Playground Wisdom

There is wisdom in the playground adage that every time we point a finger at others we have three more pointing back at ourselves. It’s true for adults too, who are given to hurling accusations against those who are just like us. Christian A complains to Christian B about what a horrible gossip Christian C is, and neither one smells the odor of irony. Or Christian Writer skewers the whole of the Christian church for its abominable judgmentalism. Then there’s the one about what dishonest and lazy laborers Christians are. We have all heard, and likely passed on urban legends about the curse of the Ichthus. The Ichthus, you will remember, is the little fish symbol that was once used by early Christians as a sort of code language to recognize each other. Now we see it in one of two places. Either it adorns the back of our cars, letting those whom we have cut off in traffic know that they have just been cut off in Jesus’ name. Or, we see it in advertising. Here, as with its ancient use, the idea is to communicate to other believers that our business is run by believers. The legendary curse is that both Christians and non-Christians in the know about the symbol actually see the symbol as a sure sign to work with someone else. Putting the Ichthus in your webpage ad, or on your billboard, or on your work truck, the story goes, tells experienced people to not use your company, because, everyone knows that Christians are notoriously lazy, dishonest and greedy.

Now my goal here isn’t to argue with the accuracy of this perception. Truth be told, I find it a little hard to believe. I’m perfectly willing to believe that Christians can be lazy, dishonest and greedy. I’m skeptical, however, that as a group they are any more lazy, dishonest or greedy than others. Even if such an assessment is accurate, however, what puzzles me is the giddy speed with which Christians are willing to point out this supposed flaw. What kind of Christian speaks this way about “those Christians”?

In the first place, the speaker, if the assessment is true, is likely one of those Christians that are likewise given to laziness, dishonesty and greed. If these weaknesses are pandemic in our midst, how can we be so confident that we too haven’t been infected? Do these brothers actually think that the lazy, dishonest and greedy Christians are aware that they are lazy, dishonest and greedy? If instead they are unaware, shouldn’t we be a little more diligent about checking ourselves before accusing amorphous others?

Second, how did lazy, dishonest and greedy Christians become a them problem, instead of a we problem? That is, why are we so quick to complain about this reality, rather than mourn for it? Even if I as an individual do not struggle with sin x, if my people do, then it is our problem together. When, for instance, I point out the foibles of Reformed people, and they are many, I am pointing out where we tend to go wrong, not where they tend to go wrong. If we Christians are lazy, dishonest and greedy, the proper posture isn’t pointing but praying. The proper posture isn’t accusing but repenting.

I pray there will come a day when even those outside the kingdom will be able to say of us, “If you ever need to hire someone, try to find one of these Christians. They’ll work until the cows come home.” I pray with even greater fervor that there will come a day when even those outside the kingdom will be able to say of us, “Say what you will about those lazy, judgmental Christians, but they sure do stick together, and they sure are quick to repent.”

Posted in apologetics, church, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Playground Wisdom

A 3rd Look at the 7th Commandment, Knowing God and the Marks of the Church

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, communion, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A 3rd Look at the 7th Commandment, Knowing God and the Marks of the Church

Last Night’s Study on The Holiness of God

Posted in Bible Study, Books, creation, Facebook Live, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, theology, wonder | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Last Night’s Study on The Holiness of God

New Theses, New Reformation


Thesis 36- We must be faithful to our spouses in thought, word and deed.

One of the great evils of decline in the broader culture is the effect it can have in the Christian culture. As the broader culture becomes more and more morally slipshod, immorality is defined downward. Christians tend to be comfortable if we can manage to stay ahead of the world’s curve. Sadly, when it comes to marital fidelity, it seems we are not even doing that. Evangelical Christians, or so the scuttlebutt goes, are virtually just as likely as their unbelieving counterparts to commit adultery.

Our infidelity, in one sense, is much worse than the infidelity of the infidel. In both cases, of course, families are torn asunder. In both cases the lives of children are turned upside down. But in the case of professing Christians, we add to that that we are lying to the watching world about who Jesus is, and who the church is called to be. That is, when a man is unfaithful to his wife he says that Jesus is unfaithful to the church. When a wife is unfaithful to her husband, she says that the church is free to be unfaithful to Christ. This follows from Paul’s connection of the husband and wife and Jesus and the church in Ephesians 5.

These lies are no small things. It is, after all, one thing to lie about how big the fish that got away was. But it is entirely another thing to lie about Jesus and His bride. We ought to be modeling for the world what fidelity looks like. We of all people ought to understand this call. Jesus, after all, was faithful, even to death on the cross.

We fail here, in the end, because we are worldly. While the world walks into marriage seeing it as something temporary, and we walk into it thinking it designed for permanence, what we have in common is how we view the purpose of marriage. We both, believers and unbelievers alike, walk down the aisle believing that marriage exists for the sake of our own happiness. When our marriages no longer provide the level of happiness we believe is our due, our eyes, our hearts and our bodies begin to wander. We begin to look for excuses to escape our marriages. We walk into adultery step by step.

We will not improve here corporately until we recognize and repent for this scandal. God will not forgive us until we show forth a broken and contrite spirit. The solution is not more marriage retreats. The solution isn’t more careful premarital counseling. The solution is not a repeal of no-fault divorce laws. Those may be good things. But we will change only when we see that we are one flesh with our spouses, that infidelity is a failure to be faithful to ourselves, that hurting our spouse only hurts us. We will change only when we remember that God gave us our spouses as a gift, not a burden. We will change only when we recognize that physical adultery isn’t a new sin, but is merely the end of the road we begin traveling when we look at another with lust, whether that other is a pin-up girl, or the hero in a romance novel, or that nice person at work. May God have mercy on our marriages.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, church, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, Theses | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on New Theses, New Reformation

Dogmatism, Election Advice and Rabbits Out of Hats

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Dogmatism, Election Advice and Rabbits Out of Hats

Join us tonight as we rejoice over the holiness of our God.

Don’t forget that today, at 7:00 eastern we continue our live study, working together through my father’s classic work, The Holiness of God. We will cover this week chapter 3. All are welcome to join us online. If, however, you are in the area, you are welcome to join us in our home. We serve a meal to our guests at 6:00. Do please let us know if you’d like to be here in person for the study or both the meal and the study. We hope to see you here.

Posted in RC Sproul JR | 4 Comments

Ask RC- How can I be sure Jesus won’t say to me “Depart from Me” on the last day?

You can’t make that sure, which is one of the keys to understanding this text. Assurance of salvation is one of the most common pastoral challenges, and understandably so. It matters, forever. And we struggle with sin until the day we die. A robust view of election sadly often doesn’t help as we end up fearing we may not be elect. Add to that this anecdotal evidence- nine times out of ten when I am seeking to help those who struggle deeply with assurance the person also has a struggle with OCD.

I was seeking to serve a brother just recently when I saw something I’d missed a hundred times before. When the goats are sent on their way their objection is all that they had done in His name, “On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness’” (). The goats are reasoning that because they had done such wonderful things for the kingdom that they deserved a place in it. They were like the Pharisee who prayed, “I thank you Lord that I am not like other men.” It was, however, the one who beat his breast crying out, “Lord, be merciful to me, a sinner” that went home justified.

But what about verse 21? “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” Isn’t Jesus making the exact opposite point, that not just those who profess faith, but those who obey will make it into heaven? If we don’t do the will of the Father, Jesus makes crystal clear, we won’t enter the kingdom. Isn’t it the will of the Father that we should prophecy in Jesus’ name, cast out demons in Jesus’ name, do mighty works in Jesus’ name? Perhaps. But this is certainly the will of the Father, that we would believe on the one He sent. The work of the Father is to rest in the Son.

When we stand before the judgment seat the last thing that should come out of our mouths is “Did we not…” The only safe thing to say is “Lord, be merciful to me, a sinner.” Our assurance, in the end, is grounded in His faithfulness, not ours, what He has done, not what we do, His holding us, not we holding on to Him.

It is a terrible thing indeed to fall under the judgment of God, to hear those dreadful words from Jesus. We, however, who speak on that day of all He has done for us and not what we have done for Him, will surely hear this, “Well done, thou good and faithful servant. Enter into your reward.” And we will dance.

Posted in Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, Doctrines of Grace, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Ask RC- How can I be sure Jesus won’t say to me “Depart from Me” on the last day?

The MacArthur/Leeman Dustup and The Bible in 5 Minutes- Exodus

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in church, covid-19, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, preaching, RC Sproul JR, special edition | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on The MacArthur/Leeman Dustup and The Bible in 5 Minutes- Exodus

The Dance of Life, or The Devil in the E’Gals

The fall of Adam and Eve is one of the stickiest theological wickets we encounter in the Bible. How could both of them, whom God had declared good, do bad? But there is a stickier wicket still, perhaps made so by the fact that it’s not in the Bible. For an event of such cosmic proportions, the Bible is surprisingly silent. How did Lucifer, the angel of light, come to be the Serpent, the father of lies? Some suggest that it was pride that got in his way, that he aspired to the very throne of God, and when he could not have it, he was cast down. Along a similar note, some suggest that it was his pride, but that it was a being lower on the chain that tripped him up. That is, it wasn’t that he wanted to be God, but that he refused to serve man. Some suggest that he balked when God revealed His plan, including the call of the angels to serve man. Man, after all, was made lower than the angels. Why should the greater serve the lesser? It seems it was the devil himself who first determined it’s better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven.

If the latter theory is the right one, we know who was the first to confuse ontology and economy, being and doing. But he was by no means the last. There is something in all of us that makes it seem somehow not right for the greater to serve the lesser. That something is pride.

The modern feminist movement, whether secular or “evangelical” suffers from the same sort of pride. The rejection of the plainly biblical affirmation that wives are to submit to their husbands (Ephesians 5:22) is driven by this objection- how can I be equal to my husband, if I am called to submit to my husband? Equals do not submit to one another, the reasoning goes, they are equal.

Sadly, too often husbands reason the same way. They also see the plain teaching of Ephesians, and conclude that since their wives are called to submit to them, that they as husbands are the superior being, that they are imbued with greater dignity and worth. That foolishness also feeds the foolishness of the feminist movement.

Egalitarianism in all its forms flows out of the same notion. We are a culture that is fast losing any sense of manners, indeed any sense of honor. We seem to believe that showing respect to another is a denial of the equality of men. Worse still we seem to go out of our way to show disrespect, that we might prove our own equality. Or we go out of our way to push away the respect directed toward us. While Lisa and I want our boys to address adults as “Sir” and “Ma’am,” too many sirs and ma’ams are teaching them not to, asking, “Oh, please don’t call me that. It makes me feel so old.” I suppose if growing older doesn’t bring with it a greater level of respect, that I can understand why so few people want to grow old.

Of course some older folks are foolish. On their merits respect is the last thing they would deserve. In like manner some husbands are buffoons. But without exception every older person is an older person, and every husband is a husband. Role relationships do not exist in a way that perfectly mirrors objective qualities. The race doesn’t always go to the swift. Every soldier knows that not every superior officer is actually superior. But every soldier is taught to “salute the uniform.” Honor is due to the office, even when not due to the man in the office.

If we would dispel the destruction of honor in our day, we would do well to start by dispelling the myth that to serve is to be less, and to be served is to be greater. And there is no greater argument against such folly than God. One of the benefits of a careful study of the covenant of redemption is that it makes this very point. God the Father not only does the work of electing a bride for the Son, but He does the job of making the assignments. With the respect to the persons of the Trinity, He is in charge. The Son, we confess, proceeds from the Father. The Spirit, we confess, proceeds from the Father and the Son. But we also confess this, “That these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory” (Westminster Shorter Catechism, question 6).

The Son does not proceed from the Father because the Father is smarter than the Son. They, along with the Spirit, know all things. They are all equally omniscient. Neither is it because the Father is stronger than the Son. Each of the members of the Trinity are equally omnipotent. With respect to their ontology, or their being, each member is the equal of the others. But with respect to their work, there is genuine submission. If the feminists are correct, that submission means unequality of being, then the Unitarians are also right. There can be no trinity.

If then, these roles are not determined by ability, by what are they determined? Both the covenant of redemption and the covenant family operate the way they do because such is what manifests the glory of God. For the dance to proceed, one must lead, and others must follow. Anything else may seem more “fair”, but it won’t seem like a dance. And that, more than anything else, was what enraged the devil.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Literary DNA- My 23 Writers That Made Me Me

It takes one to know one. Among the realms in which this truism is true is the world of the writer. Writers know writers. While science-y things are well beyond my decidedly non-STEM minded mind I do have some skill in discerning not just who is a writer, but which writers some writers read. I know there are companies out there that promise, with a spit and a promissory note, to tell you your genetic background. What though if we could list our 23 writing ancestors? If you cut open my writer’s mind and put it under a microscope, whose inky fingerprints would you find? I’ve thought it through, and have come up with my own list. I encourage you to do the same. It is, if we are honest with ourselves, a healthy experiment. If you’re so inclined, I’d love to see your literary gene mapping as well. I list these in a broad order, making no promise to being exact. Nor do I wish to defend these influences. I’m trying to be honest here, not put up a pious front. Here is mine-

1. RC Sproul– Of course no one else could top this list. Some of my favorite memories were those times when I was privileged to read his books in manuscript form. He is not to blame for my weaknesses. If I have any strengths, one way or another they likely came through him.
2. CS Lewis– Shocking to me that someone not Reformed, and so often so badly wrong, would make the list. Until you realize it’s CS Lewis.
3. Matthew Henry– I have more than my share of commentaries. None can hold a candle to Henry. He always got to the heart of the matter.
4. GK Chesterton– First a writing grandfather, as he would surely be first on Lewis’s list, but along with his “son,” tops in both piercing insight into the human condition and in the earth shaking turn of a phrase.
5. John Gerstner– Another writing grandfather, as he would surely be high on my father’s list. Absolutely penetrating mind. In person, absolutely humble heart.
6. Sinclair Ferguson– Greatest pastor/theologian, theologian/pastor of the last centuries. A pen flowing with the blood of Christ.
7. Neil Postman– Amusing Ourselves to Death made me a reader of substance. Which led me to reading more Postman.
8. E. Michael Jones– His capacity to connect personal history with ideology that has shaped the world is like no one else. He makes Romans 1 breathe.
9. Paul Johnson-Steady and fruitful from beginning to end.
10. Pat Conroy– Reading Conroy’s prose is like watching Liddell run, and knowing in both that God takes great pleasure.
11. Doug Wilson– Here I name the one who shall not be named. I’m no fan of the serrated edge, but his butter knife is as smooth as butter.
12. John Calvin– No one, outside of the Bible, has ever bound together more tightly orthodoxy and doxology.
13. JD Salinger– Dialogic rhythm like Thelonious Monk. Even internal monologues are dialogue.
14. PG Wodehouse– Joins Lewis and Chesterton in the Holy Trinity of wordpsmithing. Plus, no one more fun to read.
15. Dorothy Sayers– The Margaret Thatcher of writers. ‘Nuff said.
16. Richard Weaver– His dissertation is a eulogy, his most famous work a world-changing call to arms.
17. Gordon Clark– Greatest philosopher of the 20th century whose exposition of the pre-Socratics is a rosetta stone of my own worldview.
18. Gene Edward Veith– a living Paul Johnson- deep historical insight to go along with a style that goes down easy as silk.
19. Saint Augustine– The first to open vein and bleed.
20. Francis Turretin– Calvin filtered through the diligently ordered mind of an accountant.
21. Anthony Burgess– Lover of language and lover of humanity.
22. Ian Murray– Never once have I read a sentence from Murray and thought either, “What does that mean?” or “What does that matter?”
23. Jon Krakauer– I have zero interest in mountain climbing, disaffected youth, Mormon splinter groups or battles against Jihadis. But I love reading whatever this man writes about.

There it is. Honorable mentions to Philip K. Dick, BB Warfield, Kurt Vonnegut and Jack Kerouac. Let’s hear from you.

Posted in Books, Heroes, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, on writing well, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments