Goodness, Truth and Beauty

What hath Jerusalem to do with Athens? Much in every way. On the negative side, we would do well to remember that the citizens of God’s city, like those in the city of man, are still sinners. Though we are indwelt by God’s Holy Spirit, though we have been given hearts of flesh, we remain sinners on this side of the veil, not utterly unlike those around us. Thus Jesus, in His Sermon on the Mount, enjoins us not to do that which still comes all too naturally to us, to fret and worry about our food or our clothing. Such things, He tells us, the heathen worry about.

On a more positive note, Jerusalem and Athens have this in common: they are ruled by the same Man. That is, Jesus is Lord of both. There is no city over which Jesus does not reign. He is Lord over all of creation. We must be zealous to make this affirmation with boldness. We must, however, do so with care.

That Jesus is Lord of Athens does not mean that all is well with Athens. We cannot safely assume the city to be safe because our Lord rules over it. Instead, remembering the antithesis, the biblical truth that the seed of the woman and the seed of the Serpent will war against one another until the kingdom comes in its fullness, the reign of Jesus over Athens means Athens is in trouble. The city belongs to Jesus, and yet it rebels against Him. His lordship is less an imprimatur over the city and more a Sword of Damocles, a constant threat of judgment.

There is a third thing these cities have in common. Not only does Jesus rule both, not only are both cities populated by sinners, but both are populated by those who bear God’s image. Though the seed of the Serpent is at war with God and His people, they still bear His imprint. We see this theme repeated several times in the Bible. God calls His children to exercise dominion over the creation. The wicked line of Cain is not lazy with respect to exercising dominion. Bearing God’s image, it goes to work, turns mud into bricks, and builds a tower to make a name for itself. That this line does not labor for God’s glory but its own is a sign of sin. That it builds at all is a sign of God’s image. The same is true with respect to worship. In Romans 1, Paul belabors both that all men everywhere worship and that outside of Gods’ active grace in our lives, we all worship creatures rather than the Creator. Because we are God’s image bearers, we worship. Because we are in rebellion, we worship falsely.

This ought to inform our understanding of how these two cities relate. We do not send out envoys of peace against the enemies of God, beating our swords into plowshares. Neither, however, do we allow our sense of antithesis to cloud our common humanity, or better still, our common bearing of God’s image. Thus, we do not determine that piety demands that we who worship the risen Lord ought to walk on our hands, because the children of darkness walk on their feet. We do not assume that the right thing is for Christians to hate their children because unbelievers love their children. Instead, we thank the Lord of all for all that we still have in common. Instead, we encourage all that is good, true, and beautiful in Athens, knowing that, in the end, it all must belong to the Lord.

The Athenian Plato was not, contra those who would forget the antithesis, a sadly uninformed but brilliant man whose well-intentioned philosophical meanderings can be richly gleaned for wisdom. He was instead, as we all were prior to the work of the Spirit of God in us, an enemy of God. His philosophical thoughts had as their end goal the denying of God. Plato was, with respect to wisdom, deaf, dumb and blind. He could not, according to the Scripture, even see the kingdom of God (John 3:3). There is wisdom, however, in that nugget that suggests “even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then.” Plato did not tell us anything we did not already know when he first suggested that the three high virtues are goodness, truth, and beauty. He did, however, speak well, truthfully, and beautifully in so saying. Plato, in drawing our attention to goodness, truth, and beauty, made manifest the image of God in his own life, and in turn taught us how to better recognize that image in others. When unbelieving firefighters act heroically — when they exhibit the good — we have no reason for shame. When unbelieving scientists speak truthfully, we have no reason for shame. When unbelieving musicians create moments of beauty, we have no reason for shame. For these things neither belong in the end to Jerusalem nor to Athens. Instead, they belong to the One who is Lord of both.

Plato recognized the goodness, truth, and beauty of goodness, truth, and beauty. Jesus is goodness, truth and beauty, and every other perfection infinitely. If we would pursue goodness, truth, and beauty, we must pursue Him. We must seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness, and all these things will be added unto us.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, eschatology, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, sovereignty, wonder | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Goodness, Truth and Beauty

Lisa & I on Prov. 31; AI & Jobs? Lord of Darkness & More

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in Economics in This Lesson, Jesus Changes Everything, Lisa Sproul, Nostalgia, RC Sproul JR, Sacred Marriage, That 70s Kid | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Lisa & I on Prov. 31; AI & Jobs? Lord of Darkness & More

Chilling With the Scornful

It has long been my contention that the rampant skepticism about all things supernatural among the Reformed crowd is driven more by modernist assumptions than it is exegesis. We’re in a bit of a pickle, wanting to be true to God’s Word, and to be respectable in the eyes of the world. We affirm inerrancy but nuance our way out of the plain meaning of Genesis 1 and 2, so we don’t end up looking like those tacky fundamentalists. We agree that Jesus cast out demons, but deny demons have any dealings with humans in our day, so we don’t look like those nutty spiritual warriors. We affirm that God hears our prayers, but deny He ever actually does anything truly amazing for us, lest we look like those big haired televangelists.

I’m not a student of Kenneth Copeland. Everything I know about his theology I learned decades ago reading The Agony of Deceit, an expose on the heretical theology of most of our television preachers put together by my friend Dr. Michael Horton. An outstanding book, by the way. I confess as well to having my own doubts when a. Copeland seems to suggest he has the power to divert hurricanes and/or b. claims to have diverted a hurricane. Skepticism and its kissing cousin cynicism are my natural habitat after all.

Which is why God is working on me, and doing something even more astounding than diverting a hurricane- sanctifying me. He reminded me that there was a profound disconnect between my faith that He commands the wind and the waves and my disdain at the notion that a man’s prayers could stop a hurricane dead in its tracks. He showed me the ugliness of my sneering scorn and His call to godliness, to faith, to believing He delights not only to hear the prayers of His children, but to answer them. Too often I not only lack the faith to move mountains but worse, lack the faith to believe others have the faith to move mountains.

This world does not belong to the scientists, the weather experts, nor to the scornful. Rather it belongs to the One who speaks, and reality happens, who not only blows the winds of hurricanes, but throws the swirling tumult of galaxies. And He has promised that He will give it to the trusting, the humble, that the meek will inherit the earth.

We ought to pray with all the innocence of children, asking our Father to quell storms, to heal bodies ravaged by illness, to make it snow in August, to end every war and to fill every hungry belly. And let us do so with no shame, no blushing, no crossed fingers to prove to the cool kids we’re still with it. Let us rise up out of the seat of the scornful. Let us be planted by the rivers of water, our roots reaching so deep into the good soil that not even the greatest storm, should He determine such should come our way, can move us. Let us bring forth the fruit of faith. Let us ask that He will prosper whatsoever we do.

Posted in Biblical Doctrines, Big Eva, church, creation, Devil's Arsenal, Holy Spirit, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, prayer, RC Sproul JR, repentance, sovereignty, theology, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Does God promise to bless this nation if we will repent?

If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land (II Chron. 2: 14).

No. And yes. This well-known text is often quoted by those saddened by our nation’s cultural decline. Conservatives, both political and theological, find here comfort and hope. It doesn’t take long, however, before some more careful and precise exegete makes a salient point- this text is not a generic, proverbial truism, but a specific message to a specific people at a specific time. Said careful exegete will next point out that this nation is not this specific people and said time is not our time.

While the nation of Israel and our own nation have a great deal in common, they are not the same. Both nations were established that God’s people might be free to rightly worship Him. Both nations were founded by people motivated by a desire to please Him. Both nations, however, failed over the years to be faithful. Both nations experienced God’s judgment. That said, God actually commanded Israel to take the land. God actually made a covenant with Israel. God actually sent prophets to Israel. These United States can say none of these things. Therefore, this promise of God cannot rightly be lifted out of its context and its promises appropriated by just any nation.

