Not a thing, if we mean by “house church” a church that meets in a house. One can make all manner of arguments about the best architectural forms for public worship, but no one, I suspect, would suggest that this kind of building or that is, in itself, sinful. The issue with house churches then isn’t with the house, but with the church, or lack thereof.
There is a rather great gap between a group of people who are under authority gathering together to worship the living God while meeting in a house, and a home wherein the father, or the parents, decide for themselves that they are a church. The one has biblical precedent and standing. The other is rank rebellion, and a recipe for disaster.
I understand the temptation. It’s not often easy to find a church that does well what it’s called to do. It can get frustrating showing up Sunday after Sunday and being gawked at for keeping your children together during the service. It can be maddening when the pastor keeps preaching against judging others, all because he suspects you of judging him.
Wouldn’t it be so much nicer, so much safer, so much more comfortable, not to mention, so much more convenient, if we did it ourselves? They told us we couldn’t do school at home, and we proved them wrong. Why not just do church at home as well?
Because we all need to be under authority. Because there is no one on the planet to whom God has said, “You just answer to Me. No need to bother with any human authority. They, after all, are all sinners.” No, we all need to be under visible, earthly authority, for our own protection, and for the protection of our families.
That protection needs to be publicly affirmed, and measurably administered. That is, I need to be in a place where a specific group of men, called to this critical role, can confront me on my sin, and command me to repent. Hebrews 13:17 commands that we “Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give an account.”
How often have well-intentioned Christians left the local church because it failed to honor the Bible, and came up with this program and that, or failed to encourage modesty, or had a praise band, and those whose consciences were too tender to stay, end up in churches where there are no elders and deacons as the Scripture clearly and expressly commands?
Friends, this problem is rampant in certain circles. And here is why. The world told us that we should only one or two children. We didn’t listen. Our parents told us we should not homeschool our children. We didn’t listen. The elders told us that our children should be in Sunday School and the youth service. We didn’t listen.
Now remember that I not only believe children are a blessing, that we ought to homeschool them, and that the family ought to be together at church, but believe that actually doing these things is the right decision. But isn’t it just possible that it is also evidence that we have a hard time with authority? Isn’t it possible that we have reached the conclusion that wisdom dies with us? Isn’t it possible that we will have no one to rule over us, despite the plain teaching of the Bible that we must?
What we really need is more humility. We need a deeper understanding of our own sin, more than a deeper knowledge of the sins of the saints at the traditional church down the road. We need a consciousness of our own deceitful hearts, such that we recognize our need to be under authority.
This is the thirteenth installment of an ongoing series of pieces here on the nature and calling of the church. Stay tuned for more. Remember also that we at Sovereign Grace Fellowship meet this Sunday September 29 at 10:30 AM at our new location, at our beautiful farm at 12811 Garman Road, Spencerville, IN. Please come join us.
Thank you. I have had to learn this lesson the hard way many times.
Amen brother!
“The one has biblical precedent and standing. The other is rank rebellion, and a recipe for disaster.”
For the most part, early Church gatherings were all done in homes, for about the first 300 years. It seems it was not a recipe for disaster, but for victory. But I totally understand your point.
I have written on that issue and Christian giving. I have spent a lot of time doing research and study on how the early Church was set-up, how they operated, etc. And some of what I found is in “A Scriptural Tithe: A Study of Christian Giving & Structure of the Church” (Series No. 1) Here is a bit from chapter 7:
“No New Testament saint could point to a single man and say, “He is my pastor.” Why? Everyone understood, from Peter and Paul, the rest of the Apostles, and every Christian, that they themselves were the Priesthood. That they were a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a holy nation (I Peter 2:9). There was no single man in charge of a congregation. A group of elders or bishops was always placed in charge. The Greek word Poimen, for pastor, is only found a few times in the NT. Only one time was it used for those who care or tend to God’s Church (Ephesians 4:11). However, even there, it was referring to the office of an elder or bishop, not to a single person who was the “Pastor” of a congregation. Every other reference is to literal shepherds who tend herds or flocks.
Contrary to popular opinion, no epistles were addressed to the pastor of a congregation, they were all addressed to the church, the saints, which included the elders, bishops and deacons (we will discuss the letters to Timothy and Titus a bit later). If each congregation had its own pastor/shepherd, isn’t it strange, that in the greeting of each epistle, the head/pastor of the congregation is never acknowledged by name or office? If there was one, they were totally ignored. Below is the salutation for each epistle.”
I would be happy to send you a PDF of the book.