What’s the difference between teaching and preaching?

Like prose and poetry, these two terms are better understood as opposite ends of a spectrum, rather than raw opposites. When we write prose we are given to sundry poetic devices, word-plays, metaphors, etc. and when we write poetry we are communicating information. In like manner it is rather difficult if not impossible to teach without preaching to some degree, or to preach without some level of teaching.

One way to illustrate the distinction however is to note the difference between the indicative and the imperative. The former tells us what is, the latter tells us what we’re supposed to do. Teaching, obviously, tends toward the indicative while preaching tends toward the imperative. But what if we made the distinction absolute? Would not any teaching utterly bereft of any imperative cause us to yawn, to reply, “So what?” In like manner, were we to drain preaching of all indicative, and be left with only imperative, would we not have sermons that merely shout, “Do something!”? Would it not end up sound and fury, signifying nothing?

Which means, in the end, that these are each matters of degree. I’ve been blessed to be able to teach at several colleges and universities. Because my desire for my students is that they would grow in grace and wisdom it is not my design to merely download information from my brain to theirs. My classes therefore tend to follow a real, though unplanned pattern. It usually happens that I spend roughly two thirds of my class time giving and explaining information. Then, in the final third of class I tend to commence to preaching. I begin to exhort my students to live in light of what they have learned, to change their perspectives, and their lives. I begin to implore them to change their hearts.

I have been blessed also to preach. Here I certainly have an obligation, as best as I am able, to explain the text. I seek to place the text in its historical context. I try to clear up any grammatical ambiguities, or translation issues. But, persuaded that the Bible is not some odd and mysterious book that isn’t eminently understandable, believing that our problems are more moral than intellectual, that we are more foolish than stupid, I exhort the congregation to believe, to trust, to rejoice, to give thanks, to love, to forgive. Every Sunday when I preach I walk into the pulpit not only hoping to be true to the text, but hoping to encourage growth in godliness. I want the flock to go away persuaded that in Christ they are beloved of the Father, and that Jesus changes everything.

We who are Reformed tend to be stronger teachers than preachers. The non-Reformed tend to be stronger preachers than teachers. We agree with the Bible, but remain unmoved by it. They are quick to be moved, but not always by the Bible. The Bible is not just filled with truth. It is filled with truth that ought to change us. It isn’t enough that we are taught the Bible. We need the Bible preached.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on What’s the difference between teaching and preaching?

Psalm 22; Atin-Lay, Duplex Veritas

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Atin-Lay, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, philosophy, psalms, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Psalm 22; Atin-Lay, Duplex Veritas

Running with the Bulls

He was a pastor, one who believed in and preached the doctrines of grace. The church he served was not far from my then home, and on more than one occasion our paths have crossed. Today he sits in jail, charged with sexual assault against a minor. I don’t, of course, know if he is guilty or not. What I do know is that we will be seeing more and more of this as time goes on.

The devil is more crafty than any of the beasts of the field. He is crafty enough to know that just because all Christians know something is wrong, that he can still use that something. There are not, as far as I am aware, any Christians in favor of pornography. We all know it is a sin to consume pornography. If we succumb to that temptation, the devil is there to remind us of what we have done. We have sullied our marriage bed. We have embraced sexual immorality. We have dishonored someone’s daughter. We have distanced ourselves from our spouse. It is precisely because of these sins that the internet has been such a boon to the devil. Before the internet the consumption of pornography required real interaction with a live human being. You had to make the exchange with the clerk at the convenience store or the video store. You had to buy a ticket to the seedy theater. All the shame we feel was once public, and therefore potent but is now private and therefore weak.

The devil is content for us to feel this shame for at least two reasons. One, shamed Christians are likely porn for the devil. That is, it excites him, delights him, watching us, beloved of the Father, wallowing in our shame. The second reason is this- when we focus on the destruction wrought by looking at this website or watching that movie, we miss where we are going. It is a sin to alter our minds by injecting heroin, but the great evil is where it will lead, the sins of tomorrow whose path we blaze today. So it is with pornography.

Pornography disguises itself as a rabid ferret- fierce, destructive, but small, when it is actually a tyrannosaurus rex. What starts as immorality, the dishonoring of an unknown daughter of an unknown father, what starts as a small wedge in a marriage bed will and does become imprisoned fathers and husbands, and worse still, scarred little children who are more likely to continue the swath of destruction to another generation.

It’s a good thing to fight pornography by remembering the damage a ferret can do. But it’s a dangerous thing. Better to understand the nature of our enemy here. Would we not more earnestly flee if we knew our homes will blow up, and our lives will be ruined? Pornography is no cherry bomb; it’s an atom bomb. When we bring fire to our hearts, we light the fuse. Do not let your heart turn aside to her ways; do not stray into her paths; For she has cast down many wounded and all who were slain by her were strong men. Her house is the way to hell, descending to the chambers of death (Proverbs 7:25-27).

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Expansionism; American Idols

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

What is wrong with fundamentalism?

Having spent the better part of thirty years trying to decide whether to cling to the title “evangelical” on the basis of its historical meaning or to drop the title like a bad habit due to the many bad habits of evangelicals, I’ve come to recognize that labels are sticky things. I remember, when attending the Cambridge meeting of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, asking a friend, “Why can’t we just tell the world, ‘There’s nobody here but us fundamentalists.’” Behind me as I type is a painting of J. Gresham Machen, a giant of the faith who worked side by side with fundamentalists against theological liberalism in the early parts of the 20th century. I literally look up to the man. He is a high hero to me. He didn’t mind being grouped with fundamentalists, especially by those who denied the fundamentals. There are qualities of fundamentalists that I desperately wish described evangelicals. They have always been courageous, disinterested in the approval of men, all in on the authority of God’s Word. So why not just embrace the term?

Ironically, because I don’t want to be tarred with their weaknesses. While fundamentalism’s fundamental identity is wrapped up in their laudable commitment to the fundamentals, the next most easily identifiable marker is their propensity to practice what is called “second degree separation.” If evangelicals are too quick to call unbelievers believers, fundamentalists are too quick to call believers unbelievers.

Second degree separation works this way. It isn’t enough for the fundamentalist that a person rejects wrong ideas and the people who hold them. One must also reject persons who reject wrong ideas but not the people who hold them. If, for instance, John Stott embraces annihilationism I, along with the fundamentalists would object, disagree, tell the learned Dr. Stott, “What gives?” If, however, I continue to treat Dr. Stott as a brother not only does that make me a bad guy to fundamentalists, despite my agreement with them and disagreement with Dr. Stott on the issue, but ultimately also means that anyone not treating me like a bad guy is also a bad guy.

Here’s a real-life example. Just recently my dear wife posted something on social media encouraging me that we together are blessed to make known His name, to fight the good fight against the devil and his minions. A comment came quickly from an evangelical who, wisely, apparently has a great passion against the New Apostolic Reformation and the Word of Faith movements. Which led her to say that my wife’s words were the same words those aberrant groups would use. Which is true enough. I pointed out, however, that those nefarious purveyors of goofy ideas have also been known to say this- “Praise the Lord.” Which doesn’t make me, or my wife, or anyone, guilty of NAR or WOF errors when we too say “Praise the Lord.”

A fundamentalist is someone who is so busy looking for bad guys and bad ideas that they miss out on good ideas from good guys because of guilt by association. That’s a quality I can do without, though I face the same temptation. Affirming the fundamentals is something we all need to do better. Practicing second degree separation is something we all need to put behind us.

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, Heroes, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What is wrong with fundamentalism?

Netflix and Spills

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, Economics in This Lesson, ethics, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Netflix and Spills

Tuning Out

Reality TV may be TV but it never has been real. As a culture we’ve moved from idealized presentations of what is best about us through wholesome sitcoms like Andy Griffith and Father Knows Best, through more “realistic” social commentary sitcoms like All in the Family and MASH only to find it cheaper to take real people and give them the Trueman treatment. Put people on a deserted island, or in a diet or cooking contest or in a rehab program and let the cameras roll.

Just as video is said to have killed the radio star, so it may one day be argued the internet killed television. Our commonplace phones now carry with them better cameras than network news shows had just a few decades ago. Our laptops have stronger editing capabilities than those newtworks enjoyed those same few decades ago. And social media has invited us all to star in our own production of “This is My Life.”

The trouble is that while the presentations we make of ourselves on facebook or tiktoc or Instagram of whatever the app du jour is are not real, the people behind them are all too real. We may be playing a part, but the part is us. When Archie Bunker’s mouth committed macroaggression against George Jefferson, neither Carroll O’Conner nor Sherman Hemsley were wounded. No actual human was harmed in the creation of the humor, or the social commentary.

When all our world’s a stage, however, and we merely players on it, sound and fury harms real people. When the lines we give ourselves wound the other players, the blood is not stage magic. When we play Judge Wapner, convening our own personal court for public consumption, there are no rules of evidence, no penalties for perjury, no right to face our accusers.

I know my little “show” on the vast wasteland that is the internet signifies nothing. To adopt the wisdom of William F. Buckley, this conservative, when it comes to the internet, stands athwart digress yelling “Stop!” at a time when no one is inclined to do so, or to have much patience with those who so urge it.

Our problem belongs to us all. It is not just the other side, whether the other side is unbelievers, democrats or believers who think believers can be democrats. We all, on every side of every aisle, tune in, popcorn in hand, while real people have their lives dragged through the shameful mud that Jesus washed from us. We’re fools enough to think we don’t do it to be entertained but to fight on the side of the angels. The angels, however, are busy calling us all to peace on earth and good will to men.