That said, all of the above is just a bit too pedantic. No one, I suspect, who clings to this text, makes the mistake of equating Israel and these United States. Precious few would argue that God made a covenant with this nation as He did with Israel. Which doesn’t change the broad, proverbial, generic promise of the true and living God that those who repent will be blessed by Him. This is clearly true not just individually but corporately as well. Of course our nation, even if, in God’s economy it is of no more spiritual significance than Latvia, Indonesia or Nineveh, would receive blessing if there were widespread repentance here. If there were widespread repentance in Latvia, Indonesia or Nineveh there would be healing in those lands. Jesus is not just Lord of Israel, but of every tribe and tongue across the globe.

God promises blessings for all those who repent. To persons, to families, to churches, to communities, to states, to nations. Can institutions repent? Excellent question. I’m not sure. But the people in them certainly can, and such will always impact the institutions, for the good. Which means not only should we not be shy about owning this text and the promise therein, we ought to be eager to do so. Let us, as we see destruction all around us, repent to the living God. He will hear from heaven. He will forgive our sins and He will heal His land.

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, church, politics, RC Sproul JR, repentance | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Does God promise to bless this nation if we will repent?

Numbering The Future

Grandchildren are an awful lot like children. They ask questions. They want to know my favorite animal and my favorite food. They have even asked before what my favorite number is. Favorite number? I understand preferring one color to another, as such touches on matters of aesthetics. I understand favorite animals as well, as each different animal uniquely manifests the glory and wisdom of God in creation. Favorite food makes sense too, even if it is just a matter of taste. But favorite number? How would one choose? “Oh, I much prefer 8 because it is divisible by both 2 and 4, whereas poor 9 is only divisible by 3.”

It is not just children, however, who find something sacred in numbers. Professional athletes have been known to pay tens of thousands of dollars to secure the rights to wear particular numbers on their jerseys. Fans, by the thousands, pay hundreds to wear those same numbers on replica jerseys. Nor is this simply a Western phenomenon. Some among the Chinese are so fascinated by the power of numbers that they will name their restaurants after them. I used to frequent one called 4-5-6. Why this obsession with numbers?

I suspect the answer is found in Eden. Numbers, because of their abstract nature, may be that place where our thinking grows closest to God’s. We hear in the harmony of music and we see in the dance of the heavenly spheres echoes and reflections of the beauty of not just creation but the Creator. In its place, this is right and proper. We should always marvel at His glory and power. But we must always remember that His ways are not our ways, His thoughts not our thoughts. We must not, as Satan tempted us, see numbers as a tool for our own power and glory.

As the tenth century drew to its conclusion, too many Christians saw in that grand, round number what they thought was a glimpse into the private thoughts of God. The millennium bug bit us, and we caught the fever. Disappointments along these lines, then and now, can be peculiarly damaging, as theologies are twisted and Scriptures denied in order to explain how our math turned out wrong. If we say, “We know from searching the Scriptures that Jesus will return by this date,” and He does not return, we are left with the choice of affirming either that the Bible is not clear, or worse, wrong, or that Jesus did something else important. (See the founding of Seventh-day Adventism for the latter response.)

As the twentieth century drew to its close, many of us suffered from the same folly. Whether it was 88 Reasons Jesus Will Return in 1988 or even the technological version of millennial fever that we who are Reformed tended to favor, we thought our math would show us the mind and plan of God. We were wrong.

There is, however, a number that has the power to reveal to us God’s will for our lives — first. Jesus commands that we seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness. It’s the only number we need to know. Jesus not only doesn’t tell us to divine the day and the hour, He insists that no man knows this. He doesn’t tell us to cook our numbers so that we might read the future in their tea leaves. He tells us to leave all such foolishness and to be busy about the business of pursuing His kingdom.

Any study of church history ought to remind us of our folly. When we see the saints a thousand years ago thinking they could read the future, we should learn to better read the past. What they should have seen was hundreds and hundreds of more years of God’s people slowly learning to believe all His promises. What we should see is that we haven’t learned quite as much as we would like to think.

Leave the numbers to our one true King. Seek first His kingdom, remembering that there is one faith, one baptism, and one Lord, world without end. Amen.

Posted in Advent, apologetics, church, eschatology, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What’s Your Number?

Psychology, being something of a murky social science, has long been a source of murky attempts to diagnose not just what is wrong with us, but what we are. Pop psychology, especially seems to specialize in personality tests. We carry around with us sundry names and numbers derived from tests we take complete with ovals to fill in with number 2 pencils. What could be more scientific? Meyers Brigs gave me these four letters. Gary Chapman found me in this part of the zoo. I was choleric until they took my spleen and suddenly I became sanguine.

By and large I consider these tests to be a generally benign waste of time. So long as they are understood as little more than the type of quizzes one finds on the internet, “Which Mayberry character are you?” no harm is done. When however, we treat these tests as powerful tools of insight into our true identity, there we start falling into danger. Enter the Enneagram.

Surely the most popular personality profiler of our day, Enneagram, while claiming to reveal our personality type, can’t even claim psychology as its birthplace. Rather, the whole thing came from a purported revelation from a spirit guide. A demon. It is just another example of unbelievers’ minds be handed over to futility, on par with horoscopes and magic crystals.

The problem is that this same foolishness has made deep inroads into the church. Sometimes it’s just a lighthearted quip from the pulpit, “Of course I preach longer than you’d like. After all, my Enneagram is a 7.” Other times, however, the Enneagram is used as the foundation of church events, teachings, counseling. Some churches see the Enneagram as a touch point with the broader culture, an opportunity to demonstrate how hip and up to date our church is. Some seem to genuinely believe that real insights into people’s souls can be had. I saw recently an ad for a conference starring a Christian celebrity built around the Enneagram. It’s bad enough to do such things, but to do them with no shame is all the worse.

We should not, however, be surprised. Even a cursory study of the people of God in the Old Testament demonstrates that even believers have a deep propensity to practice various forms of syncretism. We mix together the worship of the living God with the worship of the spirit of the age. The Enneagram, in addition to its diabolical roots, feeds that same spirit of self-absorption and the spirit of victimization. It allows us to both celebrate and explore ourselves and deflect blame for our failures. “I had to end our marriage. I’m a 3 and you’re a 9.”

Nadab and Abihu learned the hard way the dangers of playing with fire. Leviticus 10 tells us that God struck them, His priests, dead on the spot for bringing strange fire into the sanctuary. We need to learn to steer clear of such dangerous games. What’s my number? I’m a 0.

Posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Biblical Doctrines, church, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on What’s Your Number?

Don’t Take the Bait; Murderous Hearts; Beatings As Blessings

This week’s Jesus Changes Everything Podcast

Posted in 10 Commandments, abortion, apologetics, Devil's Arsenal, ethics, Good News, In the Beginning, Jesus Changes Everything, persecution, politics, RC Sproul JR | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Don’t Take the Bait; Murderous Hearts; Beatings As Blessings

Fairy Dust

It was the writer Arthur C. Clarke who posited this law- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. I disagree. The technology need not be advanced at all. The truth is that the sole reason we don’t see the world all around us as magic is that we are jaded, too cool for the school of wonder. A little fire, a little sand, a little care, a little gentle blowing, and presto chango, we have glass. That’s magic that we now watch at Founders’ Days fairs. A little water, a little sluice box, more fire, a hammer and some nuance, and abracadabra, we have a golden ring.

CS Lewis reminded us of the glory of dirt in his account of the creation of Narnia. As Aslan sings his creation song the ground itself begins to bubble up like a toasted cheese sandwich. Soon those bubbles burst and elephants, badgers, platypi shook off their mantle mantles and walked forth into the light. Having been just born they mistake the evil Uncle Andrew, with his wild shock of hair, for a plant. Believing that hair to be roots they plant him upside down, and the coins in his pocket (silver and gold- this was a bygone era) fall to the ground, and up sprouts trees of silver and gold. The fecundity of Eden, I suspect, would have been much the same.

As Jesus is about the business of remaking, redeeming the world, as He, the second Adam succeeds in fulfilling the dominion mandate, our dirt becomes ever more productive and fruitful. Sand was turned into computer chips such that I rub the tips of my fingers across plastic keys (also formulated from liquid dirt, petroleum) and the words in my head become words on the screen in front of me. Sand turned into glass wires, through pushing a few more buttons, will take those same thoughts across the globe to your magic machine. You are reading my mind right now, all because of magic fairy dust.

Technology is indistinguishable from magic, because it is magic. The exercise of dominion flows out of the image of God in us and is empowered by the same Spirit who said “Let there by light” and there was light. God took nothing and made everything. We, reflecting His glory, take dirt and make widgets. The widgets, however, exist ultimately not for our comfort, but for our sanctification. They exist so that we might give thanks, that we might praise the One whose image we bear. To be jaded, to fail to be astonished that hot water pours forth when we twist a knob, that cool air flows into our homes, offices, shops and cars with the push of a button, that sheep become sweaters, that iron, wood, and cat gut become guitars to accompany our praise, is to be bored by magic.

Dust has a greater power still. When it is molded and shaped, then filled with the breath of life, it in turn speaks words of life, just as its Maker did. Words- spoken, written, preached- these bring life from death, conviction from indifference, gratitude from cynicism. Lord, give us wonder.

Posted in apologetics, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, creation, Economics in This Lesson, grace, Holy Spirit, In the Beginning, kingdom, Kingdom Notes, RC Sproul JR, wonder, worship | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

No Romans Study Tonight.


Unexpected events keep us from meeting tonight. We will also not meet next week.

Posted in announcements | Comments Off on No Romans Study Tonight.

Isn’t God just concerned with our hearts?

First, God is deeply concerned about our hearts. We often seem to think that only our thoughts and actions matter and our feelings are out of our control. Orthodoxy, right doctrine, matters. Orthopraxy, right behavior, matters. Orthopathos, right feeling, matters. The opposite error, however, is still error. Our hearts matter, but they are not the only thing that matters.

The spirit of Romanticism, following in the footsteps of gnosticism, has encouraged us to believe that our internal, invisible being is all that matters, that the physical realm does not. This shows up in the church when we dress down for corporate worship, when we build ugly but practical places of worship, when treat the Lord’s Supper as a time consuming ritual of little import. All of which flies directly in the face of the plain teaching of the Bible.

God gave explicit instructions for the clothes that the priests who came before Him were to wear, describing that they were “for beauty and for glory” (Exodus 28:2.) One can certainly argue that this was only for the priest and only for the Old Testament. What one can’t argue, however, is that God doesn’t care, that all that matters to Him is the heart of those who come into His presence. Nor does this mean that a certain level of formality in our clothing is necessary to come into His presence. It does mean, however, that forms matter to God. That Paul instructed husbands to have their wives cover their heads in I Corinthians 11 says the same thing, even if, as some argue, head coverings are no longer required. (See last week’s podcast for a discussion on that question.)

The same basic principle applies to our places of worship. God’s instructions for the tabernacle, and later for the temple were neither vague nor sloppy. Both were ornate works of art. Again one could argue that such is in the Old Testament, remembering Jesus’ answer to the woman at the well, that God seeks those who will worship Him in Spirit and in truth. Fair enough, but again, one can’t argue that God doesn’t care about forms.

The same is true with respect to the Lord’s Supper. The instructions of Jesus were not merely that from time to time we ought to meditate on His work for us. Rather He said, “This do in remembrance of me” (Luke 22: 19). “This” is actual eating and drinking, actual bread and wine. Here one cannot slip away on the basis of this being in the Old Testament. One cannot argue that this is in our past.

It is a good thing to be gracious to those who have been influenced by romanticism. It is a bad thing to, thinking of it as graciousness, practice romanticism. God has made us not souls in bodies but souls and bodies. Jesus didn’t die for just our souls but for our souls and our bodies. God’s commands do not touch on just our souls but on our souls and our bodies. Anytime we are tempted to facilely dismiss any of God’s commands we are in a dangerous place. God cares about all that we are, and commands that all that we are be in submission to all He has commanded.

Posted in 10 Commandments, beauty, Biblical Doctrines, church, communion, creation, philosophy, RC Sproul JR, worship | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment