Is calling yourself a “Calvinist” sinful?

No. But it could be. The apostle Paul admonished the Corinthians for their party loyalty, as some there said, “I am of Paul,” others, “I am of Apollos and others “I am of Cephas.” Isn’t identifying as a Calvinist, or an Arminian the same thing? Again, no, but it could be. If a believer’s identity is caught up in anyone or anything other than Christ, that’s a sin. But calling oneself a Calvinist isn’t, on its face, finding one’s identity in Calvin. It is merely describing a position on several issues that Christians disagree about. With respect to charismatic gifts, one might say, “I am of Grudem” or “I am of MacArthur” without idolizing either man. With respect to college football one could say, “I am of Alabama” or “I am of Ole Miss” without being guilty of idolizing either program.

Names, in short, can rightly be used as shorthand to identify what we believe as long as they don’t define our identity. I’m a Christian. I believe that the five points of Calvinism are true. I know enough church history to know that these five points were formulated well after Calvin had gone on to his reward, in response to the five points of Arminianism. Where do I stand with respect to believers falling away? I believe in perseverance of the saints. Where do I stand on the prescience view of election, whereby God chooses us on the basis of what He saw we would do? I’m opposed to that, affirming unconditional election.

I might should refer to myself as one who believes in the doctrines of grace, so as not to offend. Except of course that such might be construed to mean that I think Arminians don’t believe in grace. Either way, my goal is to communicate where I stand on several internal issues, not to elevate a man.

When I was in college I had a friend who, like me, was a Calvinist. He was reading Calvin and misunderstood something he had said. He raced into my dorm room, in a panic, saying, “Calvin didn’t believe Jesus was present at the creation!!!!!” I remained calm and explained to my friend, “First, I’m confident you’ve misunderstood him. Second, even if you haven’t, all that means is Calvin was wrong. There’s no need to panic.” My friend was skirting a bit to close the Corinthian problem. I was trying to help him escape it.

I think Calvin was an astonishingly great theologian. The same could be said for Saint Augustine and RC Sproul and Sinclair Ferguson. These are men who have had a deep and profound impact on my understanding of the Bible. In one sense then you could call me a Calvinist, an Augustinian, a Sproulian or a Fergusonist. I am well aware, however, that not a one of these men are God incarnate; none of them lived a perfect life or died for my sins. They were not raised from the dead, nor do they sit at the right hand of the Father. That is Jesus Christ, and Him alone. Which is why my identity is in Him.

I don’t want to offend anyone who has such a scruple. I do not, however, share it. The principle that drives it, however, I’m fully on board with.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Big Eva, Doctrines of Grace, ethics, grace, Heroes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Prodigal Father

When I served as editor-in-chief of Tabletalk magazine, I committed my share of gaffes. I received more than my share of sweet-natured but school-marmish notes about why this semicolon should have been a colon, or why further was the better word in context than farther. But there were bigger blunders as well. Once, I allowed the magazine to go out with one word of its two-word title misspelled. Happily, we received virtually no feedback on that one because the misspelled word was in Latin.

Only once, however, can I remember receiving high praise for a mistake. I wrote something about the parable of the prodigal son, and by accident I referred to it as the story of the prodigal father. The letter I received was chock full of high praise: “I can’t believe someone finally said it. I always think this is what the story should be called. Thank you for having the courage and the insight to make this point.” He went on for so long that it started to feel pretty good, until I remembered I had made a mistake, not communicated an insight.

As I read, however, I came to see the wisdom of the man’s perspective—not on my editorial skills but on the parable. It is indeed the story of the prodigal father. It is true enough that prodigal can mean “wasteful” or “careless.” It can also, however, refer to someone who is extravagant in giving, overflowing in graciousness, abundant in tenderness and love.

It is good and wise that we should learn to recognize ourselves in the Bible. I always encourage people with this rule of thumb: if you want to know who you are in a Bible story, you are the sinner. Then, in part because of this very parable, I add this: if the story has more than one sinner, you are both of them. We are both of the brothers in the parable of the prodigal son. We squander the gifts given to us by our Father. We dishonor and disobey Him. We pursue our own ends, seeing Him as merely the supplier of our needs so we can get on with acquiring our wants. On the other hand, we are also like the older brother, thinking ourselves rather fine fellows. We don’t sin as outrageously as the heathen we see on television. We aren’t hedonists like the prodigal. We, because we are sinners, somehow manage to be both libertines and Pharisees, self-indulgent and self-righteous.

The story, however, doesn’t end there. It is a good thing to come face to face with the depth and scope of our sin. It is a better thing, however, to come face to face with the grace of God. The parable does tell us how bad we are—but it ends with a robe, a fattened calf, and a great celebration. It ends with a heartfelt embrace of the prodigal, and a gentle, loving call to repentance for the older brother. The story ends, just as our story ends, with the grace of God for us.

A wise theologian more than once has said that the great question plaguing those outside the kingdom is this: What do I do with my guilt? Romans 1:18–32 argues that it is precisely the desperate need to forget that guilt that leads the lost to folly and perversion. We worship the creature because the creature won’t judge us. We exchange the truth that we are under judgment for the lie that we are perfectly safe. We determine that what we need to be safe is more stuff. So, instead of worrying about the judgment that is to come, we worry about what we will eat and what we will drink, just like the prodigal son in the pigsty of the far-off country.

The answer to both problems, however, is found in the Father. We ought never, in dealing with those outside the kingdom, to diminish their sin for the sake of winning them. We must not belittle their rebellion. We must never nuance their moral crimes into mistakes, errors, or lapses in judgment. We must never seek to diminish in their eyes the reality of the wrath of God. We must, however, be quick to point them to the one and only solution to their problem: the overflowing grace of God. God forgives the repentant. The answer to our guilt is not to deny God, to flee from Him, but to run to Him. “This is the one to whom I [the Lord] will look: he who is humble and contrite in spirit and trembles at my word” (Isa. 66:2b).

We are to seek first the kingdom of God. As we do, however, we would do well to remember that we woke up and began our journey because He breathed life into us. We would do well to remember that while we were yet afar off, He girded up His loins and ran to us, crying, “My son, my son.” We would do well to remember that when we feast with Him at His table, we receive a foretaste of the feast to come. Because we move from grace to grace, we would do well to move from amazed to astonished. If you are in Christ, your Father loves you, forgives you, and is even now pouring out His grace on you. “The Father Himself loves you, because you have loved [Jesus]” (John 16:27). Rejoice, and be exceedingly glad.

Posted in assurance, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, parables, RC Sproul JR, repentance, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Have You Heard?

Gossip, for all its destructive power, and the bounty of warning against it in the Bible, still carries with it an image as a cute or entertaining sin. We laugh at the town matriarch who is more effective at spreading information than the world wide web. We indulge in celebrity gossip while reading the headlines at the checkout at the grocery.

We are, however, able to recognize gossip and its destructive power when it comes in its most vicious form. Person A, knowing person B is completely innocent of said sin, nevertheless tells persons C-Z all about what person B supposedly did and why said person should be cancelled. Once we begin to chip away at all the elements, however, we start thinking the gossip is tame. Maybe person A jumped to an unwarranted conclusion about person B, but genuinely thinks him guilty. Maybe person A only told person C under the strictest confidence, and person C is the one who told persons D-Z. Maybe person B is actually guilty of said sin.

All these “mitigating” circumstances do not change the fact that it is gossip, and it is destructive. It doesn’t help the matter in the least. The real problem is that we like to give gossip, often not for the purpose of harming the victim but for the purpose of pleasing the recipient. And the second problem is that we like being the recipient. The two people talking to each other are simply using the one talked about as a means to an end of elevating their own status.

That the problem is so pervasive is no excuse for it being so pervasive. “Everyone does it” says nothing whatsoever about whether it’s okay to do. It’s not, which is precisely why God condemns it both frequently and vehemently in His Word. How then do we fight it?

First, we don’t do it. When I know, or think I know something about person B I need to ask myself a series of questions before sharing it with anyone else. Do I really know it? Could I be jumping to conclusions? Am I trusting information from an unreliable source? Will me telling someone else be a help to person B? If it’s true, if you know its true and if the person you’re telling never tells another, it’s still gossip if the person you are telling has no right and no need to know the information.

Second, we don’t listen to it. This can be tough because even when we try to stop the gossip being offered to us, the gossiper will try to defend his gossip on the grounds that person B did something really, really bad. When we say to the gossiper, “You know what? I don’t really need to hear this. Please don’t go on. If you need to talk to someone about this, I suggest person B” the gossiper, instead of getting the kudos he was expecting has brought shame upon himself. And he desperately wants the focus on person B’s supposed wrongdoing.

Third, repent. I have experienced in spades the destructive power of gossip. My connection to my father makes gossip about me especially juicy. That said, I’ve also created the destruction that gossip creates. I’m guilty of speaking gossip, and listening to gossip. I’m no better than others. Repentance is the beginning of getting better.

That’s it. If nobody tries to excuse it, if nobody tries to speak it, if nobody is willing to listen to it, it will die a swift death before the damage is done.

Posted in 10 Commandments, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Have You Heard?

Monday’s Study on Romans

Posted in Bible Study, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, eschatology, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Monday’s Study on Romans

Sacred Marriage, God is Near; 70s Cars; Atheists & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, Nostalgia, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sovereignty, That 70s Kid, theology | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage, God is Near; 70s Cars; Atheists & More

Giving the Spirit His Due

Pursuing an understanding of the glory of God is not limited to listing and unpacking sundry attributes. He is not an isolated thing, but is the God who relates. But this is not accidental. Our God, the living God, the triune God is not just a God who relates, but that He relates is essential to what He is. It is not an add-on, any more than being triune is incidental to His being.

Our failure along these lines is, in my judgment, just one more proof that we who are given to thinking through evangelical theology have quite a few Enlightenment snares still besetting us. We think that what defines us is what we are capable of, that we are a string of abilities. And so we think of God in the same way. Even the Westminster Shorter Catechism shows its Enlightenment chains when asking, “What is God?” What? Seriously? Wouldn’t you think the better question, the more biblical question would be, “Who is God?”

We do this whichever person of the Trinity we’re talking about. We describe the Father in terms of His power, His knowledge and His presence. We describe the Son in terms of His ontology, jumping quickly to the vexing mysteries of the incarnation. And when it comes to the Holy Spirit it seems we can’t get through ten minutes of talking about Him before we’re arguing about sign gifts. All of which makes us miss the truly shocking reality of the Spirit- that He indwells us.

It is a right application of the omnipresence of God to remember that wherever we go, God is already there. David himself said so in Psalm 139. God’s presence, however, isn’t merely a function of His ubiquity, His transcendence over all things, but of His indwelling, His immanence. To put it another way, God is not just with us universally, but is with us, believers, personally. Can you believe that? I don’t need to fear that my prayers never get past the ceiling. God is with me on my knees. I don’t need to look to the hills hoping He will come to me. He has never and will never leave me. The folly that thinks, like Adam and Eve in the garden, I can hide from God, is defeated because wherever I go, there He is.

It is good to remember that the Holy Spirit is not just a force. It is better to remember that He is a full-fledged person of the godhead. It is best, however, to remember that He is God not just with us, but in us. But wait, there’s more. He is not just in us, but there He cleanses us, guides us, instructs us, comforts us, strengthens us and fully, and immutably loves us. He is not just in us, but for us. All from within. Praise His name. He is the Spirit of the Living God.

Posted in Apostles' Creed, assurance, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, psalms, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Giving the Spirit His Due

Romans Study Tonight, Beginning Chapter 7

Tonight we continue our look at the monumental, towering book of Romans. All are welcome to our home at 7 est, or you may join us for dinner at 6:15. We will also stream the study at Facebook, RC-Lisa Sproul. We hope you’ll join us.

Posted in announcements, Bible Study, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , | Comments Off on Romans Study Tonight, Beginning Chapter 7

Why are doctrinally sound Christians so often cold?

First, this question is built on a broad, sweeping generalization. A true one, yes, but I’m not affirming either that all doctrinally sound Christians are cold, nor that all warm Christians are not doctrinally sound. That said, there is a reason for the stereotype. Many amateur theologians are experts at straining out doctrinal gnats while swallowing cold camels. My theory is a simple one- they’re cold because they don’t believe what they say they believe.

How do I know this? Because if they believed what they say they believe they wouldn’t be cold. They affirm what they affirm. They defend what they defend. They explain what they explain. But believe? Believing is more than mere affirmation, defense and explanation. As any sound amateur theologian will tell you, to believe the gospel includes fiducia, rest, or trust. The demons affirm the gospel. They could both defend it and explain it. But they don’t rest in it. They don’t love it, but hate it. They believe, and tremble in terror.

Such is not the case for colder believers. Instead, while they rest in the gospel, it is an uneasy rest. As with all of us it is a rest that wars against our flesh. The flesh rears its ugly head in the life of the lover of theology through the gateway of pride. How our depravity is made evident in that we who affirm we are totally depraved still manage to be proud that we affirm total depravity. Our prideful depravity is evident in our careful affirmation that works are not the ground of our justification but the fruit thereof, followed by our pride for being able to articulate that distinction.

Consider also the frequent frustration those of us who affirm God’s sovereignty over all things have over fellow believers who don’t affirm God’s sovereignty over all things. Disagreement? Of course. A desire to help? By all means. But frustration? Every Calvinist should lose his Calvinist card whenever he forgets that the Arminians’ Arminianism is all a part of God’s sovereign plan. When we forget that such were some of us. When we forget that despite that theological mistake, oftentimes the Arminian has a deeper love toward our Lord than we do.

Some people marvel that Dr. John MacArthur and my father were able to get along, and fight side by side over the years despite their differences. They were simply following in the footsteps of John Wesley and George Whitefield. These two men led the Great Awakening, worked together to form Methodism. Their ability to get along, however, took a hit when Wesley published an essay against Calvinism. Whitefield’s disciples asked him, following Wesley’s death, if he thought he’d see Wesley in heaven. Whitefield wisely replied, “No. John will be so much closer to the throne of grace than I will, I don’t think I’ll be able to see him.” Whitefield had the superior theology, but his heart was anything but cold.

A person who affirms the doctrines of grace says, “Look at what I’ve figured out.” A person who believes the doctrines of grace says, “Look at what God in His glorious grace has done.” Pray that we all would not only believe more accurately but more fervently and humbly.

Posted in Ask RC, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, Doctrines of Grace, grace, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, theology | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The Sole Soul of the Solas

It puzzles me deeply that so few are puzzled deeply by the paradox. We are so used to the befuddling language that we miss its befuddling nature. It ought to stop us in our tracks and arrest our attention, like those signs I see for Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Bank I could understand. Third Bank I could understand. I could understand them merging to become Fourth Bank. But Fifth Third Bank? What does that even mean?

In like manner, how is it that when our spiritual ancestors, our theological heroes, set out to tell us one thing, they ended up telling us five things? Suppose I had lived in a cave for the last five hundred years and then met someone who wanted to get me up to speed on the Reformation and what I should believe. What if they said: “There are five things. The first one is sola. . .”? Would I not have to say: “Stop right there. If there are five, how can even one of them be called sola?”

It does, of course, in the end make perfect sense. The alones are not alone because they are talking, in a manner of speaking, on different wavelengths. An infinite line is really infinite, but it doesn’t cover everything. An infinite plane is, in a manner of speaking, even more infinite than an infinite line, but it doesn’t cover everything. What sola Scriptura is seeking to keep out isn’t grace, faith, Christ, or God’s glory. It’s trying to keep out unbiblical tradition. Grace alone doesn’t exclude the Bible, faith, Christ, or the glory of God.

In a very real sense, though they spin on different axes, these five are one. The Bible alone is God’s infallible revelation of His glory, which reveals His grace in Christ, which becomes ours through the gift of faith. God’s grace is uniquely revealed in His Word, which reveals the work of Christ, which becomes ours by faith, all redounding to His glory. The solas are precise and potent affirmations of this truth—it’s all about God. They remind us not just how we might have peace with God but that peace with God is not the full and final end of all things. They remind us that the story of the Bible isn’t simply how we who are in dire straits can make it to safety and how nice God is to play such an important role in making that happen. Instead, they remind us that He is the end, and we are the means. The story is about Him and His glory more than us and our comfort.

Jesus makes much the same point in the Sermon on the Mount. He recognizes our weaknesses. We are self-centered, concerned with ourselves and what we perceive our needs to be. So, we worry about what we will eat and what we will wear. We fret about our provision and our status. What Jesus doesn’t tell us, however, is: “Now, look, you have no need to worry about these things because you have someone on your side. Other people might need to worry, but you don’t because My Father in heaven is for you. You can pursue these things with confidence, knowing that you have the supreme advantage of having the supreme being on your side.”

What He tells us instead is surprising. He tells us to set aside our petty concerns and, depending on how you look at it, to set our minds on one or two things. He said, “Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness.” Do we now have seven solas? Ought we to add the kingdom and His righteousness to the alones? By no means. These are all still together the one thing. There is an organic unity not only between the kingdom and the righteousness but between these two solas and the five solas of the Reformation. We are not failing to pursue the kingdom of God when we are seeking after His righteousness. We are not failing to pursue His righteousness when we are seeking after His kingdom. We are pursuing one thing— one way—to honor and serve our Maker and Redeemer by affirming our dependence on Him and His preeminence in all things.

The God we serve is one. As such, He calls us to follow one path. His commands are never and can never be pitted against each other. His wisdom is never and can never be pitted against itself. His grace is never and can never be pitted against His character. When we find ourselves torn, confused, pulled in different directions, it isn’t because we are faithfully following Him but because we are not. It isn’t because we are faithfully heeding His voice but because we are not.

The two—His kingdom and His righteousness—are one as the five— the solas of the Reformation—are one as the Three—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—are One. And these three groupings are one as well. In the end, they are all about the beginning. From the beginning they have always been about the end. For our lives are and always will be bound up together in the Alpha and the Omega.

Posted in 10 Commandments, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, eschatology, grace, Holy Spirit, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, Reformation, sovereignty, theology, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on The Sole Soul of the Solas

Black and White and Red All Over

What would you do, my father once wisely asked, if Jesus Christ Himself were to speak to you and make this promise- “I promise that nothing bad will ever happen to you again.”? Can you imagine? What would that do for your love for Him? What would it do to your joy? How established would your peace, your patience be if you heard Jesus promise this to you? How might the fruit of the Spirit flourish and bloom all about you? As much as I would like to dig more deeply into this promise (you can read more about it in my book Believing God) my point in this brief piece is that He has indeed so promised. Jesus tells you this in His letter to the church at Rome.

What, you don’t remember what Jesus said in that letter? This might help. Jesus also said, “Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel by God which He promised before through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures…” Jesus finished this particular epistle this way, “Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which has been kept secret since the world began but now has made manifest, and by the prophetic Scriptures has been made known to all nations, according to the commandment of the everlasting God, for obedience to the faith—to God, alone wise, be glory through Jesus Christ forever, Amen.” In between, of course, He promised that all things work together for good to those who love God, who have been called according to His purpose.

In our defense of the doctrine of the inspiration of Scripture we are careful, as we should be, to guard against crass forms of inspiration. We deny that Moses, David, Jeremiah, Luke, Paul, that all the writers of the Bible left their personalities, convictions and styles at the door when recording holy writ. They were no mere human recording mechanisms taking dictation. We speak well when we say David wrote this Psalm, or Isaiah spoke this prophecy. We then rightly hedge in the other side when we affirm that God is the author of all of His Word, that the Bible is the very vox Dei, the voice of God. All well and good.

That doesn’t mean, however, that we have escaped the subtle temptation to treat the red letters in our Bibles as the really important stuff. We would never consciously think such a thought, let alone speak such a sentiment. We would, however, because we are fools, fall into such a trap. How do we escape? We remember that the Bible is Jesus’ Word twice over, that every bit of black on white is red twice.

First, of course, the apostles who wrote for us the New Testament (and those who wrote the Old, though that is a rather longer walk to cover) were sent forth by Christ as His spokesmen, as His emissaries, as His apostles. The one who is sent speaks with all the authority of the one who sends him. If Paul says that all things work together for good, then Jesus says all things work together for good. It’s that simple.

The second point, however, ought to clinch the deal. This Jesus who sent Paul to speak to us, also sent the Spirit to speak through him. The Holy Spirit, who is of course with the first and second person of the Trinity, the same in substance, equal in power and glory, nevertheless proceeds from the Father and from the Son. God the Spirit, in breathing out all the Bible, is joyfully doing so at the command of Jesus. Jesus sent them both.

By all means, hear the voice of Paul. By all means hear the whisper of the Spirit. But, by necessity, hear the gentle words of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is all His Word, and it is all for you. As such our Bibles should be black and white and read all over, hearing the voice of the Master.

Posted in assurance, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, hermeneutics, Holy Spirit, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Black and White and Red All Over