
Which science? Science, at its worst, is filled with hubris, insisting that it and it alone is the arbiter of truth. At its best science understands that it is seeking to think God’s thoughts after Him, and will ever be doomed to come short. In an earlier piece I made the argument that in this COVID era we have scientists galore who indignantly demand that we follow the science while they’ve left it far behind and have taken up philosophy. I noted then, “If we don’t all get the vaccine, 50% of us will die” is science. Not true mind you, but testable. “We must all get the vaccine because if we don’t, 50% of us will die” is no longer science even if it were so that 50% of us would die if we don’t all get vaccinated. “Must” is a moral demand, not a scientific conclusion. There are no ethical demands in a microscope.
Today, however, I’d like to remember that even when science stays within its own dominion it is clearly on shaky ground. Why? Because while right and wrong are grounded in the eternal and immutable God, our understanding of His creation is tossed about by the wind we’ll never grasp. Imagine Dr. Fauci as a pilgrim, complete with a buckle on his black hat. Imagine a grave illness running through Plymouth colony. Here comes the doctor who pulls out of his medicine kit a great jar full of leeches. Would he not, were we reluctant to attach said leeches to our bodies, insist that we are fools for failing to follow the science? “Leeching cures disease” is science. It is old, discredited science to be sure, but it was once brand spanking new and was still wrong.
Science is quick to, when faced with its own failures, speak through the egg on its face, conceding that science is always progressing. It’s their ready excuse when they get it wrong. The problem is that they forget the principle as soon as they’ve embraced the new science. We, however, unsophisticated rubes that we are, don’t conveniently forget not only that they’ve been wrong before, but that being wrong is seen by science as a feature, not a bug. Science is Hans and Franz pumping us up with gas, telling us, “Listen to us now and stop believing us later.” Because later the new science will slap a label of “quackery” on the old science.
When science says to us, “Yes, yes, yes, of course we’ve been wrong in the past. How stupid we were to believe so fervently in what we used to believe. It was all hornswoggle and hogwash. But now, now we have the truth. Now we really know. This,” they tell us, “is ESTABLISHED science. We know this is true because all the scientists agree.” When we ask about the scientists who don’t agree they tell us, “They’re not real scientists. We can tell, because they don’t agree with the ESTABLISHED science.”
Do not fall for the bluster. Believe what you wish about COVID, Omicron, vaccines. You’ll get no argument from me wherever you fall. Just don’t fall for the bluster that insists that only the wise can see the emperor’s new clothes. Science can best be served with a nation of children snickering at its nakedness.







