The Mis

Truth is I have neither read nor watched Les Miserables. I’m not much one for musicals and well, I have no other excuse. As I recall part of the story is about a man who is sentenced to five years in prison for stealing a loaf of bread for his starving sister. He serves 19 years because of his persistent attempts to escape, and eventually begins the long and difficult process of becoming a better man. He is a most sympathetic character.

Sympathy is a good thing. Anyone left feeling unfazed at the prospect of a man serving five years in prison over a loaf of bread had better check for a heartbeat. That said, sympathy, like any other emotion, can lead us dangerously astray.

Enter Lisa Herbold, city councilwoman in the workers’ paradise that is Seattle. She is proposing legislation that would decriminalize what would otherwise be crimes, assault, larceny and more, if the perpetrator could be shown to suffer from mental illness, to have an addiction or to be in poverty. Not mitigate punishment. Not involve social services. Decriminalize. Which would ultimately mean, should this become law, that the mentally unbalanced, the addicted and the poor are entitled to the wealth of their neighbors.

The God of heaven and earth is full of compassion and grace. He is well aware of the reality of poverty. Sympathy is His passion. And yet He never made it open season on the mentally balanced, the free from addictions and the prospering. What He did instead was call upon His people to exhibit the same compassion He exhibits. He set up in Israel a system of gleaning. All landowners were commanded by God to practice it, allowing the poor to pick up the fragments from the fields, to harvest from the corners and thickets. There was, however, no civil penalty for failing to do so. More important still, while the landowner had this duty, no particular person had a right to glean any particular field. The landowner was the one with sole discretion on who might glean his fields. God’s system managed to provide for the desperately needy without enabling or entitling them, and without undermining the property ownership of property owners.

What though did God command of those who stole, hungry or not? Had Valjean lived in Israel would he have served five years over a loaf of bread? No. He would be required to make restitution for his theft. If he hadn’t the resources to make the restitution he would become the debt slave of his victim. He would have the opportunity to work off his debt. He would not be locked up like an animal. He would not be coddled like a baby. He would be treated like a man.

Our Lord calls us to compassion. But also to wisdom. We are to feel what He feels. We are also, however, to do what He commands. Compassion followed by following our own wisdom on how to work it out is folly and leads to destruction, making all of us the miserable downtrodden.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Books, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Mis

Merry Covid! Gerard’s I See Satan Fall & More


Just so you know, Jesus Changes Everything, as well as blog posts, will continue through the holidays.

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Advent, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, covid-19, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, Westminster Shorter Catechism | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Merry Covid! Gerard’s I See Satan Fall & More

New Theses, New Reformation

Thesis 53- We must believe He rules over all things.

Rome could not help but trip over her own feet. When you get the gospel wrong the error does not stay hermetically sealed, leaving everything else safe. Rather, the whole ship goes down. Rome, seeking to elevate the church, created a two-tiered world, not just distinguishing, not just dividing, but separating the sacred and the secular. The Reformation, in turn, did not seek merely to get this doctrine or that straightened out, but sought to bring every thought, as well as every word and deed captive. They understood, as we must once again come to understand, that Jesus rules over all things.

While contemporary evangelicals are not making the exact mistake Rome made we have divided reality into two worlds. We are happy to affirm that Jesus rules over our spiritual lives, that He reigns in that kingdom that resides in our hearts. Our broader lives is where things get a bit fuzzy. He impacts our work in the sense that we try to live ethically there. He is present when we are at play in the sense that we don’t want to commit any of the really bad sins. But our attitudes, perspectives, even our convictions often are simply inherited from the world around us. When we find cognitive dissonance between what the world says and what the Word says, too often we embrace the former and massage the latter. Then we justify what we’ve done by separating our faith from the rest of the world.

It, the world, however, is all His. His reign knows no bounds. There is no issue over which He has no opinion, and no opinion He has that is not true. He commands of us that we take not some, not most, but every thought captive to His obedience. That means when I think through how a man has peace with God, I must submit to Him. When I think through how to understand the culture wars, I must submit to Him. It means that I must fear Him and not the disapproval of the world.

The irony is that we can have the courage to face the world because He really does rule over it. When we stand firm in rejecting the sexual anarchy of the broader world and are vilified for it, every bit of hardship that comes our way, whether we are cancelled or driven out of business or put in prison, it is because such is what He ordained for our good and His glory. We need never fear He is in heaven wringing His hands over what we are going through.

Our calling isn’t, however, just to stand against the forces of change and shout “STOP!” Our calling is to make manifest, that is, visible, the glory of His reign. We are to press the crown rights of King Jesus where’re He reigns. Where does He reign? Everywhere. Reformation means re-forming, in the power of the Spirit, ourselves and the world around us. Jesus reigns.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, creation, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty, Theses | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Grinch-ism, and Assurance of Salvation

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Advent, apologetics, assurance, ism, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

God’s Good Pleasure

Ask RC: Does God take pleasure in the death of the wicked?

Yes, and no. First, to the no. The Bible explicitly says exactly this,

Say to them, As surely as I live, declares the Sovereign LORD, I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn from their ways and live. Turn! Turn from your evil ways! Why will you die, O house of Israel? (Ezekiel 33:11).

Shouldn’t that settle the matter? While this text is of course true, this text is likewise true,

Whatever the Lord pleases, He does, in heaven and on earth, in the seas and all deeps. (Psalm 135:6).

Which is why the answer is also yes. It is not either/or but both/and. It is not a contradiction, but a paradox. The truth is that God does take pleasure in the death of the wicked in one sense, and doesn’t in another sense. The pleasure He takes is grounded in the execution of His justice, the manifestation of His holiness. Does He take pleasure in that? He certainly does. He even tells us that He raised up Pharaoh for that very purchase, that He might manifest His glory in taking him down.

The pleasure He takes, however, isn’t in the death. What God is denying in Ezekiel is that He is a sadist, that He takes a perverse kind of pleasure in seeing people suffer. In context God is, speaking through Ezekiel, telling His covenant people who have already received judgment from God to not embrace discouragement, but to turn and repent. The people of God are beaten down, ashamed, and likely feeling hopeless. They have earned God’s disfavor and His judgment. The message then is a call to return to the loving arms of their Father, whose pleasure and delight is to forgive the repentant.

If we take an absolutist position that God in no way, shape or form finds pleasure in the death of the wicked we run into two significant roadblocks. First, the Bible makes it clear, not just in Psalm 135 but from beginning to end, that God is sovereign, that He does as He pleases, that no one and no thing can thwart His determined will. Second, the Bible makes it clear, from beginning to end, that God imposes judgment on all the wicked who are outside of Jesus. That is, to take an absolutist position on this text is to embrace full universalism, which flies in the face of the Bible.

Consider for a moment if you were a judge sentencing a murderer. You would be a perverse person indeed if you rubbed your hands together like a mad scientist while cackling before sending him to the electric chair. You would be solemn, grave. It would be a dark day for you. But, at the same time, you would rejoice in the opportunity to do your job, to bring justice to pass. How much more so for our heavenly Father who is altogether just, altogether holy, altogether merciful?

Posted in apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Sacred Marriage Under Fire iv; Proverbs

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage Under Fire iv; Proverbs

The Crowded Public Square

The story is told, and is probably true, that our most sacred holidays are placed on the calendar where they are not for historical accuracy, but for political expediency. December 25th was a pagan holiday, near the winter solstice. So was Easter. When Constantine had his supposed conversion, and dragged the remains of the Roman empire with him, it only seemed wise not to cancel the biggest parties of the year. It was decided to co-opt them instead. The holiday is dead. Long live the holiday.

Turnabout is fair play. The pagan Roman festivals, while making a minor comeback, are not on the forefront of anyone’s social calendar these days. But seeing a block full of events between the fourth Thursday in November, and the beginning of the New Year, many have decided to crash our parties. The advent season, that time when we pause to remember the need for and grace of the incarnation of our Lord is indeed a time to celebrate. And nobody likes to feel left out. Worse still, nobody likes to leave anybody out. We have invited the world to our party, and told them they don’t need Jesus to get in.

Crammed into that little window of time we now call the “holiday season” we have not only our own celebrations, but Hanakuh, Kwaanza and the vague holiday season of the poor, secular, “meta-narrative challenged.” First we shared Saint Nicholas with them, transforming a dedicated, pious monk into an overweight jolly old elf. Now we share the whole season with them. There then, on the lawn in front of town hall, we have, if we’re lucky, a manger scene, and right beside it, a menorah, some sort of Kwaanza thing, whatever that might be, and a bevy of North Pole citizens in mid-frolic. The malls, lest they anger their own seasonal god, money, by offending any potential customers, celebrate in much the same way. It is not the use of the Greek X, as in X-mas, nor crass commercialism that is killing Christmas (though it of course doesn’t help any) as much as it is multi-culturalism. If no one’s reason to celebrate is better than anyone else’s, then there can be no real reason to celebrate.

Holidays are merely the melding together of remembrance liturgies and celebrations. The thing we are remembering is the thing we are celebrating. We are rejoicing because Christ came and dwelt among us. In the world, they are merely celebrating that they are celebrating. It’s as hollow as a federal reserve note.

We should not expect the world to celebrate with us. For those outside Christ, the coming of Christ, both the first time and the last, is a day of darkness, not light. That He came to take our judgment does not change the truth that He always comes in judgment. But they can’t stand to see us having a good time. As they always do, they take away the offense of the cross and then join us in our reverie. But there is nothing to celebrate without the cross. Without the cross they are uninvited guests who should be shown the door. We do not celebrate each year the birthday of a great moral teacher. We do not celebrate the birth of our example. We celebrate that God the Son took on flesh, and dwelt with us. There is no way to make that message palatable to Jews, or Muslims, nor those affirming that we emerged from the sludge by accident.

That they are celebrating, however, does not mean that we should not. That they are whistling in the dark doesn’t mean that we can’t walk on the sunshine. It is our day, our celebration. When someone crashes your party you don’t decide to never have another party. You just celebrate it more carefully. Let them have their empty gestures, the interest on the capital they borrowed. Don’t mimic them, by celebrating the holiday season, by joining in an amorphous time of good will. Do not practice random acts of kindness and senseless acts of beauty. Without the birth of the Savior, they have neither kindness nor beauty, and are deliberate denials of the grace of God.

The answer is not slowing down the spending, (though that might be wise), nor boycotting any store caught with Christmas decorations before some arbitrary date. The answer is to drown out the cacophony of the phonies, to use this season as a time to remember. Remember your sins, which created enmity with God. And then remember that while we were yet sinners, Christ was born of a virgin for us, leaving behind His glory. While we were yet sinners, Christ lived a perfect life for us in absolute subjection to the law of His Father. While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. While we were yet sinners Christ arose and ascended to His throne for us, to intercede for us, to exercise dominion for and through us, and that Emmanuel, God with us, will come again. That is worth celebrating, no matter what the heathen are doing.

Posted in Advent, apologetics, Apostles' Creed, church, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Comments Off on The Crowded Public Square

The Way in the Manger

It is increasingly fashionable, and has always been quite easy to debunk a number of Christmas season staples that are either less than certain or certainly not true. We don’t know, for instance, how many wise men there were, because the Bible doesn’t tell us. Three gifts are mentioned, but not three men. We don’t even know that they arrived the night He was born. We do know that our typical image of the stable is way off. At that time the “stable” was the first floor of the home, where animals were brought at night, not a wooden structure away from the house.

These kinds of mistakes happen in part because our cultural baggage gets lost in transition. If we wanted a place to keep our animals we’d make it out of wood, and put it some distance from the people. So we assume they would do the same. Even the image of Joseph and the young Jesus as a carpenter is likely off quite a bit. And for much the same reason. Wood was relatively scarce in first century Palestine. Whenever possible homes, tools, even furniture were constructed of something far longer lasting, stone. It is likely that stone was the material Joseph worked with.

It is likely as well, for the same reasons, that the manger Jesus was placed in was not a wooden kind of basket but was instead stone, either carved into the wall of the first floor of the home, or free standing. Part of the subtext of the birth in the stable narrative is that it is consistent with the compelling notion that God humbled Himself in the birth of Jesus. And so it is, even if the “stable” is a bit more like an unfinished basement. But could there be more here?

Whether dug into the wall or standing alone, the stone mangers of that period look remarkably like the tombs of the same period. If you took a tomb, in fact, and shrunk it down to the size of a baby it would look exactly like a manger. Could it be that the original audience, when they read that the newborn child was laid in a manger would have naturally thought, “Yes, He was born to die. The end is foreshadowed in the beginning here.” And if so, should not we think the same?

Could there be yet another reason He was placed in the manger? Another message in the text? We’ve invested so much time and energy remembering He was born in a manger that we have virtually forgotten what a manger is for. A manger is the place where food was placed. The sheep know the manger is where they go to be fed. There they find the bread of life. We, His sheep, continue to do the same.

The stable story does a wonderful job of reminding us of His humility. The true story gives the same message, but also reminds us He came to die, and did so that we might live.

Posted in Advent, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, special edition, typology, wonder | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on The Way in the Manger

7 Churches, Lisa & I on Virgin River ii, Hardness of Hardship

Today’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, church, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on 7 Churches, Lisa & I on Virgin River ii, Hardness of Hardship

Ask RC- Why do you write?

To make manifest the kingdom of God. My goal is change, to change me, those who read my pieces, and the world. My desire is that I, and those who read my pieces would become more like Jesus. And that the pieces themselves would show us who He is.

Writing changes me, as it is at my keyboard that I do my best thinking about what matters most to me. Pieces are usually birthed while I am doing something else, taking a walk, washing dishes. But those nascent thoughts mature, become seasoned at moments just like this. Writing both listens to and speaks from that part of me that is most obscured to others and myself. I become both teacher and student.

My hope too is that the pieces I write change others. Though I know we don’t often embrace change, I know in turn that we need it. If one of my pieces leaves you where it found you, I’ve wasted your time and mine. That change sometimes involves shifting views on an issue. I want people to come to understand that we have peace with God by trusting in the finished atoning work of Christ on our behalf. I want people to grasp that God made governments to punish evil-doers, not to do evil. I want people to grasp the horror of abortion. I want people to understand that we yet struggle against sin, and that we still, as we did before we were reborn, don’t like facing our sin.

This particular goal sometimes elicits the most angry responses. It also, however, elicits some of the most encouraging. “Ouch” people say. “Reading you is like taking a 2×4 to the forehead” others insist. And I smile. You see that’s how I feel when I read writers I love. I don’t ever want to smack people upside the head for the fun of it. I do want to never shy away from doing so for the change it can engender. Is it possible that in reading, pain is weakness leaving the mind?

Change, however, is not limited to moving from denying X to affirming X. Too often we struggle with what I gently refer to as “intellectual constipation. “ We, especially we Reformed, make the mistake of thinking that thinking something is the same as believing something. We rightly aspire to have our head screwed on right, but wrongly assume that this, by itself, will take care of our hearts. What we know too often gets stuck in our heads, but doesn’t make it down to our beings. My hope is that through a right mixture of careful reasoning and unexpected beauty we might better believe what we affirm, that our convictions will not only reach our hearts, but come out our hands.

It is my heart’s desire as well that that marriage of careful reasoning and unexpected beauty would manifest the glory of God. I want to write in such a way that truth becomes not just the glorious reality that two hydrogens and an oxygen make water, but that snowflakes are liquid manna, a prodigal display of the play, and the pleroma of God. Though my gift is rather short of Olympic, I share the conviction of Eric Liddell. God made me for a purpose. But He also made me a writer. And when I write, I feel His pleasure. That’s why I write.

Posted in abortion, apologetics, Ask RC, Books, kingdom, on writing well, RC Sproul JR, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments