How are we to think about Gaza and Israel?

From virtually every angle our thinking on more recent events, and everything leading from the Balfour Declaration to them is enmeshed with confusion and emotion. In this country we have many who seem to believe Israel can do no wrong and middle easterners can do know right. The bulk of Christians have little notion of the number of Christians in the Middle East, nor how western policies impact them. We likewise have Americans who believe Israel can do no right and anything done by Muslims against them is justly deserved. Add in the mix the complicated history of the crusades, the horror of the holocaust, the allied relationship between Israel and the United States, the tangled family history of Christians and Jews, the secular perspective of the Israeli government and, well, it’s a mess.

When we face a mess the first thing we need to do, after acknowledging the mess, is seeking out what we can know and what we can untangle. We set aside, without denying the scope of the horror, our understandable emotional responses and try to coolly apply the wisdom of God. For instance, even if you have embraced the fevered dreams of raving antisemitic conspiracy theorists, even if you are right, such doesn’t justify terrorism. An anti-communist John Bircher might have thought it a good and wise thing for the United States to fight against the Viet Cong, lest all the southeast Asian dominoes fall. Such could not, however, justify the My Lai Massacre. Whether Gaza is a free country given to Palestinians in exchange for a peace they are now breaking, or an open air prison may be a difficult question. Assaulting civilians is not.

What tends to justify such horrors in the minds of Hamas radicals is the perception of being gravely wronged by Israel. Israel, having been gravely wronged, now faces the temptation to retaliate. Seeking out enemy combatants, destroying weapons caches, bombarding rocket launching sites is not retaliation. It is waging war against an aggressing army. On the other hand, carpet bombing cities, targeting civilians is retaliation.

To put it another way, one thing we ought to know is the difference between terrorism and war. They have death and destruction in common. They differ as to the targets. Terrorism attacks civilians. War attacks soldiers. If this is not clear, chances are high that emotion is clouding your judgment. A wicked enemy that practices terrorism must have war waged against it, not have terrorism terrorizing the innocent.

I don’t pretend to know where all this is going. We could be in the early stages of World War III. Or, this could turn out to be the biggest brushfire in a long history of brushfires. I do know that thousands have died by the deliberate acts of thousands. Which means we need more light than heat, more just war commitments than jingoism. We need to mourn for our fallen natures, that we are all capable of barbarism. And we need to pray for the peace of the whole of the war-torn and terrorism torn region.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, eschatology, ethics, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

7

There are, of course, plenty of nutty Christian numerologists. Like the Bible code that once captured the imagination of Bible lovers, so too is there a steady crowd that practice a Christian brand of kabbalah, mixing mysticism and math. On the other hand, there are even more Christians who are so afraid of numerology that they deny the plain truth that God treats some numbers differently from others. And none is > 7. In seven days God created the universe. He commands of us that we rest one day in seven, that we leave our ground fallow one year in seven, that we set free our indentured servants every seven years. It is the number of completeness. Seven sevens brings us to an even greater celebration, Jubilee.

Tomorrow will mark the seventh anniversary of my marriage to my precious wife Lisa. To the world this is a harbinger of doom, as the seven year itch is expected to come and create havoc. To those in Christ, however, it is a year of rest, celebration, giving thanks and praising God. It is a year to acknowledge our dependence, not just as two individuals but as one couple, on Him and His grace. He is the one who brought us together. He is the one who prepared us all our lives for our time together. He is the one who bound us, the first strand around whom we are wrapped.

There is one thing, however, that I will not rest from in the coming year. I will continue in my habit of, just before going to sleep, thanking God for Lisa. And my habit, first thing when I wake, of thanking God for Lisa. The habit helps me to remember that I never run out of things to be thankful for. Lisa, first, forgives me. I’m not yet what I will be, and still struggle with sin. I need to repent often, and she forgives often. She too repents often, and it is my delight to forgive.

Lisa also speaks words of encouragement with the softest, most gentle voice. I get to hear her encouraging others with it, and get to receive it myself. Lisa speaks words of wisdom as well, learning from all that providence has taught her. Best of all Lisa speaks the words of Scripture, rightly applying the Word of truth to our changing circumstances.

I could go on about her sense of humor, her beauty, her abundant skills as a keeper of our home, her managerial acumen. Those are wonderful gifts. What is more wonderful still is that she seeks after God. She doesn’t speak to Him as if He was in the room. She speaks to Him knowing that He is in the room. She cries out. She sings His praises. She searches the Scriptures.

She has, not one year but for the last seven, given rest to the parched, cracked field that was my life before her. She has, not one year but for the last seven, helped to set me free from unbearable chains. She has, not one year, but for the last seven loved me faithfully, while loving Him faithfully.

Happy Anniversary my beloved. May He bless us with seven sevens together, and then the Jubilee.

Posted in 10 Commandments, beauty, friends, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, Lisa Sproul, RC Sproul JR, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Rainbow Colors

It’s 84 degrees. My face and my noggin are sunburned. And it’s October as I write. I live not only in the northern state of Indiana, but in the northern portion of the state. Which pushes me, as a lover of fall and cold to wonder, “What gives?” I’ve been waiting since the beginning of June for the cold weather to come, counting down the days. My frustration in turn leads to me wonder if perhaps I’m the problem.

No, I don’t mean I should learn to love the heat. All you believers who love the heat will be healed of that malady when you are glorified. I mean I may well be misunderstanding the weather. When God makes covenant with Noah in Gen. 8:22 He makes a promise upon which not only all science but even all inductive reasoning is built upon. He said,

“While the earth remains,
Seedtime and harvest,
Cold and heat,
Winter and summer,
And day and night
Shall not cease.”

This is God’s promise of order, predictability, that to some degree we can count on the future being like the past. It is the reason I don’t expect it to be so hot in October. Truth be told, soon enough I won’t be hot. (Tomorrow is the day. I’m so excited.) We’re not going to jump right into Summer next week. Two cheers for predictability says I.

Not, however, three cheers. God’s promise of order is not a promise to let go of the reins of the future. It is not as if He vowed to be a tame lion. Whether it is the foolish enlightenment notion that the world is itself just a clock slowly unwinding through the inexorable march of impersonal forces or the confused notion that God wrote the story, set up the dominoes, bumped the first and now watches from a distance, we are prone to missing His nearness, His active works of providence. We forget that He is not only there and not silent but He is here and not passive.

We won’t plant next year’s garden in February, though God could make such the perfect time. I won’t either fear that the universe is broken if February is warm. The same God who told Job that He alone shut in the sea with doors is the God who sends tsunamis. The one who promised never again to flood the earth has chosen to flood everything from the Mississippi River to the city of Johnstown, PA, twice.

In short, we should not be surprised when we find ourselves surprised from time to time. We should not, in receiving the blessing of predictability, curse ourselves by forgetting that He is near. The laws of nature do not belong to nature nor are they, properly speaking, laws. They are instead the patterns by which God usually operates. What He never does is leave the stage He has built for the sake of making manifest His glory. Which means, rain or shine, hot or cold, summer and winter, springtime and harvest we praise Him.

Posted in beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Monday’s Study, Romans 8: 1-11

Posted in assurance, Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, resurrection, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Monday’s Study, Romans 8: 1-11

Celebrating Lisa’s Success; McCarthy’s Fall, Babel & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in abortion, apologetics, Ask RC, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, Nostalgia, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sport, That 70s Kid | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Celebrating Lisa’s Success; McCarthy’s Fall, Babel & More

The Unbearable Oughtness of Being Or, Postmodern Pharisees

The appeal of ethical relativism is rather plain to see. If there is no right and wrong then I can’t be convicted of any wrong. Ethical relativism allows me to write my own law, to edit on the fly, to finish “I may do this…” with an unassailable … “because I want to.” Desire becomes its own justification. My will becomes my law.

This appeal, however, soon enough begins to dissipate if we have any interest at all in being coherent, consistent in our thinking. We quickly turn, “I may do this, because I want to” into “You may not do that, because I want to do this.” Consider, just as an example, sexual perversion. The problem, morally speaking, with sexual perversion is that it is an abomination to God. Ethical relativism, of course, bars God from the conversation. Therefore there is no reason by which we might condemn the practice. There is, to these folks, no transcendent moral standard by which we are all bound. We can do what we want, no matter how perverse. Which means, doesn’t it, that I can call sexual perversion an abomination to God? What, after all, is to stop me? If all things are permissible, saying some things are impermissible, must be permissible.

My ethical relativist friends, of course, do not take my bigoted, narrow, hateful position lying down. In fact, they will insist that since there is no right or wrong, it is, oops, wrongfor me to say otherwise. They will chasten me, rebuke me, come down on me with all the grace and love of a Pharisee. And in so doing expose the lie of their own foundational premise. They don’t deny the existence of law, just any law that would stop them.

In like manner if instead of condemning sexual perversion I club baby seals, or question global warming (oops again, climate change), or argue that government schools ought to be forbidden to teach evolution, suddenly my friends embrace a transcendent moral standard- one I am guilty of violating. Sadly, it doesn’t do much good to be more thoughtful, or more radical. You still run into the same problem. Nietzsche, you’ll remember, castigated Christianity for its “herd morality.” He grumbled that we believers were all the time going about doing what we were told. If we wanted to be authentic, right thinking, if we wanted to be Super men, he reasoned, we ought to throw off all morality and each of us create our own. But, oops, there’s that pesky “ought” again. Did you miss it? It’s there. Why “ought” we to throw off the herd morality? Where did that moral imperative come from? We ought not to listen to other people, according to Nietzsche, unless, of course, the other person is Nietzsche. Even Nietzsche could not escape the unbearable oughtness of being.

Lawlessness does not fail because bad things will happen without law. Lawlessness fails because if it succeeds it becomes law. If moral law requires there be no moral law, then it’s a rather nasty pickle. Law is inescapable, and all those who insist that we not follow any law ultimately want us to submit to their law. Nietzsche and his heirs are not liberators, but slave traders, slave traitors. They do not throw off law but impose it. The only difference is their yoke is not easy, their burden not light.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, ism, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, logic, philosophy, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Romans Study Tonight, Beginning Chapter 8

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Why do Christians still sin?

We are born sinners. Before we’ve done anything we are one thing, sinful. Praise God, He gives life to us so that we repent and believe. Our sins- past, present and future- are forgiven. Why though are there future sins? When He declares us, in Christ, to be righteous, why does He not make us righteous fully and immediately?

It’s not a question we ask ourselves often enough. I suspect such is because we are comfortable with our sin. Believers, however, have not only been born again, not only been given a love for His Word, are not only indwelt by His Spirit but are also being washed by Jesus Himself (Ephesians 5). But we still sin.

At the horizontal level we still sin because while our old nature is dead in one sense, in another it is being put to death, and thus still lives. We are in a battle because sin, while its reign over us has ended, still has influence on us. We are, as Martin Luther put it, simul justis et peccatore, at the same time just and sinner. This battle will come to its conclusion either when He returns or when we go to Him. For now, we sin because we choose to sin. It is frustrating, maddening, humiliating. See Paul’s struggle at the end of Romans 7 for a powerful picture of the anguish that walks with us through our days.

At the vertical level, remembering that God is not guilty of any sin, especially our own, we must also acknowledge that God is sovereign even over our sins. If He ultimately wished them not to be, on the other hand, they would not be. What reason could He possibly have for allowing sin to continue in us? His glory and our good.

When teaching through Romans 7 recently it struck me that it might be that the thorn in Paul’s side that he prayed so fervently that it would be removed might not be a physical ailment. (I’ve long held, based on the description, “thorn in the side” and the fervency of the prayer that it had to be kidney stones) might be instead a besetting sin that he struggled with. If it were, it would fit snugly with God’s answer as to why He didn’t remove it. He wanted Paul to remember his dependence on God’s grace. Let us here heed the warning of Paul. We don’t excuse our sin this way, suggesting that we sin all the more that grace might abound (Romans 6:1). Nevertheless, our ongoing sins provide ongoing reason for the believer to run to the Father, to repent, and to rejoice in the forgiveness we have in Christ, glorifying God.

We are commanded to mortify our flesh, to fight the good fight, to own our sin. Nothing above should serve as an excuse for sin, nor do anything to lighten the weight of our repentance. But we need not be puzzled over why He hasn’t determined to end our battles on this side of the veil. He is glorified in every victory, and, as we run to Him seeking His mercy, every defeat.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, Latin Theological Terms, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Kids These Days

It’s a funny thing about slippery slopes—you can slide down them slowly. The principle behind the concept isn’t that you must move swiftly from here down to there if you have no moral brakes, but that you will move. A slippery slope with a gentle incline will have just as much slippage, though sliding to the bottom may take more time.

Consider the music our children listen to. My grandparents, I’m quite certain, were rather troubled by their children dancing to what we would now consider the positively clean music of Elvis. Between generations came the Beatles, who played in suits, and whose early mop-tops were more rascally than rebellious. By the time I turned on the radio, my parents objected to the suggestive lyrics of Aerosmith or the Red Hot Chili Peppers. Today there is no suggestive music anymore, because “suggestive” implies a measure of subtlety.

We got here not because we slept through the crossing of a Rubicon. Instead, we insisted that because our grandparents objected needlessly (compared to our parents), our parents must have objected needlessly (compared to us), and therefore we needed to refuse to object needlessly about our kids, knowing that their kids will be much worse. We have come to expect and accept rebellion—musically and morally—as a normal part of growing up. Some parents even begin to worry when their children don’t rebel.

All of this is evidence that even in the church we take our cues from the broader culture rather than from the Word of God. Take a moment and look in your concordance for teenager. Try adolescence. Try generation gap. See if you can find youth culture. Neither the words nor the concepts are there. These are not biblical categories. That they are common destructive elements in our homes ought to clue us in that we’re doing something wrong.

It is not enough, however, to clamp down. That is, it is not mere permissiveness that has gotten us into this mess. The problem runs deeper. It isn’t that we aren’t rightly handling the youth, but that we even concede the existence of the youth. The Bible recognizes happily the reality of children. It affirms the existence of adults. What it doesn’t do is embrace something in between.

The Bible nowhere affirms the existence of a youth culture because it everywhere encourages us to embrace a different culture—that of the kingdom of God. When Paul enjoins us to raise our children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord (Eph. 6:1), the root Greek word that is translated nurture in our English Bibles is paideia. It communicates the notion of a culture. It includes shared convictions, shared language, and shared habits of the heart.

Nathan Hatch once exposed the infiltration of peculiar American ideals into the church in his great book The Democratization of American Christianity. In our day, we are witnessing the demographicization of American Christianity. At best, we establish programs based on age, sex, and life situation. At worst, we have a church tailored to fans of country music and Mountain Dew at one site, and a church tailored to fans of jazz and Starbucks elsewhere. We are dividing what Christ has brought together; we are the Corinthians, except that we divide the body by taste rather than by income or favorite theologian.

Jesus, however, makes of the many one. We are one family, one loaf, one body, one culture, one love. Would that the broader culture would be able to say of our culture, “Oh, how they love each other.”

Posted in "race", Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, communion, Devil's Arsenal, Education, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on Kids These Days

Coming Out- LGBTQ+ Proud

I’m in favor. In fact, I’m so in favor I’d like to nominate another category to fill in the +. But first let’s look at the blessings of LGBTQ.

L is for love. Who could be opposed to love? Of course it is always helpful to define our terms. Love is, according to some, summed up in permissiveness. True love, however, does no harm. Perversion does harm. Long before it does any harm to the broader culture, it does grievous harm to those who are caught up in it. Love for these dear people means calling them to repentance, letting them know about the grace and power of the living God. So yes, most assuredly, I’m in favor of love.

G is for girls. Who could be opposed to girls? Of course it is always helpful to define our terms. Girl is, to some, anyone who thinks he or she is a girl, or who wants to present him or herself as a girl. True girl, however, is one who is born a female. Out of love for girls we don’t want to turn girlhood into a costume anyone can wear, nor do we want males put into their safe spaces, or their athletic competitions. In fact, central to human history, however clouded it might be by sin, is this, that boys protect girls. That’s why we send men off to war and women and children onto lifeboats.

B is, not surprisingly, for boys. Who could be opposed to boys? Of course, it is always helpful to define our terms. Well, you get the picture. Boys are those who are born male. Out of our love for boys we don’t want them to be looked down upon as the root of the world’s problems. We don’t want them deluding themselves into thinking they are girls. We want to see them encouraged in their callings as providers, husbands and fathers.

TQ is for top quality. Who could be opposed to top quality relationships between husbands and wives? Of course, it’s always helpful to define our terms. Top quality relationships between husbands and wives is defined by husbands loving their wives as Christ loves the church and wives submitting to husbands as the church is to submit to Christ. There is surely more to it, but when Paul wrote to the church at Ephesus, this is what he emphasized.

Which brings us to the +. I’d like to fill in that vague and amorphous, almost-all-things-are -acceptable with something clear, distinct and utterly unacceptable- h. H is for homophobic. Who could be against people objecting to sexual perversion? Just about the whole world, that’s who. Of course it is helpful to define our terms. By homophobic we do not mean what the roots in the word actually mean, an irrational fear of homosexuality. What those who oppose it mean by it is any form of disapproval of homosexuality. What we mean by it is embracing a biblical view of sexuality.

The reason I believe we should include homophobia in our list of people who need support is that there is no demographic in the west more hated and despised. We homophobes, who simply wish to live our lives in peace, who were in fact born this way, who ask nothing more of the homo-phil world that we be respected for what we are, are the constant target of cultural derision, legal prejudice and even violence. I know many homophobes who are in the closet for just this kind of hatred. Why shouldn’t they march proudly in an anti-gay parade, just like those marching proudly in a pro-gay parade? It’s a complete double standard. Even publishing this brief piece could, as others have, spark various threats of violence from the privileged of this world, the rainbow coalition and their fellow-travelers. It could likewise bring down the shadow ban.

That’s okay. By His grace I live under the cover of His rainbow.

That said, let me encourage my fellow H’s to come out of the closet. It is dangerous, but it is freeing. You just may be surprised how many of your family and friends are secret members of this oppressed tribe. They can hate you, mock you, threaten you, sue you, arrest you and kill you. But they can’t change who you are. Live free. Live proud.

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments