a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between what is public and what is private. I understand that my father was a charming man and an engaging teacher. As such many people who did not know him think they did know him. Which is why it feels perfectly natural to opine on his exercise and dietary habits, despite knowing nothing about it.

The truth is that the great bulk of you did not know him. I wish you did because he was a wonderful man. If you didn’t, however, it’s unwise to act as though you did. And if you did, it is unwise to parade that information publicly. One young man, a friend of mine, asked for some time with my father to discuss theological issues. My father was quite surprised, not long after, to find snippets of conversation between the two show up on the young man’s blog, presented as if the conversation were an interview. The point isn’t that the young man played “Gotcha” journalism. One, he wasn’t trying to. Two, nothing my father side was anything he regretted saying. What he was frustrated with was the misleading nature of the invitation to talk.

Public people, like my father, long before they are public, are people. Which means that every biting comment they hear, every trust that is betrayed, every tidbit of speculation stings. Not because public people expect everyone to love them, but because they expect people to treat them with the same respect they would show less public people. “RC was fat and smoked for many years and therefore abandoned his post by dying, unlike John MacArthur. Be like John MacArthur” isn’t how you would treat your personal enemy, let alone your friend. But because my father was a public man, it’s fair game.

I don’t ever want to hide the blessings of my relationship with my father. That’s why I wrote Growing Up (with) RC. Neither, however, do I want my openness to be the occasion for others to take shots at RC Sproul the Public Theologian as if they wouldn’t wound RC Sproul, my father. My father didn’t deserve this, not because he was a great public theologian, but because he is a brother in Christ.

I write this not to scold my brother, but to encourage us all neither to treat public people like they can do no wrong, nor like they are open targets.

Posted in Big Eva, church, cyberspace, ethics, friendship, grace, Heroes, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , , | 8 Comments