Can someone with dementia come to saving faith?

Of course. The same is true of those with severe mental handicaps, those who are yet within their mothers’ wombs, and the very young. Each of these people will have the same struggle everyone else does- they’re sinners. By nature they are at enmity with God. They are all dead in their trespasses and sins, just like those with dementia. They are inclined away from Christ, as we all once were. A person’s ability to remember things, or their level of native intelligence has precious little to do with it for one simple reason- what is lacking is rebirth.

It is true enough that there is content to our faith. Saving faith isn’t an amorphous affirmation of some blob of non-information. We are saved by a faith in a person, Jesus Christ, and all that He accomplished for us two thousand years ago. Those of us who believe in election also need to beware embracing the heresy of justification by election. All the elect, and only the elect will be given the gift of faith (John 6:44). But the ground of our salvation is the work of Christ which is appropriated by faith in Christ. We are not justified by election.

I don’t pretend to know all the various kinds and levels of mental impairment. I did raise a daughter who was never able to speak a word. Recently I had the privilege of serving beside a brother as he preached Christ to his mother whose dementia was sufficiently advanced that she frequently thought her son was her long dead husband. She is a bright-eyed and chatty woman. She wasn’t, however, strong in following a line of reasoning. She did, I’m happy to report, acknowledge her sins, her need for God’s grace in Christ, and her conviction that He suffered for Her sins, redeeming her and making her a daughter of the Father.

She may not remember that event. But, He does. He knows what He wrought in her heart, and knows what He has promised in Jesus. The God who brought the entire universe from nothing, who commanded, “Let there be light” and there was light, is more than able to bring life from death. He is more than able to overcome our darkened hearts. Our feeble minds are not an obstacle to Him.

My friend, a faithful son of both his mother and His heavenly Father, didn’t hesitate to bring the gospel to bear. He gently pressed upon his mother the reality of her sin, and the fulness of the sacrifice of Christ. And she responded. Be skeptical all you like. But beware thinking you were smart enough to come to Jesus. Do not lose sight of the fact that if we do not come as children we can not enter the kingdom of God (Matt. 18:3). If you have a loved one with diminished capacity, do not lose hope in the grace of God. And all of us must never believe that anyone still alive is beyond the power of His grace. No living human will enter the kingdom apart from faith in the work of Christ alone. No living human, however, is beyond being blessed with that faith.

Posted in Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, evangelism, grace, Holy Spirit, kingdom, prayer, preaching, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Silence of the Lambs

The world, Paul tells us, knows what’s coming. Romans 1 not only highlights the universal guilt of all men, but, ironically, defines that guilt as the denial of what we know. We know that there is a God and that we fail to meet His standard. We know, in short, that we are in trouble. But, we seek to suppress that truth in unrighteousness. The lexical background of the Greek word translated as suppress suggests something like a heavy metal spring that we try to hold down as long as we can. I believe, however, that we get closer to the spirit of our sin if we see ourselves, as God is speaking to us, while we run about with our fingers in our ears shouting, “La, la, la, la, la; I can’t hear you!”

Consider how unbelievers in the West tend to live their lives. They may not have their fingers in their ears, but they likely have their ear-buds in their ears. They surround themselves constantly with noise. At work, they have talk radio on. In the car, they play music. When they get home, they turn on the television and become distracted with their eyes as well as their ears. They hyper-schedule their days, moving from one thing that demands their attention to another, their smart-phones buzzing and beeping their daily orders.

We who have been redeemed by His grace, however, live much differently, don’t we? We don’t need the constant noise of pop culture to drown out our own thoughts. We are busy speaking to one another in psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs. We are meditating day and night on the glory, the richness, and the beauty of the Word of God. We, who have already received the pearl of great price, who have been promised eternal blessing and the drying of every tear, want nothing more than an opportunity for silence so that we can enter into the fullness of the gospel of our Lord. We want quiet that we might contemplate the peace. We seek out our prayer closets that we might give thanks.

Wait. Is that what we do? Is that how we live? Or are we instead mirror images of our neighbors? We might, if we are pious, order our pop culture from the PG side of the menu. We might carve out twenty minutes of quiet for prayer and contemplation. But we are still consumed with consuming pop culture, with surrounding ourselves with noise, and for much the same reason. We don’t, in the West, take the time to think because we don’t want to face not just the hard lesson of life under the sun— life is short and then we die— but also the much harder lesson of life lived under the Son— life is short, then we die, and hell lasts forever.

Now, to be sure, we know that we will not suffer for all eternity. That is our neighbor’s fear, not our own. The fears that plague us are much more tame. We worry about our retirement accounts. We worry about our job security. We worry about the economy and the election. We worry about our reputations, what people say and think about us. We worry so much that we worry about what we’ll worry about when we get to heaven.

The heathen know from creation itself that their Creator will bring judgment down on them. We, on the other hand, have been given a book. This book tells us about His grace. It tells us about all that is ours in Christ, that everything that He brings into our lives is for our good and His glory. It tells us on every page that He loves us with an everlasting love and that nothing can thwart His will. This means we should be at peace. We should set aside our worries. We should remove our fingers from our ears that we might hear the music of the rolling spheres magnifying His name. We should no longer cry out, “La, la, la, la; I can’t hear you!” but, “Speak, Lord, for your servant hears.”

What we need, as we seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, is to be still and know that He is God. We don’t need to turn up the volume of His revelation but turn off the noise. We don’t need Him to make bigger promises. We need eyes to see what He has already promised. We don’t need better, cleaner noise than the heathen. We need silence.

When we stop; when we take a deep breath; when we rest; when we put to death our vain desires, vain imaginings, and vain distractions; when, in fact, we not only quit the rat race but finish the race He has set before us; and when we draw our last breaths we will hear with perfect clarity what He has been saying to us from the moment we were reborn: “This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased.” And then we’ll hear heavenly choirs of angels promising, “And He shall reign forever and ever.” Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added unto you.

Posted in 10 Commandments, assurance, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, communion, creation, Devil's Arsenal, eschatology, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Keep Your Pants On

We’re fools, we meaning we humans. We see the destruction that flows from our foolish choices, and seek out any solution besides stopping with the foolish choices. The Bible says that sexual behavior is only for a married husband and wife. While the Bible says it, it isn’t a rule made strictly for those who believe in the Bible. It goes all the way back to the Garden of Eden, which means marriage is a gift for everyone and its rules apply to everyone.

What happens when we don’t obey God on this issue? In the United States, the failure to keep our pants on has led to 50 million babies being slaughtered in their mothers’ wombs. It lead to at least 350,000 gay men dying of AIDS from 1987 to 1998. It has led to three out of every ten children in the country living without both a mother and a father. It has led to the destructive fruit of those fatherless homes as every social evil, drug use, low academic scores, criminal conduct, alcoholism, promiscuity, truancy, homelessness, depression, suicide correlates to homes without a father present.

It’s all too easy to lose sight of the actual destruction while we look at statistics. Almost every one of these children began their lives wherein both parents took off their pants when they should not have. So we construct after school programs, welfare programs, free contraceptive programs, provide counseling, build prisons, hire police, everything except agree that we need to keep our pants on. In fact, we purposefully exclude the message of “keep your pants on” from students in the government’s schools. Drag queens and illustrated sex guides are fine. Abstinence is out of bounds.

Worse still, we’re fools in the church. Given the widespread practice of both adultery and fornication, the marketing gurus have persuaded the church to steer clear of the issue. Paul said of the church and fornication, “Let it not be named once among you” (Ephesians 5:3). The church in our day says, “Let the sin not be named among you as a sin, because such drives people away.”

Thirty years ago I learned of an evangelical church, one of the biggest in my city, that had members in good standing who were living together. I’m confident that many other churches had members guilty of fornication, but not that openly flaunted it. Today I’d be surprised to find any evangelical church of any size in any city that didn’t have members in good standing that were shacking up. This isn’t the fault of gay marriage or Disney or drag shows for kids. This is the fault of timid hirelings and either straying sheep or goats being goats.

My wish is that every one of us that’s ever been guilty of sexual sin of any kind would be in church, but in a church that upholds God’s law, calls His people to repentance and celebrates the grace that forgives. Better still, I wish that such sins would not be named once among us.

There is no pathway to peace and well-being in our spirits, our churches, our communities that leaves room for sin without repentance, that leaves room for taking our pants off with anyone other than our true spouse.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, communion, creation, Devil's Arsenal, Education, ethics, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, preaching, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Keep Your Pants On

This week’s Romans Study

Posted in 10 Commandments, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, hermeneutics, RC Sproul JR, repentance, resurrection, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on This week’s Romans Study

Sacred Marriage, Sharing Wisdom; Fascist Hannity & More

This Week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, Good News, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Rabbits & Hats or, Money For Nothing & Your Checks for Free

The heart of magic is misdirection. Sure, there are specially made tools of the trade. There is well-trained prestidigitation. There are moments of art and flourish. The magic, however, is to get the audience to look one direction while you do something decidedly ordinary in plain sight. That’s how we start with an empty hat, and end up with a fluffy bunny.

It is much the same in all manner of intellectual magic. If we can get our intellectual opponents to overlook the fact that we are bringing something out of nothing, we can wow them all the way to the bank.

Consider first naturalistic science. Here we begin with one of two hats, both of them black. Some will say that all of reality was compressed into a point of singularity that existed from all eternity. Did you see what they did there? They explain the creation of the universe by presupposing the existence of the universe. We ask, “If you deny that God made everything, where did everything come from?” and they reply, “Well, everything was really squished together…” We let them get away with a universe, and a profound change (the explosion of the point of singularity) from and by nothing. The second option is more brazen. On the one hand these scientists are more honest, affirming that there was nothing. And then they get more dishonest, when they tell us “it” exploded into everything. Wait. There was no “it.” There was nothing, not even a hat surrounding the emptiness. And now it’s everything?

They don’t, of course stop there. Evolution takes center stage for act two. We’ve got everything, but how are we going to make it better? How do we go from chaos to cosmos? The magicians flourish again and tell us, “Everything gets better.” We ask, , “But how? Where’s the oomph?” They tell us, “Everything gets better. It’s science.” More order, more information jump out of the hat as fish take a walk on the dry side. All by themselves.

Consider second economics. An honorable politician promises to defend our wealth. A truthful politician promises to take some of this one’s wealth for the benefit of another. A common politician promises he can make us all richer by taking from all of us. Once again the common politician is the magician. He wants us to forget that the state has nothing it can give that it did not first take from another. He may take it via taxes. He may take it by inflating the money supply. But he will leave it out of the equation, pulling bunnies out of hats. And worse, getting us to pull levers behind the curtain at our voting booths.

Consider third man’s will. Those who believe in the doctrines of grace are quite content to confess that men are free to do what they want, to act according to their nature. Indeed we affirm we must do what we want, and can do no other. Those who don’t believe in the doctrines of grace, on the other hand, define freedom of the will as the ability to do what you don’t want to do. You choose without the desire for what you choose. This too is something out of nothing. Two men are presented with the gospel message. One embraces it, the other does not. How’s come? If we confess the difference in the man, it is the man God made, the man for which God is the ultimate cause. (And of course the wiser man would have something of which to boast (Ephesians 2:9)). If we confess the difference is in God, well, welcome to the doctrines of grace.

All three, like magic, claim to give us effects without causes, something from nothing. All three depend on our willingness to be distracted, to be misdirected. All three are rabbits out of hats, and hats out of thin air.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, creation, Devil's Arsenal, Doctrines of Grace, Economics in This Lesson, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, logic, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Romans Tonight, Chapter 7, part 2

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Romans Tonight, Chapter 7, part 2

Is calling yourself a “Calvinist” sinful?

No. But it could be. The apostle Paul admonished the Corinthians for their party loyalty, as some there said, “I am of Paul,” others, “I am of Apollos and others “I am of Cephas.” Isn’t identifying as a Calvinist, or an Arminian the same thing? Again, no, but it could be. If a believer’s identity is caught up in anyone or anything other than Christ, that’s a sin. But calling oneself a Calvinist isn’t, on its face, finding one’s identity in Calvin. It is merely describing a position on several issues that Christians disagree about. With respect to charismatic gifts, one might say, “I am of Grudem” or “I am of MacArthur” without idolizing either man. With respect to college football one could say, “I am of Alabama” or “I am of Ole Miss” without being guilty of idolizing either program.

Names, in short, can rightly be used as shorthand to identify what we believe as long as they don’t define our identity. I’m a Christian. I believe that the five points of Calvinism are true. I know enough church history to know that these five points were formulated well after Calvin had gone on to his reward, in response to the five points of Arminianism. Where do I stand with respect to believers falling away? I believe in perseverance of the saints. Where do I stand on the prescience view of election, whereby God chooses us on the basis of what He saw we would do? I’m opposed to that, affirming unconditional election.

I might should refer to myself as one who believes in the doctrines of grace, so as not to offend. Except of course that such might be construed to mean that I think Arminians don’t believe in grace. Either way, my goal is to communicate where I stand on several internal issues, not to elevate a man.

When I was in college I had a friend who, like me, was a Calvinist. He was reading Calvin and misunderstood something he had said. He raced into my dorm room, in a panic, saying, “Calvin didn’t believe Jesus was present at the creation!!!!!” I remained calm and explained to my friend, “First, I’m confident you’ve misunderstood him. Second, even if you haven’t, all that means is Calvin was wrong. There’s no need to panic.” My friend was skirting a bit to close the Corinthian problem. I was trying to help him escape it.

I think Calvin was an astonishingly great theologian. The same could be said for Saint Augustine and RC Sproul and Sinclair Ferguson. These are men who have had a deep and profound impact on my understanding of the Bible. In one sense then you could call me a Calvinist, an Augustinian, a Sproulian or a Fergusonist. I am well aware, however, that not a one of these men are God incarnate; none of them lived a perfect life or died for my sins. They were not raised from the dead, nor do they sit at the right hand of the Father. That is Jesus Christ, and Him alone. Which is why my identity is in Him.

I don’t want to offend anyone who has such a scruple. I do not, however, share it. The principle that drives it, however, I’m fully on board with.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Big Eva, Doctrines of Grace, ethics, grace, Heroes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Prodigal Father

When I served as editor-in-chief of Tabletalk magazine, I committed my share of gaffes. I received more than my share of sweet-natured but school-marmish notes about why this semicolon should have been a colon, or why further was the better word in context than farther. But there were bigger blunders as well. Once, I allowed the magazine to go out with one word of its two-word title misspelled. Happily, we received virtually no feedback on that one because the misspelled word was in Latin.

Only once, however, can I remember receiving high praise for a mistake. I wrote something about the parable of the prodigal son, and by accident I referred to it as the story of the prodigal father. The letter I received was chock full of high praise: “I can’t believe someone finally said it. I always think this is what the story should be called. Thank you for having the courage and the insight to make this point.” He went on for so long that it started to feel pretty good, until I remembered I had made a mistake, not communicated an insight.

As I read, however, I came to see the wisdom of the man’s perspective—not on my editorial skills but on the parable. It is indeed the story of the prodigal father. It is true enough that prodigal can mean “wasteful” or “careless.” It can also, however, refer to someone who is extravagant in giving, overflowing in graciousness, abundant in tenderness and love.

It is good and wise that we should learn to recognize ourselves in the Bible. I always encourage people with this rule of thumb: if you want to know who you are in a Bible story, you are the sinner. Then, in part because of this very parable, I add this: if the story has more than one sinner, you are both of them. We are both of the brothers in the parable of the prodigal son. We squander the gifts given to us by our Father. We dishonor and disobey Him. We pursue our own ends, seeing Him as merely the supplier of our needs so we can get on with acquiring our wants. On the other hand, we are also like the older brother, thinking ourselves rather fine fellows. We don’t sin as outrageously as the heathen we see on television. We aren’t hedonists like the prodigal. We, because we are sinners, somehow manage to be both libertines and Pharisees, self-indulgent and self-righteous.

The story, however, doesn’t end there. It is a good thing to come face to face with the depth and scope of our sin. It is a better thing, however, to come face to face with the grace of God. The parable does tell us how bad we are—but it ends with a robe, a fattened calf, and a great celebration. It ends with a heartfelt embrace of the prodigal, and a gentle, loving call to repentance for the older brother. The story ends, just as our story ends, with the grace of God for us.

A wise theologian more than once has said that the great question plaguing those outside the kingdom is this: What do I do with my guilt? Romans 1:18–32 argues that it is precisely the desperate need to forget that guilt that leads the lost to folly and perversion. We worship the creature because the creature won’t judge us. We exchange the truth that we are under judgment for the lie that we are perfectly safe. We determine that what we need to be safe is more stuff. So, instead of worrying about the judgment that is to come, we worry about what we will eat and what we will drink, just like the prodigal son in the pigsty of the far-off country.

The answer to both problems, however, is found in the Father. We ought never, in dealing with those outside the kingdom, to diminish their sin for the sake of winning them. We must not belittle their rebellion. We must never nuance their moral crimes into mistakes, errors, or lapses in judgment. We must never seek to diminish in their eyes the reality of the wrath of God. We must, however, be quick to point them to the one and only solution to their problem: the overflowing grace of God. God forgives the repentant. The answer to our guilt is not to deny God, to flee from Him, but to run to Him. “This is the one to whom I [the Lord] will look: he who is humble and contrite in spirit and trembles at my word” (Isa. 66:2b).

We are to seek first the kingdom of God. As we do, however, we would do well to remember that we woke up and began our journey because He breathed life into us. We would do well to remember that while we were yet afar off, He girded up His loins and ran to us, crying, “My son, my son.” We would do well to remember that when we feast with Him at His table, we receive a foretaste of the feast to come. Because we move from grace to grace, we would do well to move from amazed to astonished. If you are in Christ, your Father loves you, forgives you, and is even now pouring out His grace on you. “The Father Himself loves you, because you have loved [Jesus]” (John 16:27). Rejoice, and be exceedingly glad.

Posted in assurance, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, parables, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Have You Heard?

Gossip, for all its destructive power, and the bounty of warning against it in the Bible, still carries with it an image as a cute or entertaining sin. We laugh at the town matriarch who is more effective at spreading information than the world wide web. We indulge in celebrity gossip while reading the headlines at the checkout at the grocery.

We are, however, able to recognize gossip and its destructive power when it comes in its most vicious form. Person A, knowing person B is completely innocent of said sin, nevertheless tells persons C-Z all about what person B supposedly did and why said person should be cancelled. Once we begin to chip away at all the elements, however, we start thinking the gossip is tame. Maybe person A jumped to an unwarranted conclusion about person B, but genuinely thinks him guilty. Maybe person A only told person C under the strictest confidence, and person C is the one who told persons D-Z. Maybe person B is actually guilty of said sin.

All these “mitigating” circumstances do not change the fact that it is gossip, and it is destructive. It doesn’t help the matter in the least. The real problem is that we like to give gossip, often not for the purpose of harming the victim but for the purpose of pleasing the recipient. And the second problem is that we like being the recipient. The two people talking to each other are simply using the one talked about as a means to an end of elevating their own status.

That the problem is so pervasive is no excuse for it being so pervasive. “Everyone does it” says nothing whatsoever about whether it’s okay to do. It’s not, which is precisely why God condemns it both frequently and vehemently in His Word. How then do we fight it?

First, we don’t do it. When I know, or think I know something about person B I need to ask myself a series of questions before sharing it with anyone else. Do I really know it? Could I be jumping to conclusions? Am I trusting information from an unreliable source? Will me telling someone else be a help to person B? If it’s true, if you know its true and if the person you’re telling never tells another, it’s still gossip if the person you are telling has no right and no need to know the information.

Second, we don’t listen to it. This can be tough because even when we try to stop the gossip being offered to us, the gossiper will try to defend his gossip on the grounds that person B did something really, really bad. When we say to the gossiper, “You know what? I don’t really need to hear this. Please don’t go on. If you need to talk to someone about this, I suggest person B” the gossiper, instead of getting the kudos he was expecting has brought shame upon himself. And he desperately wants the focus on person B’s supposed wrongdoing.

Third, repent. I have experienced in spades the destructive power of gossip. My connection to my father makes gossip about me especially juicy. That said, I’ve also created the destruction that gossip creates. I’m guilty of speaking gossip, and listening to gossip. I’m no better than others. Repentance is the beginning of getting better.

That’s it. If nobody tries to excuse it, if nobody tries to speak it, if nobody is willing to listen to it, it will die a swift death before the damage is done.

Posted in 10 Commandments, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Have You Heard?