A comic once made the astute observation that we are never “stuck in traffic.” Instead, we are traffic. In the same way, we don’t tune out the noise because we are the noise. Even my noise is the noise. The RC Sproul Jr. Show has been on the air for decades now. Long enough for me to not wish it on my worst enemy. Please, if you want to encourage the downtrodden, do it in private. If you want to challenge the Philistines, do it in private. If you want to grow in grace and wisdom, seek, as much as is possible with you, to live in peace and quietness with all men.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Big Eva, church, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Getting to Know You; Censoring Ourselves

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in abortion, apologetics, appeal, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Getting to Know You; Censoring Ourselves

One Covenant Under God

We are a litigious people. We not only like to sue one another, we like to avoid being sued, and having to sue. That is, we hire lawyers not only to write up contracts, but to help enforce contracts. Handshakes and verbal agreements have gone the way of the nickel cup of coffee. (And be careful with that coffee now. It just might be hot, and you wouldn’t want anyone to sue.) As a culture we can barely even agree to disagree.

On the other hand, we are likewise a licentious people. We want our pleasures, and we want them now, and nothing, we seem to believe, ought to stand in our way. We have our rights, and by rights, we will have them. Contracts, the saying goes, are made to be broken.

It is a strange marriage in a given culture. The great English novelist, Anthony Burgess, in his great work, A Clockwork Orange, speculated that cultures are doomed to alternate between two extremes of the pendulum. Sometimes a culture embraces a Pelagian view of man, what Burgess called the “Pel phase.” Here man is seen as basically good, and all restraints are inherently bad. This romantic notion, however, soon loses its romance, as sinful men without restraint begin to, well, sin. Their sin grows bolder and bolder until the culture reacts, and enters into the “Aug phase,” named for Augustine. Here man is looked at as fundamentally sinful, and restraints are all the rage. The state, in seeking to restrain sin, soon enters into sin, becoming ever more oppressive itself. Soon enough the people tire of a heavy handed state, and the pendulum swings back the other way.

His analysis, a case could be made, reflects similar thinking on the issue of the Trinity. Some cultures tend more toward the one, and exhibit a uniformitarianism, often manifested as totalitarianism. Other cultures tend toward the three, (or the many) and, as T.S. Elliot put it, the center cannot hold. Culture simply disintegrates in a fog of variety. The solution here is, of course, the Trinity, where the one and the many come together in peace. But what of the shift from a permissive culture to a repressive one and back again?

The answer here is covenant. Just as the Trinity brings together the one and the many, so covenant binds together (or marries, if you will) the legal and the familial. Covenant does not merely reduce down to contract, for such misses the inherent grace therein. God did not create Adam and Eve as tabula rasa (blank slates), placing them in a neutral realm and then waiting to see which way they would go. Instead, He blessed them with life and a garden. He put them in a paradise they did not earn, and He walked with them in the cool of the evening. This relationship, however, wasn’t some sort of anything-goes, if-it-feels-good-it-must-be-good relationship. Yes, God loved them. Yes, He blessed them. But He established that love and the boundaries by which it might be protected by making covenant. It is in this context, in the context of a loving father in relationship with His children, that God first establishes covenant with man.

Covenants, rightly understood, then, are not merely contracts, the legal forms of legal relationships. Neither are they formless sentimental feelings that bring people together as long as those feelings last. Instead, they are both. In covenant we have real obligation. Real promises are made, and real sanctions handed down when those promises are broken. But underlying all of that is grace, love, and relationship.

This is why Paul speaks of our heavenly Father this way, “It was to show His righteousness at the present time, so that He might be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus” (Rom. 3:26). God did not wink at our sin because He loved us. Instead, because He loved us, He punished our sin in His Son on the cross. He wanted to justify us because He loves us. He did it justly by punishing His only begotten Son.

Grasping covenant is not only necessary for understanding the Word of God, but it is our only hope, culturally speaking, to escape the pendulum of which Burgess wrote. It was in fact our understanding of covenant that birthed the freest nation the world has ever known. It is no accident that the British, during the time of the Revolutionary War, referred to it as “the Presbyterian war.” We are a nation founded on the principle of covenant, beginning even before the Revolution with the Mayflower Compact.

A nation built upon covenant is a nation that recognizes the sinfulness of man, and so wishes not only to restrain the sinful impulses of the individual but also to restrain the sinfulness of men who have power in the state. As Lord Acton observed: “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” To restrain the state we need checks and balances. We need covenant keepers in office. And we will have these things only when we in the church learn to keep covenant among ourselves. We will have faithful politicians when we are faithful to our Shepherd. The nation will be free again when God’s people are once again subject to their High King, and when God’s people rejoice in their Great Husband, even Jesus our Lord.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Forever Friend; Ask RC, Does God hear unbelievers’ prayers?

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, friends, friendship, Jesus Changes Everything, prayer, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Forever Friend; Ask RC, Does God hear unbelievers’ prayers?