#JesusToo

We are all rather quick to lay claim to the title “victim.” The truth is we are all victims. Every mother’s son of us has, at one time or another, been the victim of someone else’s sins against us. It happens to all of us, however, because it happens by all of us. Every mother’s son of us has, at one time or another, victimized someone else with our sins. This, please understand, does not flatten out all sins. Neither does it excuse any sins. I cannot escape my guilt for victimizing others by pointing to my having been victimized by others. I’m not suggesting either that when we are victimized our calling is ever and always to pretend it never happened.

My goal instead is to demonstrate the contrast between the ways of the world and the way of Jesus. To achieve the status of “victim” in our day is to win the prize. We seem to think that parading around the sins committed against us somehow atones for the sins we commit. We win sympathy, accolades, sometimes even fame and fortune. We are led to the front row, the head of the class and eventually, our face graces the cover of People magazine.

Jesus, we should remember, does identify with victims. When He confronted Saul on the road to Damascus He asked not why Saul was persecuting the church, but why he was persecuting Him. That’s solidarity. Jesus warns us that the persecution He experienced is precisely what we should expect from those around us, reminding us that the servant is not greater than the Master. We are, when persecuted for His name’s sake, united with Him.

That said, the true gospel glory is found in this- Jesus identifies with us, not just when we are victims but as we are victimizers. It is in our sin that He finds us, that He is united to us, that He is punished instead of us. When we confess our sins, He is the one who cries out, “Me too.” He confesses not just before the watching world, but before His own Father- “I did that.” And what did He receive for identifying with us victimizers? Crucifixion. The outpouring on Him of the full wrath and fury of His Father. Shame, degradation, and death. All of which is what we are due.

Jeffrey Epstein, the cruel victimizer, having taken the innocence of so many, purportedly took his own life. Jesus of Nazareth, the gentle Lamb of God, having taken the guilt of so many, laid down His life. Both died of their own wills. One, however, did so to escape earthly judgment for his own sins. The Other did so to take on the heavenly judgment for the sins of others, for my sins and yours.

Identity politics is a stinking morass of self, defining ourselves by our victim group. Identity theology, wherein Jesus identifies with sinners like us is a sweet aroma of grace and life, of paradise. Because He identifies with victimizers He leads us, once dead, to victory. #metoo

Posted in 10 Commandments, assurance, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, grace, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, repentance, scandal, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What counsel would you give to the newly married?

It is not, I believe, an accident that marriage is described in the Bible as “leaving and cleaving.” This not only defines marriage well but highlights one of the ways we so often get it wrong. Before we are married our allegiance and identity, generally speaking, is defined by the family we were born into. While we may establish our own homes, we don’t usually establish a differing identity. That happens with “I do” but the mental and emotional shift tends to involve some grinding of gears. This is true not only of bride and groom, but both sets of parents and even beyond that. No one likes giving up what they once had with either party of a new family. But such is our calling. We witness weddings not only to remind bride and groom of their vows, but to remind ourselves that a new family was formed.

Your best friend that wants to know your deepest thoughts on how things are going? They’re not your best friend anymore. Your spouse is. If you’re having trouble, talk to your spouse about it. That groomsman that warned you about some flaws he saw in your wife, and wants to know if he’s right? He doesn’t get to know. It’s none of his concern. The circle of loyalty doesn’t grow with a wedding but shrinks. The tightest circle consists of just two.

I’m not suggesting that all other relationships simply come to an end when we marry. I am suggesting that they all change. By all means continue to honor your parents. Seek their counsel, the two of you together. By all means, continue to be a good friend, but do so remembering that good fences make for good neighbors. Remember that when you are struggling with your spouse your friend a. will only hear your side of the story, b. will almost certainly side with you c. won’t forgive your spouse when you do and d. will not have the wisdom to know how little he or she has. If you are the friend, send your friend back to their best friend. “You are right, and your spouse wrong” is likely the last thing your friend needs to hear, even if he or she is right and the spouse wrong.

Marriage is hard. Moving from wedding to marriage can be especially hard. We’re often not prepared for it. The devil, however, is. He will push every button, lay every snare to weaken the ties that bind us, even using the ties that we have rightly loosed in marrying. And both parties can find themselves bewildered.

Alongside leaving and cleaving I’d argue that the defining quality of a marriage is that it consists of two sinners who love each other. Here the devil pits these two truths against each other. “If he loved you, he wouldn’t have sinned against you in that way.” “You know she just says she loves you. It’s a lie and her behavior proves it.” No. Two sinners, not one. One may sin more than the other, but likely not enough to matter. To beat the devil here marriage must rightly be seen as two sinners who love each other enough to repent and to forgive.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, friends, friendship, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Someone is Wrong on the Internet

It takes two to tango, and that doesn’t even include the band. Our choices, our behaviors, are rarely as discreet as we think they are. Not only do our decisions bleed into our other decisions, they touch on other people’s lives, more often than not. No man is an island; neither is any man a peninsula.

First, consider gossip. If gossip is spoken in the woods and no one hears, does it still make a mess? Guarding our tongues is important. But we need to guard our ears as well. Without an audience, gossip dies on the vine. It isn’t gossip when I know something you don’t. It isn’t gossip when you find out what I knew first. It’s only gossip when I get to be the one telling you. Ego and pride drive the tongue and open the ear.

The same is true of controversy. In the prototypical schoolyard fight, there is typically the victim, the bully, and the cowards. While we rightly cheer for the victim and hiss at the bully, the cowards, too, deserve our opprobrium. They haven’t even the willingness to risk what the bully has, and worse still, they provide the audience he craves.

The Internet has not helped. Cyber-bullies hide behind proxy servers and false names. Victims slowly learn that fighting back only encourages them. And there is no vice principal patrolling the hallways and breaking things up. Then there are the cowards. They create the page views, and some even input their own comments, usually anonymously, yelling, “Fight, fight,” while they sit three rows back. They create the audience that is the real raison d’être of the controversy to begin with.

Internet controversy gives us the liberty to play theological video games. That is, it is vicarious, faux drama, exciting enough to keep us tapping away at our keyboards but not so exciting that we lose sleep. We read an attack site (discernment blog, as some like to call themselves), and find that the kingdom is crumbling because Joel Osteen’s book is being carried in some LifeWay store somewhere, or because a guy in our camp invited a guy in their camp to speak at a conference. We head over to our favorite guru’s blog to get the straight skinny on just what the respectable ones are saying about this issue or that.

In all this reading, all this key-stroking, what we are really stroking is our egos. We think that by keeping up with the controversy we are really fighting the battle. And because of all the Internet play it is getting, we know it is the battle for the ages. We think we are fighting off Suleiman’s Muslim assault on Vienna, preserving Western Christianity, when all we are really doing is playing with toy soldiers. Like those who fought in the Saint Crispin’s Day battle, we can then go to our beds thinking ourselves fine fellows for having been in the fight. We, in short, aim far and miss far.

There are true, important, eternity- in-the-balance controversies going on all around us. There are fights we are called not merely to egg on from the sidelines but to join. The calculus for the importance of any particular battle, in terms of its lasting impact on the great war between the seed of the woman and the seed of the Serpent, is simple enough. First, we need to know how large is the teaching ministry of the principals involved in the battle. We need to know how many unique visits this guy’s website gets. We need to know how many people recognize his name. The higher those numbers, the less important the battle.

The real battles are these: Will I speak graciously to my children today? Will I have a grateful and cheerful heart about my neighbors, my fellow employees, those with whom I worship? Will I go to war against gossip, not by pointing out the gossip of others but by tending my own garden? Whether some evangelical superstar embraces some mystical prayer form is less important to the kingdom’s future than whether I will pray faithfully for that little girl with the brain tumor.

It is true that the world out there matters. There are controversies that count. Martin Luther changed the world, facing bullies like David before Goliath. But when his beloved wife, Katie, trusted in the finished work of Christ alone, that changed eternity.

Not many of us worry about what we will eat or what we will wear. Sadly, that’s not because we’re so spiritual; rather, it is because we are so prosperous. Having been freed from such worries, do we then focus on pursuing the kingdom of God and His righteousness, or do we instead worry about the future of this theological coalition or the direction of that ideological podcast? Pursue the kingdom by pursuing His righteousness. And then all these things will be added to you. Stop your fretting. The future does not depend on you. It depends on the One on whom you depend.

There is someone wrong on the Internet. It’s probably you. Log off, hug your kids, kiss your wife, and go get some of His rest. The world will not only be there when you get back, it will have been made better.

Posted in Big Eva, church, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Not With Flesh and Blood

It’s always a good thing to remember that when the Bible reminds us of something it’s likely because we are prone to forget. Given God’s absolute authority, anything He says once is sufficiently compelling that we have a duty to believe it. He doesn’t stutter. But He does tell us some things more than once. He reminds us, for instance, that the battle we are engaged in, which traces all the way back to Eden, is not just against the world and our own flesh, but against the devil. We battle with principalities and powers.

We are losing, however, the battle to remember. The great bulk of evangelical believers are willing to affirm that demons are real, and evil. Most, however, would likewise affirm that they are far. Demons, we seem to think, have high tailed it out of developed countries and now wage war only in the dark corners of this world. Which is sure proof enough that they are quite active right here.

C.S. Lewis, in his classic work The Screwtape Letters argues that the devil typically follows one of two strategies. Either he seeks to present himself as the evil god, ever present, all-powerful, a force to be feared. Or, he seeks to hide himself, to be forgotten. I suspect he is much more effective when he is able to take the latter tack. In our day I suspect the average evangelical is less likely to believe in the active work of the demonic than is the average unbeliever.

I am currently reading a fascinating book by Ryan Pitterson, The Judgment of the Nephilim. Therein he makes his case that the account in Genesis 6 of the sons of God intermarrying with the daughters of men isn’t about the godly line of Seth and the line of Cain coming together, but of fallen angels and human women. I was once firmly in the Seth/Cain camp but have almost completed the journey to the other side. What I am utterly convinced of along the way is that the battle between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent isn’t merely between believers and unbelievers but is between Holy Spirit indwelt believers and unholy spirits at work in unbelievers.

Spiritual warfare is here, now, real, destructive, important. That said, the weapons of our warfare are not carnal. Indeed they are as powerful as they are ordinary. The weapons of our warfare are fruit, both the fruit of the Spirit and that fruit of the vine. The weapons of our warfare are faith, hope and love. The weapons of our warfare are trust and gratitude. Our victories are rarely fit for some blockbuster movie screen. More often they come through simple prayers, words of encouragement and biblical counsel.

Let us daily put on the full armor of God, acknowledging the nature of our warfare and through the ordinary, yet extraordinarily potent means of grace, make known the glorious reign of our King.

Posted in abortion, Biblical Doctrines, Biblical theology, Big Eva, church, Devil's Arsenal, Holy Spirit, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, theology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Not With Flesh and Blood

No Coveting; Rumors of Wars; Happy Fasting & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, creation, eschatology, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Month of Sundays, politics, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on No Coveting; Rumors of Wars; Happy Fasting & More

Lawless Law, or No Dog in This Fight

The purported value of ethical relativism, the idea that there are no transcendent, binding rules for right and wrong that all humans are morally required to submit to, is that it allows us to live in peace. That is, if you have your ethics, and I have my ethics, well then there is no real need for us to fight over whose ethic wins. (So long, as, of course, our lives never actually cross.) The real value is far more sinister. We find ethical relativism appealing because we find our own guilt unappealing. Though we seek to suppress such knowledge, we all know that God is, that He is holy, that we are not, and that we are in trouble. Not the kind of pleasant thoughts one wants to go to sleep thinking on, so we suppress that truth. Do away with ethics and we do away with His holiness, our guilt, and therefore our trouble.

Trouble is, we don’t live in our own solipsistic bubbles. Our worlds do collide. Consider the case of Jason Collins, the NBA player who about ten years back announced in Sports Illustrated, that he engages in sexual acts with men. On the one hand we are not supposed to judge him. After all, there is no transcendent standard that says men should only take their pants off with their wives. On the other hand, we are supposed to not judge him. Wait. How did that get in there? Sodomy is fine because there is no moral standard we all must meet. But we must all approve sodomy because there is a moral standard we all must meet. Says who? If there is no transcendent moral standard by which we must condemn sexual perversion, where did this transcendent moral standard come from, that insists we must not condemn sexual perversion? Somebody is imposing their own ethic here, and it’s not the Christians.

Jason Collins was the first male professional athlete to admit he mistreats men. For that he received magazine covers, applause from the entire Good Morning American television crew, congratulatory phone calls from the first lady, and a thumbs up from her husband. Where, I am left wondering, was all this for the first male professional athlete to admit he mistreats dogs? Where was the Michael Vick coming out party? I want to live in a world where dog fighters need no longer live in fear and shame. How many young dog fighters could have been set free from bigotry if the world had simply affirmed Michael when he bravely acknowledged his habits? It’s a cold world when a dog fighter can’t be affirmed in what he is.

That’s different? Why? Because dogs can’t give their consent, while Mr. Collins’ victim and victimizers can and do? So who made consent the magic word? (And is it really that magic? What about adult incest? Will we celebrate our diversity, and hand Jackie Robinson’s mantle to the first professional athlete to come out of the adult incest closet? ) Why does consent make all personal moral decisions now become transcendently sound moral decisions? Did God say consent is the key? Or was that just some men? And if other men disagree? Why is consent privileged, thereby making child molesters suddenly become evil? By what standard?

Ethical relativism is not merely absurd. It is instead that tool by which God’s judgments are not just banished, but judged as beyond the pale. The end game isn’t “Nobody gets to affirm right and wrong” but “You Christians may not affirm right and wrong.” Which is why sexual perverts do not merely ask for tolerance but demand affirmation. Their own worldview won’t allow it, but when has that ever stopped them?

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, persecution, philosophy, politics, post-modernism, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What is the three-fold use of the law?

God’s law serves at least three purposes, which Calvin wisely expressed. He affirmed that the law first serves as a mirror for us. It reveals the perfect character of God, and in so doing, it exposes our sin. This might be called the schoolmaster function. The law instructs us in our need for God’s grace. It reveals His perfection, and our failure to measure up. It reveals our need for Christ.

The second use is often called the civil use of the law. Here Calvin argued that those outside the kingdom are restrained by the revelation of the law. It doesn’t change the heart of the unregenerate, but it can create a sense of fear. As the civil law reflects God’s revealed law, and with it, civil sanctions, it restrains the wicked.

The third use of the law is likely the most controversial. Calvin argued that the law reveals to us that which is pleasing to God. That is, it tells us what to do. As we obey it we please Him. Some fear that in embracing this third use we muddy up the first use. If we argue with respect to the law, “This you must do” are we not at least obscuring the truth that “This you cannot do”?

My fear, however, operates in the other direction. If we obscure the third use of the law we obscure the first use of the law. That is, if we are not called and required to follow the commands of God, our failure to do so doesn’t mean we are at enmity with God. The schoolmaster cannot tell us of our need for atonement if we have not failed to do what we are called to do. Secondly, however, without the third use of the law we end up worse off than the heathen. We don’t know what to do. We are left without direction. If we are not called to do what the law of God says, how will we decide what to do?

Some will say, “Let love decide.” Great answer. Trouble is, the Great Commandment, which calls us to love God and our neighbor, is that which binds up all the law and the prophets (Matthew 22:40). Which means that “love” is not a new, indistinct, culturally conditioned law, but is instead the law of God. We are not left with what we think love means, by abandoning the law, but are left with what love actually means by keeping the law.

The third use of the law, however, has this other benefit. We could see it as the other side of the second use coin, or as an extension of the third use. The law tells us how to have a good life. It tells us how to be blessed. It tells us how to do what we were made to do. To put it more poetically, the law is the gateway to joy. This is less because, especially for believers, God sends thunderbolts down on us when we disobey Him, or rose petals on us when we obey. It is more because the law is good in itself. Obedience is blessing long before obedience brings blessing. We were made for this.

David certainly needed the law to convict him, to point him to his need for Christ. But he sang, “Oh how I love your law” (Psalm 119:97) for the joy that it brings. God’s law is not a list of pleasures we are not allowed to have, a list of delights we are not allowed to touch. It is instead pleasure and delight. Having been, while yet unbelievers, restrained, having been at our conversion convicted, having been in our walk instructed, may we be in our hearts, as we will be in eternity, ever joyful.

Posted in 10 Commandments, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, ethics, grace, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Pleasures Forevermore


“Two things I ask of you; deny them not to me before I die: Remove far from me falsehood and lying; give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with the food that is needful for me, lest I be full and deny you and say, ‘Who is the Lord?’ or lest I be poor and steal and profane the name of my God.”

So the wisdom of Agur, found in Proverbs 30, reminds us. Though sin knows no tax brackets — the poor can be greedy and the rich envious — peculiar circumstances tend to produce peculiar temptations. Agur fears that should God lead him into poverty, he might be tempted to steal and thus profane the name of God. He fears in turn that should God lead him into great riches, he might forget God. He asks God to protect him, through His providence, from both temptations.

Many of us, oddly, are in both categories, at least in some sense. In a culture driven by dissatisfaction, we can all at least feel poor. The Joneses stay always ahead of us, pushing us onward. A rocky economy feeds our economic insecurities, and we are tempted, if not to steal, at least to cut some moral corners. Virtue and integrity can be expensive, and we can always buy them back when better times come. On the other hand, we are not the 99 percent but are in the 99th percentile. That is, by world historical standards, compared to all the people who ever lived on this planet, even if we are among the most poor in America, each of us is in the top one percent in terms of comforts, luxury, ease and wealth. Our poor are wealthier than kings of old. There is no shame in being poor. There is no guilt in being wealthy. There is, however, shame in stealing and guilt in failing to give thanks.

A God-centered life, then, is not found in feeding a constant craving for more, better, newer. Neither, however, is it found in embracing an ascetic aesthetic, eschewing the good gifts of God. He is the giver of every good gift, both contentment in abasement and a shiny new car. He is not impressed with our piety if we accept the former but turn up our nose at the latter, thinking ourselves too pure for such crass blessings.

The issue, then, isn’t the size of our bank accounts or the square footage of our homes. The issue is the perspective of our hearts. A God-centered life is one that gives thanks in all His providences. It was one of the wealthiest men of ancient antiquity who spoke these wisest of words: “The Lord gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord” (Job 1:21).

The issue isn’t in what we have but in what we want. What do we long for? What do we daydream about? How do we measure ourselves and the success or failure of our efforts? Who do we look up to, and what is it about them that we admire? The broader culture is obsessed with the rich and the famous. Tabloids at the grocery store, tabloid television, Internet gossip sites — these all feed our insatiable desire to know what they are like, how they live.

The evangelical world, as is so often the case, has its own version of the cultural phenomenon. We have rock-star preachers, Lollapalooza-like conferences and concerts, and, as well, Internet sites complete with all the latest gossip on who is hot, who is not, and the reasons why.

We, however, are in the world but are not to be of the world. We are called to aspire for not just something better but the one needful thing. We are called, in living a God-centered life, to seek God’s kingdom, to pursue God’s righteousness.

We are blessed to be shown the way to the one thing that will satisfy. A God-centered life, in the end, isn’t self-denying. It, instead, is how we find ourselves. Jesus said we would find our lives in losing them. Augustine said our hearts are restless until they find their rest in Him. And John Piper reminds us that God is most glorified in us when we are most satisfied in Him. The glory of the contentment, the blessing of the car, is not found in the contentment nor in the car, but in the Giver of these good gifts.

Our calling is to look through every good gift to the One giving it. He is the goodness in which the gifts live and move and have their being. He gives Himself. This is the path of life. Our end is that we would be in His presence, that we would rejoice to be there. His promise is not only that we will find pleasures at His right hand, but that we will find them forevermore (Ps. 16).

Whether grasping for more or turning up our noses at what He has given, we miss Him. The Lord blesses us and He keeps us. The Lord makes His face to shine upon us and He is gracious to us. The Lord lifts up His countenance upon us and gives us peace, now and forevermore (Num. 6:24–26).

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Devil's Arsenal, grace, kingdom, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The Cross and the Crown, or, Jesus Changes Everything

Chattel slavery. Suttee, the practice of burning widows at their husband’s funeral. Racism. Sex trafficking. Child exposure. Hunger. Disease. Abortion.

It’s a woefully partial list. These are just a few of the social evils that Christians have fought against over the centuries, driven by their Christian faith. There are some that even left-leaning unbelievers have been co-belligerents against, and others where they have been on the other side. Others that might be on the list, income inequality, property rights, affirmative action, racial color-blindness sadly have Christians fighting on differing sides. When that happens, rest assured that soon enough some Christians will complain that those on the other side have forgotten the gospel, and gotten political.

I know of one fellow who was speaking at a local gathering of professing believers who suggested that Jesus had come to bring good news to the poor. He said Jesus wanted to see captives set free and the oppressed enjoying liberty. That fellow, of course, was Jesus. He announced this as He first began His public ministry (Luke 4:18). He did not see such ministry as a distraction to His ministry but as its nature. Now we can spiritualize these conditions. We were the poor in spirit who are enriched by the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. We were captive to our sin who have been set at liberty. Oui and amen as the French are wont to say.

We can also denude the spiritual emphasis and become full time social gospel evangelists, thinking the point of Jesus coming is to establish the gospel according to Marx. We can think we’re doing the work of the ministry when we make the poor poorer and tighten the captives chains. Mais non, as I wish the French would say.

Or we can understand that Jesus is Lord over all things. That His gospel is not just about the redeeming of our souls but the remaking of His world. That He came to bring good news to the poor, and to set captives free. Just as there is no square inch of reality that He does not declare as His own, so there is no discussion, no realm, no sphere, no political debate that He will allow Himself to be excluded from. No, that He will allow Himself to not be the center of. “All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things and in Him all things consist” (Col. 1:17). Every unborn child, every tax-payer, every citizen of every nation, every institution, every political structure is created through Him and for Him.

Any honorable effort to make visible the reign of Jesus over all things is not a distraction from the gospel but a manifestation of the gospel. Those who would argue otherwise at best have an anemic and truncated gospel, at worst seek to deny His rightful authority.

The weapons of our warfare are not carnal. History is littered with professing believers who wrapped up their own ambitions in the name of Jesus and fought with sword and spear. The problem, each time, was the ambitions and the sword and spear, not the name of Jesus, nor His ambitions. Jesus is Lord.

Posted in "race", 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, politics, preaching, RC Sproul JR, sexual confusion, sovereignty | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Sacred Marriage, 9th Commandment; Ordaining Women & More

This Week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, Good News, grace, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Nostalgia, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, That 70s Kid | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Sacred Marriage, 9th Commandment; Ordaining Women & More