What’ve we lost in losing letter writing?

A Letter from the Depths on Modern Communication, with a tip of the hat to Screwtape.

My Dearest Gaulips,

You asked about some of the newest features our media consultants are working on, and how you might put them to good use in your treatment of your patient. I will explain a few of them, but do not lose sight of the simple principle- the more we can take these cursed humans away from their bodies, the better off we can be. Entice them with ease, with reach, with speed, with convenience, but take away from them the things that matter the most- actual communication. When we move them from aural communication to written communication we automatically remove all the subtleties of communication, the non-verbal cues that give context, and perhaps more important, social lubricant.

Our enemy, however, managed quite well with the written word. I remember those heady days when we lit so many fires in those early churches. And that accursed traitor Paul would take pen to parchment and put out our fires. Hand copied, hand delivered letters, some plain and simple, others complicated and deep established and strengthened, and still strengthen His body. So we’re trying another tack.

Our internet division has still managed to hype all the familiar communication strengths while diverting attention from the weaknesses. Because the internet allows them to write and publish quickly, it encourages them to write and publish foolishly. One key stroke and every ill-formed, ill-informed and ill-intended thought is launched like a flaming arrow. I remember how humans used to labor over their words, how even the practical challenge of finding an envelope and a stamp would allow their ire to chill, and for cooler heads to prevail.

The same principle of speed works on the other end as well. Because it is so easy to send information there is a corresponding increase in the amount of information. But the eye gate cannot convert to broadband. That is, they can only read so much. Since there is so much to read, they read too swiftly, too carelessly. They scan just enough to form a broad opinion, then switch over to outgoing and send their take into the web. Soon enough such carelessness, in connection with the lack of context, leads to giving offense and taking offense, and we enjoy a feast of bitterness.

The humans, noting the glut of information, the bottleneck of the eye, have come up with an interesting solution. They call it twitter, and its key function is that it reduces all communication down to 280 characters. Paul would not have even made it out of his greeting. Imagine him trying to write to the Corinthians-

Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
To the church of God which is at Corinth, to those who are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, b

and he’d be done. When Paul wrote, people mulled over the letters, studied them. They smelled of the very love and labor of the author for his audience.

Which brings us perhaps to the best feature of the internet- it is unreal. There is no actual world in the world wide web. Though there is a web. Just like buying with a credit card is easier because it doesn’t look or feel like money, so communicating via the web, where there is no ink, no paper, no hands touching, feels like not communicating at all. Which means none of the rules of communication apply. We aren’t lying if we aren’t actually saying something. We certainly can’t be held accountable if no one knows us, or knows our name.

My advice with your patient then is to push him away from patience. My advice for your human is to push him away from his humanity. Teach him to see himself as a mere collection of ever changing opinions about an ever changing world of issues. Teach him to see those with whom he disagrees as a collection of ever changing opinions about an ever changing world of issues. Encourage him to see letters as the media of a dead generation, and his own generation on the cutting edge of communication. As always, when we give them a shiny bauble, never let them see the beauty we make them give up.

Don’t forget that letters are personal, just as this one is. Be sure not to miss my tone. In case you’re unsure, it’s hungry.

In His Satanic Majesty’s Service,

Baron Tech

This entry was posted in 10 Commandments, apologetics, Ask RC, Biblical Doctrines, Books, church, cyberspace, Devil's Arsenal, kingdom, on writing well, RC Sproul JR and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What’ve we lost in losing letter writing?

  1. Thomas says:

    You ask yourself why God would intentionally create a world in perfect unity by intimately relating to us with all of the biblical words. And in those words through progressive revelation constitute a independent nation of Israel that in very small historical accounts display that creation unity. Why would God expel them from that established garden within those walls and place them in the middle of everything that brought chaos and unnatural desires? Why would they squander more considerable time in those godless nations than peacefully exercising their paternal control in properly honoring God by faithfully fulfilling the creation mandate to meet on the glorious day of rest? I believe its because God achieves His most colossal work in the most surprising places. I also believe that God moves time by historical recreation rather than process. God reasonable actions are never thwarted. He is always righteous, justified, and faithful. He is always recreating the original through pronounced laws, covenants, curses, decrees, statutes and promises. Its not the essential things of divine creation that efficiently manage the world. Its our carefully manipulating them for our genuine pleasure and Gods glory that moves the history of redemption.

  2. Derek Christman says:

    A most excellent letter! It reminds me of an article I read where when because of the Postal Service the cost of sending a letter was reduced significantly. The author complained this would lead to a reduction in quality of letters. People would no longer think and compose their letters carefully because they are no so cheap to send. Imagine if he could have seen the coming of Twitter! I have to admit it does seem to me that the ease of communicating via social media is not bringing out the best of human beings. Thanks for your thoughtful insight.

Comments are closed.